scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of everolimus in gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after 177Lu-octreotate

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 825-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Kamp ◽  
Brenda Gumz ◽  
Richard A Feelders ◽  
Dik J Kwekkeboom ◽  
Gregory Kaltsas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Develop Disease Progression

Although 177Lu-octreotate is an effective treatment for patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), some patients will fail or develop disease progression necessitating further treatment. We examined whether the safety and efficacy of everolimus after prior treatment with 177Lu-octreotate is different from the published safety profile of everolimus in GEP-NETs. In this multicenter study, 24 GEP-NET patients were included. Adverse events were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. Tumor response was measured according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.0. Major clinical adverse events (grade 3 or 4) during treatment with everolimus were hyperglycemia (20.8%), fatigue (8.3%), thrombocytopenia (8.3%), and elevated alanine transaminase levels (8.3%). By radiological review, there were four partial responses (16.7%), five patients (62.5%) with stable disease, and three patients (12.5%) with progressive disease. For two patients (8.3%), no data on tumor response were available. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.1 months (95% CI, 11.5–21.2). Median PFS of the current study was longer when compared with the RADIANT-3 trial (13.1 vs 11.4 months) and shorter when compared with the RADIANT-1 trial (13.1 vs 16.7 months). In conclusion, the safety profile of everolimus is not influenced by previous treatment with peptide receptor radiotherapy.

scholarly journals MGMT expression predicts response to temozolomide in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 625-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Cros ◽  
O Hentic ◽  
V Rebours ◽  
M Zappa ◽  
N Gille ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Mgmt Expression

Temozolomide (TEM) showed encouraging results in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WDPNETs). LowO6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression andMGMTpromoter methylation within tumors correlate with a better outcome under TEM-based chemotherapy in glioblastoma. We aimed to assess whether MGMT expression andMGMTpromoter methylation could help predict the efficacy of TEM-based chemotherapy in patients with WDPNET. Consecutive patients with progressive WDPNET and/or liver involvement over 50% who received TEM between 2006 and 2012 were retrospectively studied. Tumor response was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 guidelines. Nuclear expression of MGMT was assessed by immunochemistry (H-score, 0–300) andMGMTpromoter methylation by pyrosequencing. Forty-three patients (21 men, 58years (27–84)) with grade 1 WDPNET (n=6) or 2 (n=36) were analyzed. Objective response, stable disease, and progression rates were seen in 17 patients (39.5%), 18 patients (41.9%), and 8 patients (18.6%), respectively. Low MGMT expression (≤50) was associated with radiological objective response (P=0.04) and better progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.35 (0.15–0.81),P=0.01). Disease control rate at 18months of treatment remained satisfying with an MGMT score up to 100 (74%) but dropped with a higher expression. HighMGMTpromoter methylation was associated with a low MGMT expression and longer PFS (HR=0.37 (0.29–1.08),P=0.05). Low MGMT score (≤50) appears to predict an objective tumor response, whereas an intermediate MGMT score (50–100) seems to be associated with prolonged stable disease.

scholarly journals 177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Radiosensitizing Capecitabine Versus Octreotide Long-Acting Release as First-Line Systemic Therapy in Advanced Grade 1 or 2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Institution Experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 1167-1175
Author(s):  
Swayamjeet Satapathy ◽  
Bhagwant R. Mittal ◽  
Ashwani Sood ◽  
Apurva Sood ◽  
Rakesh Kapoor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Octreotide Lar ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Long Acting

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine and octreotide long-acting release (LAR) as first-line systemic therapy in advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data of consecutive patients of advanced inoperable or metastatic grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs treated with first-line 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine or octreotide LAR from September 2012 to December 2019 were collected and analyzed for response, toxicity, and survival outcomes. RESULTS Seventy-six patients (median age: 53 years; range 14-81 years) with treatment-naïve advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs were included. Thirty-six patients received a median cumulative dose of 27.3 GBq of 177Lu-DOTATATE intravenously at 8-12 weeks' intervals along with 1,250 mg/m2 oral capecitabine on days 0-14 of each cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE, whereas 40 patients were administered 30 mg octreotide LAR intramuscularly every 4 weeks. Using response evaluation criteria in solid tumor 1.1, the objective response rate was 38% in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm compared with 15% in the octreotide LAR arm ( P = .025), whereas the disease control rates were 88% and 67% in 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms, respectively ( P = .035). The median durations of progression-free survival in the 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms were 54 months and 16 months, respectively ( P = .017), whereas the median overall survival was not reached and not significantly different across both the arms. Of the treatment-related adverse events, no major difference was observed in the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities between the two treatment arms. CONCLUSION First-line systemic 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine achieved better radiologic response and longer progression-free survival compared with octreotide LAR in patients with advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs. Future randomized controlled trials are, however, required to determine the best treatment sequence for the treatment-naïve patients with advanced GEP-NETs.

scholarly journals A Randomized Phase 2 Study of ADXS11-001 Listeria monocytogenes–Listeriolysin O Immunotherapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treatment of Advanced Cervical Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 764-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Partha Basu ◽  
Ajay Mehta ◽  
Minish Jain ◽  
Sudeep Gupta ◽  
Rajnish V. Nagarkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Listeriolysin O ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Phase 2 Study

ObjectivesA global unmet medical need exists for effective treatments for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer, as patients have a short life expectancy. Recently, immunotherapies have shown promising survival benefits for patients with advanced forms of cancer. Axalimogene filolisbac (ADXS11-001), aListeria monocytogenesimmunotherapy with a broad effect on the immune system, is under investigation for treatment of human papillomavirus–associated cancers including cervical cancer.MethodsThis phase 2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ADXS11-001, administered with or without cisplatin, in patients with recurrent/refractory cervical cancer following prior chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. A total of 109 patients were treated, and 69 were evaluable for tumor response at equal to or more than 3 months postbaseline.ResultsMedian overall survival (OS) was comparable between treatment groups (ADXS11-001: 8.28 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.85–10.5 months; ADXS11-001 + cisplatin: 8.78 months; 95% CI, 7.4–13.3 months). The 12- and 18-month milestone OS rates were 30.9% versus 38.9%, and 23.6% versus 25.9% for each group, respectively (34.9% and 24.8% combined). Median progression-free survival (6.10 vs 6.08 months) and the overall response rate (17.1% vs 14.7%) were similar for both groups. ADXS11-001 was generally well tolerated; adverse events were predominantly mild to moderate in severity and not related to treatment. More adverse events were reported in the combination group (429 vs 275).ConclusionsThese promising safety and efficacy results, including the encouraging 12-month 34.9% combined OS rate, warrant further investigation of ADXS11-001 for treatment of recurrent/refractory cervical cancer.

Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of Anlotinib in Advanced Osteosarcoma With Metastases After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanqing Li ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Lei Song ◽  
Qiuchi Ai ◽  
shuai zhang
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Multimodal Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Common Drug ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Therapeutic Doses

Abstract To study and observe the safety and efficacy of anlotinib in the treatment of advanced osteosarcoma with metastases. We retrospectively studied patients with advanced osteosarcoma and metastases who received anlotinib treatment in our hospital from June 2018 to April 2020. All patients had received standard multimodal therapies, before taking anlotinib. Therapeutic doses of anlotinib were 12 mg for adults and 10 mg for children and adolescents once a day for 2 consecutive weeks, followed by a week of withdrawal. This 3-week cycle of treatment was continued until the tumor progressed rapidly or the patients failed to tolerate the side effects. Adverse drug reactions were recorded, and therapeutic efficacy was evaluated based on progression free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). The median PFS was 9.81 ± 0.9 months, and the 6-month and 10-month PFS rates were 73.3% and 33.3%, respectively. The median OS was 11.43 ± 0.58 months. No patients achieved complete response. After 6 months of treatment, the DCR and ORR were 80% and 13.3%, respectively. No drug-related deaths or Grade 4 adverse events occurred in the patients. Five patients (33.3%) had Grade 3 adverse events. The most common drug-related adverse events were hand-food syndrome, fatigue, high blood pressure, anorexia, and pneumothorax. Anlotinib had a certain curative effect on patients with advanced osteosarcoma and metastases after failure of standard treatment. The adverse events were mostly tolerable or relieved after treatment.

scholarly journals The Challenge of Evaluating Response to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Present and the Future

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1083
Author(s):  
Virginia Liberini ◽  
Martin W. Huellner ◽  
Serena Grimaldi ◽  
Monica Finessi ◽  
Philippe Thuillier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Morphological Response ◽  
Peptide Receptor ◽  
Clinical Biomarkers ◽  
Standardized Parameters

The NETTER-1 study has proven peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) to be one of the most effective therapeutic options for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), improving progression-free survival and overall survival. However, PRRT response assessment is challenging and no consensus on methods and timing has yet been reached among experts in the field. This issue is owed to the suboptimal sensitivity and specificity of clinical biomarkers, limitations of morphological response criteria in slowly growing tumors and necrotic changes after therapy, a lack of standardized parameters and timing of functional imaging and the heterogeneity of PRRT protocols in the literature. The aim of this article is to review the most relevant current approaches for PRRT efficacy prediction and response assessment criteria in order to provide an overview of suitable tools for safe and efficacious PRRT.

scholarly journals Sorafenib treatment by Child–Pugh score in Latin American patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (31) ◽  
pp. 2511-2520
Author(s):  
Laura L de Guevara ◽  
Lucy Dagher ◽  
Vanessa MV Arruda ◽  
Keiko Nakajima ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Real World ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

Aim: To evaluate sorafenib treatment in Latin American patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the real-world GIDEON study. Patients & methods: Sorafenib administration, safety and efficacy were analyzed by Child–Pugh status. Results: Of 90 evaluable patients (37% Child–Pugh A, 46% Child–Pugh B and 3% Child–Pugh C at study entry), 97% started sorafenib at 800 mg/day. Patients with Child–Pugh B7 had the longest median treatment duration of sorafenib (33.1 weeks). Sorafenib-related adverse events occurred in 58% of patients with Child–Pugh A (21% grade 3/4) and 46% with Child–Pugh B (7% grade 3/4). Conclusion: Sorafenib had a similar safety profile across patients with Child–Pugh A and B and is a treatment option for both groups.

scholarly journals Asphericity of Somatostatin Receptor Expression in Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Innovative Predictor of Outcome in Everolimus Treatment?

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 732
Author(s):  
Christoph Wetz ◽  
Julian Rogasch ◽  
Philipp Genseke ◽  
Imke Schatka ◽  
Christian Furth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
Risk Benefit Assessment ◽  
Octreotide Scintigraphy

Background: in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET), the mTOR inhibitor everolimus is associated with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS). This study evaluated the lesional asphericity (ASP) in pretherapeutic somatostatin receptor (SSR) imaging as the first imaging-based prognostic marker for PFS. Methods: this retrospective bicentric cohort study included 30 patients (f = 13, median age, 66.5 (48–81) years) with pretherapeutic [111In-DTPA0]octreotide scintigraphy (Octreoscan®). ASP of functional volumes of up to three leading lesions per patient (n = 74) was calculated after semiautomatic, background-adapted segmentation. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression regarding PFS for clinical factors and the maximum ASP per patient was obtained. Results: all 30 patients showed metachronous or progressive liver metastases. ASP, primary tumor site, metastases pattern, and prior peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) were significantly associated with PFS in univariable Cox regression. Only ASP > 12.9% (hazard ratio (HR), 3.33; p = 0.024) and prior PRRT (HR, 0.35; p = 0.043) remained significant in multivariable Cox. Median PFS was 6.7 months for ASP > 12.9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1–11.4 months) versus 14.4 (12.5–16.3) months for ASP ≤ 12.9% (log-rank, p = 0.028). Conclusion: pretherapeutic ASP of SSR positive lesions independently predicted PFS for treatment with everolimus in GEP-NET. ASP may supplement risk-benefit assessment before patient inclusion to treatment.

Talactoferrin alfa may prolong progression-free survival in advanced renal carcinoma patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4600-4600 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Srinivas ◽  
W. M. Stadler ◽  
R. Bukowski ◽  
R. Figlin ◽  
T. Hayes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Early Results

4600 Background: Talactoferrin alfa (formerly known as recombinant human lactoferrin, rhLF) is a novel immunomodulatory 80 kD protein with demonstrated oral anti-tumor properties in animal models, and promising early results in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Phase 1/2 trials. Methods: An open label Phase 2 study of Talactoferrin Oral Solution at 1.5 g talactoferrin alfa b.i.d. given up to a maximum of 4 cycles of 12 weeks on, 2 weeks off was conducted at 6 sites. Eligibility included predominantly clear cell histology, failure of at least one prior systemic therapy, tumor progression within the prior 9 months, a performance status of <2 (ECOG) and adequate organ function. The primary endpoints were the incidence of 14-week progression-free survival (PFS) and overall tumor response (by RECIST). The statistical plan specified an objective of 12.5% response rate or a progression-free survival rate of ≥40% at 14 weeks. Secondary endpoints included median PFS and median overall survival (OS). Results: Forty-four patients were enrolled. Eighteen patients (41%) were considered low risk and twenty-six (59%) considered intermediate risk based on the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) criteria. There were no talactoferrin-related Grade 3 or 4 adverse events or laboratory abnormalities. The most common related grade 1 or 2 adverse events were gastrointestinal symptoms. There was one unconfirmed tumor response and the 14-week PFS was 55%. The median PFS was 21 weeks (46 weeks and 9.4 weeks in the patients with low and intermediate risk prognostic factors, respectively). The median OS has not yet been reached. Conclusions: Talactoferrin alfa is well tolerated. The 14-week PFS met the pre-specified criteria for success (>40%). Due to the heterogeneity of tumor biology of RCC, any further evaluation of talactoferrin in this population should be in a larger randomized trial. [Table: see text]

Metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with somatostatin analogues: Ten years experience in a third level hospital in Mexico City.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 514-514
Author(s):  
Alberto Pimentel ◽  
Abdel Karim Dip Borunda ◽  
Luis Jonathan Bueno Rosario ◽  
Gloria Martinez Martinez ◽  
Miguel Angel Pluma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Common Symptom ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Long Acting

514 Background: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NET´s) are infrequent tumors, with a variety of symptoms depending of the kind of peptide they secrete as well as the affected organs. Long acting somatostatin analogues have shown an adequate rate of symptom control in functional tumors, they also have demonstrated antiproliferative effect, which is translated in a significant improvement of progression free and overall survival Methods: In this retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic GEP NET treated with long acting somatostatin analogues as first line, treated between 2005 and 2015, we evaluated clinical and pathological features, symptoms, disease control and survival adjusted with OMS classification Results: Our cohort included 95 patients with a mean age of 53 years. Primary affected sites were midgut (29.4%), followed by pNET (17.%), stomach (14.7%), and primary unknown in 14%. 20% of cases were functional tumors with diarrhea as the most common symptom in 70% and flushing in 50%. Considering the whole cohort the most prevalent symptom was abdominal pain in the 50% of cases. The OMS classification showed low grade tumors in 65% and 35% intermediate grade. Most common metastatic organ sites were; liver only 35%, liver and other 30%, peritoneum 10% and lymph nodes in 6%, non-specified sites in 19%. Somatostatine analogues used in first line were octreotide in 80% and lanreotide in 20%. Survival results demonstrated a progression free survival for the whole cohort of 84months. No differences between lanreotide and octreotide were observed. Conclusions: This study represents the first Mexican cohort of patients with GEP NET’s treated with somatostatin analogues with a long follow up.

A phase II trial of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with advanced, progressive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 619-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Halperin ◽  
Suyu Liu ◽  
Arvind Dasari ◽  
David R. Fogelman ◽  
Priya Bhosale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Yield Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Pre Treatment

619 Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare and heterogeneous tumors arising throughout the aerodigestive tract, which are incurable and life-limiting when metastatic. Prior studies of checkpoint inhibitors in NET patients have yielded minimal evidence of efficacy. Historically, effective therapies for advanced, progressive NET yield response rates less than 10% and progression-free survival (PFS) durations of approximately 11 months, as compared to approximately 4.5 months with placebo. Methods: We undertook a phase II basket study of atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in patients with rare cancers, and present here the data from the pancreatic NET (pNET) cohort and extrapancreatic NET (epNET) cohort, each of which included 20 patients with grade 1-2 NET that was progressive under any prior therapy. Patients received 1200mg of atezolizumab and 15mg/kg of bevacizumab IV q 21 days. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response by RECIST 1.1. Results: The confirmed objective response rate with this combination was 20% (95% CI 6-44%) in the pNET cohort and 15% (95% CI 3-38%) in the epNET cohort. The median PFS in the pNET cohort is 19.6 months (95% CI 10.6-NR), while it was 14.9 months (95% CI 6.1-NR) in the epNET cohort, 1-year PFS was 75% and 52%, respectively. The combination was well-tolerated in this patient population, with the most common related treatment-emergent adverse events being hypertension (47.5%), proteinuria (37.5%), and fatigue (35%). The most common related grade 3/4 adverse events were hypertension (20%) and proteinuria (7.5%). Conclusions: The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab demonstrated moderate clinical activity in patients with advanced NETs. As pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies were obtained for all patients, correlations with immune infiltration, mutations, and transcriptome alterations should provide additional insight into the mechanisms of response and resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT03074513.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document