scholarly journals POLIGAMI DALAM PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT HUKUM ISLAM (KRITIK TERHADAP HUKUM PERKAWINAN DI INDONESIA)

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Danu Aris Setiyanto

This paper will focus on polygamy with a philosophical approach to Islamic law and directly associated with the marriage law in Indonesia. Polygamy is an issue in family law of Islam in the discussion of fiqih both classic and contemporary. Even polygamy is a discussion that is always debated theologically and anthropocentrically. In the positive law in Indonesia, polygamy is allowed with certain conditions which are strict and in it famous with the principle of monogamy. The main requirement of polygamy both in fiqih and in Act No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage is fair, both physically and spiritually. Polygamy is a right that can only be owned by the husband and not owned by the wife. In the philosophy of Islamic law, polygamy is certainly not due only to the satisfaction of mere biological. But more than that, polygamy is interpreted as a solution to resolve a number of social issues such as the poor orphans, protection of the poor widow, and others. Polygamy in philosophy also has the meaning of protection, to avoid lewdness, and justice for feminists. However, in practice in Indonesia, philosophy of polygamy in the Marriage Law considered  by some of parties, can not be realized effectively. This is due to the absence of strict sanctions, weak administration, and the lack of public awareness in obeying the rules of religion and the Marriage Law in Indonesia. [Tulisan ini akan difokuskan tentang poligami dengan pendekatan filosofis hukum Islam dan dikaitkan langsung dengan hukum perkawinan di Indonesia. Poligami merupakan isu dalam hukum keluarga Islam baik dalam pembahasan fikih klasik maupun fikih kontemporer. Bahkan poligami adalah pembahasan yang selalu diperdebatkan secara teologis maupun antroposentris. Dalam hukum positif di Indonesia, poligami diperbolehkan dengan syarat-syarat tertentu yang ketat dan di dalamnya terkenal dengan asas monogami. Syarat utama poligami baik dalam  fikih maupun dalam Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan adalah adil, baik secara lahir maupun secara batin. Poligami merupakan hak yang hanya dimiliki oleh suami dan tidak dimiliki oleh istri. Secara filosofi hukum Islam, poligami tentu saja bukan karena hanya untuk kepuasan biologis semata. Namun lebih dari itu, poligami dimaknai sebagai solusi untuk menyelesaikan sejumlah persoalan sosial seperti adanya anak yatim yang kurang mampu, perlindungan janda yang lemah dan lain-lain. Poligami secara filosofi juga memiliki makna perlindungan, menghindari perbuatan keji, dan keadilan bagi kaum feminis. Namun dalam praktinya di Indonesia, makna filosofi poligami dalam UU Perkawinan dianggap sejumlah pihak tidak dapat diwujudkan efektif. Hal ini disebabkan karena tidak adanya sanksi yang tegas, lemahnya administrasi, dan lemahnya kesadaran masyarakat dalam menaati aturan agama dan UU Perkawinan di Indonesia.]

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-60
Author(s):  
Miftahul Huda

The reality of the difference in applying Islamic law in the context of marriage law legislation in modern Muslim countries is undeniable. Tunisia and Turkey, for example, have practiced Islamic law of liberal nuance. Unlike the case with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates that still use the application of Islamic law as it is in their fiqh books. In between these two currents many countries are trying to apply the law in their own countries by trying to bridge the urgent new needs and local wisdom. This is widely embraced by modern Muslim countries in general. This paper reviews typologically the heterogeneousness of family law legislation of modern Muslim countries while responding to modernization issues. Typical buildings seen from modern family law reforms can be classified into four types. The first type is progressive, pluralistic and extradoctrinal reform, such as in Turkey and Tunisia. The second type is adaptive, unified and intradoctrinal reform, as in Indonesia, Malaysia, Morocco, Algeria and Pakistan. The third type is adaptive, unified and intradoctrinal reform, represented by Iraq. While the fourth type is progressive, unifiied and extradoctrinal reform, which can be represented by Somalia and Algeria.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-78
Author(s):  
Haqqiyah Uthlufah

The problem of the principle of submission in the divorce law in the Religious Court by a non-Muslim couple occurs because the couple's marriage is based on Islamic law. What cannot be separated from Islamic law is Islamic family law because it is related to the faith of a Muslim. Islamic family law can only apply to Muslims and cannot apply to non-Muslims. The problem of the principle of submission to the divorce law was incomplete (incomplete norm) or the existence of a legal vacuum (vacuum of norm) in marriage law in Indonesia. This research is a legal research and is normative in nature. The approach used is statutory, case, and conceptual. The legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary. The method of collecting legal materials is first to qualify the facts and then to qualify the law. The analytical tool used is legal interpretation in the form of principal, systematic and grammatical interpretation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Muchammad Ichsan

This study aims at examining the legality of interreligious marriage according to Islamic law and Indonesian positive law. To reach the goal set by this research, a descriptive method is used in the writing while an analytical method is employed to scrutinize the relevant problems. This study finds that interreligious marriage has spread widely among Indonesians that it has now become a phenomenon. However, Islam does not recognize a Muslim woman's marriage unless she is married by a man belonging to the same religion, i.e. a Muslim. A Muslim man is not permitted to marry a mushrik (polytheist) woman. It is lawful for him to marry a woman from the Ahlul Kitaab (Jews and Christians), but Indonesian ulemas prohibit such a marriage as well because of the negative outcomes. Meanwhile, the 1974 Indonesian Marriage Law fails to address the issue of interreligious marriage in a clear manner. This brings forth at least three interpretations: firstly, the law does not regulate interreligious marriage at all; secondly, the law allows it; and thirdly, the law denies it. Through an analysis, the last interpretation is found to have stronger reasons than the others.  Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji legalitas pernikahan antaragama menurut hukum Islam dan hukum positif Indonesia. Agar tercapai tujuan yang diinginkan, maka penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif untuk menganalisis masalah yang sedang diteliti. Studi ini menemukan bahwa pernikahan antaragama telah menyebar luas di kalangan masyarakat Indonesia yang kini telah menjadi fenomena. Namun, Islam tidak mengenali pernikahan wanita Muslim kecuali jika dia menikah dengan pria yang memiliki agama yang sama, yaitu seorang Muslim. Seorang pria Muslim tidak diizinkan untuk menikahi wanita musyrik (politeis). Dan halal baginya untuk menikahi wanita dari Ahlul Kitaab (Yahudi dan Kristen), namun sebagian ulama Indonesia tetap melarang pernikahan semacam ini, karena beberapa alasan. Sementara itu, Undang-Undang Perkawinan Indonesia 1974 gagal menangani masalah pernikahan antaragama dengan cara yang jelas. Ini setidaknya menghasilkan tiga interpretasi: pertama, hukum sama sekali tidak mengatur pernikahan antaragama; Kedua, hukum mengizinkannya; Ketiga, undang-undang tersebut menolaknya. Melalui sebuah analisis tersebut di atas, disimpulkan bahwa jenis interpretasi yang terakhir ditemukan memiliki alasan yang lebih kuat daripada alasan yang lainnya.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-103
Author(s):  
Sanawiah Sanawiah

The purpose of this study was to find out what sirri marriage laws according to Islamic Law and Positive Law, to find harmony and marriage requirements and to find out how the role of Religious Court of Palangka Raya in socialization confirmation marriage. The method used in this research is the method of legal normative. As for the type of research used in this study is inventory regulations that related to confirmation of marriage legalized marriage sirri according to Positive Law and Religious Law. Law wedding sirri results according to Islamic Law and Positive Law, sirri marriage according to Islamic Law illegitimate because it does not have a guardian of marriage, while marriage sirri in the view of the majority of Indonesian society is marriage not recorded but the terms and illegitimate pillars have been met in accordance with Islamic Law. Meanwhile, according to the law of the wedding positive sirri is as where according to Marriage Law in Indonesia if a legal marriage in syar'i then legitimate also according to law "marriage is not recorded" is legal according to the laws and regulations because according to Islamic Marriage Law applicable in Indonesia is based on Article 2 (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 in conjunction with Article 4 Compilation of Islamic Law (as ius constitutun) in conjunction with Article 3 bill-HM-PA-Bperkw 2007 (as ius constituendum).


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosdiana Rosdiana ◽  
Hotnidah Nasution

AbstractThe terrorist or ex-terrorist wives in Solo have experienced diverse conditions after their husband officially becomes a terrorist prisoner who has been lived in jail. The Rights of Wife in Law No. 1 of 1974 about Marriage among terrorist wives in Solo have sharpened the analysis on how their level of perception of the wife’s rights that regulated by Law No. 10 of 1974. This study aims to reveal the reality of cases that took place with terrorist wives related to the fulfillment of their rights as a wife regulated by law, and to categorize their marital status related to the validity in a positive law (whether the marriage is registered or not in The Office of Religious Affairs (KUA)). Besides, this paper also wants to explore the terrorist wives' understanding who are legally married in KUA regarding their rights which are highly protected by the law. This research uses a qualitative method which aimed to find concepts and theories, and library research by applying the empirical or sociological legal approach. Data sources used are Primary Data, namely the terrorist prisoner’s wives in Solo, and secondary data from the Marriage Law (Law No. 1 of 1974), Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), books, journals, articles, views of legal experts, and the results of other paper and writings related to the problems that become the subject in this research discussion. The descriptive data analysis method aims to figure out systematically, factually and accurately the facts about the understanding of terrorist wives related to their rights in the Marriage Law (Law No. 1 of 1974). After analyzing and interpreting the existing data, it can be concluded that the terrorist prisoner wives in Central Java have a fairly good understanding of their rights as wives regulated in Law No. 1 of 1974. If only there are rights that undermanned by them for the unfulfilled obligations by the husband, then it is caused by their sincerity attitude towards the husband status who becomes a prisoner. The religious doctrine that is strong enough makes the prisoner’s wife do not ask many of her rights, both physical and mental rights that are not well fulfilled. For them, the status of a husband to become a terrorist prisoner is a Shari reason which consequences must be accepted sincerely.Keywords: Understanding, wife's rights, Terrorist Prisoner’s Wives


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-2020
Author(s):  
Fathonah K. Daud ◽  
Aden Rosadi

This article examines the dynamics of family law in the Islamic Republic of Iran where there are upheavals and struggles between the secular elites and ulama from 1927 to the present day. This study applied a library research by digging up information related to the theme of the study. The results of this study indicate that the Islamic Republic of Iran is dominantly Shia Imamiyyah (Jafari) but it also accommodates the Hanafi (Sunni) School in the field of marriage law. Iranian family law has gone through many changes. Since 1928 the issue of divorce and marriage which was originally regulated in Irans Qanun Madani came into force in 1930, the Marriage Law was then enacted in 1931. After three decades, in 1967 there was a reformation, the Marriage Law was replaced by the Family Protection act, then it was replaced with the Protection of Family in 1975. These laws are a combination of Islamic Law and French civil Jurisprudence, though they seem more secular. However, since the Iranian Revolution in 1979, these laws have been abolished and all laws in Iran have been returned to sharia law. As a result, the laws become repressive against women, except in the field of inheritance which provides gender equality. While there have been many highly educated women in Iran, since 2006 many women have filed for divorce. On the other hand, the practice of mutah marriage has begun to be abandoned and polygamy is opposed by the community.


Author(s):  
Ahmad Sainul

There is a difference in the concept of the legal maturity limit according to Islamic law and positive law. The legal subject's maturity is fifteen years old or ihtilam for men and menstruation for women. whereas according to positive law there is no legal certainty regarding legal skills in the age of 18 years, 21 years, or after marriage, resulting in confusion in determining one's skills before the law. Then the age difference in the Marriage Law for men and women needs to be equalized and needs to be re-agreed in accordance with physical and mental considerations for all parties who will get married


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Binka Lg Simatupang ◽  
Taufik Siregar

<p>Juridical Review Due to Divorce Against Gono-Gini Property Distribution According to the Civil Code on Decision Number: 706/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Medan</p><h1>The main goal of humans in slimming is to form a harmonious household. Based on the marriage law number 1 of 1974, marriage is a birth bond between a man and a woman as a husband with a family (household) goal that is pleasant or eternal through the Almighty Godhead. If the divorce occurs indoors, the household can be described as having a result of the person in dispute in the household, where during the marriage, the household that has assets or in everyday language in Indonesia is said to be a "gono-gini" property. In this study, the research engineers are normative juridical, namely research aimed at examining or norms in positive law. The characteristics of this research are analytical descriptive, which is uniquely from the facts to determine something that happened. The purpose of this study was to find out the implementation of the sharing of shared assets and to find out the obstacles to the distribution of shared assets. In addition, in the Compilation of Islamic Law, the distribution of shared assets is also regulated in KHPerdata.</h1>


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Beni Chandra ◽  
Toha Andiko

The Indonesian Government guarantees the rights and protection of children by Act 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection. The law provides absolute protection for children against physical and psychological violence that they may receive, but on the other hand there is an interest in Moslem’s families to educate their children according to Islamic law (fiqh), so that there is a contradiction both of them. This research was conducted to determine the view of Islamic family and positive law on the problem of handling and protecting children and the limits of violence against children. The researchers used a comparative approach and library research method. Based on the research conducted, it is found that Islamic family and positive law go in line to provide protection for children. The differences are in the perspective of “children”, violence against children, the application of physical and psychological punishment, and actions against perpetrators of violence. In addition, there are limits to acts of both physical and psychological violence as a preventive and repressive measure against children, according to the provisions of Islamic family law


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-108
Author(s):  
Nastangin N

Underage marriage is marriage between men and women who both have not reached the age of 19 years for men and 16 years for women according to the regulations in the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974. Marriage is done legally in formal lawand state law. State that is invalid if it does not meet the requirements. In the perspective of religion, underage marriage is marriage carried out by people who have not been mature. The majority of Islamic Law experts legalize early marriage. This understanding is the result of the interpretation of Q.S.Ath-Thalak: 4 and historical records The Prophet married Aisyah at a young age. Some scholars also legalize underage marriage has become a consensus of Islamic law experts. The purpose of this paper is to find out the nature of the existence of marriage records. This research uses a philosophical approach, by explaining the nature and wisdom of its formal object. The conclusion is that there is age limitation to give benefit to someone who wants to get married because age is very influential on family life


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document