scholarly journals Body Dysmorphic Symptoms Scale for patients seeking esthetic surgery: cross-cultural validation study

2016 ◽  
Vol 134 (6) ◽  
pp. 480-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Dalpasquale Ramos ◽  
Maria José Azevedo de Brito ◽  
Mônica Sarto Piccolo ◽  
Maria Fernanda Normanha da Silva Martins Rosella ◽  
Miguel Sabino Neto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Validation Study ◽  
Body Dysmorphic Disorder ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
The Body ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Brazilian Version ◽  
Cultural Validation

ABSTRACT: CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Rhinoplasty is one of the most sought-after esthetic operations among individuals with body dysmorphic disorder. The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Body Dysmorphic Symptoms Scale. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-cultural validation study conducted in a plastic surgery outpatient clinic of a public university hospital. METHODS: Between February 2014 and March 2015, 80 consecutive patients of both sexes seeking rhinoplasty were selected. Thirty of them participated in the phase of cultural adaptation of the instrument. Reproducibility was tested on 20 patients and construct validity was assessed on 50 patients, with correlation against the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale for Body Dysmorphic Disorder. RESULTS: The Brazilian version of the instrument showed Cronbach's alpha of 0.805 and excellent inter-rater reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.873; P < 0.001) and intra-rater reproducibility (ICC = 0.939; P < 0.001). Significant differences in total scores were found between patients with and without symptoms (P < 0.001). A strong correlation (r = 0.841; P < 0.001) was observed between the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale for Body Dysmorphic Disorder and the Body Dysmorphic Symptoms Scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.981, thus showing good accuracy for discriminating between presence and absence of symptoms of body dysmorphic disorder. Forty-six percent of the patients had body dysmorphic symptoms and 54% had moderate to severe appearance-related obsessive-compulsive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The Brazilian version of the Body Dysmorphic Symptoms Scale is a reproducible instrument that presents face, content and construct validity.

scholarly journals Brazilian version of the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination

2008 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Trajano Borges Jorge ◽  
Miguel Sabino Neto ◽  
Jamil Natour ◽  
Daniela Francescato Veiga ◽  
Anamaria Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Body Dysmorphic Disorder ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
The Body ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Brazilian Version

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Body image improvement is considered to be the main reason for undergoing plastic surgery. The objective was to translate the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination (BDDE) into Brazilian Portuguese and to adapt and validate this questionnaire for use in Brazil. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional survey, at the Department of Plastic Surgery of Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: The BDDE was first translated into Portuguese and then back-translated into English. These translations were then discussed by healthcare professionals in order to establish the final Brazilian version. In a second stage, the validity and reliability of the BDDE were assessed. For this, patients were initially interviewed by two interviewers and subsequently, by only one of these interviewers. On the first occasion, in addition to the BDDE, the body shape questionnaire (BSQ) and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale were also applied. These questionnaires were applied to 90 patients. RESULTS: Six questions were modified during the assessment of cultural equivalence. Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 and the intraclass correlation coefficients for interobserver and test-retest reliability were 0.91 and 0.87, respectively. Pearson's coefficient showed no correlation between the BDDE and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale (0.22), whereas there was a moderate correlation between the BDDE and the BSQ (0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The BDDE was successfully translated and adapted, with good internal consistency, reliability and construct validity.

Core dimensions of a burnout scale: Psychometric properties and a cross cultural validation study

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Sarbescu ◽  
Delia Virga ◽  
Coralia Sulea ◽  
Ilona van Beek ◽  
Wilmar Schaufeli
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Validation Study ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cultural Validation

scholarly journals Psychometric analysis of the Brazilian-version Kidscreen-27 questionnaire

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Magno da Silveira ◽  
Alexsandra da Silva Bandeira ◽  
Marcus Vinicius Veber Lopes ◽  
Adriano Ferreti Borgatto ◽  
Kelly Samara da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Public Schools ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Discriminatory Power ◽  
Brazilian Version ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Delta G

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to verify the reliability, discriminatory power and construct validity of the Kidscreen-27 questionnaire in Brazilian adolescents. Methods Adolescents that participated of the pilot study (210 adolescents; 52.9% boys; 13.7 years old) and of the baseline (816 participants; 52.7% girls; 13.1 years old) of the Movimente Project in 2016/2017 composed the sample of the present study. This project was carried out in six public schools in the city of Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Test–retest reproducibility was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient and Gwet coefficient; internal consistency through McDonald's Omega; Hankins' Delta G coefficient verified the scale's discriminatory power and; confirmatory factor analysis to assess construct validity. Results Reproducibility values ranged from 0.71 to 0.78 for the dimensions (ICC), and ranged from 0.60 to 0.83 for the items (Gwet). McDonald's Ômega (0.82–0.91) for internal consistency measures. Discriminatory power ranging from 0.94 for the dimension Social Support and Friends to 0.98 for Psychological Well-Being. The factorial loads were > 0.40, except for item 19 (0.36). The fit quality indicators of the model were adequate (X2[df] = 1022.89 [311], p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.053 (0.049–0.087); CFI = 0.988; TLI = 0.987), confirming the five-factor structure originally proposed. Conclusions The Brazilian-version Kidscreen-27 achieved good levels of reproducibility, internal consistency, discriminatory power and construct validity. Its use is adequate to measure the health-related quality of life of adolescents in the Brazilian context.

scholarly journals Psychometric testing of the mental health inventory in an Arabian context: Cross-cultural validation study

Nursing Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbas Al Mutair ◽  
Mohammed Al Mohaini ◽  
Ritin Fernandez ◽  
Lorna Moxham ◽  
Samuel Lapkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Validation Study ◽  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cultural Validation

scholarly journals Symbol Digit Modalities Test Variant in a Smartphone App for Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: Validation Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pim van Oirschot ◽  
Marco Heerings ◽  
Karine Wendrich ◽  
Bram den Teuling ◽  
Marijn B Martens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Validation Study ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Study Participant ◽  
Smartphone App ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Matched Group ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Study Participants

BACKGROUND The decline of cognitive processing speed (CPS) is a common dysfunction in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is widely used to formally quantify CPS. We implemented a variant of the SDMT in MS sherpa, a smartphone app for persons with MS. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the construct validity and test-retest reliability of the MS sherpa smartphone variant of the SDMT (sSDMT). METHODS We performed a validation study with 25 persons with relapsing-remitting MS and 79 healthy control (HC) subjects. In the HC group, 21 subjects were matched to the persons with MS with regard to age, gender, and education and they followed the same assessment schedule as the persons with MS (the “HC matched” group) and 58 subjects had a less intense assessment schedule to determine reference values (the “HC normative” group). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were determined between the paper-and-pencil SDMT and its smartphone variant (sSDMT) on 2 occasions, 4 weeks apart. Other ICCs were determined for test-retest reliability, which were derived from 10 smartphone tests per study participant, with 3 days in between each test. Seven study participants with MS were interviewed regarding their experiences with the sSDMT. RESULTS The SDMT scores were on average 12.06% higher than the sSDMT scores, with a standard deviation of 10.68%. An ICC of 0.838 was found for the construct validity of the sSDMT in the combined analysis of persons with MS and HC subjects. Average ICCs for test-retest reliability of the sSDMT for persons with MS, the HC matched group, and the HC normative group were 0.874, 0.857, and 0.867, respectively. The practice effect was significant between the first and the second test of the persons with MS and the HC matched group and trivial for all other test-retests. The interviewed study participants expressed a positive attitude toward the sSDMT, but they also discussed the importance of adapting a smartphone cognition test in accordance with the needs of the individual persons with MS. CONCLUSIONS The high correlation between sSDMT and the conventional SDMT scores indicates a very good construct validity. Similarly, high correlations underpin a very good test-retest reliability of the sSDMT. We conclude that the sSDMT has the potential to be used as a tool to monitor CPS in persons with MS, both in clinical studies and in clinical practice.

Energy-Based Devices Affect the Aesthetic Outcome of Cervical Thyroidectomy and Parathyroidectomy. A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonella Pino ◽  
◽  
Lorenzo Gasco ◽  
Daqi Zhang ◽  
Paolo Carcoforo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Dysmorphic Disorder ◽  
The Body ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Aesthetic Outcome ◽  
Aesthetic Result ◽  
Scar Assessment ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Thyroid and parathyroid diseases are very common. Most of these cases are in women and may be amenable to surgery. The patient’s perception that these are not life-threatening diseases leads them to expect an excellent aesthetic result, since the surgical incision area is clearly visible. Objective: To evaluate different scarring outcomes using three different energy-based devices (Harmonic Focus®, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ; Thunderbeat Open Fine Jaw®, Olympus Medical, Tokyo, Japan; LigaSure Small Jaw®, Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) and to determine the impact of post-thyroidectomy/parathyroidectomy scars on the patient’s quality of life. Methods: One hundred female patients who underwent thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy between September 2017 and September 2019 at the Endocrine and Minimally Invasive Surgery Department of Messina University Hospital were recruited. A retrospective analysis assessed the thickness of the cervical scar via ultrasound imaging, and the patient’s degree of satisfaction through the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire (BDDQ). Results: The patients were divided into three groups according to the energy-device used: group A (LigaSure SJ (n=38), group B (Harmonic F, n=32) and group C (Thunderbeat OFJ, n=30). The three groups were homogeneous with respect to number of patients, age and surgical procedures. The best aesthetic result, which correlated with the lowest scar thickness, was observed in group A; these patients were more satisfied than those in the other two groups. Moreover, correlations between scar thickness and quantitative variables (such as age or BMI) were not found in any of the groups. Conclusions: Based on the data collected and our experience, the LigaSure Small Jaw® (Medtronic) seems to offer the best aesthetic outcome in patients who undergo transverse cervicotomy for thyroid and parathyroid diseases. However, further prospective studies involving a greater number of cases are needed.

Cross-cultural validation of the Brazilian version of the spiritual care competence scale

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (03) ◽  
pp. 322-327
Author(s):  
Luciana Winterkorn Dezorzi ◽  
Márcia Mocellin Raymundo ◽  
José Roberto Goldim ◽  
René van Leeuwen
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Spiritual Care ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Expert Committee ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Final Version ◽  
Competence Scale ◽  
Cultural Validation

AbstractObjectiveThis study describes the cross-cultural validation and psychometric evaluation of the Spiritual Care Competence Scale – Brazilian Portuguese version. This reliable and valid instrument is recommended in the literature to measure the outcomes of the education process in the development of spiritual care competences.MethodThis is a cross-sectional validation study following the stages proposed by Beaton et al.: translation into Portuguese, back translation into English, expert committee review for semantic equivalence, assessment of the clarity of the pre-final version, and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the final version in Portuguese. Health professionals working at a public hospital in South Brazil participated in the different stages of this study.ResultRegarding internal consistency, total Cronbach's alpha was 0.92 and the mean inter-item correlation was 0.29. The test-retest procedure showed no statistically significant differences in the six subscales. The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.67 to 0.84, demonstrating the stability of the scale.Significance of resultsThe results support the psychometric quality of the scale and indicate that the adapted instrument is a valid and reliable scale with good internal consistency for measuring spiritual care competencies of health professionals in Brazilian healthcare settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document