scholarly journals The peculiarities of elaboration of the French-Ukrainian and UkrainianFrench dictionary of physical education and sport

XLinguae ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-298
Author(s):  
Rostyslav Koval ◽  
Olha Romanchuk ◽  
Ulyana Protsenko ◽  
Andrii Sova ◽  
Olesia Tatarovska

In this article we analyze the principles of elaboration of the French-Ukrainian and Ukrainian-French dictionary of physical education and sport / PES. In the dictionary, we include the terms to name the sites where a sporting activity takes place; the names of players and sportsmen; medical professions; equipment and accessories; sports; competitions and rules; people and structures that follow these regulations; institutions and organizations; verbs related to sport; techniques and styles; results, procedures and reactions; sports medicine terminology. The practical results will improve the possibilities of teaching French for students of physical education and sport, and for those who want to learn French for specific purposes (PES).

Work ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 767-769
Author(s):  
Sanaz Faraji ◽  
Mahboubeh Ghayour Najafabadi ◽  
Mitch Rostad ◽  
Albert Thomas Anastasio

The potential ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic global shut down on physical education providers and youth sport coaches may be particularly severe due to substantial cutbacks on many of their normal activities. This population faces unique challenges in engaging in “virtual learning” given the physical nature of their job, potentially leading to sedentary lifestyle, weight gain, and the development of depressive mood disorders. This commentary aims to explore options to mitigate worsening of stress, depression, physical inactivity, and social disconnection in youth sport coaches following the guidelines of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) and to call attention to this vulnerable demographic which has been substantially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.


2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (Avance Online) ◽  

Resumen El Grupo de Trabajo Avilés fue impulsado por el Consejo Superior de Deportes en 2009 y está formado por representantes de los Centros de Medicina de la Educación Física y el Deporte de todas las comunidades autónomas que cuentan con estas infraestructuras y representantes de centros de medicina del deporte de centros de tecnificación, centros municipales de medicina del deporte y la Agencia Española de Protección de la Salud del Deportista. Como objetivos de este grupo de trabajo figuran la coordinación entre estas estructuras autonómicas de la medicina del deporte, el planteamiento de soluciones comunes a las diferentes problemáticas que sufren cada uno de los centros y el ser un grupo de asesoramiento, en los diferentes ámbitos de la medicina de la educación física y el deporte, para el Consejo Superior de Deportes. Este grupo de trabajo se reúne periódicamente; en su última reunión, celebrada del 12 al 13 de noviembre de 2018 en Avilés, tras las diferentes reuniones de trabajo celebradas, se acordaron una serie de conclusiones, en relación con el propio Grupo de Avilés, la salud del deportista, la regulación de los reconocimientos medicodeportivos, la promoción de la actividad física beneficiosa para la salud, la investigación en Medicina de la Educación Física y el Deporte, o el mantenimiento de la especialidad. Este artículo reproduce dichas conclusiones. Abstract The Avilés Working Group was promoted by the National Sports Council in 2009 and is made up of representatives of Physical Education and Sports Medicine Centers of all the autonomous communities that have these infrastructures, Sports Technification Centers, municipal Sports Medicine Centers and the Spanish Agency for Health Protection in Sport. The objectives of this working group include the coordination between these autonomous structures of Sports Medicine, the proposal of common solutions to the different problems suffered by each of the centers and to be an advisory group in the different areas of the Physical Education and Sports Medicine, for the National Sports Council. This working group meets periodically; at its last meeting, held from 12 to 13 November 2018 in Avilés, after the different work meetings held, a series of conclusions were agreed, in relation to the Avilés Group itself, the health of the athlete, the regulation of the sports medical examinations, the promotion of the beneficial physical activity to health, research in Physical Education and Sports Medicine, or the maintenance of the medical specialty. This article reproduces these conclusions. Resumo O grupo de Trabalho Avilés foi incentivado pelo Conselho Superior de Esportes em 2009. É composto por representantes dos Centros de Medicina da Educação Física e Esporte de todas as comunidades autônomas que contam com estas infraestruturas, bem como representantes dos centros de medicina do esporte de centros técnicos, centros municipais de medicina do esporte e da Agencia Espanhola de Proteção da saúde do esportista. Como objetivos de trabalho desde grupo, figuram a coordenação entre estas estruturas autonômicas da medicina do esporte, a criação de soluções comuns as diferentes problemáticas que sofrem cada um dos centros, além de ser um grupo de assessoramento, nos diferentes âmbitos da medicina da educação física e do esporte, para o Conselho Superior de Esportes. Este grupo de trabalho se reúne periodicamente; Em sua última reunião, celebrada de 12 à 13 de novembro de 2018 em Avilés, traz as diferentes reuniões de trabalho celebradas, se acordam uma série de conclusões em relação ao próprio Grupo de Avilés, a saúde do esportista, a regulação dos reconhecimentos médico desportivos, a promoção da atividade física voltada a saúde, a investigação em Medicina da Educação Física e do esporte e a manutenção da especialidade. Este artigo reproduz estas conclusões.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-126
Author(s):  
Pedro Manonelles Marqueta ◽  
Luis Franco Bonafonte ◽  
Carlos De Teresa Galván ◽  
Miguel Del Valle Soto ◽  
Teresa Gaztañaga Aurrekoetxea ◽  
...  

The regular practice of physical exercise is extraordinarily effective in the management of a growing number of chronic diseases, some of them with a prevalence of pandemic magnitude, for which the society must assume the incorporation of physical activity as a health strategy to prevent and to serve as a complementary treatment of the disease. Not only medicine and physiotherapy play a fundamental role in the management of exercise for health but also, outside of health, Sports science and physical education degree is crucial in this field of work. From a health point of view, medicine and physiotherapy have a primary role in the management of exercise for health and also, outside of health, sports science and physical education degree occupy a very prominent role in the promotion and implementation of strategies for the promotion of health. These professions have been occupying a position in addressing this problem that, on some occasions, has led to points of friction with respect to their role, responsibilities and function. On the other hand, there is a need to resolve the question of the professions’ areas of competence while maintaining the will to simultaneously recognize the growing areas of competence shared interprofessionally and the highly relevant areas specific to each profession. This document is based on the need to address the incorporation of exercise in the prevention and management of disease in a solid and consistent way, considering the contribution of the professions involved from the perspective of multidisciplinary work and with a non-conflictual but cooperative, transparent and respectful collaboration. In addition, this collaboration should always aim at serving society in the most effective way possible, clearly defining the professional attributions of medicine, physiotherapy and physical activity and sport sciences in everything related to the use of exercise as a tool for health.


Author(s):  
Michael K. Gross

With the advent of national and international concern about children’s decreasing activity levels, a number of interventions have been put in place that aim to promote cardiovascular health. These include national trials such as CATCH (Perry, Sellers, & Johnson, 1997) and SPARK (Sallis, McKenzie, Alcaraz, Kolody, Faucette, & Hovell, 1997). At a more programmatic level, there has been increasing attention towards the expansion of school physical education, dissuading children from pursuing sedentary activities, providing suitable role models for physical activity, and making activity-promoting changes in the environment (Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness, 2006).


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (4) ◽  
pp. 40-47
Author(s):  
Anatoliy Chustrak ◽  
Artemy Kiziryan ◽  
Edward Kiziryan

According to the Federal center of kinesitherapy and sports medicine of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation, only 12% of people who are involved in sports become apparently healthy. There has long been a polemic in literature, which is better physical education or sports? Physical culture is a part of General human culture. And the sport is just one of many means of physical exercise within this more General category of «physical culture». Today, unfortunately, culture prevents to live not only for athletes, but also politicians, businessmen and government officials. The article draws attentions to the negative aspects of sports that have become more prominent in recent years: injury, illness and even deaths of elite athletes. The article provides facts, statements of famous scientists, traumatologists, doctors and trainers about the reasons for the negative impact of sports and recommendations how to avoid it and warn that exercise: sports like smoking are dangerous to health. Recommendations for beginner athletes are given. The doctor's consultation and recommendations what kind of sport is best to do need to be at least in this problem. What should be: sportswear, shoes and most importantly what loads to use in the beginning. It is forbidden to go in for sports with a diagnosis of cancer and immunodeficiency diseases, colds and other inflammations and even if you feel ill. You need to listen to your body, finish training at the first signs of fatigue and avoid strenuous physical activity, which is rarely noticed by coaches. According to the statistics of injuries among runners: the most common injuries are knees, then ankles, hips, lower back, muscles and tendons, thighs and calves, upper back and neck. The US Safety Commission has registered 554,000 injuries to cyclists in one year. The recommendations of Academician M. Amosov are shown: a set of 10 exercises, repeating each exercise 100 times. Tibetan lamas recommend only 5 exercises and repetitions from 3 to 21 times each of the exercise. Everything can be used for good or harm. Everything is food, and everything is poison, the main thing is moderation. You can choose high sports achievements and records or high efficiency and healthy longevity.


2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Pigozzi ◽  
A. Di Gianfrancesco ◽  
M. Zorzoli ◽  
N. Bachl ◽  
D. Mc Donagh ◽  
...  

In addition to their therapeutic applications, glucocorticosteroids have been widely used and abused in the belief that these substances may enhance athletic performance. Analysis of athlete urine samples by antidoping laboratories around the world support this conclusion. It is commonly accepted in medical practice to use local glucocorticosteroid injections in the treatment of non-infectious local musculotendinous inflammatory conditions conveying symptom relief and often a speedier return to sporting activity. This practice is not to be considered illicit, but sports physicians must accept that such an intervention is not in itself an immediate cure and that an athlete will still require a period of recuperation before continuing sporting activity. How long such a period of recuperation should last is a matter of conjecture and there is little concrete data to support what is, or what is not, an acceptable period of inactivity. In the interest of athlete safety, we would propose to maintain systemic glucocorticosteroids on the World Anti-Doping Agency's (WADA) list of prohibited substances, both in and out-of-competition as well as a mandatory period of 48 hours of rest from play after receiving a local glucocorticosteroid injection.


1970 ◽  
Vol 19 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 80-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Venerando ◽  
M. Milani-Comparetti

In his recent book Dr. Roy J. Schepherd states that:“Further information of genetic effects is likely to be derived from comparisons of identical (monozygotic) and fraternal (dizygotic) twins. Gedda (1961) has already shown that identical twins are more likely to have a similar interest in sports than are fraternal twins. It would be interesting to carry out comparisons of maximum oxygen intake and other objective measurements of endurance fitness on the two classes of twins, but this crucial experiment has yet to be completed”.We are very glad to be able to announce here that Dr. Schepherd's wish is being fulfilled within the scope of a wider research project undertaken jointly by the Gregor Mendel Institute for Medical Genetics and Twin Research and the Italian Olympic Committee's Institute of Sports Medicine under the auspices of the Italian Sports Medicine Federation.The studies we have undertaken aim to assess the respective roles of genetic and environmental factors as related to selection and training in sports and physical education.The twin method affords, through a comparison of MZ and DZ within-pair concordances, an assessment of the degree of genetic conditioning in any individual trait.It is quite obvious that the possible influence of training on any given trait is inversely proportional to the degree of genetic conditioning of the same trait.If a given trait, required for a certain type of activity, is completely or almost completely conditioned by the genotype, we should seek those who have inherited it from their parents without wasting time and effort in useless training sessions.As we can see, the scientific information we are seeking has great practical importance in the selection and training of athletes in every single field of sports and physical education.


2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-27
Author(s):  
Ágnes Vámos ◽  
Gyongyi S. Foldesi ◽  
Tamas Doczi

AbstractIn this study, the sporting activity of Hungarian school pupils is investigated with a focus on regional differences. The objective of the paper is to answer the following questions: Are there regional differences in pupils’ sporting activity, and, if yes, what is their relationship with the socio-cultural background of the pupils and the infrastructural and staffing conditions of schools? Has the 2012 introduction of daily physical education had a different effect on pupils’ leisure-time sporting activity in disadvantaged and affluent regions? Can the trends in the sporting activity of pupils be characterized as convergent or divergent since the introduction of daily physical education? The paper is based on an extensive study that relies on the most comprehensive database on physical education in schools, the National Assessment of Basic Competencies (NABC). The present study statistically analyzed eighth-grade pupil and school data from the 2010 and 2014 NABC. The results present the regional differences in pupils’ participation in sporting activity, their recent modification, and the main reasons behind the changes. In conclusion, the authors state that social, economic, and cultural inequalities are not clearly reflected in the sporting activity of students; however, certain data still call attention to the need to examine regional differences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document