scholarly journals Labour with low dose epidural analgesia: maternal perception and fetal outcome

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasudha Sawant ◽  
Archana Kumbhar
Keyword(s):  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Natural Phenomenon ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Second Stage Of Labour ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vertex Presentation

Background: Experiencing labour pains and giving birth to infant is normal physiological process. Though it is a natural phenomenon, it produces severe pain which requires analgesia to relieve pain during labour. The objective of this study was to compare effects of low dose epidural analgesia verses no analgesia during labour on mother and fetus.Methods: Here in this study we have assessed effect of epidural analgesia on mother and fetus. Total we have taken 60 women in age group of 20-26 years with full term pregnancy (37-42 weeks). Those who have entered spontaneous labour with vertex presentation, without any previous uterine surgery, clinically adequate pelvis. We had divided these women in 2 groups, 30 were given epidural analgesia and 30 without any analgesia. Variables recorded were pain score during labour using VAS, duration of labour during each stage, mode of delivery, Apgar score of newborn at 1 minute and 5 minutes.Results: Present study shows that duration of first stage of labour in epidural and non-analgesia group are same. Second stage of labour is prolonged in epidural group than non-analgesia group. Both groups had normal APGAR score. Epidural analgesia is not associated with any change in mode of delivery. Visual analogue scale is good with epidural analgesia.Conclusions: There was no significant difference in first stage of labour in both group. Second stage of labour was slightly prolonged in EA group than control, but it was less than two hours. No harmful neonatal outcome in epidural analgesia.

scholarly journals LABOUR ANALGESIA BY NEUROAXIAL BLOCKADE TECHNIQUE AND ITS LABOUR OUTCOME

2021 ◽  
pp. 10-13
Author(s):  
R.Shanthi Malar ◽  
V. Vijayalakshmi ◽  
P. Thenmozhi
Keyword(s):  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Labour Analgesia ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Second Stage Of Labour ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND:Pain relief during labour is an important component of modern obstetric care and can be produced by neuraxial, systemic or inhalational analgesia. Recent meta-analyses have supported epidural analgesia as the most efficacious technique.A good labour analgesia should aim at good pain relief during delivery process,at the same time not causing foetal acidosis,ensures safe for both mother and the baby. AIM OF THE STUDY:To study the influence of epidural analgesia on maternal and neonatal outcome MATERIALS AND METHODS:The study was conducted in the depar tment of Obstet r ics and Gynecology,GOVT.Stanley Medical College,Govt.RSRM LYING IN HOSPITAL,CHENNAI over a period of eight months from July 2019 to February 2021. The study was performed in 120 selected subjects. The study subjects were divided based on intervention – labour analgesia into 2 study groups. In this study,change in vital parameters,fetal heart rate,assessment of pain score,Duration of first and second stage of labour,mode of delivery,APGAR score and the need for NICU admission were noted and recorded.Any complications during the course of labour were also recorded. RESULTS:In this study,there was no significant difference in the mean duration of first and second stage of labour in both the study and control groups.The mean Apgar score of babies at one minute was 7.02 and at 5 minutes was 8.07 in the labour analgesia group and showed no significance.Maternal satisfaction for the effect of epidural analgesia,60.00% of the patients of epidural analgesia, the incidence of satisfactory/very satisfactory experience was meaningfully and significantly more in labour analgesia group subjects compared to control group subjects by 30 % with a 2 fold increase. CONCLUSION: As per this study labour analgesia using neuroaxial blockade technique are more likely to encounter increasing maternal satisfaction and good quality labour pain reduction.

scholarly journals EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOUR

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 9-12
Author(s):  
HUMAIRA TABASSUM ◽  
SOHAIL SHAHZAD ◽  
SHAHIDA SHERAZ ◽  
Muhammad Boota
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Analytical Study ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Outcome Study ◽  
Maternal Satisfaction ◽  
Apgar Scores ◽  
Labour Time

To evaluate the effects of epidural analgesia on the painrelief and maternal and fetal outcome. Study design: Comparative & analytical study. Place and Duration: In MilitaryHospital Rawalpindi fromOct 1998 to Oct 1999. Patients and Method: 100 full term healthy primigravida admitted forinduction of labour. Fifty patients were given epidural analgesia and 50 served as control to whom no analgesia wasgiven. Outcome measures observed were duration of labour, mode of delivery; Apgar score of the newborn; untowardreaction and intra-partum complications. Results: The data analysis revealed that epidural analgesia significantlyprolonged labour time and was associated with increased instrumental delivery rate. Significant reduction in intra-partumfetal complications was seen, while C-section rate was not effected by epidural analgesia. Apgar scores were higherin analgesia group as compared to control. Conclusion: Although accused of prolonging labour time, it’s benefits interms of great maternal satisfaction and reduced intra-partum complications still makes it an option for labouringpatients.

scholarly journals Cesarean Section or Instrumental Delivery: The Best Choice for Mode of Delivery during Second Stage of Labor

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-46
Author(s):  
Suniti Rawal ◽  
Neeta Katuwal ◽  
Sajana Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Teenage Pregnancy ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Instrumental Delivery ◽  
Second Stage Of Labor ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Second Stage Of Labour ◽  
Emergency Cesarean ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

Introduction Managing second stage of labour is very crucial. Emergency Cesarean Section (CS) or Instrumental Delivery (ID) is the only choices although complications might occur in both modes of deliveries. The rate of CS is at rise and the fear of failed ID followed by emergency CS with added complications makes the choice more difficult amongst the obstetricians. MethodsA retrospective study done to assess the maternal and fetal outcome in second stage of labour following ID and emergency CS from April 2018 to March 2019 among the pregnant women having completed 34 weeks of gestations and beyond. ResultsOf 4761 deliveries, 2537 (53.2%) were vaginal and 2224 (46.7%) CS, and amongst all, 133 (2.7%) were second stage interventions. Out of 133, 78 had ID, 76 were successful and 2 failed. Fifty seven (2.6%) were second stage CS. Nulliparas (65.8%) needed more ID, teenage pregnancy (6.5%) (p=0.04) and heart disease (18.4%) (p=0.002) were high risk for ID. Complications were more in CS, uterine extensions, (29.8%) (p<0.001), urinary complications, (43.9%) (p<0.001) and blood loss (p<0.001). Neonatal admission too was higher in CS (n=29) and more so due to respiratory distress (16/29). ConclusionDespite of few failed attempted ID, it still proved to be better choice for delivery during second stage, as both maternal and neonatal complications were higher following the second stage CS. Hence, the correct and timely decision for ID addressing the associated risk factors could lead to favorable outcome.

scholarly journals Comparative study between levobupivacaine with clonidine and levobupivacaine with fentanyl in epidural labour analgesia in rural set up

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 4087
Author(s):  
Prashant K. Mishra ◽  
Anand K. Singh ◽  
Pragati Divedi
Keyword(s):  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Breakthrough Pain ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Labour Analgesia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Neuraxial techniques are the gold standard for intrapartum labour analgesia. Neuraxial labour analgesia using new local anaesthetics such as levobupivacaine has become very popular by virtue of the safety and lesser motor blockade caused by these agents. Multiple randomized controlled trials comparing epidural analgesia with systemic opioids, nitrous oxide or both have demonstrated lower internal pain scores and higher maternal satisfaction with neuraxial analgesia. The purpose of this study is to compare fentanyl and clonidine combination with levobupivacaine in terms of effect of epidural labour analgesia on fetal outcome and incidence of instrumental or caesarean delivery and duration of second stage of labour.Methods: A total of 50 primiparous with singleton pregnancy and vertex presentation and cervical dilatation of 3-5 cm were enrolled for the study in our hospital in department of obstetrics and gynecology. They were divided into group 1 and group 2 (25 patients in each group). Group 1 received 10 ml. of 0.125% isobaric levobupivacaine with 25µg fentanyl and group 2 received 10 ml of 0.125% isobaric levobupivacaine with 60 µg clonidine. Parturients were given epidural analgesia on numerical rating scale (NRS) Score >3. Breakthrough pain supplemented with 3-5 ml of 0.125% levobupivacaine. Data collected were demographic profile of the patients, analgesic qualities, 1st and 2nd stage labour duration, side effects and feto-maternal outcome.Results: Post treatment mean NRS were almost similar between two groups at all periods except at 15 minutes when it was significantly lower for group 2 (2.64±0.49). Onset of analgesia was earlier in group 2 (13.68±0.94) in comparison to group 1 (15.36±1.18) and was statistically significant.Conclusions: In conclusion Group 2 (levobupivacaine with clonidine) showed significant difference in early onset of analgesia but did not show any significant difference in duration of labour, maternal and fetal outcome and mode of delivery.

scholarly journals Clincial Experience with Patient-Controlled and Staff-Administered Intermittent Bolus Epidural Analgesia in Labour

1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Paech ◽  
T. J. G. Pavy ◽  
C. Sims ◽  
M. D. Westmore ◽  
J. M. Storey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Obstetric Delivery ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Intermittent Bolus ◽  
Second Stage Of Labour ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Maximum Pain ◽  
Delivery Unit ◽  
Ib Method

A prospective randomized study was Performed to detail clinical experience with both patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and midwife-administered intermittent bolus (IB) epidural analgesia during labour, under the conditions pertaining in a busy obstetric delivery unit. Both methods used 0.125% bupivacaine plus fentanyl, and similar rescue supplementation although management decisions related to epidural analgesia were made principally by attending midwives One hundred and ninety-eight women were recruited and data analysed from 167 (PCEA n = 82 IB n=85) The groups were demographically similar. Median hourly pain scores, ratings of analgesia and satisfaction did not differ Maximum pain scores were significantly higher in those receiving IB epidural analgesia (P<0.05). The PCEA group had a significantly higher rate of supplementation and bupivacaine use (P<0.01), and a longer duration of the second stage of labour (P<0.03) The relative risk of instrumental delivery with PCEA versus the IB method was 1.57 (CI 1.07–2.38) Experience within our unit with PCEA is contrasted with that of IB epidural analgesia, the method most commonly used; and with that of controlled trials comparing these two methods.

scholarly journals Analysis of intracranial hemorrhage grade in preterm singleton pregnancies delivered vaginally or by cesarean section

2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasa Ljustina ◽  
Ivana Berisavac ◽  
Milica Berisavac ◽  
Ljudmila Kovacevic-Vukolic ◽  
Vesna Velickovic-Aleksic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Perinatal Outcome ◽  
Intraventricular Hemorrhage ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Preterm Neonates ◽  
Delivery Methods ◽  
Premature Babies ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vertex Presentation ◽  
Singleton Pregnancies

Background/Aim. Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal mortality. Periventricular hemorrhage-intraventricular hemorrhage (PVH-IVH) remains a significant cause of both morbidity and mortality in infants prematurely born. The aim of the study was to evaluate the perinatal outcome regarding IVH of premature babies according to the mode of delivery. Methods. A total of 126 women in preterm singleton pregnancies with vertex presentation and 126 neonates weighted from 750 g to 1,500 g at birth were enrolled. The outcomes of 64 neonates born vaginally were compared to 62 neonates born by cesarean section. Results. There was no significant difference in the incidence of IVH among both groups. Conclusion. Our data is consistent with the hypothesis that the mode of delivery does not influence IVH and consenquently perinatal outcome in preterm neonates.

scholarly journals Clinico-radiological Observations in Meconium Aspiration Syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (209) ◽  
pp. 510-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana Lama ◽  
Shyam Kumar Mahato ◽  
Nagendra Chaudhary ◽  
Nikhil Agrawal ◽  
Santosh Pathak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Apgar Score ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Birth Asphyxia ◽  
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Radiological Findings ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Meconium Aspiration ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: To understand and report the prevalence of meconium aspiration syndrome and the clinico-radiological features in a tertiary care hospital of western Nepal. Methods: An observational study carried out for a year in 2014-15 in all babies with MAS. Clinical and radiological profiles of MAS in relation to gender, gestational age, mode of delivery, birth weight, Apgar score, thickness of meconium, age at admission and the immediate outcome were studied. Results: Out of 584 admitted newborns (male=389; female=186) during the study period, 78 (13.4%) had meconium aspiration syndrome with male: female ratio of 1.2:1. Majority of babies admitted to NICU had thick meconium [n=52 (66.7%)]. There was no statistical significant difference in various parameters such as Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, respiratory distress, birth asphyxia, duration of oxygen use, MAS severity and chest x-ray in those with thick MAS compared to thin. Among all newborns with MAS, 59% (n=46) had abnormal radiological findings with over two-folds in those with thick MAS (71.7%)] compared to thin (28%). Hyperinflation (47.8%), diffuse patchy infiltration (37%), consolidation (21.7%) collapse (8.7%), right lung fissure (6.5%) and pneumothorax (8.7%) were the abnormal radiological findings seen in MAS babies. The odds of having APGAR score at 1 minute at least 7 or more was twice unlikely in those having thick meconium compared to thin (P=0.02) Conclusions: Thick meconium is relatively common with more significant abnormal radiological findings and low Apgar score.

scholarly journals Upright kneeling position during second stage of labor: a pilot study

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali Dabral ◽  
Pallavi Pawar ◽  
Rekha Bharti ◽  
Archana Kumari ◽  
Achla Batra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
North India ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Apgar Scores ◽  
Second Stage Of Labor ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Perineal Tears ◽  
Second Stage Of Labour

Background: Women delivering in upright position have shorter labour due to efficient and stronger contractions with faster descent of foetal head. The present study aimed to find out effect of upright kneeling position in the second stage of labour on maternal and foetal outcome and assess patients’ satisfaction.Methods: The study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital of North India from October 2012 to February 2014. Low risk women admitted in early labour were divided into two groups, women delivering in kneeling position and in supine position. The outcome measures studied were, duration of second stage of labour, mode of delivery, 2nd degree perineal tears, Apgar scores at 5 minutes, NICU admission rate and patient satisfaction.Results: The mean duration of second stage of labour in kneeling group was shorter by 14.901 minutes. The rate of vaginal delivery was comparable for both primigravidas and multigravida in kneeling and supine groups, RR: 2.275, 95% CI (0.7872-6.5831) and RR: 1.633, 95% CI (0.393-6.775). Primigravidas had more 2nd degree perineal tears in kneeling group as compared to supine, RR 4.191, 95% CI (1.54 to 11.41). No difference in Apgar scores >7 at 5 minutes was observed in both groups, however, significantly lesser babies in kneeling group were admitted in NICU, RR 0.246, 95% CI (0.079 to 0.761). There was no difference on comparing satisfaction scores of primigravidas and multigravida in both supine and kneeling position.Conclusions: Kneeling position reduces the duration of second stage of labour and NICU admissions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document