Oral Vancomycin as Secondary Prophylaxis for Clostridioides difficile Infection

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. e2020031807
Author(s):  
Hongkai Bao ◽  
Jennifer Lighter ◽  
Yanina Dubrovskaya ◽  
Cristian Merchan ◽  
Justin Siegfried ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Oral Vancomycin ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

scholarly journals 1376. Oral Vancomycin as Secondary Prophylaxis Against Clostridioides difficile Infection in Pediatric Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S698-S698
Author(s):  
Hongkai Bao ◽  
Yanina Dubrovskaya ◽  
John Papadopoulos ◽  
Justin Siegfried ◽  
Cristian Merchan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Antibiotic Exposure ◽  
Oral Vancomycin ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
History Of ◽  
Systemic Antibiotics

Abstract Background Secondary oral vancomycin prophylaxis (OVP) has been utilized in adults with a history of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) while receiving systemic antibiotics to prevent CDI recurrence. However, this practice is poorly described in pediatric patients. Rates of CDI recurrence in pediatric patients range from 10-40% and is associated with morbidity and mortality. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of secondary OVP in pediatric patients with subsequent antibiotic exposure. Methods This retrospective study evaluated pediatric patients ≤18 years with any history of clinical CDI and receiving systemic antibiotics in a subsequent encounter during the time period of 2013-2019. Patients who received OVP 10 mg/kg (up to 125 mg per dose) every 12 hours during concomitant antibiotics were compared to those who did not. The primary outcome was CDI recurrence within 8 weeks following antibiotic exposure. Secondary outcomes included time to recurrence, severity of recurrence, and isolation of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) from any site. Risk factors for CDI recurrence were assessed using logistic regression. Results A total of 153 patients were screened for inclusion, of which 32 and 47 patients were assigned to the OVP and no OVP group, respectively. Median age was 8.6 years and the most common comorbidities were malignancy (47%) and immunosuppression (46%). Median time since last CDI to study inclusion was 64.5 days in the OVP group and 90 days in the no OVP group, P=0.320. Compared to the no OVP group, OVP patients had longer hospital stays (5 vs 14 days, P=0.001) and more concomitant antibiotic exposure (8 vs 12.5 days, P=0.001). Median duration of OVP was 12 days. CDI recurrence occurred in 12 patients and was significantly lower in the OVP vs no OVP group (3.1% vs 23.4%; odds ratio, 0.106; 95% confidence interval, 0.013-0.864; P=0.022). VRE was not isolated in any patients. After adjustment in a multivariate analysis, only secondary OVP remained as a protective factor against recurrence (odds ratio, 0.082; 95% confidence interval, 0.009-0.748; P=0.027). Conclusion Secondary OVP effectively reduces the risk of recurrent CDI in pediatric patients with a history of CDI while receiving systemic antibiotics. Future prospective studies should validate these findings. Disclosures Cristian Merchan, PharMD, BCCCP, abbive (Speaker’s Bureau)

scholarly journals 785. Association between Prevalence of Laboratory-Identified Clostridioides difficile Infections (CDIs) and CDI Antibiotic Treatment in U.S. Acute Care Hospitals, 2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S437-S437
Author(s):  
Kerui Xu ◽  
Andrea L Benin ◽  
Hsiu Wu ◽  
Jonathan R Edwards ◽  
Qunna Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Prevalence Rates ◽  
Hospital Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Oral Vancomycin ◽  
Patient Admissions ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are an urgent public health threat, accounting for 223,900 infections and 12,800 deaths in hospitalized patients annually. In early 2018, the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommended oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin as the first-line antibiotics for CDIs. To track the uptake of IDSA’s recommendations, we evaluated the association between CDI prevalence and use of first-line antibiotics in hospitals reporting to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Methods We matched 2018 hospital-level, NHSN data on laboratory-identified CDIs with NHSN antimicrobial use (AU) data for the same time period. Hospitals that submitted < 6 months of either data type in 2018 were excluded. The association between quarterly hospital-level CDI prevalence rates per 100 patient-admissions and use of CDI antibiotics (oral vancomycin plus fidaxomicin) per 1,000 days-present was evaluated using Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient and using Goodman and Kruskal’s gamma (G) on ordinal quartiles to assess rates of discordant pairs. Results Among the 2735 hospital-level quarters based on 714 hospitals included in the study, CDI prevalence (median: 0.46 per 100 patient-admissions) and CDI antibiotic use (median: 8.85 antibiotic-days per 1,000 days-present) demonstrated only a moderately positive correlation (r = 0.48). Among hospitals in the highest quartile for CDI prevalence, 5.1% were in the lowest quartile for antibiotic use. Among hospitals in the highest quartile for antibiotic use, 5.3% were in the lowest quartile for CDI prevalence, and 54.2% were in the highest quartile for CDI prevalence (G = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.57–0.63). Correlation of hospital-level Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) prevalence rates and oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin use in U.S. acute care hospitals, 2018 Distribution of hospital-level Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) prevalence rates and oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin use in ordinal quartiles (Q1–Q4) to access rates of discordant pairs Conclusion The moderate correlation and discordant rates suggest that vancomycin and fidaxomicin are less frequently used as primary antibiotics in some hospitals; whereas in others, CDI antibiotic use is occurring in the absence of positive laboratory tests for CDI. To further investigate this discordance, there is a need to assess hospitals’ prescribing and testing practices in an ongoing manner. These findings may be useful to serve as baseline for measuring progress of appropriateness of treatment and testing for CDIs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Analysis of the impact of secondary prophylaxis on Clostridioides difficile recurrence in critically ill adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 205031212093089
Author(s):  
Kathryn A Connor ◽  
Kelly M Conn
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Infection Prophylaxis ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Critically Ill Adults ◽  
Ill Adults ◽  
Infection Recurrence

Introduction: Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile infection recurrence in patients re-exposed to antibiotics for treatment of a non- Clostridioides difficile infection is high at approximately 33%. Low-dose per os vancomycin (e.g. 125 mg q12 h) or metronidazole (e.g. 500 mg intravenous/per osq8 h) may help prevent recurrences, but study of secondary prophylaxis in critically ill patients is needed. Objectives: To determine whether critically ill adults receiving low-dose per os vancomycin for secondary Clostridioides difficile infection prophylaxis have fewer recurrences of Clostridioides difficile infection in 90 days compared with patients receiving metronidazole for secondary Clostridioides difficile infection prophylaxis or control (no secondary prophylaxis). Methods: This was a retrospective, two-center, observational study in a large academic medical center and affiliated community hospital. Included patients had a history of Clostridioides difficile infection within 1 year of receiving antibiotics for clinical care. We compared patients receiving secondary prophylaxis with vancomycin or metronidazole and control patients; in addition, an unplanned fourth group (vancomycin/metronidazole combination) was identified and analyzed. The primary outcome was Clostridioides difficile infection recurrence within 90 days of a course of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Fisher’s exact, analysis of variance, and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare Clostridioides difficile infection recurrence with prophylaxis group and additional contributing factors. Results: Eighty-two patients were included: 38 control (46.3%), 20 metronidazole (24.4%), 17 vancomycin (20.7%), and 7 combination (8.5%). Ten of 82 patients (12.2%) had at least one Clostridioides difficile infection recurrence; 8/38 patients in the control group (21.1%), 1/7 patients in the combination group (14.3%), 1/17 patients in the per os vancomycin group (5.9%), and 0/20 in the metronidazole group (0%; p = 0.073). As a post hoc secondary analysis, the three prophylaxis groups were coalesced into one group and compared with control (4.5% vs 21%; p = 0.039). Additional factors (e.g. age, obesity, immunosuppression, acid suppression) were not significantly associated with Clostridioides difficile infection recurrence or with prophylaxis group. Conclusion: There was no difference in Clostridioides difficile infection recurrence between prophylaxis groups, however, given the low recurrence rate, prospective evaluation with a larger sample of critically ill patients is necessary.

Dose addition of intravenous metronidazole to oral vancomycin improve outcomes in Clostridioides difficile infection?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Wang ◽  
Aaron Schluger ◽  
Jianhua Li ◽  
Angela Gomez-Simmonds ◽  
Hojjat Salmasian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Dual Therapy ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Index Test ◽  
Oral Vancomycin ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

Abstract Background Guidelines recommend adding intravenous (IV) metronidazole to oral vancomycin for fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). This study compared dual therapy with IV metronidazole and oral vancomycin versus vancomycin monotherapy. It assessed prevalence of use and effectiveness of dual therapy in non-fulminant and fulminant CDI. Methods This was a two-center retrospective study conducted from 2010 to 2018. Adult inpatients were included if they had a positive C. difficile PCR performed on an unformed stool and received oral vancomycin within two days (either before or after) of testing. Patients were classified as having received dual therapy if IV metronidazole was given within the same time window, and otherwise as having received vancomycin monotherapy. The primary outcome was  death or colectomy within 90 days after the index test. Logistic regression modeling was used to adjust for CDI severity and other established predictors of CDI outcomes. CDI recurrence was examined as a secondary outcome, adjusting for death as a competing risk. Results The study included 2,114 patients (dual therapy: 993; monotherapy: 1,121) of whom 23% met the primary outcome. There was no association between dual therapy and the primary outcome (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.07, 95% CI 0.79-1.45) which remained true when the analysis was restricted to patients with fulminant CDI (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.65-2.10). There was also no association between dual therapy and CDI recurrence. Conclusions Dual therapy with IV metronidazole and oral vancomycin was common for non-fulminant and fulminant CDI, but was not associated with improved outcomes compared to vancomycin alone.

Effect of oral vancomycin dose on outcomes in patients with Clostridioides difficile infection

2021 ◽  
pp. 106311
Author(s):  
J.Nicholas O'Donnell ◽  
Gregory M. Novak ◽  
Benjamin R Bratek ◽  
Gurkirat Singh ◽  
Odirichukwu O Duru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Vancomycin ◽  
Vancomycin Dose ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

scholarly journals 2414. Effectiveness of Oral Vancomycin for Prevention of Healthcare Facility-Onset Clostridioides difficile Infection in High-Risk Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S833-S833
Author(s):  
Steven W Johnson ◽  
David H Priest ◽  
Shannon V Brown
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Oral Vancomycin ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Systemic Antibiotics ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Studies suggest oral vancomycin prophylaxis may be effective in preventing Clostridioides difficile infection. These studies are limited by their retrospective design, reliance on local clinical practice patterns, lack of intervention standardization, and limited risk stratification. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of oral vancomycin for the prevention of healthcare facility-onset CDI (HCFO-CDI) in high-risk patients. Methods We conducted a randomized, prospective, open-label study at Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center in Winston-Salem, North Carolina between October 2018 and April 2019. Admitted high-risk patients (defined as: ≥ 60 years of age, hospitalized ≤ 30 days prior to the index hospitalization and received systemic antibiotics during that prior hospitalization and currently receiving systemic antibiotics) were randomized 1:1 to either oral vancomycin (dosed at 125 mg once daily while receiving systemic antibiotics and continued for 5 days post completion of systemic antibiotics [OVP]), or no prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was incidence of HCFO-CDI. Secondary endpoints included incidence of community-onset healthcare facility-associated CDI (CO-HCFA-CDI), development of VRE colonization after receiving OVP, and adverse effects and cost of OVP. Results A total of 100 patients were evaluated, 50 patients in each group. Baseline and hospitalization characteristics were similar in each group. No incidents of HCFO-CDI were diagnosed in the OVP group compared with 6 (12%) in the no prophylaxis group (P = 0.03). CO-HCFA-CDI was not observed in either group. No patients developed new VRE colonization with only 1 patient reporting mild gastrointestinal side-effects to OVP. A total of 600 doses of OVP were given during the study, with each patient receiving an average of 12 doses. Total acquisition cost of OVP was $728.25, $60.69 per patient. Conclusion OVP was highly effective in preventing HCFO-CDI. OVP was well tolerated with no apparent risk for VRE colonization. Further prospective investigation is warranted to determine the impact and cost-effectiveness of routine use of OVP in high-risk patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Use of Oral Vancomycin for Clostridioides difficile Infection and the Risk of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 645-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa W Stevens ◽  
Karim Khader ◽  
Kelly Echevarria ◽  
Richard E Nelson ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Adjusted Relative Risk ◽  
Oral Vancomycin ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

Abstract Background Vancomycin is now a preferred treatment for all cases of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), regardless of disease severity. Concerns remain that a large-scale shift to oral vancomycin may increase selection pressure for vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE). We evaluated the risk of VRE following oral vancomycin or metronidazole treatment among patients with CDI. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with CDI in the US Department of Veterans Affairs health system between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2016. Patients were included if they were treated with metronidazole or oral vancomycin and had no history of VRE in the previous year. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation of 50 datasets. Patients treated with oral vancomycin were compared to those treated with metronidazole after balancing on patient characteristics using propensity score matching in each imputed dataset. Patients were followed for VRE isolated from a clinical culture within 3 months. Results Patients treated with oral vancomycin were no more likely to develop VRE within 3 months than metronidazole-treated patients (adjusted relative risk, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], .77 to 1.20), equating to an absolute risk difference of −0.11% (95% CI, −.68% to .47%). Similar results were observed at 6 months. Conclusions Our results suggest that oral vancomycin and metronidazole are equally likely to impact patients’ risk of VRE. In the setting of stable CDI incidence, replacement of metronidazole with oral vancomycin is unlikely to be a significant driver of increased risk of VRE at the patient level. In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients with Clostridioides difficile infection, the use of oral vancomycin did not increase the risk of vancomycin-resistant Enterococci infection at 3 or 6 months compared to metronidazole.

scholarly journals Mo1963 – Does Addition of Metronidazole to Oral Vancomycin Improve Outcomes in Clostridioides Difficile Infection?

2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-903
Author(s):  
Ying Wang ◽  
Aaron Schluger ◽  
Jianhua Li ◽  
Angela Gomez-Simmonds ◽  
Daniel E. Freedberg
Keyword(s):  
Oral Vancomycin ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

scholarly journals Rare Clinical Association between Clostridioides difficile Infection and Ischemic Colitis: Case Report and Literature Review

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 705
Author(s):  
Elena Mirela Ionescu ◽  
Ana-Maria Curte ◽  
Andrei Ovidiu Olteanu ◽  
Carmen Monica Preda ◽  
Ioana Tieranu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Ischemic Colitis ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Oral Vancomycin ◽  
Mild Disease ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Fecal Tests ◽  
Histologic Changes ◽  
Severe Colitis

Background and Objectives: Gut microbiota plays an important role in the wellbeing of the host through different interactions between microflora constituents. In certain instances, Clostridioides difficile may pullulate, causing infection with associated colitis that may vary in terms of severity from mild disease to severe colitis, with increased associated mortality due to its complications. However, there are few literature data regarding the association between Clostridioides difficile and ischemic colitis. Case report: We report the case of a 30-year-old male patient, overweight, with impending dehydration, who presented with hematochezia and colicky abdominal pain, with positive fecal tests for the detection of Clostridioides difficile infection and endoscopic appearance suggesting ischemic colitis in the sigmoid and left colon, confirmed by computed tomography and histology. The patient was treated with oral Vancomycin, with resolution of symptoms, and was reevaluated through colonoscopy eight weeks after discharge, with endoscopic mucosal normalization and histological scarring process on biopsy samples. Conclusion: We report one of the few cases in the literature of ischemic colitis associated with Clostridioides difficile infection, with resolution of clinical, endoscopic, and histologic changes after specific treatment with oral Vancomycin suggesting a possible association between the two diseases. We also review the existing literature data regarding this comorbid association.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document