scholarly journals Implikasi Yuridis Peraturan pemerintah tentang Pungutan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Terhadap Notaris Pemegang Surat Tanda Terdaftar yang tidak pernah Berkegiatan di Pasar Modal

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Ratna Ayu Puspitasari ◽  
Imam Koeswahyono ◽  
Titik Soeryati Soekesi
Keyword(s):  
Capital Market ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Legal Force ◽  
The Capital Market

This paper aims to describe the authority of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in conducting supervision and regulation of the financial services sector, and the juridical implications of Government Regulation Number 11 of 2014 concerning OJK Levy for capital market notaries registered with Registered Letters (STTD) who are not active in the capital market. The research method used in this paper is a normative juridical. The results of the study indicate that the OJK has the authority to levy notaries. Legal implications arising from Government Regulation Number 11 of 2014 concerning Financial Services Authority Levies for notaries who have STTD but do not engage in capital market activities becomes the state’s receivables. Payments will be made by the state receivable committee, with a forced letter that has the same legal force as the Grosse deed.

scholarly journals PENGAWASAN PASAR MODAL SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANGUNDANG NOMOR 21 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN

Legalita ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-79
Author(s):  
Suwardi
Keyword(s):  
Capital Market ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
The Public ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Capital Market

The capital market is seen as an effective means to accelerate the development of a country because of its ability to mobilize long-term funds from the public to be channeled to productive sectors. However, trading traffic on the capital market requires supervision from the government or parties that are considered to be independent to create safe and comfortable market conditions for each party that will carry out the transaction. This article raises the issue of how to control the capital market before and after the enactment of the Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority ?. The writing of this article uses a normative approach in analyzing various laws and regulations as well as literature related to capital market developments. The process of data analysis is done qualitatively. The function of the capital market supervision after the enactment of Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning OJK replaces the function previously performed by the Capital Market Supervisory Agency (Bapepam). Supervision under the OJK is based on a passion to give attention to protection and education for consumers. Education and protection of financial consumers is directed to increase the trust of investors and consumers in every activity and business activity in the financial services sector and provide opportunities and opportunities for the development of the financial services sector in a fair, efficient and transparent manner.

scholarly journals PERAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN TERHADAP PENGAWASAN LEMBAGA KEUANGAN DI INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. 177-188
Author(s):  
Annisa Arifka Sari
Keyword(s):  
Capital Market ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Financial Service ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Stable Manner ◽  
The Government

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan sebagai lembaga independen dalam melakukan pengawasan terhadap lembaga jasa keuangan di Indonesia serta kewenangan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Dari hasil penelitian dijelaskan bahwa Otoritas Jasa Keuangan adalah lembaga yang independen dan bebas dari campur tangan pihak lain, yang mempunyai fungsi, tugas, dan wewenang pengaturan, pengawasan, pemeriksaan, dan penyidikan terhadap lembaga jasa keuangan seperti perbankan. Dasar hukum dibentuknya Otoritas Jasa Keuangan adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011. Secara kelembagaan, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan berada di luar pemerintah, yang dimaknai bahwa Otoritas Jasa Keuangan tidak menjadi bagian dari kekuasaan pemerintah. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dibentuk dengan tujuan agar keseluruhan kegiatan di dalam sektor jasa keuangan terselenggara secara teratur, adil, transparan, dan akuntabel; mampu mewujudkan sistem keuangan yang tumbuh secara berkelanjutan dan stabil; serta mampu melindungi kepentingan konsumen dan masyarakat. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan bertugas tidak hanya mengatur dan mengawasi perbankan saja, tetapi juga mencakup pasar modal, perasuransian, dana pensiun, lembaga pembiayaan, serta lembaga jasa keuangan lainnya.    THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY ON SUPERVISION OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN INDONESIA This research aims to explain the role of the Financial Services Authority as an independent institution in supervising financial service institutions in Indonesia as well as the authority of the Financial Services Authority as regulated in Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority. The method used in this research is normative legal research. From the research results, it is explained that the Financial Services Authority is an independent institution and free from interference from other parties, which has the function, task and authority to regulate, supervise, examine and investigate financial service institutions such as banks. The legal basis for the establishment of the Financial Services Authority is Law Number 21 of 2011. Institutionally, the Financial Services Authority is outside the government, which means that the Financial Services Authority is not part of the government's power. The Financial Services Authority was formed with the aim that all activities in the financial services sector are carried out in an orderly, fair, transparent and accountable manner; able to realize a financial system that grows in a sustainable and stable manner; and able to protect the interests of consumers and society. The Financial Services Authority is tasked with not only regulating and supervising banking, but also covering the capital market, insurance, pension funds, financing institutions, and other financial service institutions.    

scholarly journals Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Perlindungan Konsumen Electronic Banking Pada PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. Cabang Sigli

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-468
Author(s):  
Nazaruddin Nazaruddin
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Banking Service ◽  
Article 9 ◽  
The People ◽  
The Subject

Pasal 9 huruf c Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (selanjutnya disebut UU OJK) menyatakan bahwa untuk melaksanakan tugas pengawasan OJK, mempunyai wewenang melakukan pengawasan, pemeriksaan, penyidikan, perlindungan konsumen, dan tindakan lain terhadap lembaga jasa keuangan, pelaku, dan/atau penunjang kegiatan jasa keuangan, sebagaimana dimaksud dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di sektor jasa keuangan. Pasal 28 huruf a UU OJK menyatakan bahwa untuk perlindungan konsumen dan masyarakat, OJK berwenang melakukan tindakan pencegahan kerugian konsumen dan masyarakat, salah satunya memberikan informasi dan edukasi kepada masyarakat atas karakteristik sektor jasa keuangan, layanan, dan produknya. Namun pada kenyataannya, pelaksanaan edukasi yang dilakukan oleh pihak perbankan tersebut tentu saja berada di bawah pengawasan OJK, sehingga secara tidak langsung OJK pun bertanggung jawab terhadap risiko penggunaan produk e-banking yang dapat merugikan konsumen. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis empiris yaitu jenis penelitian yang meneliti dan menelaah efektivitas suatu peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menujukkan Tanggung Jawab OJK terhadap konsumen yang mengalami kerugian akibat penggunaan layanan e-banking  adalah melakukan pendampingan bagi konsumen dan sebagai fasilitator dalam rangka melakukan gugatan ganti kerugian terhadap bank dengan jalan Eksternal Dispute Resolution, baik melalui litigasi maupun non litigasi.The Government Regulation No. 21 of 2011 Article 9 (c) regarding the Financial Services Authority (hereinafter referred to as UU OJK) states that in order to carry out the supervision other task to the financial services instituition the subject and/or the supporting financial services activities, as referred to the regulation about financial services activity. Article 28 (a) of UU OJK also states that in protection of consumers and people, OJK authorized to act in preventing costumer and people loss by providing information as well as education for the people regarding the characteristic of the financial services sector, the services and the products. In fact, however, the execution of the educating process done by the bank is under the supervision of OJK so OJK is indirectly responsible for the risk of e-banking products usage that harm consumers. This type of research used in this research is juridical empirical research that examines the types of research and study the effectiveness of laws. The result of the result indicated that the responsibility of OJK to the consumer who suffered losses by the e-banking service is by providing assistance and act as a facilitator in pursuing a lawsuit to get compensation from the bank by external dispute resolution, both by litigation and non-litigation.

scholarly journals INTEGRATED ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION INSTITUTIONS IN THE FINANCIAL SERVICES SECTOR: DISPUTE RESOLUTION EFFORTS IN CONSUMER PROTECTION FRAMEWORK

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Lastuti Abubakar ◽  
Tri Handayani
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
Analytical Research ◽  
Financial Technology

<em>This study examines and analyzes the legal implications of strengthening the integrated Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector regulations. This study applies a normative juridical approach with descriptive-analytical research specifications. The data are analyzed using qualitative juridical analysis. Results show that: an Integrated Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector is a dispute resolution institution that is in accordance with the characteristics of the financial services sector as an agent of trust and prioritizes consumer protection. It is expected that consumer dispute resolution is faster, cheaper, and fairer for both Business Actors and the consumers; strengthening of regulations on integrated ADR Institutions in the Financial Services Sector aims to create independent, fair, effective, and efficient dispute resolution capable of anticipating developments in the financial services sector that are increasingly complex from a legal perspective, the use of financial technology, and products/services across financial services sectors</em>

scholarly journals ANALISIS PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DALAM KEGIATAN USAHA JASA KEUANGAN PASAR MODAL DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Indah Pramesuri Suralaga ◽  
Revi Wulansari ◽  
Inna Windhatria
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Professional Institution ◽  
Investment Tool ◽  
The Capital Market

Capital Markets can also be interpreted as a professional institution that deals with securities buying and selling transactions, the capital market as a long-term investment tool that is currently becoming a trend in the community. But it cannot be denied that along with the development of the capital market in Indonesia it has caused problems or also disputes in the process of capital market activities in Indonesia. The problem in this research is how do the procedures and dispute resolution processes in business activities in the financial services sector after the procedures and processes in the settlement of Capital Market disputes, we must also know the legal consequences of the disputes in the financial services business of the Capital Market? The research method used a normative and empirical juridical approach, the data used are secondary data and primary data. Studies conducted with literature studies and field studies, data analysis used is qualitative juridical. The results show that the procedure and capital market dispute resolution process can be carried out either litigation or non-litigation, but the joint parties usually choose a non-litigation path in the procedure, if through non-litigation the parties must go through internal mediation first if the internal mediation fails involving the Financial Services Authority (OJK) as a facilitator in the process of resolving the problems after the process at the financial services authority did not get an agreement, the settlement could be continued through the Sengekta Alternative Settlement Agency (LAPS) and the Capital Market Arbitration Agency (BAPMI).

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Modal Ventura Dengan Perusahan Pasangan Usaha (PPU)

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 311
Author(s):  
Indrajaya Indrajaya
Keyword(s):  
Venture Capital ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Business Partner ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
The Government ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes

In running their business, what is often the main obstacle for business actors in developing their business is usually related to the provision of capital. In order to overcome this, the Government issued policies in the economic sector, one of which was the issuance of policies regarding Financing Institutions as regulated in Presidential Regulation Number 9 of 2009. Followed up by the Regulation of the Minister of Finance on Venture Capital Companies No. 18 of 2012. As one of the businesses in the financial services sector, its approach is not only in business but also needs to be accompanied by a legal approach (legal approch) so that its existence can be recognized in business traffic. Even though the agreement has been bound in a contract, it is still common for business partner companies to default, and even lead to disputes in court. The purpose of this study is to analyze the settlement of disputes due to default by PPU on the contents of the financing contract between the Venture Capital Company and the PPU. The research method is normative legal research, using primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The approach is carried out with a statutory approach (statute approach) and a conceptual approach (conceptual approach). From the results of the research it is known that the settlement of disputes due to default by PPU on the contents of the financing contract between the Venture Capital Company and PPU, the settlement of the dispute is carried out by prioritizing non-litigation mechanisms, but if no agreement is reached, the Litigation channel is used.

Liberalisation and Consolidation: The Single European Market and the Remaking of European Financial Capital

1992 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Leyshon ◽  
N J Thrift
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
European Market ◽  
Financial Capital ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Single European Market

The European Community's attempts to restructure the European financial services sector, as part of the Single European Market programme, are examined. These attempts are seen to embody impulses towards the liberalisation and consolidation of the sector which are often at odds. The authors examine the state regulation of money and financial institutions, consider the chief tendencies towards liberalisation and the opposing tendencies towards consolidation, and speculate on the outcome of the programme, especially on the struggle between finance and financial capital models of state regulation of money and finance.

scholarly journals Potential Legal Conflict For The Implementation Of Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 /POJK.04/2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Theresia Anita Christiani
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Potential Conflict ◽  
Market Sector ◽  
Loss Compensation ◽  
The Capital Market

Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 / POJK .04 / 2020 was promulgated to increase effectiveness and justice in law enforcement in the capital market sector. The form of legal protection regulated is the Return of Unauthorized Profits and the Investor Loss Compensation Fund (Disgorgement Fund). The research objective in this paper is to find potential legal conflicts that arise in the implementation of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 / POJK .04 / 2020. The research method, this type of research is normative juridical research, which uses secondary data. The findings obtained are that there are two potential legal conflicts. First, there is a potential conflict between the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 / POJK .04 / 2020 and Law Number 37 of 2004. Second, the Potential Conflict between the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 / POJK. 04/2020 with Law Number 37 the Year 2004 and Law Number 40 the Year 2007, which will obstruct legal objectives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document