scholarly journals Evaluation of shear bond strength of different treatments of ceramic bracket surfaces

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Patrícia Helou Ramos Andrade ◽  
Rogério Vieira Reges ◽  
Marcos Augusto Lenza
Keyword(s):  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Test System ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Ceramic Brackets ◽  
Composite Resin Restoration ◽  
Ceramic Bracket

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bonding strength of the ceramic bracket and composite resin restoration interface, using four types of treatment on the base of the bracket. METHODOLOGY: 48 photoactivated composite resin discs were used (FiltekTM Z250) contained in specimens and divided into 4 groups of 12 specimens for each group according to the type of treatment performed on the base of the brackets. Once the brackets were bonded, the specimens were subjected to shear stress carried out in a universal testing machine (MTS: 810 Material Test System) calibrated with a fixed speed of 0.5 mm / minute. The values obtained were recorded and compared by means of appropriate statistical tests - analysis of variance and then Tukey's test. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The surfaces of ceramic brackets conditioned with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 1 minute, followed by aluminum oxide blasting, 50µ, after silane application and primer application, was considered the best method to prepare surfaces of ceramic brackets prior to orthodontic esthetic bonding.

scholarly journals Perbedaan Kekuatan Geser Reparasi Gigi Tiruan Cekat dengan Resin Komposit Packable dan Flowable (Uji Laboratoris pada permukaan logam NiCr)

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Endang Wahyuningtyas ◽  
Suparyono Saleh ◽  
Sri Budi Barunawati
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Flowable Composite ◽  
Diamond Bur ◽  
Universal Testing

Latar Belakang. Resin komposit merupakan bahan pilihan untuk reparasi Gigi Tiruan Cekat porcelain fused to metal (PFM) Karena estetis baik dan manipulasi mudah. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kekuatan geser perlekatan resin komposit pada permukaan logam Gigi Tiruan Cekat dengan menggunakan resin komposit jenis packable dan jenis flowable. Metode penelitian. Subjek penelitian berupa logam NiCr (Noritake, Japan) berbentuk silinder dengan diameter 10 mm dan tinggi 3 mm. Penelitian dibagi menjadi dua kelompok, masing-masing terdiri dari 10 subjek. Kelompok pertama reparasi dengan resin komposit packable (Z250™ 3M ESPE, USA) dan kelompok kedua reparasi dengan resin komposit flowable (Dyad flow, Kerr, USA). Permukaan subjek dikasari dengan wheel diamond bur, dietsa dengan asam fosfat 37 % (Scotchbond™, 3M ESPE, USA) kemudian dicuci dan dikeringkan, selanjutnya diaplikasikan silan (Rely X™ Ceramic Primer, 3M ESPE, USA) dan bonding (Adper™ Single Bond, 3M ESPE, USA). Permukaan kemudian dilapisi dengan resin komposit packable dan flowable, disinari selama 40 detik. Subjek penelitian direndam di dalam distilled water dan dimasukkan ke dalam incubator dengan suhu 37°C selama 7 hari. Uji kekuatan geser dilakukan dengan menggunakan Universal Testing Machine. Data dianalisis dengan uji t. hasil uji t menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan bermakna kekuatan geser reparasi gigi tiruan cekat pada permukaan logam (p<0,05). Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah kekuatan geser reparasi pada permukaan logam dengan menggunakan resin komposit flowable yang mengandung bahan coupling agent lebih tinggi dibandingkan reparasi pada permukaan porselen dengan menggunakan resin komposit packable. Background. One of selected material by repairing the fixed partial denture was composite resin because of its good aesthetics and low manipulation. The aim. This research was aimed at identifying the differences of shear bond strength of composite resin on metal surface by using different composite resins, namely packable and flowable composite resins. Method. The research subjects were cylinders with 10 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height. The research subjects with metal material of NiCr (Noritke, Japan) involved two groups. The first group comprising 10 repair subjects with composite packable (Z250™, 3M ESPE, USA) and 10 repair subjects with flowable composite (Dyad flow, Kerr, USA). The surface of the subjects were roughned with wheel diamond bur and etched with 37% phosphate acid (Scotbond™, 3M ESPE, USA) were applied. The surface was then coated with packable and flowable composite resins and light-cured for 40 seconds. The research subjects were immersed in distilled water and put into the incubator at temperature of 37°C for 7 days. The shear bond strength test was conducted using the Universal Testing Machine. Data were analyzed using t-test. The result. The research result showed that there were differences of shear bond strength of repair between packable and flowable composite resins. The result of t-test indicated significant diffrences on metal surface (p<0,05). The conclusion of this research is that shear bond strength of repair with flowable composite which contain coupling agent has higher shear bond strength than that of packable composite resin.

The effect of caries detector dyes and a cavity cleansing agent on composite resin bonding to enamel and dentin

2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azza El-Housseiny ◽  
Hana Jamjoum
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Group V ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of caries detector dyes and/or cavity cleanser on composite bonding and etching patterns of enamel and dentin. One hundred and eight non-carious premolars were divided into six groups according to the enamel and dentin pretreatment investigated. The different pretreatment were as follows: Group I: teeth with prophylaxis only, Group II: Sable seek caries detector dye,Groups III: chlorhexidine cavity cleanser,Group IV: the caries detectors dye followed by prophylaxis, Group V: the cavity cleanser followed by the caries detector dye, and Group IV: Snoop caries detector dye. The shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to enamel and dentin was evaluated by the Instron Universal testing machine while, the topographic details of enamel and dentin were examined by the SEM following the different pretreatment and acid etching. Results of the shear bond strength showed no statistically significant difference among the six groups, with no substantial differences in SEM results. It is concluded that using the caries detector dyes and/or chlorhexidine cavity cleanser before acid etching does not significantly affect composite bonding to enamel and dentin.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Kloroform Terhadap Pelarutan Bahan Perekat Yang Menempel Pada Braket Keramik Yang Lepas Dari Gigi

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-18
Author(s):  
Ken Edinata ◽  
Endah Mardiati
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Universal Testing Machine ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Ceramic Brackets ◽  
Ceramic Bracket

ABSTRAK Kebutuhan braket transparan pada perawatan ortodonti semakin berkembang dengan adanya kebutuhan braket sewarna gigi, terutama wanita yang memerlukan penampilan estetik maksimal. Braket yang lepas dalam perawatan ortodonti perlu direkatkan kembali. Pembersihan landasan braket yang terlepas sehingga dapat direkatkan kembali akan mengurangi biaya yang harus dikeluarkan pasien. Melakukan daur ulang braket haruslah dapatdapat dilakukan tanpa merubah sifat fisik dan ukuran dari braket tersebut. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimental analitik laboratoris in vitro dengan pendekatan komparatif yang bertujuan untuk melihat perbedaan kuat rekat geser braket keramik yang dibersihkan dengan kloroform selama 20 menit, 40 menit, 60 menit. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah 60 buah braket keramik monokristalin  merek Ice Inspire dari Ormco dengan perlekatan mekanik. Pengukuran uji rekat geser menggunakan Instron Universal Testing Machine dan sisa resin menggunakan skor ARI. Analisis statistik dilakukan dengan uji Wilcoxon dan ANOVA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan bermakna kuat rekat geser braket keramik pasca rekat yang dibersihkan dengan kloroform selama 20 menit, 40 menit, 60 menit dan braket keramik pascarekat yang baru. Simpulan dari penelitian ini bahwa Terdapat perbedaan kuat rekat geser braket keramik yang dibersihkan dengan kloroform selama 20 menit, 40 menit, 60 menit dengan braket keramik yang baru, Semakin lama waktu pembersihan braket keramik dengan kloroform, sisa resin adhesif akan semakin bersih dan mempunyai kuat rekat geser yang lebih tinggi. Terdapat perbedaan sisa resin adesif antara braket keramik pasca rekat yang dibersihkan dengan kloroform yang dilepas kembali dengan braket keramik pasca rekat yang baru.   Kata Kunci : perbedaan kuat rekat geser, kloroform, kuat rekat geser, ARI, braket keramik.                                                                                                    ABSTRACT Transparant bracket needs in orthodontic treatment is become huge caused the needs of tranlucent bracket , especially women who require maximum aesthetic appearance. Debonding bracket in orthodontic treatment need  to reattached.  By Cleaning mesh of bracket so it can be reattached to reduce patient costs . Recycling bracket must can done without changing the physical properties and the size of bracket. This study is an experimental study in vitro analytical comparative approach that aims to see the difference shear strength adhesion to ceramic brackets were cleaned with chloroform for 20 minutes , 40 minutes , 60 minutes . The sample used in this study were 60 pieces of ceramic bracket monokristalin from Ormco Inspire Ice with mechanical retention. Measurement of shear strength test using the Instron Universal Testing Machine and the rest of the resin using ARI scores . Statistical analysis was used  with Wilcoxon test and ANOVA . The results showed there were significant differences in the bracket shear strength rebonding ceramic bracket, which cleaned with chloroform for 20 minutes , 40 minutes , 60 minutes and new rebonding ceramic bracket. Conclusions from this research that There is a difference in the shear strength ceramic brackets  which cleaned using chloroform for 20 minutes , 40 minutes , 60 minutes and with a new ceramic bracket , the longer time cleaning ceramic bracket with chloroform, the rest of the adhesive resin will be clean and have strong adhesion higher shear. There are differences between the residual resin adhesive after adhesive ceramic bracket cleaned with chloroform is released back and the ceramic new bracket rebonding. Key words : 

scholarly journals Shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic brackets using color change adhesives

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aisha de Souza Gomes Stumpf ◽  
Carlos Bergmann ◽  
José Renato Prietsch ◽  
Juliane Vicenzi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Color Change ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Bonding Material ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Ceramic Brackets ◽  
The Mean

OBJECTIVE: To determine the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using color change adhesives that are supposed to aid in removing excess of bonding material and compare them to a traditional adhesive. METHODS: Ninety metallic and ninety ceramic brackets were bonded to bovine incisors using two color change adhesives and a regular one. A tensile stress was applied by a universal testing machine. The teeth were observed in a microscope after debonding in order to determine the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). RESULTS: The statistical analysis (ANOVA, Tukey, and Kruskall-Wallis tests) demonstrated that the mean bond strength presented no difference when metallic and ceramic brackets were compared but the bond resistance values were significantly different for the three adhesives used. The most common ARI outcome was the entire adhesive remaining on the enamel. CONCLUSIONS: The bond strength was similar for metallic and ceramic brackets when the same adhesive system was used. ARI scores demonstrated that bonding with these adhesives is safe even when ceramic brackets were used. On the other hand, bond strength was too low for orthodontic purposes when Ortho Lite Cure was used.

scholarly journals Pengaruh bahan desensitasi pasca bleaching ekstrakoronal terhadap kekuatan geser pelekatan restorasi resin komposit

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Ema Mulyawati
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Universal Testing Machine ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

The Effect of desensitizing agent in post-extracoronal bleaching on shear bond strength of composite resin. The dentinal hypersensitivity is a common condition among patients after extracoronal bleaching treatment that usually needs the application of desensitizing agent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the composite resin restoration shear bond strength with and without desensitizing application after extracoronal bleaching using 40% of H2O2. Twenty one extracted permanent human incisor teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups of 7 each. Group I was with the application of 40% H2O2 without any desensitizing agent. Group II was with the application of 40% of H2O2 with desensitizing agent and group III served as the control. The teeth were immersed in artificial saliva and stored in 37 °C incubator for 7 days. The teeth were restored using composite resin. After restoring the shear bond strength of composite resin was tested using a universal testing machine. Result and conclusion. there is no significant difference between bleaching group with and without desensitizing agent. The application of desensitizing agent after extracoronal bleaching did not impact the composite resin shear bond strength.ABSTRAKDentin hipersensitif merupakan kondisi yang biasa dialami pasien setelah perawatan bleaching ekstrakoronal yang biasanya memerlukan aplikasi bahan desensitasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh bahan desensitasi pasca bleaching ekstrakoronal menggunakan H2O2 40% terhadap kekutan geser pelekatan restorasi resin komposit. Dua puluh satu gigi permanen insisivus yang telah dicabut dibagi dalam tiga kelompok masing-masing 7 gigi. Kelompok I dilakukan bleaching ekstrakoronal dengan H2O2 tanpa bahan desensitasi. Kelompok II dilakukan bleaching setelah itu diaplikasikan bahan desensitasi dan kelompok III sebagai kelompok kontrol. Semua gigi-gigi tersebut di rendam dalam saliva buatan dan dimasukkan inkubator selama 7 hari pada suhu 37 °C. Selanjutnya seluruh gigi dilakukan restorasi resin komposit menggunakan light cure halogen. Setelah itu dilakukan pengujian kekuatan geser pelekatan menggunakan universal testing machine. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji Kruskal - Wallis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan kekuatan geser pelekatan pada semua kelompok perlakuan (p > 0,05). Dari penelitian ini disimpulkan bahwa tidak terdapat pengaruh aplikasi bahan desensitasi pasca bleaching ekstrakoronal terhadap kekuatan geser pelekatan restorasi resin komposit.

scholarly journals Comparison of Shear Strength of Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets Cemented to Zirconia Depending on Surface Treatment: An In Vitro Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (02) ◽  
pp. 150-155
Author(s):  
Sibel Cetik ◽  
Thaï Hoang Ha ◽  
Léa Sitri ◽  
Hadrien Duterme ◽  
Viet Pham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Surface Preparation ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Airborne Particle ◽  
Ceramic Brackets ◽  
Ceramic Bracket

Abstract Objectives Due to the high demand for all-ceramic restorations, monolithic zirconia restorations are nowadays frequently used. With the demand for adult orthodontic treatments, orthodontists need to be mindful of the quality of their brackets bonding to this type of material, as it requires special conditioning. This study aimed to compare different surface treatments of zirconia when bonding metal or ceramic orthodontic brackets. The objectives are to compare the shear bond strength; the amount of adhesive remaining on the surface of the material; the incidence of adhesive, cohesive, and mixed failures; and the occurrence of zirconia fractures. Materials and Methods Forty monolithic blocks of zirconia of a diameter of 10 mm and a length of 10 mm were prepared and randomly divided into two groups (n = 20): metallic or ceramic brackets. Each group was subsequently divided into two subgroups (n = 10) depending on the surface preparation (laser treatment or airborne particle abrasion): SMB (airborne particle abrasion, metal bracket), SCB (airborne particle abrasion, ceramic bracket), LMB (laser; metal bracket), and LCB (laser, ceramic bracket). The samples were tested for shear bond strength using a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant index and the occurrence of zirconia fractures and different types of failures were assessed by optical and electron microscopy. Statistical Analysis Results were analyzed using analysis of variance. Results The differences were significant between the metallic (SMB, LMB) and ceramic (SCB, LCB) bracket groups with regard to shear bond strength, with respectively 23.29 ± 5.34 MPa, 21.59 ± 4.03 MPa, 20.06 ± 4.05 MPa, and 17.55 ± 3.88 MPa. In terms of surface treatment, no statistical differences were found between the different groups. Conclusion Metal brackets have a greater bond strength than ceramic brackets when cemented to zirconia. The surface treatment of zirconia surface has no influence on the shear bond strength.

scholarly journals Effect of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG Lasers on Ceramic Bracket Debonding from Composite Blocks

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Hossein Mirhashemi ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Hashem Hossaini ◽  
Ardavan Etemadi ◽  
Mohammad Javad Kharazifard ◽  
Abolghasem Bahador ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Yttrium Aluminum Garnet ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Universal Testing Machine ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Ceramic Brackets ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Ceramic Bracket

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effect of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) and erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium, garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) lasers on the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic brackets debonding from the surface of composite blocks. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six composite blocks were fabricated using Filtek Z250 light-cure composite. Block surfaces were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 30 seconds and then rinsed with water for 20 seconds and dried. Maxillary right central incisor ceramic orthodontic brackets were bonded to the surfaces of composite blocks using Transbond XT adhesive and were cured for 40 seconds. Twelve samples were irradiated with Er:YAG laser, while 12 samples were irradiated with Er,Cr:YSGG laser, and the brackets were then debonded using a universal testing machine. Twelve samples served as controls (debonding using the universal testing machine without using a laser). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score and bracket or composite cracks were evaluated under a stereomicroscope. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the comparison of the three groups. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the ARI scores. Results: The mean SBS was 17.01±5.22 MPa with Er:YAG laser, 18.03±6.46 MPa with Er,Cr:YSGG laser, and 16.61±6.73 MPa in the control group; the difference of the three groups was not significant (P=0.835). The difference in the ARI scores and enamel and composite cracks was not significant either (P>0.05). Conclusion: This study did not show any reduction in the bond strength of ceramic bracket to composite blocks after Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation.

scholarly journals CO2 laser irradiation for debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-52
Author(s):  
Denise Souza Matos ◽  
Erika Calvano Küchler ◽  
Maria Cristina Borsatto ◽  
Mirian Aiko Nakane Matsumoto ◽  
Fernanda Vicioni Marques ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Co2 Laser ◽  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Ceramic Brackets ◽  
Ceramic Bracket

Abstract This study evaluated shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index (ARI) and fracture mode of chemically and mechanically retained ceramic brackets bonded with different composite resins and irradiated with CO2 laser. The null hypothesis was that ceramic brackets bonded with different composite resins and irradiated with CO2 laser would have similar SBS values. Ninety human premolars were divided into four experimental groups according to the combination of type of composite resin (Transbond XT and Z 250) and type of ceramic bracket (Fascination and Mystique), and two control groups (n=15). In the four experimental groups, the brackets were irradiated with CO2 laser at 10 W for 3 seconds before SBS testing. Enamel surface ARI was calculated after debonding under electron microscopy scanning. ANOVA and the Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis. The laser groups had lower SBS values than the non-irradiated groups (control) (p<0.05). The mechanically retained brackets (Mystique) had the higher (p<0.05) and Z250 had the lower SBS values after CO2 laser irradiation. The groups bonded with Z250 had the highest ARI. Adhesive fractures were the most prevalent. The null hypothesis was rejected. CO2 laser decreased SBS efficiently and facilitated debonding of mechanically and chemically retained ceramic brackets.

scholarly journals Shear Bond Strength of Different Adhesive Materials used for Bonding Orthodontic Brackets : A Comparative in vitro Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-26
Author(s):  
Muzin Shahi Shaik ◽  
Snigdha Pattanaik ◽  
Sudhakar Pathuri ◽  
Arunachalam Sivakumar
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Test Group ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Adhesive Materials

Introduction: Bond strength is an important property and determines the amount of force delivered and treatment duration in orthodontics. Many light-cured bonding materials are being used; but it is required to determine the most efficient one withdesired bond strength. Objective: To determine and compare the shear bond strength of three visible light-cured composites (Transbond XT, Heliositand Enlight) and two self-cured composites (Rely-a-bond and Concise). Materials & Method: 100 extracted premolars were collected and randomly divided into 5 test groups of different adhesives. Brackets were bonded to the teeth in each test group with the respective adhesive according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each specimen was debonded using Universal Testing Machine and the shear bond strength for each specimen was calculated. All the groups were compared by ANOVA one-way test. Results: There were statistically significant differences among the five groups (P<0.05). The shear bond strength of Enlight (13.92 ± 3.92) is similar to Transbond XT (14.30 ± 4.35). Conclusion: Light cure composites showed higher bond strength than self cure composites.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document