scholarly journals Review of Key Positions of the Presidium of Intellectual Property Court of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-178
Author(s):  
Natalia Kapyrina ◽  
Maria Kolzdorf
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The Russian Federation

scholarly journals The Practice of Review of Cases on Challenging Statutory Acts of the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property by the Intellectual Property Rights Court: Keeping Going over the Same Ground

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Yu. Andreeva ◽  
◽  
Moisey I. Lifson ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Utility Model ◽  
Reasonable Time ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article is devoted to the institution of challenging the normative legal acts of Rospatent in the Court on Intellectual Rights on the example of several cases examined by the Court. The authors highlight a number of problems in this area. Since the consideration of a public objection to a patent for a controversial utility model or invention and the decision on the results of the consideration of such an objection is within the competence of Rospatent, and the PIS performs only a supervisory function, it is difficult to solve this problem within a reasonable time. The authors propose: all disputes related to intellectual property after issuing a security document should be resolved not in an administrative - judicial manner, but only in a judicial one, by analogy with the violation of the patent of the Russian Federation for intellectual property objects.

The antitrust immunity of intellectual property in Russia

2021 ◽  
pp. 32-39
Author(s):  
S. S. Burchik
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Antitrust Law ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Antitrust Immunity

The growing importance of intellectual property as an asset raises the question whether exercising of the intellectual property rights shall be regulated by antitrust law to protect against possible abuses and ensure the efficiency of the economy. The study aims to improve the existing regulation in the Russian Federation and align it with the idea of balancing private and public interests while fostering competition and encouraging innovation.

scholarly journals NEW LAW “ON JURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITIES OF FOREIGN STATES AND THEIR PROPERTY”

2016 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Ирина Хлестова ◽  
Irina KHlyestova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Activity ◽  
Labor Disputes ◽  
Russian Territory ◽  
Foreign State ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The article is devoted to the analyses of the new Law on jurisdictional immunities of states and their property of 2015. The Law accepts the fundamental notions of the UN Convention on jurisdictional immunities of states and their properties of 2004. The Law envisages that a foreign state enjoys jurisdictional immunities for itself and in respect of its property subject to the provisions of this Law. The Law establishes exceptions from the judicial immunity of a foreign state. A foreign state does not enjoy judicial immunity in respect of disputes related to civil transactions if these transactions are not related to the exercise of sovereign powers of authority by this state. With certain exceptions a foreign state does not enjoy judicial immunity in respect of disputes concerning commercial and other economic activity within the territory of the Russian Federation, labor disputes, disputes related to immovable property located in the Russian territory, disputes related to personal injuries and damage to property, disputes related to intellectual property, disputes related to running of state owned vessels. The Law provides a foreign state’s property with the immunity from injunctive measures. The Law defines categories of a foreign state’s property which enjoy immunity from enforcement process. The Law provides for the reciprocity. The Law is based on the concept of restrictive immunities of a foreign state.

scholarly journals LEGAL ASPECTS OF EXISTENCE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE INTERNET

2020 ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
O.V. Boychenko ◽  
O.Yu. Smirnova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Legislative Process ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Protecting Intellectual Property

The article considers the legal aspects of the existence of intellectual property on the Internet. The main regulatory documents governing the relationship between the use of intellectual property on the Internet are analyzed, such as: the WIPO international convention, the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, part 4; Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 09.02.2012; The latest edition of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. In the form of a structural and didactic scheme are presented: objects of intellectual property, means of individualization; an algorithm for the interaction of participants in the legislative process to seize illegal content. Features of the problems of protecting intellectual property rights on the Internet, the main causes of violation of intellectual property rights and ways of protecting intellectual property are presented. The losses of various sectors of society from Internet piracy are given. The basic tools of copyright infringement on the Internet are described, as well as existing methods of confirming copyright in content.

scholarly journals The Use of Objects of Intellectual Property as Mortgage Tools

2018 ◽  
pp. 39-46
Author(s):  
E. V. Altukhova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Industrialized Countries ◽  
Property Market ◽  
Economic Relations ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Innovation Economy ◽  
Scientific And Technological Development

Present day economy is based on knowledge and intellect, where the principle element of competitiveness is intellectual property. Availability of intellectual property market is an integral part of the innovation economy development, which determines the form and procedure of objects of intellectual property circulation. In industrialized countries intellectual property becomes a factor of production. The necessity to use objects of intellectual property in economic relations is stipulated also by globalization processes taking place in economy. It is impossible to realize the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation without new technologies. At the same time the development, protection and introduction of new technologies are not feasible without new approaches and methods of using objects of intellectual property in the system of economic relations. One of these approaches is the use of intellectual property as a mortgage tool. The article analyzes a possibility of using objects of intellectual property as a mortgage. It studies practice and features of such deals in Russia and abroad. Legislative regulation of these relations is also investigated. Key conditions of the credit deal using object of intellectual property as a mortgage were formulated, the principle criterion of conducting this transaction is the use of the effective object of intellectual property, which can guarantee min risks both for the creditor and the borrower.

scholarly journals Legal regulation of the development and application of artificial intelligence in military sector of the Russian Federation in the context of the government strategy and ensuring the protection of intellectual property rights

2021 ◽  
pp. 26-42
Author(s):  
Maryam Abdurakhmanovna Akhmadova
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Intellectual Activity ◽  
Military Equipment ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
Legislative Framework ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government

The subject of this research is the examination of legal perspective on the approaches towards regulation of artificial intelligence and robotic technologies in military sector of the Russian Federation, including in ensuring the protection of the results of intellectual activity of researchers and developers, as well as the analysis of law enforcement practice on the protection of intellectual property in the interests of the state. In this format, the author determines the key conditions for recognition of the results of intellectual activity of military, special, and dual purpose as protectable object in accordance with the effective civil legislation. Attention is given to the practical results of domestic military equipment development using the artificial intelligence systems. The scientific novelty consists in articulation of the problem and approaches towards its research. The conclusion is made wide use of artificial intelligence technologies in the sphere of ensuring national security, as well as regulation based on the technical approach, rather than legal, not only create advantages in the military context, but can also cause issues that must be resolved. Taking into account real achievements in legal regulation of the results of intellectual activity, including the theoretical component, the author ascertains the need for improvement of the legislative framework on both, federal level and bylaws, including for the purpose of achieving a uniform use of the conceptual-categorical apparatus.

scholarly journals ASPECTS OF PROTECTION OF DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISE’S RIGHTS TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ITEMS

2018 ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
A. F. Strakhov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
Research Development ◽  
Full Extent ◽  
Legal Standards ◽  
Innovative Solutions ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
State Regional

When performing research, development, and engineering (RD&E) financed using state, regional, or municipal budget funds, legal relations between a customer and a RD&E contractor with regard to ownership of a created intellectual property are regulated by Part 4 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [1]. The intellectual property includes patentable innovative solutions which are qualified as intellectual property items. According to the applicable legal standards and law enforcement practice, patent protection obligations with regard to the created intellectual property items are imposed on the RD&E contractors. However, patent right holders with regard to these intellectual property items are the RD&E customers. As a result, the RD&E contractors face several difficulties, delays, and limitations with regard to patenting the intellectual property items and do not obtain necessary privileges to the full extent in connection with patenting the created intellectual property items. This article analyses the applicable procedure for distribution of the rights and obligations between the contractors and customers of the RD&E with regard to the patent protection of the created intellectual property items. Using experience of JSC Principle Production and Technical Company Granit as an example, a possibility of protecting RD&E contractors' interests by pre-emptive patenting of the intellectual property items prior to RD&E activities start is explained.

scholarly journals Science. Technology. Innovation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonid Gokhberg ◽  
Kirill Ditkovskiy ◽  
Evgeniya Evnevich ◽  
Maxim Kotsemir ◽  
Irina Kuznetsova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
International Comparisons ◽  
Federal State ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Statistical Studies ◽  
Data Book ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Innovation Indicators

This pocket data book contains main S&T and innovation indicators for the Russian Federation. The publication includes the most recent statistical data on R&D input and output, as well as international comparisons. The data book includes information of the Russian Federal State Statistics Service, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), European Statistical Office (Eurostat), UNESCO, World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), national statistical offices of other countries, and results of own methodological and analytical studies of the HSE Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge. In some cases, 2019 data are preliminary.

scholarly journals Protection of intellectual property of an architect

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 05029
Author(s):  
Nicolay Zhilskiy ◽  
Emma Shariapova ◽  
Marina Matveeva
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Architectural Design ◽  
Creative Activity ◽  
Protection Mechanism ◽  
Categorical Framework ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Protection

In the paper, the authors raise the issue of protecting the copyright of an architect. One of the ways to protect it is the trial. The RF Constitution guarantees judicial protection of rights and freedoms. Recently, in the Russian Federation, the number of appeals to the court for copyright protection has increased, indicating a large number of infringements of intellectual property rights of architects. The study of the authors showed that often the cause of litigation is the discrepancy of the values of the objects of copyright of the architect. To interpret such concepts as “architectural solution”, “architectural design”, “architect’s concept”, “architect’s idea” and others, the court is forced to involve specialists whose opinions in the court decision become the source of law, which contradicts the theory of state and law. The authors believe that the legislative consolidation of clear, certain essential features of the conceptual and categorical framework used in architectural activity is the improvement of the protection mechanism for the works of architects that are the result of their creative activity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document