scholarly journals Infections with Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria are a Serious Problem Among Critically Ill Children: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study

Pathogens ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Aygun ◽  
Fatma Deniz Aygun ◽  
Fatih Varol ◽  
Cansu Durak ◽  
Haluk Çokuğraş ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Culture Positive

Children in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are vulnerable to infections because invasive devices are frequently used during their admission. We aimed to determine the prevalence, associated factors, and prognosis of infections in our PICU. This retrospective study evaluated culture results from 477 paediatric patients who were treated in the PICU between January 2014 and March 2019. Ninety patients (18.9%) had bacterial infections, with gram-negative bacteria being the predominant infectious agents. Culture-positive patients were younger than culture-negative patients, and age was related to mortality and various clinical factors. Culture-positive bacterial infections in the PICU were associated with increased use of invasive mechanical ventilation (odds ratio(OR); 2.254), red blood cell (RBC) transfusions (OR:2.624), and inotropic drugs (OR:2.262). Carbapenem resistance was found in approximately one-third of gram-negative bacteria, and was most common in tracheal aspirate specimens and cases involving Klebsiella spp. Total parenteral nutrition was a significant risk factor (OR:5.870). Positive blood culture results were associated with poorer patient survival than other culture results. These findings indicate that infections, especially those involving carbapenem-resistant bacteria, are an important issue when treating critically ill children.

scholarly journals An overview of carbapenem, its resistance and therapeutic options for infections caused by carbapenem resistant bacteria

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1454
Author(s):  
Hari P. Nepal ◽  
Rama Paudel
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Therapeutic Options ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Penicillin Binding Proteins ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
The World

Carbapenems are beta-lactam drugs that have broadest spectrum of activity. They are commonly used as the drugs of last resort to treat complicated bacterial infections. They bind to penicillin binding proteins (PBPs) and inhibit cell wall synthesis in bacteria. Important members that are in clinical use include doripenem, ertapenem, imipenem, and meropenem. Unlike other members, imipenem is hydrolyzed significantly by renal dehydropeptidase; therefore, it is administered together with an inhibitor of renal dehydropeptidase, cilastatin. Carbapenems are usually administered intravenously due to their low oral bioavailability. Most common side effects of these drugs include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, skin rashes, and reactions at the infusion sites. Increasing resistance to these antibiotics is being reported throughout the world and is posing a threat to public health.  Primary mechanisms of carbapenem resistance include expulsion of drug and inactivation of the drug by production of carbapenemases which may not only hydrolyze carbapenem, but also cephalosporin, penicillin, and aztreonam. Resistance especially among Gram negative bacteria is of much concern since there are only limited therapeutic options available for infections caused by carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. Commonly used drugs to treat such infections include polymyxins, fosfomycin and tigecycline.

scholarly journals Can Nebulised Colistin Therapy Improve Outcomes in Critically Ill Children with Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Pneumonia?

Antibiotics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aygun ◽  
Aygun ◽  
Varol ◽  
Durak ◽  
Cokugraş ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Tracheal Aspirate ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
History Of

In the past decade, multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria have become a major problem, especially for patients in intensive care units. Recently, colistin became the last resort therapy for MDR gram-negative bacteria infections. However, nebulised colistin use was limited to adult patients. Thus, we investigated the efficacy and safety of nebulised colistin treatment against MDR microorganisms in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Data of all patients admitted for various critical illnesses (January 2016 to January 2019) were reviewed. Differences between groups (with and without a history of nebulised colistin) were compared. Of 330 patients, 23 (6.97%) used nebulised colistin. Significant relationships were found between nebulised colistin usage and several prognostic factors (inotropic drug use (p = 0.009), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (p ≤ 0.001), duration in PICU (p ≤ 0.001), and C-reactive protein level (p = 0.003)). The most common microorganism in tracheal aspirate and sputum cultures was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13 patients). The most common underlying diagnosis was cystic fibrosis, noted in 6 patients. No serious nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity occurred. This study showed that colistin can be safely used directly in the airway of critically ill children. However, nebulised colistin use did not have a positive effect on mortality and prognosis.

scholarly journals Treatment Options for Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacterial Infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement_7) ◽  
pp. S565-S575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohei Doi
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Clinical Development ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
First Line ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
New Agents ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant

AbstractAntimicrobial resistance has become one of the greatest threats to public health, with rising resistance to carbapenems being a particular concern due to the lack of effective and safe alternative treatment options. Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria of clinical relevance include the Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and more recently, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Colistin and tigecycline have been used as first-line agents for the treatment of infections caused by these pathogens; however, there are uncertainties regarding their efficacy even when used in combination with other agents. More recently, several new agents with activity against certain carbapenem-resistant pathogens have been approved for clinical use or are reaching late-stage clinical development. They include ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, plazomicin, eravacycline, and cefiderocol. In addition, fosfomycin has been redeveloped in a new intravenous formulation. Data regarding the clinical efficacy of these new agents specific to infections caused by carbapenem-resistant pathogens are slowly emerging and appear to generally favor newer agents over previous best available therapy. As more treatment options become widely available for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infections, the role of antimicrobial stewardship will become crucial in ensuring appropriate and rationale use of these new agents.

scholarly journals In vivo studies on antibiotic combination for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e100055
Author(s):  
Elda Righi ◽  
Luigia Scudeller ◽  
Margherita Chiamenti ◽  
Kamilia Abdelraouf ◽  
Thomas Lodise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
In Vivo Models ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Antibiotic Combination

ObjectiveThere is poor evidence to determine the superiority of combination regimens versus monotherapy against infections due to carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria. In vivo models can simulate the pathophysiology of infections in humans and assess antibiotic efficacy. We aim to investigate in vivo effects of antibiotic combination on mortality and disease burden for infections due to CR Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae and provide an unbiased overview of existing knowledge. The results of the study can help prioritising future research on the most promising therapies against CR bacteria.Methods and analysisThis protocol was formulated using the Systematic Review Protocol for Animal Intervention Studies (SYRCLE) Checklist. Publications will be collected from PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science. Quality checklists adapted by Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies and SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool will be used. If the meta-analysis seems feasible, the ES and the 95% CI will be analysed. The heterogeneity between studies will be assessed by I2 test. Subgroup meta-analysis will be performed when possible to assess the impact of the studies on efficacy of the treatments. Funnel plotting will be used to evaluate the risk of publication bias.DisseminationThis systematic review and meta-analysis is part of a wider research collaboration project, the COmbination tHErapy to treat sepsis due to carbapenem-Resistant bacteria in adult and paediatric population: EvideNCE and common practice (COHERENCE) study that includes also the analyses of in vitro and human studies. Data will be presented at international conferences and the results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019128104(available at: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019128104).

scholarly journals Trends of Bloodstream Infections in a University Greek Hospital during a Three-Year Period: Incidence of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Seasonality in Gram-negative Predominance

2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fevronia Kolonitsiou ◽  
Matthaios Papadimitriou-Olivgeris ◽  
Anastasia Spiliopoulou ◽  
Vasiliki Stamouli ◽  
Vasileios Papakostas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant

The aim of the study was to assess the epidemiology, the incidence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and bloodstream infections’ (BSIs) seasonality in a university hospital. This retrospective study was carried out in the University General Hospital of Patras, Greece, during 2011–13 y. Blood cultures from patients with clinical presentation suggestive of bloodstream infection were performed by the BacT/ALERT System. Isolates were identified by Vitek 2 Advanced Expert System. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by the disk diffusion method and E-test. Resistance genes (mecA in staphylococci; vanA/vanB/vanC in enterococci; blaKPC/blaVIM/blaNDM in Klebsiella spp.) were detected by PCR. In total, 4607 (9.7%) blood cultures were positive from 47451 sets sent to Department of Microbiology, representing 1732 BSIs. Gram-negative bacteria (52.3%) were the most commonly isolated, followed by Gram-positive (39.5%), fungi (6.6%) and anaerobes bacteria (1.8%). The highest contamination rate was observed among Gram-positive bacteria (42.3%). Among 330 CNS and 150 Staphylococcus aureus, 281 (85.2%) and 60 (40.0%) were mecA-positive, respectively. From 113 enterococci, eight were vanA, two vanB and two vanC-positives. Of the total 207 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (73.4%), 202 carried blaKPC, four blaKPC and blaVIM and one blaVIM. A significant increase in monthly BSIs’ incidence was shown (R2: 0.449), which may be attributed to a rise of Gram-positive BSIs (R2: 0.337). Gram-positive BSIs were less frequent in spring (P < 0.001), summer (P < 0.001), and autumn (P < 0.001), as compared to winter months, while Gram-negative bacteria (P < 0.001) and fungi (P < 0.001) were more frequent in summer months. BSIs due to methicillin resistant S. aureus and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria increased during the study period. The increasing incidence of BSIs can be attributed to an increase of Gram-positive BSI incidence, even though Gram-negative bacteria remained the predominant ones. Seasonality may play a role in the predominance of Gram-negative’s BSI.

scholarly journals Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Treating Bacterial Infections: One More Mechanism of Action

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teiji Sawa ◽  
Mao Kinoshita ◽  
Keita Inoue ◽  
Junya Ohara ◽  
Kiyoshi Moriyama
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Bacterial Toxin ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Secretion Systems ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Drug Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Toxin Secretion ◽  
Dependent Cell ◽  
V Antigen

The mechanisms underlying the effects of γ-globulin therapy for bacterial infections are thought to involve bacterial cell lysis via complement activation, phagocytosis via bacterial opsonization, toxin neutralization, and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Nevertheless, recent advances in the study of pathogenicity in gram-negative bacteria have raised the possibility of an association between γ-globulin and bacterial toxin secretion. Over time, new toxin secretion systems like the type III secretion system have been discovered in many pathogenic gram-negative bacteria. With this system, the bacterial toxins are directly injected into the cytoplasm of the target cell through a special secretory apparatus without any exposure to the extracellular environment and, therefore, with no opportunity for antibodies to neutralize the toxin. However, because antibodies against the V-antigen, which is located on the needle-shaped tip of the bacterial secretion apparatus, can inhibit toxin translocation, this raises the hope that the toxin might be susceptible to antibody targeting. Because multi-drug resistant bacteria are now prevalent, inhibiting this secretion mechanism is attractive as an alternative or adjunctive therapy against lethal bacterial infections. Thus, it would not be unreasonable to define the blocking effect of anti-V-antigen antibodies as the fifth mechanism for immunoglobulin action against bacterial infections.

scholarly journals Sensitivity Pattern of Gram Negative Bacteria Contaminating Traumatic Wounds: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Kathamandu Valley

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-107
Author(s):  
Satya Narayan Suwal ◽  
Sammodavardhana Kaundinnyayana ◽  
Krishna Govinda Prajapati ◽  
Reena Baidya
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Antibacterial Agents ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Accidental Trauma ◽  
Culture Positivity ◽  
Sensitivity Pattern ◽  
Culture Positivity Rate

Introduction: Gram negative bacteria are commonly involved in wound infections and are significantly associated with morbidity and mortality because of increasing resistance to commonly used antibacterial agents. This study aims to evaluate the pattern of antibacterial sensitivity of the gram negative bacteria from wound swabs of accidental trauma cases. Methods: This retrospective study was done by collecting all the culture positive reports for wound swabs of accidental wounds from the microbiology laboratory and analyzing the reports showing growth of gram negative bacteria for frequency of sensitivity to commonly used antibacterial agents. Results: Culture positivity rate was 21.95% with growth of gram negative bacteria in 79.7% of cases. The most commonly isolated organism was Escherichia coli being 41.3% among gram negative isolates. Highly resistant bacteria were E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter spp. Conclusions: As there is low culture positivity rate for wound swabs obtained before washing the wounds inflicted by accidental trauma, prolonged routine use of prophylactic antibiotic is not justified. Thoroughly washing the wound is very likely to decrease the rate of wound infection further and reduces the need of antibacterial agents. Culture and sensitivity test should guide the treatment when wound is infected because highly resistant gram negative organism may be involved in such cases.

scholarly journals Treatment of Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Pathogenic Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1639-1647
Author(s):  
Wardah Mohammad Akram ◽  
Godfred Antony Menezes ◽  
Nida Abbas ◽  
Wasim Ahmad ◽  
Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Empirical Therapy ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Review Management ◽  
Emergence Of Resistance ◽  
Novel Therapeutic

The multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) infections in severely infected patients present numerous difficulties in terms of treatment failure where antibiotics cannot arrest such drug resistant bacteria. Based on the patient’s medical history and updated microbiological epidemiology data, an effective empirical treatment remains critical for optimal results to safeguard human health. The aim of this manuscript is to review management of MDR-Gram negative pathogenic bacterial infections. Quick diagnosis and narrow antimicrobial spectrum require rapid and timely diagnosis and effective laboratories in accordance with antimicrobial stewardship (AS) principles. Worldwide, there is an increased emergence of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Recently, novel therapeutic options, such as meropenem/vaborbactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, eravacycline and plazomicin became accessible to effectively counteract severe infections. Optimally using these delays the emergence of resistance to novel therapeutic agents. Further study is required, however, due to uncertainties in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics optimization of dosages and therapeutic duration in severely ill patients. The novel agents should be verified for (i) action on carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; (ii) action on CRE of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors dependence on type of carbapenemase; (iii) emergence of resistance to novel antibacterials and dismiss selective pressure promoting development of resistance. Alternative treatments should be approached alike phage therapy or antibacterial peptides. The choice of empirical therapy is complicated by antibiotic resistance and can be combated by accurate antibiotic and their combinations usage, which is critical to patient survival. Noteworthy are local epidemiology, effective teamwork and antibiotic stewardship to guarantee that medications are utilized properly to counter the resistance.

scholarly journals Etiology and Antimicrobial Resistance of Secondary Bacterial Infections in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A Retrospective Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Li ◽  
Junwei Wang ◽  
Yi Yang ◽  
Peishan Cai ◽  
Jingchao Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Considerable Proportion ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Union Hospital ◽  
Critical Patients ◽  
Resistance Rates

Abstract Background: A considerable proportion of patients hospitalized with corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have acquired secondary bacterial infections (SBIs). We report the etiology and antimicrobial resistance of bacteria to provide theoretical basis for appropriate infection therapy.Methods: In the retrospective study, we reviewed electronic medical records of all the patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the Wuhan Union hospital from January 27 to March 17, 2020. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients who acquired SBIs were enrolled. Demographic, clinical course, etiology and antimicrobial resistance data of the SBIs were collected. Outcomes were also compared between patients who were classified as severe on admission and those who were classified as critical.Results: 6.8% (102/1495) of the patients with COVID-19 had acquired SBIs and almost half of them (50, 49.0%) died during hospitalization. Compared with the severe patients, the critical patients had a higher chance of SBIs. 159 strains of bacteria were isolated, 85.5% of which were Gram-negative bacteria. The top three bacteria of SBIs were A. baumannii (35.8%), K. pneumoniae (30.8%) and Staphylococcus (8.8%). The isolation rate of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae were 91.2% and 75.5%, respectively. Meticillin resistance was in 100% of Staphylococcus, and vancomycin resistance was not found. Conclusions: SBIs may occur in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and lead to high mortality. The incidence of SBIs was associated with the grade on admission. Gram-negative bacteria, especially A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae, were the main bacteria and the resistance rates of the major isolated bacteria were generally high.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document