scholarly journals An overview of carbapenem, its resistance and therapeutic options for infections caused by carbapenem resistant bacteria

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1454
Author(s):  
Hari P. Nepal ◽  
Rama Paudel
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Therapeutic Options ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Penicillin Binding Proteins ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
The World

Carbapenems are beta-lactam drugs that have broadest spectrum of activity. They are commonly used as the drugs of last resort to treat complicated bacterial infections. They bind to penicillin binding proteins (PBPs) and inhibit cell wall synthesis in bacteria. Important members that are in clinical use include doripenem, ertapenem, imipenem, and meropenem. Unlike other members, imipenem is hydrolyzed significantly by renal dehydropeptidase; therefore, it is administered together with an inhibitor of renal dehydropeptidase, cilastatin. Carbapenems are usually administered intravenously due to their low oral bioavailability. Most common side effects of these drugs include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, skin rashes, and reactions at the infusion sites. Increasing resistance to these antibiotics is being reported throughout the world and is posing a threat to public health.  Primary mechanisms of carbapenem resistance include expulsion of drug and inactivation of the drug by production of carbapenemases which may not only hydrolyze carbapenem, but also cephalosporin, penicillin, and aztreonam. Resistance especially among Gram negative bacteria is of much concern since there are only limited therapeutic options available for infections caused by carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. Commonly used drugs to treat such infections include polymyxins, fosfomycin and tigecycline.

scholarly journals Infections with Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria are a Serious Problem Among Critically Ill Children: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study

Pathogens ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Aygun ◽  
Fatma Deniz Aygun ◽  
Fatih Varol ◽  
Cansu Durak ◽  
Haluk Çokuğraş ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Culture Positive

Children in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are vulnerable to infections because invasive devices are frequently used during their admission. We aimed to determine the prevalence, associated factors, and prognosis of infections in our PICU. This retrospective study evaluated culture results from 477 paediatric patients who were treated in the PICU between January 2014 and March 2019. Ninety patients (18.9%) had bacterial infections, with gram-negative bacteria being the predominant infectious agents. Culture-positive patients were younger than culture-negative patients, and age was related to mortality and various clinical factors. Culture-positive bacterial infections in the PICU were associated with increased use of invasive mechanical ventilation (odds ratio(OR); 2.254), red blood cell (RBC) transfusions (OR:2.624), and inotropic drugs (OR:2.262). Carbapenem resistance was found in approximately one-third of gram-negative bacteria, and was most common in tracheal aspirate specimens and cases involving Klebsiella spp. Total parenteral nutrition was a significant risk factor (OR:5.870). Positive blood culture results were associated with poorer patient survival than other culture results. These findings indicate that infections, especially those involving carbapenem-resistant bacteria, are an important issue when treating critically ill children.

scholarly journals Identification of blaGIM-1 in Acinetobacter variabilis isolated from the hospital environment in Tamil Nadu, India

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasanth Manohar ◽  
Murugavel Ragavi ◽  
Ashby Augustine ◽  
Hrishikesh MV ◽  
Nachimuthu Ramesh
Keyword(s):  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Hospital Environments ◽  
Surveillance Programs

AbstractBackgroundEmergence of carbapenem resistance mechanisms among Gram-negative bacteria is a worrisome health problem. Here, we focused on to identify the presence of carbapenem-resistant bacteria among the samples collected from hospital environments in Tamil Nadu.MethodsA total of 30 hospital environmental samples were collected between August 2017 and January 2018 from hospitals located in Chennai and Vellore such as lift switches, stair rails, switchboards, nursing desks, used nursing gloves, door handles, wheelchairs, touch screens, chairs and from pillars inside the hospitals.Results and discussionA total of 22 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria were isolated that included Escherichia coli, Klebsiella sp., Enterobacter sp., Salmonella sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter sp. Interestingly, blaGIM-1 was detected in Acinetobacter variabilis strain isolated in samples collected from hospitals. Unlike other studies, the identified GIM-1 was not plasmid encoded, and this is the first report for the presence of GIM-1 (German imipenemase) in India.ConclusionExtensive surveillance programs are necessary to trace the uncontrolled spread of carbapenem-resistance genes in order to reduce the rapid spread of resistance.

scholarly journals Simple, rapid, and cost-effective modified Carba NP test for carbapenemase detection among Gram-negative bacteria

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (04) ◽  
pp. 303-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoorashetty Manohara Rudresh ◽  
Giriyapur Siddappa Ravi ◽  
Lakshminarayanappa Sunitha ◽  
Sadiya Noor Hajira ◽  
Ellappan Kalaiarasan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Confirmatory Test ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Routine Basis ◽  
Phenotypic Tests

Abstract PURPOSE: Detection of carbapenemases among Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is important for both clinicians and infection control practitioners. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommends Carba NP (CNP) as confirmatory test for carbapenemase production. The reagents required for CNP test are costly and hence the test cannot be performed on a routine basis. The present study evaluates modifications of CNP test for rapid detection of carbapenemases among GNB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The GNB were screened for carbapenemase production using CNP, CarbAcineto NP (CANP), and modified CNP (mCNP) test. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on all the carbapenem-resistant bacteria for carbapenemase genes. The results of three phenotypic tests were compared with PCR. RESULTS: A total of 765 gram negative bacteria were screened for carbapenem resistance. Carbapenem resistance was found in 144 GNB. The metallo-β-lactamases were most common carbapenemases followed by OXA-48-like enzymes. The CANP test was most sensitive (80.6%) for carbapenemases detection. The mCNP test was 62.1% sensitive for detection of carbapenemases. The mCNP, CNP, and CANP tests were equally sensitive (95%) for detection of NDM enzymes among Enterobacteriaceae. The mCNP test had poor sensitivity for detection of OXA-48-like enzymes. CONCLUSION: The mCNP test was rapid, cost-effective, and easily adoptable on routine basis. The early detection of carbapenemases using mCNP test will help in preventing the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms in the hospital settings.

scholarly journals Using Molecular Diagnostics to Develop Therapeutic Strategies for Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred C. Tenover
Keyword(s):  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Molecular Tests ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Class B ◽  
Global Threat

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms have become a global threat. Such infections can be very difficult to treat, especially when they are caused by carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO). Since infections caused by CPO tend to have worse outcomes than non-CPO infections, it is important to identify the type of carbapenemase present in the isolate or at least the Ambler Class (i.e., A, B, or D), to optimize therapy. Many of the newer beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations are not active against organisms carrying Class B metallo-enzymes, so differentiating organisms with Class A or D carbapenemases from those with Class B enzymes rapidly is critical. Using molecular tests to detect and differentiate carbapenem-resistance genes (CRG) in bacterial isolates provides fast and actionable results, but utilization of these tests globally appears to be low. Detecting CRG directly in positive blood culture bottles or in syndromic panels coupled with bacterial identification are helpful when results are positive, however, even negative results can provide guidance for anti-infective therapy for key organism-drug combinations when linked to local epidemiology. This perspective will focus on the reluctance of laboratories to use molecular tests as aids to developing therapeutic strategies for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms and how to overcome that reluctance.

Determination of carbapenemase genes in clinical isolates using Cepheid Xpert Carba-R

2021 ◽  
pp. 16-19
Author(s):  
N. I. Gabrielyan ◽  
V. G. Kormilitsyna ◽  
V. K. Zaletaeva ◽  
A. V. Krotevich ◽  
I. A. Miloserdov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Resistance Genes ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Critical Issue ◽  
Sensitivity Study ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant

Detection of carbapenem resistance genes is a critical issue for hospitals due to possible recommendations for infection control and targeted therapy. The Cepheid Xpert instrument, a Carba-R test for the detection and differentiation of five common carbapenemase genes, was tested from September 2020 to February 2021. As part of the approbation, 20 tests were provided. This review presents the results of the approbation of a relatively regular sensitivity study on Siemens WalkAway‑96 plus. Cepheid Xpert Carba-R analysis has been shown to be an accurate and fast tool for detecting colonization by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria, which can help limit the spread of these organisms in hospitals.

scholarly journals Treatment Options for Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacterial Infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement_7) ◽  
pp. S565-S575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohei Doi
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Clinical Development ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
First Line ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
New Agents ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant

AbstractAntimicrobial resistance has become one of the greatest threats to public health, with rising resistance to carbapenems being a particular concern due to the lack of effective and safe alternative treatment options. Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria of clinical relevance include the Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and more recently, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Colistin and tigecycline have been used as first-line agents for the treatment of infections caused by these pathogens; however, there are uncertainties regarding their efficacy even when used in combination with other agents. More recently, several new agents with activity against certain carbapenem-resistant pathogens have been approved for clinical use or are reaching late-stage clinical development. They include ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, plazomicin, eravacycline, and cefiderocol. In addition, fosfomycin has been redeveloped in a new intravenous formulation. Data regarding the clinical efficacy of these new agents specific to infections caused by carbapenem-resistant pathogens are slowly emerging and appear to generally favor newer agents over previous best available therapy. As more treatment options become widely available for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infections, the role of antimicrobial stewardship will become crucial in ensuring appropriate and rationale use of these new agents.

scholarly journals In vivo studies on antibiotic combination for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e100055
Author(s):  
Elda Righi ◽  
Luigia Scudeller ◽  
Margherita Chiamenti ◽  
Kamilia Abdelraouf ◽  
Thomas Lodise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
In Vivo Models ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Antibiotic Combination

ObjectiveThere is poor evidence to determine the superiority of combination regimens versus monotherapy against infections due to carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria. In vivo models can simulate the pathophysiology of infections in humans and assess antibiotic efficacy. We aim to investigate in vivo effects of antibiotic combination on mortality and disease burden for infections due to CR Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae and provide an unbiased overview of existing knowledge. The results of the study can help prioritising future research on the most promising therapies against CR bacteria.Methods and analysisThis protocol was formulated using the Systematic Review Protocol for Animal Intervention Studies (SYRCLE) Checklist. Publications will be collected from PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science. Quality checklists adapted by Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies and SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool will be used. If the meta-analysis seems feasible, the ES and the 95% CI will be analysed. The heterogeneity between studies will be assessed by I2 test. Subgroup meta-analysis will be performed when possible to assess the impact of the studies on efficacy of the treatments. Funnel plotting will be used to evaluate the risk of publication bias.DisseminationThis systematic review and meta-analysis is part of a wider research collaboration project, the COmbination tHErapy to treat sepsis due to carbapenem-Resistant bacteria in adult and paediatric population: EvideNCE and common practice (COHERENCE) study that includes also the analyses of in vitro and human studies. Data will be presented at international conferences and the results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019128104(available at: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019128104).

Successful Treatment of a Case of Intracranial Infection Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumonia After Craniocerebral Operation in Patient with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-450
Author(s):  
Xianchun Zhu ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Youmei Huang ◽  
Huaping Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Present Report ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumonia ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Intracranial Infection ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant

Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) is one of the most common clinical drug-resistant bacteria, which is mainly related to the production of broad-spectrum beta lactamase and cephalosporin hydrolase. Carbapenems, an atypical beta lactam antibiotic, has been the most effective antibiotic for the treatment of bacterial infections caused by KP in hospital. However, with the extensive application of carbapenem antibiotics in clinic, many reports on carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella Pneumonia (CRKP) have appeared in many parts of the world. The CRKP could cause a higher mortality and morbidity. Here, we report a 26-year-old male patient with severe traumatic brain injury who underwent intracranial infection caused by CRKP after craniocerebral operation. He was successfully cured with a combination of emergency craniotomy, multidisciplinary consultation, effective nursing and strict quarantine measures. In the present report, we emphasize the effective nursing and strict quarantine measures, which contribute to the treatment of bacterial infections caused by KP.

scholarly journals Trends of Bloodstream Infections in a University Greek Hospital during a Three-Year Period: Incidence of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Seasonality in Gram-negative Predominance

2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fevronia Kolonitsiou ◽  
Matthaios Papadimitriou-Olivgeris ◽  
Anastasia Spiliopoulou ◽  
Vasiliki Stamouli ◽  
Vasileios Papakostas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant

The aim of the study was to assess the epidemiology, the incidence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and bloodstream infections’ (BSIs) seasonality in a university hospital. This retrospective study was carried out in the University General Hospital of Patras, Greece, during 2011–13 y. Blood cultures from patients with clinical presentation suggestive of bloodstream infection were performed by the BacT/ALERT System. Isolates were identified by Vitek 2 Advanced Expert System. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by the disk diffusion method and E-test. Resistance genes (mecA in staphylococci; vanA/vanB/vanC in enterococci; blaKPC/blaVIM/blaNDM in Klebsiella spp.) were detected by PCR. In total, 4607 (9.7%) blood cultures were positive from 47451 sets sent to Department of Microbiology, representing 1732 BSIs. Gram-negative bacteria (52.3%) were the most commonly isolated, followed by Gram-positive (39.5%), fungi (6.6%) and anaerobes bacteria (1.8%). The highest contamination rate was observed among Gram-positive bacteria (42.3%). Among 330 CNS and 150 Staphylococcus aureus, 281 (85.2%) and 60 (40.0%) were mecA-positive, respectively. From 113 enterococci, eight were vanA, two vanB and two vanC-positives. Of the total 207 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (73.4%), 202 carried blaKPC, four blaKPC and blaVIM and one blaVIM. A significant increase in monthly BSIs’ incidence was shown (R2: 0.449), which may be attributed to a rise of Gram-positive BSIs (R2: 0.337). Gram-positive BSIs were less frequent in spring (P < 0.001), summer (P < 0.001), and autumn (P < 0.001), as compared to winter months, while Gram-negative bacteria (P < 0.001) and fungi (P < 0.001) were more frequent in summer months. BSIs due to methicillin resistant S. aureus and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria increased during the study period. The increasing incidence of BSIs can be attributed to an increase of Gram-positive BSI incidence, even though Gram-negative bacteria remained the predominant ones. Seasonality may play a role in the predominance of Gram-negative’s BSI.

scholarly journals Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Treating Bacterial Infections: One More Mechanism of Action

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teiji Sawa ◽  
Mao Kinoshita ◽  
Keita Inoue ◽  
Junya Ohara ◽  
Kiyoshi Moriyama
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Bacterial Toxin ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Secretion Systems ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Drug Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Toxin Secretion ◽  
Dependent Cell ◽  
V Antigen

The mechanisms underlying the effects of γ-globulin therapy for bacterial infections are thought to involve bacterial cell lysis via complement activation, phagocytosis via bacterial opsonization, toxin neutralization, and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Nevertheless, recent advances in the study of pathogenicity in gram-negative bacteria have raised the possibility of an association between γ-globulin and bacterial toxin secretion. Over time, new toxin secretion systems like the type III secretion system have been discovered in many pathogenic gram-negative bacteria. With this system, the bacterial toxins are directly injected into the cytoplasm of the target cell through a special secretory apparatus without any exposure to the extracellular environment and, therefore, with no opportunity for antibodies to neutralize the toxin. However, because antibodies against the V-antigen, which is located on the needle-shaped tip of the bacterial secretion apparatus, can inhibit toxin translocation, this raises the hope that the toxin might be susceptible to antibody targeting. Because multi-drug resistant bacteria are now prevalent, inhibiting this secretion mechanism is attractive as an alternative or adjunctive therapy against lethal bacterial infections. Thus, it would not be unreasonable to define the blocking effect of anti-V-antigen antibodies as the fifth mechanism for immunoglobulin action against bacterial infections.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document