scholarly journals REVIEW ON POTENTIAL TARGETED THERAPY FOR TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Nurul Issttifa Aminuddin ◽  
Raihana Edros ◽  
Rajaletchumy Veloo Kutty
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Molecular Targets ◽  
Single Type ◽  
Triple Negative Tumor ◽  
Negative Tumor ◽  
Potential Opportunity

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a very aggressive type of cancer.  TNBC is not just a single type of disease to be cured, but it consists of 6 subtypes which are basal-like 1 and 2, immunomodulatory, mesenchymal, mesenchymal stem- like and luminar androgen receptor. These subtypes has diverse characteristics, which hold potential opportunity for targeted treatment. Lack of molecular targets for triple negative tumor lead to limited targeted therapies for TNBC.  Therefore, effective targeted therapies are urgently needed for TNBC. This paper will highlight on the potential targets in TNBC and treatment options that are currently under clinical application.  

scholarly journals Harnessing DNA Repair Defects to Augment Immune-Based Therapies in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis A. Clark ◽  
Eddy S. Yang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Dna Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Potential Efficacy ◽  
Tumor Immune Microenvironment ◽  
Repair Mechanisms

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has poor prognosis with limited treatment options, with little therapeutic progress made during the past several decades. DNA damage response (DDR) associated therapies, including radiation and inhibitors of DDR, demonstrate potential efficacy against TNBC, especially under the guidance of genomic subtype-directed treatment. The tumor immune microenvironment also contributes greatly to TNBC malignancy and response to conventional and targeted therapies. Immunotherapy represents a developing trend in targeted therapies directed against TNBC and strategies combining immunotherapy and modulators of the DDR pathways are being pursued. There is increasing understanding of the potential interplay between DDR pathways and immune-associated signaling. As such, the question of how we treat TNBC regarding novel immuno-molecular strategies is continually evolving. In this review, we explore the current and upcoming treatment options of TNBC in the context of DNA repair mechanisms and immune-based therapies, with a focus on implications of recent genomic analyses and clinical trial findings.

scholarly journals Optimizing cisplatin delivery to triple-negative breast cancer through novel EGFR aptamer-conjugated polymeric nanovectors

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Agnello ◽  
Silvia Tortorella ◽  
Annachiara d’Argenio ◽  
Clarissa Carbone ◽  
Simona Camorani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Targeting ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Metastatic Setting

Abstract Background Management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is still challenging because of its aggressive clinical behavior and limited targeted treatment options. Cisplatin represents a promising chemotherapeutic compound in neoadjuvant approaches and in the metastatic setting, but its use is limited by scarce bioavailability, severe systemic side effects and drug resistance. Novel site-directed aptamer-based nanotherapeutics have the potential to overcome obstacles of chemotherapy. In this study we investigated the tumor targeting and the anti-tumorigenic effectiveness of novel cisplatin-loaded and aptamer-decorated nanosystems in TNBC. Methods Nanotechnological procedures were applied to entrap cisplatin at high efficacy into polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs) that were conjugated on their surface with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) selective and cell-internalizing CL4 aptamer to improve targeted therapy. Internalization into TNBC MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells of aptamer-decorated PNPs, loaded with BODIPY505-515, was monitored by confocal microscopy using EGFR-depleted cells as negative control. Tumor targeting and biodistribution was evaluated by fluorescence reflectance imaging upon intravenously injection of Cyanine7-labeled nanovectors in nude mice bearing subcutaneous MDA-MB-231 tumors. Cytotoxicity of cisplatin-loaded PNPs toward TNBC cells was evaluated by MTT assay and the antitumor effect was assessed by tumor growth experiments in vivo and ex vivo analyses. Results We demonstrate specific, high and rapid uptake into EGFR-positive TNBC cells of CL4-conjugated fluorescent PNPs which, when loaded with cisplatin, resulted considerably more cytotoxic than the free drug and nanovectors either unconjugated or conjugated with a scrambled aptamer. Importantly, animal studies showed that the CL4-equipped PNPs achieve significantly higher tumor targeting efficiency and enhanced therapeutic effects, without any signs of systemic toxicity, compared with free cisplatin and untargeted PNPs. Conclusions Our study proposes novel and safe drug-loaded targeted nanosystems for EGFR-positive TNBC with excellent potential for the application in cancer diagnosis and therapy.

scholarly journals Tumor Microenvironment: Key Players in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Immunomodulation

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3357
Author(s):  
Hongmei Zheng ◽  
Sumit Siddharth ◽  
Sheetal Parida ◽  
Xinhong Wu ◽  
Dipali Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
High Mobility ◽  
Sphingosine 1 Phosphate ◽  
Molecular Patterns

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease and is highly related to immunomodulation. As we know, the most effective approach to treat TNBC so far is still chemotherapy. Chemotherapy can induce immunogenic cell death, release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling; therefore, it will be interesting to investigate the relationship between chemotherapy-induced TME changes and TNBC immunomodulation. In this review, we focus on the immunosuppressive and immunoreactive role of TME in TNBC immunomodulation and the contribution of TME constituents to TNBC subtype classification. Further, we also discuss the role of chemotherapy-induced TME remodeling in modulating TNBC immune response and tumor progression with emphasis on DAMPs-associated molecules including high mobility group box1 (HMGB1), exosomes, and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1), which may provide us with new clues to explore effective combined treatment options for TNBC.

scholarly journals Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies

2011 ◽  
Vol 121 (7) ◽  
pp. 2750-2767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian D. Lehmann ◽  
Joshua A. Bauer ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Melinda E. Sanders ◽  
A. Bapsi Chakravarthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Preclinical Models ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Selection Of

scholarly journals Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A review of common therapeutic Targets and Current Treatment options.

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daud Akhtar ◽  
Ahsen Chaudhry
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Du Sein ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cell Signalling ◽  
Effets Secondaires ◽  
Breast Cancer Chemotherapy

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer which lacks ER, PR, and HER2 expression. It is characterized by poor prognosis and resistance to standard treatment forms for breast cancer. Chemotherapy is still currently the core neo-adjuvant treatment option for patients with TNBC, although it has mixed levels of efficacy on overall survival and many serious side effects. Platinum- based therapies have been used to treat TNBC in conjunction with chemotherapy, but they are not a widely effective treatment due to the heterogeneity of TNBC. For this reason, other novel approaches, particularly those which target molecular components involved in TNBC pathogenesis, are being investigated. Angiogenesis inhibitors, which include monoclonal antibodies or small molecules that inhibit VEGF, have been shown to improve progression-free survival, but have not demonstrated an impact on overall survival. PARP enzyme inhibitors, when combined with chemotherapy and carboplatin for the treatment of TNBC, have demonstrated a significant reduction in risk progression and mortality. However, the majority of PARP inhibitors are still in trials and their effectiveness in clini- cal settings has yet to be determined. Additional proposed targets for directed therapy against TNBC include cell signalling pathways involving EGFR or PI3K. Overall, issues such as treatment resistance and side effects are important challenges that must be overcome in order to enable improvements in patient prognosis and clinical impact. RÉSUMÉ Le cancer du sein triple négatif (CSTN) est un sous-type de cancer du sein auquel il manque les récepteurs d’œstrogènes (ER), les récepteurs de progestérone (PR) et l’expression de HER2. Il est caractérisé par un pronostic défavorable et une résistance aux traite- ments standards du cancer du sein. À l’heure actuelle, la chimiothérapie est encore l’option principale de traitement néoadjuvant pour les patients ayant le CSTN, bien qu’elle ait des niveaux variés d’efficacité sur la survie globale, ainsi que de nombreux effets secondaires sérieux. Les thérapies à base de platine ont été utilisées pour traiter le CSTN en conjonction avec la chimiothérapie, mais elles ne sont pas très efficaces étant donné l’hétérogénéité du CSTN. En raison de cela, d’autres approches novatrices, particulièrement celles qui ciblent les composantes moléculaires impliquées dans la pathogenèse du CSTN, font actuellement l’objet d’enquêtes. Les inhibiteurs de l’angiogenèse, dont les anticorps monoclonaux ou les petites molécules inhibant le VEGF, ont démontré la capacité d’améliorer la survie sans progression de la maladie, mais n’ont pas démontré d’impact sur la survie globale. Les inhibiteurs d’enzymes PARP, lorsque combinés avec la chimiothérapie et le carboplatine pour le traitement du CSTN, ont démontré une réduction significative du risque de progression et de la mortalité. Toutefois, la majorité des inhibiteurs PARP subissent encore des essais et leur efficacité clinique reste à être déterminée. D’autres cibles suggérées pour la thérapie dirigée contre le CSTN incluent les voies de signalisation impliquant le EGFR ou le PI3K. Dans l’ensemble, des problèmes tels la résistance au traitement et les effets secondaires sont des défis importants qui doivent être surmontés afin de permettre des améliorations au niveau du pronostic du patient et de l’impact clinique. 

scholarly journals Opportunities for metastatic triple negative breast cancer therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-81
Author(s):  
Inna P. Ganshina ◽  
Olga O. Gordeeva ◽  
Mariam S. Manukyan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Biological Heterogeneity ◽  
New Treatment

Metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is a difficult task for the chemotherapist in view of the disease aggressiveness, biological heterogeneity of the tumor, as well as the limit of therapy options. The approved modern drugs, such as immunotherapy and PARP inhibitors, have improved the treatment results in women with mTNBC. However, not all women are the candidates for this kind of therapy due to the lack of suitable points of application. In this context, high hopes are placed on the new treatment options currently being studied in clinical trials. The review summarizes data on advanced drugs that have demonstrated their efficacy in this multiplex group of women, but not yet registered at the territory of the Russian Federation Russian Federation, and will allow us to form an idea of the future algorithm of treatment of women with mTNBC.

Association of statin use with clinical outcomes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 523-523
Author(s):  
Malgorzata Nowakowska ◽  
Xiudong Lei ◽  
Mikayla R Thompson ◽  
Simona Flora Shaitelman ◽  
Mackenzie Wehner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Cancer Outcomes ◽  
Breast Cancer Outcomes ◽  
Statin Use

523 Background: Statins have been shown to target pathways related to breast cancer carcinogenesis, specifically in more aggressive breast cancer subtypes such as triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Given the limited toxicity profile, low cost, and ease of use of statins, an association between statin therapy and improved breast cancer outcomes, particularly in aggressive breast cancers with more limited treatment options, could have important public health implications. Here we examine the association of statin therapy with breast cancer outcomes in women with stage I-III breast cancer, specifically TNBC. Methods: We utilized Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare and Texas Cancer Registry (TCR)-Medicare data. We included women age 66 years or older with histologically confirmed stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed from 2008-2015. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to examine the association of statin use with overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) adjusting for age, race, education, state buy-in, residence area, stage, subtype, endocrine therapy, radiation, chemotherapy, surgery, baseline statin use, comorbidity, and baseline hypertension. For BCSS, we accounted for the competing risk of death using the Fine and Grey method. We required all individuals to survive until 12 months post-diagnosis, which we defined as the start of the follow-up period, to account for immortal time bias. Results: We identified 45,063 patients with stage I-III breast cancer meeting inclusion criteria, out of which 22,518 (50.0%) received a statin within one year following diagnosis (statin-users). The 5-year cumulative estimates of breast cancer specific deaths were 5.9% and 6.9% for statin-users and non-users (P <.001), respectively. In the overall cohort, adjusted models showed a statistically significant association between statin use and improved BCSS (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.97; P =.021), but no association with OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.03; P =.23). The association was strongest in patients with TNBC for BCSS (SHR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.86; P =.006) and OS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.95; P =.018). Stratification by stage showed that the effect of statin therapy in TNBC was limited to patients with localized disease. Our results were consistent using propensity score matched models and when limiting our analysis to statin therapy initiated following breast cancer diagnosis. Conclusions: Among women with non-metastatic breast cancer, we found that statin use was associated with an OS and BCSS benefit among women with TNBC. Our data suggest that statins may have a role as an adjuvant therapy in select patients with breast cancer and supports further investigation, particularly among patients with TNBC, for whom effective treatment options are more limited.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document