Relationship of nursing diagnoses, nursing outcomes, and nursing interventions for patient care in intensive care units

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikyung Moon
Author(s):  
Nai-Chung Chang ◽  
Michael Jones ◽  
Heather Schacht Reisinger ◽  
Marin L. Schweizer ◽  
Elizabeth Chrischilles ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To determine whether the order in which healthcare workers perform patient care tasks affects hand hygiene compliance. Design: For this retrospective analysis of data collected during the Strategies to Reduce Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria in Intensive Care Units (STAR*ICU) study, we linked consecutive tasks healthcare workers performed into care sequences and identified task transitions: 2 consecutive task sequences and the intervening hand hygiene opportunity. We compared hand hygiene compliance rates and used multiple logistic regression to determine the adjusted odds for healthcare workers (HCWs) transitioning in a direction that increased or decreased the risk to patients if healthcare workers did not perform hand hygiene before the task and for HCWs contaminating their hands. Setting: The study was conducted in 17 adult surgical, medical, and medical-surgical intensive care units. Participants: HCWs in the STAR*ICU study units. Results: HCWs moved from cleaner to dirtier tasks during 5,303 transitions (34.7%) and from dirtier to cleaner tasks during 10,000 transitions (65.4%). Physicians (odds ratio [OR]: 1.50; P < .0001) and other HCWs (OR, 2.15; P < .0001) were more likely than nurses to move from dirtier to cleaner tasks. Glove use was associated with moving from dirtier to cleaner tasks (OR, 1.22; P < .0001). Hand hygiene compliance was lower when HCWs transitioned from dirtier to cleaner tasks than when they transitioned in the opposite direction (adjusted OR, 0.93; P < .0001). Conclusions: HCWs did not organize patient care tasks in a manner that decreased risk to patients, and they were less likely to perform hand hygiene when transitioning from dirtier to cleaner tasks than the reverse. These practices could increase the risk of transmission or infection.


2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 854-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tânia Couto Machado Chianca ◽  
Patrícia de Oliveira Salgado ◽  
Juliana Peixoto Albuquerque ◽  
Camila Claudia Campos ◽  
Meire Chucre Tannure ◽  
...  

AIM: to analyze whether nursing goals formulated for nursing diagnoses can be mapped to nursing outcomes classification and to identify the scales most appropriate to the outcomes mapped. METHOD: a descriptive study was developed in an intensive care unit. Data collection involved extraction of goals in 44 medical records, content standardization, cross-mapping to the outcomes, identification of appropriated scales and validation. Descriptive analysis and agreement with the cross-mapping process were performed. RESULTS: nursing goals (59) were mapped to (28) different outcomes, with agreement of 83% in the mapping process. All goals were mapped to outcomes, which allows to affirm that these outcomes contemplates the goals elaborated to patient care. CONCLUSION: these results favor the inclusion of outcomes and scales validated in the planning and evaluation phases of the nursing process of a software in construction.


2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernadette Longo ◽  
Craig Weinert ◽  
T. Kenny Fountain

Medical personnel in hospital intensive care units routinely rely on protocols to deliver some types of patient care. These protocol documents are developed by hospital physicians and staff to ensure that standards of care are followed. Thus, the protocol document becomes a de facto standing order, standing in for the physician's judgment in routine situations. This article reports findings from Phase I of an ongoing study exploring how insulin protocols are designed and used in intensive care units to transfer medical research findings into patient care “best practices.” We developed a taxonomy of document design elements and analyzed 29 insulin protocols to determine their use of these elements. We found that 93% of the protocols used tables to communicate procedures for measuring glucose levels and administering insulin. We further found that the protocols did not adhere well to principles for designing instructions and hypothesized that this finding reflected different purposes for instructions (training) and protocols (standardizing practice).


1983 ◽  
Vol 4 (S4) ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  

This section contains information essential to understanding and properly using the isolation precautions that appear in the guideline and on the instruction cards. Many of the techniques and recommendations for isolation precautions are appropriate not only for patients known or suspected to be infected but also for routine patient care. For example, gowns are appropriate for patient-care personnel when soiling with feces is likely, whether or not the patient is known or suspected to be infected with an enteric pathogen, and caution should be used when handling any used needle.Handwashing is the single most important means of preventing the spread of infection. Personnel should always wash their hands, even when gloves are used, after taking care of an infected patient or one who is colonized with microorganisms of special clinical or epidemiologic significance, for example, multiply-resistant bacteria. In addition, personnel should wash their hands after touching excretions (feces, urine, or material soiled with them) or secretions (from wounds, skin infections, etc.) before touching any patient again. Hands should also be washed before performing invasive procedures, touching wounds, or touching patients who are particularly susceptible to infection. Hands should be washed between all patient contacts in intensive care units and newborn nurseries. (See Guideline for Hospital Environmental Control: Antiseptics, Handwashing, and Handwashing Facilities.)When taking care of patients infected (or colonized) with virulent or epidemiologically important microorganisms, personnel should consider using antiseptics for handwashing rather than soap and water, especially in intensive care units.


Rev Rene ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Silva de Araújo ◽  
Andreza Freire de França ◽  
João Kelvin Da Silva Mendonça ◽  
Ana Rita de Cássia Bettencourt ◽  
Thatiana Lameira Maciel Amaral ◽  
...  

Objective: construction and validation of a systematization instrument for Nursing Care, characterizing the profile of patients of an intensive care unit in the north of Brazil. Methods: it was a descriptive methodological study that followed a nursing process model in five phases. Results: it was suggested that the instrument be constructed in two formats; one for admission and another for daily assessment. Some items were removed from the instrument according to content validation content by the nurses. Of the 45 patients evaluated, 60.0% were men, 44.0% were married, 40.0% had low education levels, chronic renal failure and cancer. The main nursing diagnoses were risk for infection (100.0%) and impaired physical mobility (97.8%). The main nursing interventions were: handwashing, changing intravenous access, performing aseptic techniques and moving patients every 2 hours. Conclusion: construction and content validation were carried out successfully, promoting instruments capable of providing quality nursing care for patients in intensive care.


2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 746-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Cristina Pires Nascimento ◽  
Maria Cecília Toffoletto ◽  
Leilane Andrade Gonçalves ◽  
Walkíria das Graças Freitas ◽  
Katia Grillo Padilha

This quantitative, retrospective study aimed to characterize adverse events (AE) in Intensive Care Units (ICU), Semi-Intensive Care Units (SCU) and Inpatient Units (IU), regarding nature, type, day of the week and nursing professionals / patient ratio at the moment of occurrence; as well as to identify nursing interventions after the event and AE rates. The study was performed at a private hospital in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Two hundred twenty-nine AE were notified. The predominant events were related to nasogastric tubes (NGT) (57.6%), followed by patient fall (16.6%) and medication errors (14.8%). The nursing professionals /patient ratio at the moment of the event was 1:2 for the ICU, 1:3 for the SCU and 1:4 for the IU. A similar distribution was observed for the other days of the week. The nursing interventions were: repositioning the NGT (83.2%) and communication of the occurrence to the physician in case of medication errors (47.6%) and falls (55.2%). The highest AE rate was related to NGT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document