scholarly journals Potential Legal Conflict For The Implementation Of Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 /POJK.04/2020

Author(s):  
Theresia Anita Christiani

Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 / POJK .04 / 2020 was promulgated to increase effectiveness and justice in law enforcement in the capital market sector. The form of legal protection regulated is the Return of Unauthorized Profits and the Investor Loss Compensation Fund (Disgorgement Fund). The research objective in this paper is to find potential legal conflicts that arise in the implementation of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 / POJK .04 / 2020. The research method, this type of research is normative juridical research, which uses secondary data. The findings obtained are that there are two potential legal conflicts. First, there is a potential conflict between the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 / POJK .04 / 2020 and Law Number 37 of 2004. Second, the Potential Conflict between the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 / POJK. 04/2020 with Law Number 37 the Year 2004 and Law Number 40 the Year 2007, which will obstruct legal objectives.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasna Kharimah Septiana

This article aims to analyze the legal protection for investors is related to the practice of market manipulation as regulated in Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning the Capital Market and what forms of legal protection are provided by the Financial Services Authority (OJK), Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI), KSEI and KPEI as well as the impact of market manipulation and how the accountability will be imposed on the actors.This article uses a normative juridical legal research method. The normative juridical character is carried out by examining secondary data or by the method of literature study of legal materials which are the reference for research, which is focused on examining the application of rules or norms in positive law. The research was carried out by means of a literature study of the laws and regulations related to market manipulation in the capital market sector.The case study in this research is the alleged case of market manipulation conducted by PT Bliss Property Indonesia Tbk (POSA) which occurred on May 10th, 2019, allegedly taking action to manipulate the market so that there are drastic fluctuations in the movement of stock prices out of the ordinary and without accompanied by clear fundamentals of the company, it is suspected that this trade is not fair so that it harms one of the investors


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Raysa Mayasonda ◽  
Lastuti Abubakar ◽  
Ema Rahmawati

Various kind of capital market violations show the characteristics of capital market violations that the loss is rarely realized by the investor. Currently, the regulation provides a way to resolve investor loss of capital market and the practice of resolving violations of the law in the capital market through the investor protection regulation is sometimes not satisfactory for the harmed investors. As a step to strengthen the law enforcement instruments, the Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan / OJK) issued a Draft Regulation (RPOJK) on OJK regarding Disgorgement and Disgorgement Fund to facilitate investor’s legal protection against losses internally by itself. The purpose is to analyze the disgorgement mechanism regulation plan through the study of RPOJK so that it can be applied as a new settlement in the capital market and suitable with existing ways. The research method uses a normative juridical approach that is through the existing study of the rule of law that apply primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, also from existing electronic literature. Based on the result of the study, it is concluded the plan of the disgorgement mechanism regulation as a form of refund through administrative mechanism is different from civil compensation and it can be applied as one of the investor’s legal protections because the form of the order in disgorgement as a refund is considered effective, proportional and can be preventive.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilda Hilmiah Dimyati

Abstract: Legal Protection for Investors in the Capital Market. Supervision in the financial services industry capital markets experienced a change of control by Bapepam-LK be supervised by the Financial Services Authority. Institutionally, Bapepam-LK is responsible to the Minister of Finance, as Bapepam-LK is under the auspices of the Ministry of Finance, while the Financial Services Authority is responsible to Parliament or the public. Crucial aspect on which the formation of the FSA is not maximum protection of the interests of consumers of financial services. In accordance with the problems that occur as above, the authors feel the need to examine the legal protection in the capital market. This writing will also examine the parties are entitled to legal protection based on Law No. 8 of 1995 and the Capital Market Law No. 21 of 2011 on the Financial Services Authority. Abstrak: Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Investor Dalam Pasar Modal. Pengawasan di bidang industri jasa keuangan pasar modal mengalami perubahan dari pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh Bapepam-LK menjadi diawasi oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Secara kelembagaan, Bapepam-LK bertanggung jawab kepada Menteri Keuangan, karena Bapepam-LK berada di bawah naungan Kementrian Keuangan, sedangkan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan bertanggung jawab kepada Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat atau masyarakat. Aspek krusial yang menjadi dasar pembentukan OJK adalah tidak maksimalnya perlindungan kepentingan konsumen jasa keuangan. Sesuai dengan permasalahan yang terjadi seperti diatas, maka penulis merasa perlu untuk meneliti tentang perlindungan hukum di pasar modal. Penulisan ini juga akan meneliti para pihak yang berhak atas perlindungan hukum berdasarkan pada Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 Tentang Pasar Modal dan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v1i2.1473


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-53
Author(s):  
La Gurusi ◽  
Edy Nurcahyo

The fenomenon of domestic violence, especially against women, becomes a serious social problem. Law enforcement is required in order to eliminate domestic violence. The purpose of this study is to find out how the form of legal protection against women as victims of violence in households and to know what factors affect the occurrence of violence in the household. This research method using normative law research method. The data used is secondary data from the Baubau city resort police in 2017. Data were analysis using qualitative analysis. The results of the study indicate that the form of legal protection against women as victims of violence in households is the protection of preventive and repressive law. In two forms of legal protection, preventive law protection is more dominant than repressive.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vidya Noor Rachmadini

<table width="605" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="406"><p><em>Legal Protection for Investors in the Capital Market. Supervision in the financial services industry capital markets experienced a change of control by Bapepam-LK be supervised by the Financial Services Authority. Institutionally, Bapepam-LK is responsible to the Minister of Finance, as Bapepam-LK is under the auspices of the Ministry of Finance, while the Financial Services Authority is responsible to Parliament or the public. Crucial aspect on which the formation of the FSA is not maximum protection of the interests of consumers of financial services. In accordance with the problems that occur as above, the authors feel the need to examine the legal protection in the capital market. This writing will also examine the parties are entitled to legal protection based on Law No. 8 of 1995 and the Capital Market Law No. 21 of 2011 on the Financial Services Authority.</em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong></p><p><em>Legal Protection, Consumer Interests, The Capital Market</em></p></td></tr></tbody></table>


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-193
Author(s):  
Loviga Ferdinanta Sembiring ◽  
Utary Maharani Barus ◽  
Isnaini Isnaini

The purpose of this study is to find out 1) whether the legal protection carried out by prison officers for prisoners is in accordance with Law Number 12 of 1999 concerning Corrections; 2) how is the security system at Class II B Penitentiary in Lubuk Pakam; and 3) What are the obstacles faced in law enforcement in Class II B Penitentiary, Lubuk Pakam. The research method used in this study is empirical normative juridical supported by secondary data and interviews with informants. The results of the study show that: 1) Correctional Institutions are a place to carry out the formation of prisoners and correctional students. 2) Community service and security and order maintenance in Lapas are not yet optimal, the quality of human security officers is low, and 3) Development officers and administrative officers must always be consolidated through coaching officers with concurrent and special meetings/briefings.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Indah Pramesuri Suralaga ◽  
Revi Wulansari ◽  
Inna Windhatria

Capital Markets can also be interpreted as a professional institution that deals with securities buying and selling transactions, the capital market as a long-term investment tool that is currently becoming a trend in the community. But it cannot be denied that along with the development of the capital market in Indonesia it has caused problems or also disputes in the process of capital market activities in Indonesia. The problem in this research is how do the procedures and dispute resolution processes in business activities in the financial services sector after the procedures and processes in the settlement of Capital Market disputes, we must also know the legal consequences of the disputes in the financial services business of the Capital Market? The research method used a normative and empirical juridical approach, the data used are secondary data and primary data. Studies conducted with literature studies and field studies, data analysis used is qualitative juridical. The results show that the procedure and capital market dispute resolution process can be carried out either litigation or non-litigation, but the joint parties usually choose a non-litigation path in the procedure, if through non-litigation the parties must go through internal mediation first if the internal mediation fails involving the Financial Services Authority (OJK) as a facilitator in the process of resolving the problems after the process at the financial services authority did not get an agreement, the settlement could be continued through the Sengekta Alternative Settlement Agency (LAPS) and the Capital Market Arbitration Agency (BAPMI).


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Ratna Ayu Puspitasari ◽  
Imam Koeswahyono ◽  
Titik Soeryati Soekesi

This paper aims to describe the authority of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in conducting supervision and regulation of the financial services sector, and the juridical implications of Government Regulation Number 11 of 2014 concerning OJK Levy for capital market notaries registered with Registered Letters (STTD) who are not active in the capital market. The research method used in this paper is a normative juridical. The results of the study indicate that the OJK has the authority to levy notaries. Legal implications arising from Government Regulation Number 11 of 2014 concerning Financial Services Authority Levies for notaries who have STTD but do not engage in capital market activities becomes the state’s receivables. Payments will be made by the state receivable committee, with a forced letter that has the same legal force as the Grosse deed.


GANEC SWARA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 798
Author(s):  
I GUSTI AGUNG WISUDAWAN ◽  
BUDI SUTRISNO ◽  
DIMAN ADE MULADA

      The development of the capital market in Indonesia has increased from time to time but this development is not without obstacles. The obstacle that often arises is the occurrence of fraudulent practices in the capital market involving legal subjects in the capital market itself. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize supervision by the OJK in the Capital Market sector to minimize this fraudulent practice. The type of research used in this research is Normative Research with a statutory approach (Statute Approach), Conceptual Approach (Conceptual Approach), Case Approach (Case Approach), and Analysis Approach (Analytical Approach). This study also uses legal materials which consist of primary legal materials, namely legal materials in the form of Law No. 8 of 1995 concerning the Capital Market and OJK laws and regulations, secondary legal materials, namely literature related to the issues raised in this study and materials. Tertiary Law consists of a legal dictionary and encyclopedia. Legal material collection techniques used in this research is a Documentation Study with Legal Material Analysis, namely Qualitative Descriptive Analysis.       The results of this study are Optimization of Supervision by the Financial Services Authority in the Capital Market according to positive law in Indonesia, namely Revising Law No. 8 of 1995 concerning Capital Markets. Revised Law Number 21 the Year 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority. The supervisory mechanism carried out by the OJK is to use a system of supervisory tools and supervisory action covering various checks such as securities transactions, securities agency compliance, investment management compliance, issuer compliance, and professional and supporting institutions compliance


Author(s):  
Bartolomeus Diaz Sianipar

AbstrakSaat ini perkembangan ekonomi berjalan sangat pesat namun, ditengah pesatnya pertumbuhan ekonomi terdapat juga ketidakstabilan ekonomi yang kemudian memberikan peluang kepada pihak-pihak yang berkaitan dengan kegiatan pasar modal untuk melakukan kejahatan pasar modal. Banyaknya kejahatan yang terjadi dalam kegiatan pasar modal sejak tahun 2009 sampai tahun 2017 tentunyamenimbulkan banyak spekulasi tentang wewenang dari badan OJK yang bertanggung jawab dalam pengawasan pasar modalsehingga ini menjadi permasalahan dalam penelitian ini. Permasalahannya adalah bagaimana peran pemerintah dalam mitigasi kejahatan pasar modal Indonesia.Penelitian ini dilakukan terhadap kebijakan dan kinerja Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah yuridis normative. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini library research, dengan sumber bahan hukum sekunder. Sanksi terhadap kejahatan pasar modal tercantum dalam UUPM bahwa kejahatan dalam pasar modal dapat dituntut secara perdata berupa sanksi atas perbuatan melawan hukum, serta dapat juga dituntut secara pidana. Namun oleh lembaga regulator pasar modal, yaitu OJK cenderung ke arah ganti rugi atau denda/sanksi administratif. Dengan maraknya kejadian kejahatan pasar modal, Sangat diharapkan kepada OJK untuk dapat membuat regulator yang mengikuti perkembangan dengan keadaan dan kondisi yang terdapat dalam penegakan hukum pasar modal sehingga, dapat meminimalisir kejahatan dalam pasar modal serta tidak membuat investor baik nasional maupun asing takut untuk turut andil dalam pasar modal di Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Peran Pemerintah, Mitigasi, Kejahatan, Pasar Modal. AbstractAt present the economic development is running very rapidly but, In a middle of the rapid economic growth there is also economic instability which then provides opportunities for parties related to capital market activities to commit capital market crimes. The large number of crimes that have occurred in capital market activities from 2009 to 2017 has caused a lot of speculation about the authority of the OJK agency responsible for modest market supervision so that this becomes a problem in this research. The problem is how the government plays a role in mitigating Indonesia's capital market crime. This study was conducted on the policies and performance of the Financial Services Authority (OJK). The type of research used in this writing is normative juridical. The method of approach used in this study is the research library, with a source of secondary legal material. Sanctions for capital market crimes are stated in the Capital Market Law that crime in the capital market can be prosecuted in the form of sanctions for acts against the law, and can also be prosecuted criminal. However, by the capital market regulator, the OJK tends towards compensation or fines/administrative sanctions.With capital market events, it is desirable for OJK to be able to make regulators that follow developments and conditions needed in capital market law enforcement, can minimize crime in the capital market and It also does not make investors both national and foreign afraid to take part in the capital market in Indonesia.Keywords: Role of Government, Mitigation, Crime, Capital Market.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document