scholarly journals EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOUR

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 9-12
Author(s):  
HUMAIRA TABASSUM ◽  
SOHAIL SHAHZAD ◽  
SHAHIDA SHERAZ ◽  
Muhammad Boota
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Analytical Study ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Outcome Study ◽  
Maternal Satisfaction ◽  
Apgar Scores ◽  
Labour Time

To evaluate the effects of epidural analgesia on the painrelief and maternal and fetal outcome. Study design: Comparative & analytical study. Place and Duration: In MilitaryHospital Rawalpindi fromOct 1998 to Oct 1999. Patients and Method: 100 full term healthy primigravida admitted forinduction of labour. Fifty patients were given epidural analgesia and 50 served as control to whom no analgesia wasgiven. Outcome measures observed were duration of labour, mode of delivery; Apgar score of the newborn; untowardreaction and intra-partum complications. Results: The data analysis revealed that epidural analgesia significantlyprolonged labour time and was associated with increased instrumental delivery rate. Significant reduction in intra-partumfetal complications was seen, while C-section rate was not effected by epidural analgesia. Apgar scores were higherin analgesia group as compared to control. Conclusion: Although accused of prolonging labour time, it’s benefits interms of great maternal satisfaction and reduced intra-partum complications still makes it an option for labouringpatients.

scholarly journals Labour with low dose epidural analgesia: maternal perception and fetal outcome

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasudha Sawant ◽  
Archana Kumbhar
Keyword(s):  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Natural Phenomenon ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Second Stage Of Labour ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vertex Presentation

Background: Experiencing labour pains and giving birth to infant is normal physiological process. Though it is a natural phenomenon, it produces severe pain which requires analgesia to relieve pain during labour. The objective of this study was to compare effects of low dose epidural analgesia verses no analgesia during labour on mother and fetus.Methods: Here in this study we have assessed effect of epidural analgesia on mother and fetus. Total we have taken 60 women in age group of 20-26 years with full term pregnancy (37-42 weeks). Those who have entered spontaneous labour with vertex presentation, without any previous uterine surgery, clinically adequate pelvis. We had divided these women in 2 groups, 30 were given epidural analgesia and 30 without any analgesia. Variables recorded were pain score during labour using VAS, duration of labour during each stage, mode of delivery, Apgar score of newborn at 1 minute and 5 minutes.Results: Present study shows that duration of first stage of labour in epidural and non-analgesia group are same. Second stage of labour is prolonged in epidural group than non-analgesia group. Both groups had normal APGAR score. Epidural analgesia is not associated with any change in mode of delivery. Visual analogue scale is good with epidural analgesia.Conclusions: There was no significant difference in first stage of labour in both group. Second stage of labour was slightly prolonged in EA group than control, but it was less than two hours. No harmful neonatal outcome in epidural analgesia.

scholarly journals Comparison of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) with Basal Infusion and Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (PIEB) with PCEA in Labour Analgesia – A One-Year Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-31
Author(s):  
Zawiah Kassim ◽  
Arifah Mokthar ◽  
Norliza Mohd Nor ◽  
Suhaina mohamad ◽  
Sarina Osman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Labour Analgesia ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Maternal Satisfaction ◽  
Apgar Scores ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year ◽  
Infusion Regimen

Introduction: For the past thirty years, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with basal infusion regimen has successfully improved the variable intensity of labour pain due to its advantage in allowing self-titration by the parturient. However, a recent review on programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) with PCEA regimen proved to be superior compared to PCEA with basal infusion, in terms of higher maternal satisfaction with longer duration of analgesia and lower local anaesthetic consumption. Following the introduction of PIEB at our institution, we did a study to compare maternal satisfaction, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome between these two methods of epidural labour analgesia. Methodology: We conducted a one-year retrospective analysis of data from obstetric analgesia service (OAS) record sheet and hospital information system evaluating outcomes after labour analgesia delivered by PCEA with basal infusion regimen (PCEA + basal infusion) and PIEB with PCEA regimen (PIEB+PCEA). The primary outcome was maternal satisfaction towards their labour analgesia. Other outcome parameters were the mode of delivery and neonatal Apgar scores. Outcomes were compared using independent t-test and Chi-square test. Result: There was no significant difference in maternal satisfaction between the two groups (P=0.398). However, a higher percentage of excellent satisfaction was found in the PIEB + PCEA group compared to that in the PCEA + basal infusion group (PIEB+PCEA 146/172 (84.9%) vs PCEA + basal infusion 138/171 (80.7%) respectively). There was no significant difference in the mode of delivery (P=0.296). However, PIEB+PCEA group had a higher percentage of spontaneous vaginal deliveries (PIEB+PCEA 87/172 (50.6%) vs PCEA + basal infusion 70/171 (40.9%) respectively) and a lower percentage of Caesarean deliveries (PIEB + PCEA 71/172 (41.3%) vs PCEA + basal infusion 87/171 (50.9%) respectively). Despite statistically significant differences found in Apgar scores in 1 minute (P=0.036), there was no significant difference in the scores at 5 minutes (P=0.107). Apgar scores and mean (SD) at 1 minute and 5 minutes for PIEB + PCEA were 7.77(0.85) and 8.91(0.55) respectively, and for PCEA + basal infusion the scores at 1 minute and 5 minutes were 7.92(0.39) and 8.98(0.19) respectively. Conclusion: PIEB with PCEA regimen is a newer epidural delivery technique for labour analgesia in our centre, which produced a comparable outcome to PCEA with basal infusion regimen.

scholarly journals Epidural analgesia during labour: its influences on pain relief, progress of labour, mode of delivery, maternal and foetal

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 555
Author(s):  
M. Suneetha ◽  
A. Saritha
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Obstetric Care ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Sitting Position ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Group 2

Background: Today, the availability of regional anaesthesia for labour is considered a reflection of standard obstetric care. This study is to be conducted in a tertiary care centre with all facilities available for proposed end of proving that epidural analgesia is a safe and effective method for both parturient and the foetus in abolishing pain during labour.Methods: A total of 60 parturients were studied. they were randomly divided into two groups Group 1 includes 30 parturients. In this group parturient received epidural analgesia. The loading dose consisted of 10 ml of Bupivacaine 0.1% and Fentanyl 0.0002% (20 mcg). The top up doses were 10 ml of 0.1% Bupivacaine and Fentanyl 0.0002%, administered whenever the parturient complained of pain. When parturients enters into second stage a further 12-15 ml was injected with parturient in sitting position or semi-sitting position. Group 2 - (control group) Includes 30 parturients. In this group parturient was monitored without any analgesia.Results: This prospective study was done to assess the effect of epidural analgesia on the progress of labour and its outcome, to evaluate its efficacy as an analgesic technique and to study the maternal and fetal outcome. The total number of 60 parturients were selected and randomly categorized into two groups. CASE-Those who received epidural analgesia, CONTROL-Those who did not receive any analgesia.Conclusions: Epidural analgesia provides a versatile method of administering effective and satisfactory pain relief to parturient women. The technique should not be considered as a single entity, because the type and the dose of epidural medication can be altered as needed.

scholarly journals Tramadol versus placebo for labor analgesia in low risk women: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 342
Author(s):  
Aastha Raheja ◽  
Krishna Agarwal ◽  
Rini Pachori ◽  
Gauri Gandhi
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Labor Analgesia ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

Background: In low- and middle-income countries epidural analgesia is generally not available and practically no form of labor analgesia is given to the majority of the parturient. The purpose of study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tramadol as a labor analgesic during first stage of labor.Methods: Pregnant women admitted in the labor room satisfying the eligibility criteria were randomized to receive intramuscular injection of either 100 mg tramadol or 2 ml distilled water. Visual analogue score (VAS) was assessed at the beginning and every hour till 4 hours. Pain satisfaction, duration of second stage of labor, fetal heart rate, mode of delivery, and any maternal side effects of the study drug were recorded. Neonatal evaluation using Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes was done. For statistical analysis Student t-test, Chi Square test and Fisher’s exact test were used.Results: Total of 86 women were included in the study. The VAS scores were significantly lower in the tramadol group at 1, 2 and 3 hours after the administration. Pain relief satisfaction was significantly higher in the tramadol group. Rate of cervical dilatation, duration of the second and the third stage, need for instrumental delivery or lower segment caesarean section, rate of fetal distress and Apgar score at one and five minutes were comparable in both the groups. Nausea was significantly higher in tramadol group.Conclusions: Tramadol is a safe and efficacious drug which is inexpensive, easily available and easy to administer with few minor side effects. It can be used as a labour analgesic as an alternative to epidural analgesia in settings where epidural analgesia is not available. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov PRS registration number: NCT02999594. 

scholarly journals Admission Cardiotocography in High Risk Pregnancies

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-54
Author(s):  
Jwala Thapa ◽  
Rajib Sah
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Neonatal Resuscitation ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
P Value ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Admission Test ◽  
The Relationship

Aims: The objective of the study was to evaluate the relationship between admission cardiotocography and fetal outcome among high risk obstetrics patients.Methods: The study was a hospital based observational study of 130 patients, conducted at Paropakar maternity and Women’s Hospital, Kathmandu from January 2014 to June 2014. A 20-minute cardiotocography reading was done in admission room and reading was categorized in 3 groups- reactive, equivocal and ominous. The results were compared to see the relationship between normal and abnormal admission test in terms of color of liquor, mode of delivery, Apgar score at 5 minutes, neonatal resuscitation needed and NICU admission.Results: Result of admission test (AT) was reactive in 95(73.1%), equivocal in 19(14.6%) and ominous in 16(12.3%) which has significant relationship with mode of delivery (p-value=0.003), color of liquor (p-value=0.000), Apgar score at 5 minutes (p-value=0.000) and perinatal outcome (p-value=0.00). Incidences of vaginal deliveries were more common when the test was reactive whereas operative deliveries were more common when the AT was ominous/equivocal.Conclusions: Admission test is simple, cost effective and non-invasive technique for detecting fetal hypoxia and predicting fetal outcome that can serve as a screening tool in triaging fetuses of high-risk patients in developing countries with a heavy workload and limited resources.

scholarly journals THE CORRELATION BETWEEN FOETAL MOVEMENTS COUNT AND FOETAL OUTCOME

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamta Gangwal
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Fetal Movement ◽  
Risk Pregnancy ◽  
Fetal Movements ◽  
Reduced Fetal Movement

Background: A reduced fetal movement is a common indication for assessment of fetal well being. A reduced fetal movement is considered as high risk pregnancy because the fetus is at high risk of hypoxia and sudden demise. Methods: Hospital based prospective study conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, RVRS Medical College, Bhilwara. Total 130 pregnant women were included in this study. Results: 10.77% patients didn’t perceive fetal movements after admission. Out of 14 patients with absent DFMC, 6 babies (42.86%) died and 8 babies (57.14%) survived. The association betweenNon Stress Test and mode of delivery was found statistically significant. 83.33%) were admitted in NICU. Out of 24 patients presenting with non reactive NST, 20.83% (5) babies born with APGAR score more than 7 and 79.17% (19) babies had APGAR score 4-7. Conclusion: The association between NST & DFMC and fetal outcome was found statistically significant. Keywords: DFMC, NST, Fetal outcome, survived.

scholarly journals LABOUR ANALGESIA BY NEUROAXIAL BLOCKADE TECHNIQUE AND ITS LABOUR OUTCOME

2021 ◽  
pp. 10-13
Author(s):  
R.Shanthi Malar ◽  
V. Vijayalakshmi ◽  
P. Thenmozhi
Keyword(s):  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Labour Analgesia ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Second Stage Of Labour ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND:Pain relief during labour is an important component of modern obstetric care and can be produced by neuraxial, systemic or inhalational analgesia. Recent meta-analyses have supported epidural analgesia as the most efficacious technique.A good labour analgesia should aim at good pain relief during delivery process,at the same time not causing foetal acidosis,ensures safe for both mother and the baby. AIM OF THE STUDY:To study the influence of epidural analgesia on maternal and neonatal outcome MATERIALS AND METHODS:The study was conducted in the depar tment of Obstet r ics and Gynecology,GOVT.Stanley Medical College,Govt.RSRM LYING IN HOSPITAL,CHENNAI over a period of eight months from July 2019 to February 2021. The study was performed in 120 selected subjects. The study subjects were divided based on intervention – labour analgesia into 2 study groups. In this study,change in vital parameters,fetal heart rate,assessment of pain score,Duration of first and second stage of labour,mode of delivery,APGAR score and the need for NICU admission were noted and recorded.Any complications during the course of labour were also recorded. RESULTS:In this study,there was no significant difference in the mean duration of first and second stage of labour in both the study and control groups.The mean Apgar score of babies at one minute was 7.02 and at 5 minutes was 8.07 in the labour analgesia group and showed no significance.Maternal satisfaction for the effect of epidural analgesia,60.00% of the patients of epidural analgesia, the incidence of satisfactory/very satisfactory experience was meaningfully and significantly more in labour analgesia group subjects compared to control group subjects by 30 % with a 2 fold increase. CONCLUSION: As per this study labour analgesia using neuroaxial blockade technique are more likely to encounter increasing maternal satisfaction and good quality labour pain reduction.

scholarly journals FETAL OUTCOME;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (03) ◽  
pp. 462-465
Author(s):  
Afsheen Memon ◽  
Aisha Abdullah Sheikh ◽  
Anisa Kamal
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
High Rate ◽  
P Value ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Nuchal Cord ◽  
Nicu Admission

Objectives: To compare the effect of nuchal cord versus without cord aroundthe neck on mode of delivery and fetal outcome. Study design: Case control comparativestudy. Period: 1st August 2013 to 31st March 2014. Setting: Gyn /Obs Department at Sir SyedHospital Karachi. Material and Methods: A comparative study was carried out on 2 groupsof parturient ladies. The study group comprised of those ladies who at the time of delivery(vaginal delivery/caesarean-section) had clinically cord around the neck while the other group(control) did not have nuchal cord. Duration of labour, mode of delivery were noted. Perinataloutcome was measured in terms of Apgar score and NICU admission. High risk pregnancieswere excluded from the study. Result: Incidence of nuchal cord at the time of delivery was22.7%. A high rate of caesarean delivery observed in study group as compared to controlgroup (70 % vs 40%) (P value 0.00006). Fetal heart rate irregularities & meconium stainedliquor finding was not significantly different in two groups (p< 0.161) & (p<0.169) respectively.Similarly fetal outcome measured in terms of Apgar score at 1 & 5 min & NICU admissionwas also not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: A significant highrate of caesareans section rate was observed in the study group mainly due to fetal distress(FHR irregularities). This means cord around the neck is a risk factor & needs extra monitoringspecially through intermittent CTG monitoring during labour so that fetal distress can be pickedup early & emergency caesarean section can be performed to avoid fetal compromise.

scholarly journals Low amniotic uid index and the materno-fetal out come in 3rd trimester of pregnancy

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
Fahmida Monir ◽  
Rumana Nazneen ◽  
Rumana Akhter ◽  
Tahmina Begum ◽  
AKM Abdul Kayum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Amniotic Fluid ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Amniotic Fluid Index ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical Disorders ◽  
Indirect Indicator

Amniotic fluid volume is an indirect indicator of fetal well being. About 8% of pregnant women can have low amniotic fluid, with about 4% being diagnosed with oligohydramnios. Oligohydramnios can cause complications in about 12% of pregnancies that go past 41 wks of gestation. This cross-sectional observational study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BSMMU, Dhaka from July 2010 to December 2010 on 55 admitted pregnant mother of 28-40 weeks gestational age with low amniotic fluid index (<8cm) with or without medical disorders specially during and after delivery along with its impact on mode of termination of pregnancy & complications of the fetus. Most of the mother (64%) had mild oligohydramnios. Most of them were < 37weeks of gestation and 69.1% of them had to undergo caesarean section as there mode of delivery. The indications were mostly (66%) due to less fetal movement, IUGR, previous C/S, malpresentation etc. The current study showed significantly higher rate (65.5%) of low birth weight resulting from the low AFI. The APGAR score less than 7 in 5 minute was significantly higher in severe oligohydramnios group and majority of the neonate experienced complications like RDS (13%), meconeum aspiration (21%) with admission in neonatal ward (54%). Low AFI has poorer prognosis to some extent with maternal as well as fetal outcome. It is responsible for a significantly higher rate of caesarean section & also associated with low birth rate along with low APGAR score and increase in neonatal complications.Bangladesh Med J. 2015 Jan; 44 (1): 16-20

scholarly journals FETOMATERNAL OUTCOME OF PREGNANCY BETWEEN 40 AND 42 WEEKS

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (03) ◽  
pp. 317-322
Author(s):  
NAZIA AMJAD ◽  
TAYYBA IMRAN ◽  
AHSEN NAZIR AHMED
Keyword(s):  
Apgar Score ◽  
Perinatal Death ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Biophysical Profile ◽  
The Difference

.Objective:To evaluatewhether serial monitoring of fetuses beyond 40 weeks with biophysical profileand non stress test improves the fetal outcome in terms of morbidity and mortality.Design: Prospective control study.Setting: Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology at Ittefaq Hospital( Trust) Lahore,. Period: From Jan, 2007 to June2008.Patients and Methods: Two hundred women with singleton uncomplicated pregnancies at 40 weeks were dividedinto two groups; A study group with biweekly biophysical profile and non stress test and a control group with biweeklyantenatal clinical assessment with fetal kick count chart. Main outcome measures were onset of labour, mode ofdelivery, Apgar score, presence of meconium and admission to nursery. Results: The age of patients ranged between18 to 39 years with the mean of 26.33.The range of gravidity was between primigravida to gravida seven. Ninety sixpercent of total patients were delivered by 41 weeks and 6 days.18% of women were induced in study group comparedto 11% in control group ( p value=0.124 ).Cesarean section rate was 8% in study group and 11% in control group. Rateof instrumental deliveries was 6.5% in study group while 11.2% in control group. The difference in mode of delivery wasfound to be insignificant ( p=0.538 ).Weights of the babies ranged between 2.6 to 4.4 kg with a mean of 3.246 kg.Cumulative %age of APGAR score at 5 minutes was more than 6/10 in 92.5% cases ( p=0.665 ).Meconiumwas foundin 18% of cases in study group and 22% of control group( p=0.917 ).12 % of the babies were admitted to nursery instudy group compared to 16% in control group. Perinatal mortality was found to be 10/1000 in control group while therewas no perinatal death in study group. Conclusions: The difference of outcome between two groups was found to bestatistically insignificant which concluded the validity of either mode of management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document