scholarly journals Study of glottic lesions in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery

Author(s):  
Vikrant Mittal ◽  
Manish Munjal ◽  
Rohit Verma ◽  
Parth Chopra ◽  
Hemant Chopra

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Vocal cords are the most common site of laryngeal pathologies. Hoarseness is the sentinel symptom for lesions affecting the glottis. The aim of this study was to categorize various types of lesions affecting the glottis in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery. Patients’ demographic profile, gender, occupational factors were studied. Clinical, microlaryngeal and histopathological correlation of the lesions was done.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> 50 patients with glottic pathologies undergoing microlaryngeal surgery were included. Patients underwent detailed examination including indirect laryngoscopy, flexible fibreoptic laryngoscopy, followed by microscopic laryngeal examination under general anaesthesia. The lesions were excised using standard microlaryngeal instruments and the specimens were subjected to histopathological examination. The data was analysed.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> There was male preponderance (male: female ratio of 1.27:1). Housewives formed the largest group (28%). Commonest pathologies were vocal nodules (34%), vocal polyps (22%) and carcinoma (22%). Microlaryngoscopy was found to be the best means of visualizing the lesions and reaching a clinical diagnosis. In 10 (20%) patients, the final histopathological diagnosis was different from clinical diagnosis.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> In this study, vocal nodules were the commonest lesions to affect the glottis. Microlaryngoscopy proved to be the best method for examination. Also, there was discrepancy in the clinical and histopathological diagnosis in 20% cases.</p>

Author(s):  
Sumit Thakur

Eyelid tumors are the most common neoplasm in daily ophthalmology practice and encompass a wide variety of benign and malignant tumors. The most common presenting symptoms for skin cancer on the eyelids include a mass or tumor, ulceration, or soreness. It is an institution-based study and the patients were recruited from the OPD and Indoor-wards of Aravind Eye Hospital. Each patient was examined by the slit lamp bio-microscope. The size of the tumor is measured with a detailed examination of the tumor-like margin, the involvement of the other adnexal structure, and the lymph node. Excision biopsies were done and send for histopathological examination. Wound closure with lid reconstruction done according to the size and site of the tumor. Out of 66 patients, the clinical diagnosis of 56(85%) patients was correlated with the histopathological diagnosis but in the remaining 10(15%) patients no correlation was found between histopathological and clinical diagnosis. Proper knowledge of the tumor, anatomy of the lid, and history will help in the appropriate diagnosis of eyelid tumor which can be confirmed by histopathological examination. In the present study, tumors were managed with excision biopsy and lid reconstruction was done depending upon the location and extent of the tumor.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-161
Author(s):  
Reena Rana ◽  
G P Ghimire ◽  
S Gupta ◽  
M Singh ◽  
KK Jha ◽  
...  

IntroductionClinical diagnosis of dermatological manifestation of neoplastic skin lesion can pose a diagnostic difficulty at times. Histopathological diagnosis is mandatory for accurate characterization of disease entity for proper and timely management of cases.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze malignant tumor of skin with respect to age, sex, clinical features and histopathological features and to evaluate the accuracy of clinical diagnosis with histopathological correlation.MethodologyThis is hospital based cross-sectional study conducted at Nepalgunj Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kohalpur from February 2010 to January 2011. A total of 70 histopathological specimens of skin biopsies were studied and correlated with the clinical diagnosis. The data was entered into Microsoft  office excel and analyzed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS 17.0).ResultsMalignant tumor of skin constituted 21.4% of total cases. In malignant tumor, most common sites were head and neck regions followed by lower limb with keratinocytic tumors being in the majority. Most of the specimens (65.7%) were obtained as excisional biopsies.  Seven cases diagnosed as benign lesions clinically, turned out to be malignant on histopathological examination. Out of 13 cases in which clinical diagnosis was of malignancy, only 8 turned out to be malignant, thus for malignant lesions, the clinical diagnosis had a sensitivity of 53.3%, specificity of 90.9% and a positive predictive value of 61.5%.ConclusionsSquamous cell carcinoma was the most common malignant tumor in this study and histopathological correlation significantly modifies the overall management in dermatological disorders where clinical diagnoses are equivocal.Birat Journal of Health SciencesVol.2/No.1/Issue 2/ Jan - April 2017, Page: 156-161


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (33) ◽  
pp. 3054-3059
Author(s):  
Rajendra Prasad Jagannadham ◽  
Lakshmi Latchupatula ◽  
Sravani Ponnada ◽  
Neelima Lalam ◽  
Raghunadhababu Gudipudi ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND A variety of non - neoplastic and neoplastic conditions involve the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses and nasopharynx and these are very common lesions encountered in clinical practice. Histopathological examination of these lesions is the gold standard for diagnosis because management and prognosis vary among different lesions. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the histopathological study of the lesions of the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses and nasopharynx in relation to their incidence, age, gender and site wise distribution and to compare the results with the available data. METHODS A study of 88 cases was conducted for a period of 2 years from August 2017 to July 2019. After fixation, Processing and Haematoxylin and Eosin staining and special stains histopathological diagnosis was made. RESULTS Among 88 total cases, 58 were males and 30 were females. A male predominance was observed with a male to female ratio of 1.93 : 1. They were more common in third, fourth and fifth decade of life. Malignant nasal lesions were seen after fourth decade of life. Nasal lesions were more common in nasal cavity (67.05 %), followed by paranasal sinuses (18.18 %) and nasopharynx (14.75). Out of 88 total cases, 39 (44.32 %) were non - neoplastic, 30 (34.09 %) were benign and 19 (21.59 %) were malignant nasal lesions. CONCLUSIONS Sinonasal lesions and nasopharyngeal lesions can have various differential diagnoses. A complete clinical, radiological and histopathological correlation helps to categorize these sinonasal lesions into various non - neoplastic and neoplastic types. But histopathological examination remains the mainstay of definitive diagnosis. KEYWORDS Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, Nasopharynx, Benign Tumours, Malignant Tumours, Histopathological Examination


1991 ◽  
Vol 3 (S1) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Alafuzoff ◽  
A.-L. Rönnberg ◽  
S. Asikainen-Gustafsson

Between January 1988 and December 1989, 1,600 autopsies were performed at Huddinge University Hospital, representing approximately 40% of the 4,000 deceased patients. In 40% (647) of the autopsy cases, patients showed clinical signs of CNS dysfunction.Of these cases, 58% (380) were subject to neuropathological evaluation, including both macro- and microscopic examination. Only macroscopic examination by general pathologists was performed on the remaining cases. Clinical signs of dementia were seen in 10% (169 cases) of the autopsied patients. Neuropathological evaluations were performed on 70% (118) of these patients. Of these, 60% (70) showed degenerative changes and 36% (43) vascular alterations. Macroscopic examinations alone were performed in 30% of the cases. Of these, signs of severe cortical atrophy were seen in 21%, vascular lesions in 12%, and no macroscopic changes in 67%. The completeness of clinical and postmortem examinations of the 169 demented patients was variable. Approximately 40% of the patients lacked any diagnostic decision. In approximately 50% of the cases with diagnostic decision, the clinical diagnosis correlated with the histopathological diagnosis. This low correlation between the clinical diagnosis and the exact nature of the disease was primarily based on the variable completeness of the clinical examinations. In order to improve this situation, it is important to perform both a complete clinical investigation and a neuropathological verification of the nature of the disease.


Author(s):  
Dinesh Pal Yadav ◽  
Ramgopal Yadav ◽  
Indra Bhati

Background: Hysterectomy is the most common gynecological surgery done in the females worldwide as it provides definitive cure to a wide range of gynecological diseases, both benign and malignant. The indications to perform this major surgery should always be justified and the pathology should be proved histopathologically. Histopathological analysis and review is mandatory to evaluate the appropriateness of the hysterectomy.Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UMAID Hospital, Dr. S.N. M.C. Jodhpur (Raj.) during October 2014 to March 2015.Total 105 cases were studied during this period. The study included all women undergoing planned abdominal hysterectomy. Data was recorded on proformas, including demographic characteristics and clinical features. Hysterectomy specimens were saved in 10% formalin and sent to the Department of Pathology. Histopathology reports were analyzed and compared with the indications of surgery to draw various informative conclusions.Results: Of 105 cases, 55(52.38%) were in the age group of 41 – 50, which comprised the commonest age group undergoing the surgery. Maximum women (95%) those underwent hysterectomy were multiparous. Most common preoperatively clinical diagnosis was leiomyoma uterus which was diagnosed clinically and sonographically in 51(48.57%) cases. On Histopathological examination, the commonest pathology, similar to clinical impression, was found to be Leiomyoma at 50.48% (n = 53). Adenomyosis (21.90%) was detected as Second most common pathology. Histopathological confirmation of pre-operative diagnosis was 89% for malignancy, 96% for fibroids, 100% for adenomyosis, 100% for pelvic inflammatory disease.Conclusions: There was a high correlation when the clinical diagnosis was a fibroid, adenomyosis and ovarian mass. Every hysterectomy specimen should be subjected to histopathological examination because it is mandatory for conforming diagnosis and ensuring optimal management, in particular of malignant disease.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53
Author(s):  
Mohammad Sowkat Hossain ◽  
S M Mahbubul Alam ◽  
Sk Md Jaynul Islam ◽  
Wasim Selimul Haque ◽  
Shamoli Yasmin

Background: Undifferentiated tumours in the head and neck region are not uncommon. They can arise from different sites like in mucosa as well as in salivary glands, soft tissues or lymph nodes. Histopathological examination plays a central role in the diagnosis but difficulties arise with some tumours which are poorlydifferentiated due to their high inter- and intra-observer variability. In those cases, immunohistochemistry has greatly assisted to diagnose the tumours that cannot be accurately identified using routine histopathological procedures. The correct histopathological diagnosis is essential especially in case of malignant tumourwhere subsequent specific therapy is required. The aim of this study was to determine the role of immunohistochemistry for diagnosing undifferentiated malignancy in the head and neck region. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted during July 2014 to June 2015. A total of 35 Bangladeshi patient’s specimens of head and neck swelling were collected from two renowned laboratories in Dhaka city.These cases were diagnosed as undifferentiated tumour in histopathological examination.Standard protocol was followed for immunohistochemistry.Then primary immunohistochemical panel which included the markers for Epithelial CK (AE1/AE3),mesenchymal marker (Vimentin) and lymphoid marker (LCA) were used.The cases which were not resolved by primary immunohistochemistry panel, the second panel was applied for further sub classification (Desmin, Chromogranin, CK20, CEA, CD20, CD30, HMB45, NSE). Based on interpretation of immunohistochemical findings final diagnoses were made.Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows version 22.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA). Results: A total of 35 undifferentiated tumorsof head-neck region were studied.The mean age was 46.3±17.6 years and male to female ratio was 4.8:1. The majority 13 (37.1%) patient had cervical lymphadenopathy, 11 (31.4%) had neck mass and 4(11.4%) had in nasal/sinonasal mass.Regarding histopathologicalcell types, round cell was 21 (60.0%), spindle cell 6 (17.1%), pleomorphic cells 6(17.1%) and epithelioid cells 2(5.7%). In initial histopathological examination, majority 25(71.4%) were undifferentiated malignant neoplasm, 8(22.8%) were metastatic undifferentiated carcinoma, 1(2.9%) was pleomorphic sarcoma and the remaining 1(2.9%) had malignant adnexal tumour. By application of immunohistochemistry, most (33, 94.3%) of the cases were resolved and the two cases remained unresolved. Among the resolved cases majority (15, 45.5%) were lymphoma, 4(12.1%) were metastatic carcinoma, 3(9.1%) were Ewing’s sarcoma and malignant melanoma were found in 3(9.1%) cases. Conclusion: This study supports that the immunohistochemical technique has a fundamental role in the investigation of undifferentiated tumour origin, to determine the correct guidance for treatment and improving the prognosis for head and neck tumour patients. Birdem Med J 2020; 10(1): 48-53


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
Pal Subrata ◽  
Chakrabarti Srabani ◽  
Sinha Anuradha ◽  
Phukan Jyoti Prakash ◽  
Bose Kingshuk ◽  
...  

Introduction: Hysterectomy is the most commonly performed gynaecological surgery in India as well as in abroad. It is frequently done in myometrial and endometrial pathologies and rarely for other causes. Hysterectomy is definitive management for diseases like fibroid, adenomyosis, dysfunctional bleeding, prolapsed uterus and malignant lesions of uterus and adenexa. We aimed our study to observe incidence of different pathologies of uterus and other reproductive organs in hysterectomy specimens and retrospective correlation between clinical diagnosis and histopathological finding of hysterectomy cases.Materials and Methods: Retrospective data were collected from our routine histopathological laboratory. Detailed history, clinical examination and operative findings and provisional diagnosis of all 950 hysterectomy cases were recorded during study period of 2 years. Histopathological diagnosis was correlated with clinical and preoperative diagnosis.Observations: Abdominal hysterectomy (734 cases, 77.26%) was the most common route of approach during surgery. Common pre-operative diagnoses were fibroid uterus (32%), dysfunctional uterine bleeding (28.95%), uterine prolapsed (22.74%). Other causes included uterine polyps (1.6%), complications of pregnancy (2.74%), ovarian tumours (8.42%), cervical carcinomas (2.97%) etc. Common pathologies on histology were leiomyoma (32%), adenomyosis (20.32%), atrophic endometrium (17.26%) and endometrial pathology (8.95%).Discussion: Our study has been correlated with other studies of India and other south Asian countries. Most common indication of hysterectomy in our study is dysfunctional uterine bleeding (32%) but Gupta et al and Jha R et al found utero-vaginal prolapse as most common indication. Leiomyoma was the most common histology diagnosed in the present series. Clinical diagnosis was possible in 67.57% cases in our study similar to Khan et al (70.51%).Conclusions: Histopathological examination of hysterectomy specimens helps to detect the exact causes and underlined pathology.Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.17(1) 2018 p.88-92


1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Subedi ◽  
US Dangol ◽  
MB Adhikary ◽  
S Pudasaini ◽  
R Baral

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency. Obstruction of the lumen by fecolith is the usual cause of acute appendicitis.The aim of the study was to analyze clinical presentation of acute appendicitis and its histopathological correlation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of acute appendicitis was done in the Department of Surgery of Helping Hands Community Hospital from January 2009 to December 2010. Three hundred forty five patients out of 415 patients with clinical diagnosis of appendicitis underwent operative treatment. The histopathological reports were reviewed and correlated with clinical diagnosis. Results: Out of 345 patients who underwent operative procedure 98% (n= 338) came with chief complaint of pain in the periumbilical region migrating to the right iliac fossa. The mean age of presentation was 42 years. Increased leucocyte count was seen in only 65% cases. Acute appendicitis was more commonly seen in male patients (214 cases, 62%). The most common per operative finding was acutely inflammed appendix (84%) followed by perforated appendix (7.5%), gangrenous appendix (3.5%) and appendicular lump (1.5%). However, histopathological diagnoses were acute appendicitis (91.9%), resolving appendicitis (3.5%), lymphoid hyperplasia (2.6%), mucocele (0.3%) and carcinoid (0.3%). Normal histology was seen in 1.4% cases. Conclusion: Though there are other causes of acute abdomen, acute appendicitis still stands first amongst all the emergencies. Histopathological examination of appendectomy specimen should not be omitted in order to see the incidence negative appendectomy rate and to avoid complications relating to malignant conditions. Keywords: Acute appendicitis; Appendectomy; Appendicular perforation; Histopathology DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v1i2.5402 JPN 2011; 1(2): 104-107


Cephalalgia ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Ekbom ◽  
DA Svensson ◽  
H Träff ◽  
E Waldenlind

Five hundred and fifty-four patients with episodic cluster headache (ECH) and chronic cluster headache (CCH) were examined between 1963 and 1997. Mean age at onset was significantly higher in women with CCH compared with women with ECH and in men with ECH or CCH. In women with CCH age at onset was evenly distributed from 10 to 69 years, whereas in men with CCH and in both sexes with ECH, there was a peak when they were in their 20s. In women with ECH a second peak of onset occurred in their 50s. Although not statistically significant, primary CCH started later in women (mean 50.8 years) than secondary CCH (mean 35.5 years). There was a significant variation in the male : female ratio with respect to age at onset, being largest between 30 and 49 years of age (ECH 7.2 : 1; CCH 11.0 : 1) and lowest after 50 (ECH 2.3 : 1; CCH 0.6 : 1). During the observation period of more than 30 years there was a trend towards a decreasing male preponderance; the male: female ratio was significantly higher among patients with onset before rather than after 1970. The proportion of episodic vs. chronic CH did not change during the study period. The nature of the sex- and age-related pattern of cluster headache onset remains to be elucidated but mechanisms associated with sex hormone regulation, perhaps of hypothalamic origin, may be involved, as well as environmental factors related to lifestyle.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Galih Fata Anadza ◽  
Endang Syamsudin ◽  
Abel Tasman Yuza

Introduction: The diagnosis of a pathological disorder can be made in various stages, namely history taking, clinical examination and supporting examination. Clinical diagnosis is a diagnosis obtained from anamnesis and the results of clinical examination. Histopathological diagnosis is a diagnosis obtained from a microscopic examination of tissue. Clinical diagnosis and histopathological examination results may differ. The aim of the study was to obtain the accuracy value of the dentist’s clinical diagnosis by calculating the number of differences between the clinical diagnosis and the results of the histopathological examination of patients who were biopsied in the Department of Oral Surgery of General Hospital Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung. Methods: A retrospective descriptive study of cases of pathological abnormalities biopsied in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of General Hospital Dr Hasan Sadikin Bandung. The total number of study samples was 109 medical records of patients with biopsy. Results: The accuracy value of the clinical diagnosis of dentists was 76%, where the difference between the clinical diagnosis and the histopathological examination was 24%. The most common type of disorder with the greatest difference in diagnosis is ameloblastoma followed by papilloma and mucocele. Conclusion: The accuracy value of the clinical diagnosis of dentists in oral lesions performed biopsy is 76%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document