scholarly journals Energy-based devices for treatment of melasma

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (t1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Merheb Jordão ◽  
Priscila Regina Orso Rebellato

<p>Melasma, as a pigmentation disorder, induces significant stress to the patients and its recurrent nature remains a challenge in clinical practice. Treatment is based on a variety of mechanisms to prevent and/or stop the pigment production process by destroying the deposited pigment for removal or release, by peeling cells to improve their turnover, and by reducing inflammation. The use of appropriate devices and correct settings are crucial in the treatment of melasma. Cases unresponsive to topical bleaches or chemical peels should be referred for laser therapy. It is important that a maintenance therapy to avoid the recurrence of melasma be indicated. In this paper, we review energy-based devices for melasma treatment.</p>

Physiotherapy ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
GD Baxter ◽  
AJ Bell ◽  
JM Allen ◽  
J Ravey

Author(s):  
Holly Lee ◽  
Peter Duggan ◽  
Ernesta Paola Neri ◽  
Jason Tay ◽  
Victor Jimenez Zepeda

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) defines renal disease resulting from monoclonal proteins that are secreted from clonal B cells, that does not meet criteria for lymphoma or multiple myeloma. Recognizing MGRS in clinical practice is important because renal outcomes are poor and treatments targeting the underlying clonal disease have been associated with improved renal survival. In this case report, we present a case of a patient with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) with IgG-kappa deposition who underwent clone directed treatment in a phased approach with induction and maintenance to achieve renal response. This is one of the first cases to report on MGRS treatment that required extended maintenance therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18770-e18770
Author(s):  
Zohra Ali ◽  
Laura Appadu ◽  
Ellen Kitetere ◽  
Julian Wampfler ◽  
Dorothy Yang ◽  
...  

e18770 Background: Maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in recurrent high grade ovarian cancer is standard of care for patients who have responded to second or subsequent lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. The increased access to PARP inhibitors (Olaparib, Niraparib and Rucaparib) has provided the opportunity to explore the real-world toxicities in routine clinical practice, toxicity management and the consequent impact on maintenance therapy outcomes. Methods: Patients with relapsed ovarian cancer that received maintenance PARP inhibitor therapy in routine clinical practice between April 2015 and April 2020 were identified. Electronic patient records were reviewed retrospectively to retrieve details of any reported toxicities (occurring at any time during therapy) and their management. Data was entered into and analysed in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Results: 99 patients who received second or subsequent line maintenance PARPi therapy were included (median age 63.6 years). 36% had a germline BRCA1/2 mutation, 6% had a somatic BRCA1/2 mutation and 58% were BRCA wild-type. 69% received 2nd line maintenance therapy; 22% and 9% received a maintenance PARP inhibitor following 3rd or 4+ line therapy respectively. 56% had not received previous maintenance therapy; 43% had received Bevacizumab. 48% patients commenced maintenance therapy at full dose. 13% of patients experienced no toxicities. 60% of patients experienced G1-2 toxicities, with 42% experiencing >2 episodes; most common toxicities were fatigue, nausea/vomiting and thrombocytopenia. 26% of patients experienced >G3 toxicity, with 9% experiencing >2 episodes, 4% of which were recurring toxicities; most common toxicities were hypertension, neutropenia and anaemia. 64% of patients developed toxicity within the first cycle of treatment; 39% had a dose interruption, 56% of which were < 2 weeks duration. 59% patients required a dose reduction from their starting dose due to toxicities. There was no significant difference in median PFS between patients who had been dose reduced compared to those who received full starting dose (p > 0.05). Conclusions: In keeping with phase III clinical trials, our real-world experience is that most PARPi toxicities are low grade and occur early in treatment. Toxicities can be effectively managed with brief dose interruptions and dose reductions, without adverse impact on survival outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (29) ◽  
pp. 3199-3206
Author(s):  
Harshabad Singh ◽  
Kimberly Perez ◽  
Brian M. Wolpin ◽  
Andrew J. Aguirre

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document