scholarly journals Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Modal Ventura Dengan Perusahan Pasangan Usaha (PPU)

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 311
Author(s):  
Indrajaya Indrajaya

In running their business, what is often the main obstacle for business actors in developing their business is usually related to the provision of capital. In order to overcome this, the Government issued policies in the economic sector, one of which was the issuance of policies regarding Financing Institutions as regulated in Presidential Regulation Number 9 of 2009. Followed up by the Regulation of the Minister of Finance on Venture Capital Companies No. 18 of 2012. As one of the businesses in the financial services sector, its approach is not only in business but also needs to be accompanied by a legal approach (legal approch) so that its existence can be recognized in business traffic. Even though the agreement has been bound in a contract, it is still common for business partner companies to default, and even lead to disputes in court. The purpose of this study is to analyze the settlement of disputes due to default by PPU on the contents of the financing contract between the Venture Capital Company and the PPU. The research method is normative legal research, using primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The approach is carried out with a statutory approach (statute approach) and a conceptual approach (conceptual approach). From the results of the research it is known that the settlement of disputes due to default by PPU on the contents of the financing contract between the Venture Capital Company and PPU, the settlement of the dispute is carried out by prioritizing non-litigation mechanisms, but if no agreement is reached, the Litigation channel is used.

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. 177-188
Author(s):  
Annisa Arifka Sari

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan sebagai lembaga independen dalam melakukan pengawasan terhadap lembaga jasa keuangan di Indonesia serta kewenangan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Dari hasil penelitian dijelaskan bahwa Otoritas Jasa Keuangan adalah lembaga yang independen dan bebas dari campur tangan pihak lain, yang mempunyai fungsi, tugas, dan wewenang pengaturan, pengawasan, pemeriksaan, dan penyidikan terhadap lembaga jasa keuangan seperti perbankan. Dasar hukum dibentuknya Otoritas Jasa Keuangan adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011. Secara kelembagaan, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan berada di luar pemerintah, yang dimaknai bahwa Otoritas Jasa Keuangan tidak menjadi bagian dari kekuasaan pemerintah. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dibentuk dengan tujuan agar keseluruhan kegiatan di dalam sektor jasa keuangan terselenggara secara teratur, adil, transparan, dan akuntabel; mampu mewujudkan sistem keuangan yang tumbuh secara berkelanjutan dan stabil; serta mampu melindungi kepentingan konsumen dan masyarakat. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan bertugas tidak hanya mengatur dan mengawasi perbankan saja, tetapi juga mencakup pasar modal, perasuransian, dana pensiun, lembaga pembiayaan, serta lembaga jasa keuangan lainnya.    THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY ON SUPERVISION OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN INDONESIA This research aims to explain the role of the Financial Services Authority as an independent institution in supervising financial service institutions in Indonesia as well as the authority of the Financial Services Authority as regulated in Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority. The method used in this research is normative legal research. From the research results, it is explained that the Financial Services Authority is an independent institution and free from interference from other parties, which has the function, task and authority to regulate, supervise, examine and investigate financial service institutions such as banks. The legal basis for the establishment of the Financial Services Authority is Law Number 21 of 2011. Institutionally, the Financial Services Authority is outside the government, which means that the Financial Services Authority is not part of the government's power. The Financial Services Authority was formed with the aim that all activities in the financial services sector are carried out in an orderly, fair, transparent and accountable manner; able to realize a financial system that grows in a sustainable and stable manner; and able to protect the interests of consumers and society. The Financial Services Authority is tasked with not only regulating and supervising banking, but also covering the capital market, insurance, pension funds, financing institutions, and other financial service institutions.    


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 550
Author(s):  
Serlika Aprita

In Law No. 21 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority authorizes the OJK to carry out investigations. Investigation is one of OJK's supervisory duties as referred to in Article 9 letter c of the OJK Law which reads: "To carry out the supervisory duties as referred to in Article 6, OJK has the authority to carry out supervision, examination, investigation, consumer protection, and other actions against Service Institutions. Finance, actors and / or supporting financial services activities as referred to in the laws and regulations in the financial services sector. " According to Article 49 paragraph (1) of Law No. 21 of 2011 concerning Financial Services Authority (OJK), OJK Investigators are: 1. Apart from Investigating Officers of the State Police of the Republic of Indonesia, certain Civil Servants whose scope of duties and responsibilities includes supervision financial services sector within the OJK, given special authority as investigators as referred to in the Criminal Procedure Code. The research method in this paper is to use normative legal research. The regulation regarding the role of the OJK as an investigator is regulated in article 9 letter (c) of Law No. 20 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority which becomes the basis for OJK in conducting investigations of banking crimes, so that the OJK carries out the function of implementing an integrated regulatory and supervisory system of all activities in the financial services sector.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 170
Author(s):  
Herdian Ayu Andreana Beru Tarigan ◽  
Darminto Hartono Paulus

<p>Increasing competition in the Indonesian banking industry has encouraged many banks to improve the quality of services to customers by utilizing information technology developments. Service innovation in the use of information technology encourages banks to enter the era of digital banking services. However, the development of digital banking services also increases the risks faced by banks. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the implementation of digital banking services and customer protection for risks from digital banking services. The method used in this study is an empirical legal research method. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of digital banking services is regulated by OJK Regulation No.12/POJK.03/2018. The existence of this OJK Regulation is expected by banks as providers of digital banking services to always prioritize risk management in the use of information technology. In addition, this study also shows the existence of 2 types of customer protection for the use of digital banking services, namely preventive protection in the form of legislation related to customer protection in the financial services sector and repressive protection in the form of bank accountability for complaints from customers using digital banking services.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-222
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Bagus Sempidi Junior ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Desak Gde Dwi Arini

Development of information technology through legal infrastructure and its regulation so that the use of Information Technology is carried out safely to prevent its misuse by taking into account the religious and socio-cultural values of the Indonesian people. . The research method uses normative legal research and problem approaches using statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study show that consumer legal protection in online Electronic Commerce business transactions is regulated through online sale and purchase agreements based on conventional formal and material terms accompanied by buying and selling transactions carried out electronically through computer media. Settlement of disputes in e-commerce business transactions via online, is carried out both non-litigation and litigation. The suggestion is to the Government, it is hoped that participation in solving problems is very important, if a case like this occurs between different countries, then the settlement of this problem must be determined which legal rules will be used to solve it. The purpose of this study is to determine legal protection for consumers in electronic commerce business transactions through online, and how to resolve disputes that occur in electronic commerce business transaction agreements through online


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-58
Author(s):  
Anwar Hidayat ◽  
Budiman

Perkembangan pandemi Covid-19 saat ini sangat mengkhawatirkan dimana terjadinya suatupeningkatan kasus corona khusus di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahuidan menganalisis kebijakan yang diambil pemerintah dalam penanganan pandemi Covid-19serta langkah-langkah yang diambil pemerintah untuk menganggulangi dampak-dampak, terutama dampak dari segi ekonomi dan sosial akibat pandemi Covid-19. Metode penelitianhukum yang digunakan yakni metode penelitian hukum normatif. Adapun pendekatan yangdigunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatankonseptual. Penelitian ini berlandaskan pengaturan perundang-undangan yang mengaturmengenai penanganan dan penganggulangan pandemi Covid-19 serta analisis atas konseppenetapan peraturan perundang-undangan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dalamrangka penanganan Covid-19, berawal dari pemerintah tmengeluarkan kebijakan tentangPembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar yang merujuk pada Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun2018 tentang Kekarantinaan Kesehatan. Peraturan pelaksanaannya yaitu PeraturanPemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 tentang Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar, sertaKeputusan Presiden tentang Kedaruratan Kesehatan sampai dengan saat ini pemerintah telahmengeluarkan kebijakan PPKM yang dimana dilakukan secara berkala. Untukmenganggulangi dampak Covid-19 dari segi ekonomi dan sosial pemerintah mengambilbeberapa kebijakan-kebijakan, yang diantaranya adalah: Peraturan Menteri KeuanganRepublik Indonesia Nomor 23/Pmk.03/2020 tentang Insentif Pajak Untuk WajibPajakTerdampak Wabah Virus Corona; Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Kata Kunci : Kebijakan, Penanganan, Covid-19 The current development of the Covid-19 pandemic is very worrying where there is anincrease in special corona cases in Indonesia. This study aims to identify and analyze thepolicies taken by the government in handling the Covid-19 pandemic and the steps taken bythe government to mitigate the impacts, especially the economic and social impacts of theCovid-19 pandemic. The legal research method used is the normative legal research method. The approach used in this research is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Thisresearch is based on the legislation governing the handling and handling of the Covid-19pandemic as well as an analysis of the concept of establishing these laws and regulations. The results of this study are in the context of handling Covid-19, starting with thegovernment issuing a policy on Large-Scale Social Restrictions which refers to Law Number6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine. The implementing regulations are GovernmentRegulation Number 21 of 2020 concerning Large-Scale Social Restrictions, as well as thePresidential Decree on Health Emergencies. Until now, the government has issued a PPKMpolicy which is carried out regularly. To address the economic and social impact of Covid- 19, the government has taken several policies, including: Regulation of the Minister ofFinance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23/Pmk.03/2020 concerning Tax Incentives forTaxpayers Af ected by the Corona Virus Outbreak; Regulation of the Financial ServicesAuthority of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 /Pojk.03/2020 concerning NationalEconomic Stimulus as a Countercyclical Policy for the Impact of the Spread of Corona VirusDisease2019; and Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of2020 concerning Refocussing of Activities, Reallocation of Budgets, and Procurement ofGoods and Services in the Context of Accelerating Handling of Corona Virus Disease 2019(Covid-19). Keyword : Policy, Handling, Covid-19


Author(s):  
Muhammad Yusrizal Adi Syaputra

The political party's position as a determinant of government head nomination in Indonesia made the political party a central and strong role in the determination of the Cabinet in the presidential government of Indonesia and allowed the political party to determine the Cabinet domination established by the President elected. This research aims to determine the model of the presidential institution strengthening in the multi-party era in Indonesia and to know the political and juridical construction of the presidential institution in determining the cabinet in Indonesia. The method used is a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach. The results of this research are, firstly that the strengthening of the presidential institution in the multi-party era can occur when done with the restriction of political parties through the mechanism of the parliamentary threshold. Secondly, that the political construction of the cabinet determination by the President is based on the coalition of political party supporters of the government, and the juridical construction of the President may elect the Minister of the party proposal because it is based on article 6A paragraph (2) The Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945. Kedudukan partai politik sebagai penentu pencalonan kepala pemerintahan di Indonesia menjadikan Partai Politik memiliki peran sentral dan kuat dalam penentuan kabinet di Pemerintahan Presidentiil Indonesia dan memungkinkan partai politik untuk menentukan dominasi kabinet yang dibentuk oleh Presiden terpilih. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui model penguatan lembaga kepresidenan pada era multi partai di Indonesia, dan untuk mengetahui konstruksi politis dan yuridis lembaga kepresidenan dalam menentukan kabinet di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa pertama, penguatan lembaga kepresidenan di era multi partai dapat terjadi apabila dilakukan dengan pembatasan partai politik melalui mekanisme parlementary threshold. Kedua, bahwa konstruksi politis penentuan kabinet oleh presiden didasarkan atas koalisi partai politik pendukung pemerintahan, dan konstruksi yuridis presiden dapat memilih menteri dari usulan partai karena didasarkan pada Pasal 6A ayat (2) UUD 1945.


2002 ◽  
Vol 41 (4II) ◽  
pp. 567-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hanif Akhtar

The emergence of a fast-paced dynamic environment in the business world in general, and in the financial services sector in particular, has highlighted the significance of competition and efficiency. The need for deregulation has become a touchstone of success in fostering both competition and efficiency especially in the economies, which are exposed to structural reforms. In addition to that, intense competition both among domestic and foreign banks, rapid speed of innovations and introduction of new financial instruments, changing consumer’s demands and desire for product augmentation have changed the way a bank conducts business and services its customers. Larger the degree of competition, it is perceived that the firms would become more efficient. However, when the structure of an industry is product of the government regulations, the degree of competition is impaired markedly implying that the efficiency suffers negatively.


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 281
Author(s):  
Bismar Nasution

A non-independent regulatory structure in the financial services sector had already conduced poor economic condition for some countries in the 1990s. Learned from that experience, the existence of OJK in Indonesia must be supported by the existence of an independent regulatory structure so that the purpose of OJK being formed in the first place can be materialized. The existence of the independent regulatory structure, can be measured by OJK’s independence in terms of regulation, supervision, institutional, and independence in terms of financing. In the context of OJK in Indonesia, the independent regulatory structure, is not intended to make OJK as a catalyst for economic development or a referee for a fair play. OJK’s independence must be played to balance the interests of the government, consumer, and financial services industry so that the direction of economic policy can go hand in hand. Though not in the perfect shape yet, the regulation of OJK has already adopted all aspects from that independent regulatory structure. It was said not in the perfect shape yet, because a harmonization is still needed on a number of laws and regulations relating, and establishment of implementing regulations at the technical level of operational. With these, OJK is expected to be more objective and also can run its authority adequately, transparently, and accountably. Furthermore, OJK is expected to have a sufficient legal authority to conduct an investigation into the financial services issues. Keywords: Regulatory structure, independence, OJK


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Ratna Ayu Puspitasari ◽  
Imam Koeswahyono ◽  
Titik Soeryati Soekesi

This paper aims to describe the authority of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in conducting supervision and regulation of the financial services sector, and the juridical implications of Government Regulation Number 11 of 2014 concerning OJK Levy for capital market notaries registered with Registered Letters (STTD) who are not active in the capital market. The research method used in this paper is a normative juridical. The results of the study indicate that the OJK has the authority to levy notaries. Legal implications arising from Government Regulation Number 11 of 2014 concerning Financial Services Authority Levies for notaries who have STTD but do not engage in capital market activities becomes the state’s receivables. Payments will be made by the state receivable committee, with a forced letter that has the same legal force as the Grosse deed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 210
Author(s):  
B. Rini Heryanti ◽  
Dewi Tuti Muryati ◽  
Efi Yulistyowati

<p>Perkembangan penyelesaian sengketa asuransi melalui ADR, banyak diminati oleh para pihak yang bersengketa.karena dirasa lebih realistis, mudah, murah, dan cepat tanpa harus mengorbankan faktor kepastian. Penyelesaian sengketa kontrak asuransi melalui jalur non litigasi/ADR dapat diselesaikan melalui BMAI yang telah didirikan pada tahun 2006, di tahun 2011 pemerintah juga telah mendirikan OJK yang mempunyai tugas untuk melakukan pengawasan disektor jasa keuangan bank dan non bank, yang didalamnya salah satu tugasnya adalah melakukan penyelesaian sengketa asuransi. Perumusan masalah yang diteliti adalah, bagaimanakah kewenangan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dalam penyelesaian sengketa hukum kontrak asuransi?, bagaimanakah kedudukan BMAI kedepanya, setelah didirikannya OJK ? Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini, metode pendekatan yuridis normatif, dengan spesifikasi deskriptif analitis, sedangkan teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan data primer dan data sekunder. Hasil penelitian pengaduan dan penyelesaian sengketa asuransi oleh OJK secara umum diatur dalam Pasal 29 Undang-Undang No.21 tahun 2011.Memperhatikan Pasal 29 tersebut mengamanatkan OJK untuk menyiapkan perangkat, menyusun mekanisme, dan memfasilitasi penyelesaian pengaduan konsumen yang dirugikan oleh pelaku di lembaga jasa keuangan, maka OJK mengeluarkan Peraturan OJK No.1/POJK. 07/2013 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan dan Surat Edaran OJK No.2/SEOJK. 07/2014 tentang Pelayanan dan Penyelesaian Pengaduan Konsumen Pada Pelaku Usaha Jasa Keuangan, sedangkan kedudukan BMAI setelah adanya OJK berada dibawah OJK.</p><p>The development of the insurance dispute resolution through ADR, much in demand by the parties to bersengketa.felt to be more realistic, easier, cheaper, and faster without sacrificing the certainty factor. Dispute settlement insurance contract through the non litigation / ADR can be resolved through BMAI which had been established in 2006, in 2011 the government has also set up the FSA, which has the task to pass surveillance sector financial services of banks and non-banks, which includes one of his tasks is to insurance dispute resolution. The formulation of the problem under study is, how does the authority of the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in insurance contract law dispute resolution?, How BMAI position, after the establishment of the FSA ? The method used in this research, normative juridical approach, the analytical descriptive specification, while the data collection techniques using primary data and secondary. The research result of complaints and the settlement of disputes by the FSA insurance is generally provided for in article 29 of Law 21 years 2011. Article 29 mandates the FSA to set up the equipment, develop mechanisms and facilitate the resolution of consumer complaints were harmed by the offender in the financial services institution , the FSA issued a FSA Regulation 1 / POJK.07 / 2013 on Consumer Protection and Financial Services Sector FSA Circular No.2 / SEOJK.07 / 2014 on the Ministry and the Consumer Complaint Settlement In Financial Services business communities, while the position of BMAI, the FSA under the FSA.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document