scholarly journals Conclusiones de las VI Jornadas del Grupo Avilés Sobre Medicina del Deporte

2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (Avance Online) ◽  

Resumen El Grupo de Trabajo Avilés fue impulsado por el Consejo Superior de Deportes en 2009 y está formado por representantes de los Centros de Medicina de la Educación Física y el Deporte de todas las comunidades autónomas que cuentan con estas infraestructuras y representantes de centros de medicina del deporte de centros de tecnificación, centros municipales de medicina del deporte y la Agencia Española de Protección de la Salud del Deportista. Como objetivos de este grupo de trabajo figuran la coordinación entre estas estructuras autonómicas de la medicina del deporte, el planteamiento de soluciones comunes a las diferentes problemáticas que sufren cada uno de los centros y el ser un grupo de asesoramiento, en los diferentes ámbitos de la medicina de la educación física y el deporte, para el Consejo Superior de Deportes. Este grupo de trabajo se reúne periódicamente; en su última reunión, celebrada del 12 al 13 de noviembre de 2018 en Avilés, tras las diferentes reuniones de trabajo celebradas, se acordaron una serie de conclusiones, en relación con el propio Grupo de Avilés, la salud del deportista, la regulación de los reconocimientos medicodeportivos, la promoción de la actividad física beneficiosa para la salud, la investigación en Medicina de la Educación Física y el Deporte, o el mantenimiento de la especialidad. Este artículo reproduce dichas conclusiones. Abstract The Avilés Working Group was promoted by the National Sports Council in 2009 and is made up of representatives of Physical Education and Sports Medicine Centers of all the autonomous communities that have these infrastructures, Sports Technification Centers, municipal Sports Medicine Centers and the Spanish Agency for Health Protection in Sport. The objectives of this working group include the coordination between these autonomous structures of Sports Medicine, the proposal of common solutions to the different problems suffered by each of the centers and to be an advisory group in the different areas of the Physical Education and Sports Medicine, for the National Sports Council. This working group meets periodically; at its last meeting, held from 12 to 13 November 2018 in Avilés, after the different work meetings held, a series of conclusions were agreed, in relation to the Avilés Group itself, the health of the athlete, the regulation of the sports medical examinations, the promotion of the beneficial physical activity to health, research in Physical Education and Sports Medicine, or the maintenance of the medical specialty. This article reproduces these conclusions. Resumo O grupo de Trabalho Avilés foi incentivado pelo Conselho Superior de Esportes em 2009. É composto por representantes dos Centros de Medicina da Educação Física e Esporte de todas as comunidades autônomas que contam com estas infraestruturas, bem como representantes dos centros de medicina do esporte de centros técnicos, centros municipais de medicina do esporte e da Agencia Espanhola de Proteção da saúde do esportista. Como objetivos de trabalho desde grupo, figuram a coordenação entre estas estruturas autonômicas da medicina do esporte, a criação de soluções comuns as diferentes problemáticas que sofrem cada um dos centros, além de ser um grupo de assessoramento, nos diferentes âmbitos da medicina da educação física e do esporte, para o Conselho Superior de Esportes. Este grupo de trabalho se reúne periodicamente; Em sua última reunião, celebrada de 12 à 13 de novembro de 2018 em Avilés, traz as diferentes reuniões de trabalho celebradas, se acordam uma série de conclusões em relação ao próprio Grupo de Avilés, a saúde do esportista, a regulação dos reconhecimentos médico desportivos, a promoção da atividade física voltada a saúde, a investigação em Medicina da Educação Física e do esporte e a manutenção da especialidade. Este artigo reproduz estas conclusões.

Retos ◽  
2016 ◽  
pp. 82-87
Author(s):  
David Méndez Alonso ◽  
Angel Pérez Pueyo ◽  
Antonio Méndez Giménez ◽  
Francisco Javier Fernandez Río ◽  
José Antonio Prieto Saborit

Tres fueron los objetivos de esta investigación: a) analizar el desarrollo curricular autonómico a partir del RD 1.105/2014 que establece el currículo básico de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria (ESO) en relación a la Educación Física (EF), b) comparar la carga horaria asignada a esta asignatura, y c) examinar las diferentes posibilidades que los currículos autonómicos han contemplado para incrementar la actividad física (AF) de los estudiantes en horario lectivo. Se realizó un análisis comparativo y cualitativo de las 15 normativas curriculares autonómicas disponibles. Los resultados muestran una elevada disparidad entre las autonomías en la manera de abordar los elementos curriculares. La catalogación de la EF como asignatura específica ha provocado serias divergencias, principalmente en los contenidos. Pese a las reiteradas reivindicaciones de los docentes y profesionales de la salud, la carga horaria se ha mantenido inmutable en relación a las leyes anteriores: dos horas semanales. Con todo, la consideración de propuestas en el marco de las asignaturas de libre configuración autonómica podría representar una vía eficaz para el incremento de la AF en los centros educativos.Abstract. The present research work has three main goals: a) to assess curricular development of RD 1105/2014, which establishes the basic curriculum in compulsory Secondary Education, in relation to Physical Education; b) to compare credit hours of this subject by Autonomous Community; and c) to examine the different curricular strategies that each Autonomous Community has taken into consideration to increase students’ physical activity levels within the school context. A comparative, qualitative analysis was carried out to assess 15 Spanish Autonomous Communities’ curricula. Results showed high disparities among Communities. The fact that Physical Education has been stated by law as a specific subject has led to sharp differences, mainly in terms of contents. Despite education and health professionals’ recurrent demands for change, physical education credit hours have remained unaltered: 2 hours per week. However, the consideration of different proposals within the new free-configuration autonomous subjects framework could represent an effective strategy to increase physical activity in educational contexts.


2020 ◽  
pp. 001789692097132
Author(s):  
Denise Peerbhoy ◽  
Masoumeh Minou ◽  
Gareth Stratton

Objective: The aim of this project was to document a partnership working process from a cross-sectoral and cross-cultural participatory health research study focused on promoting physical activity among women from Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) backgrounds. Design: A participatory health research paradigm was used to support this pilot feasibility study into partnership working for health promotion. Action research and community development principles underpinned the design, delivery and interpretation of findings from a community-based survey, data from four focus groups and bespoke interventions. Setting: Community groups from education, leisure, health and religious community sectors, and charity sectors, in the City of Liverpool, met in different venues representing those sectors. Method: Reflection on the process of community engagement in a research study guided by socio-ecological model, community development and action research principles. Results: Seven emerging collaborative processes based on effective partnership working, capacity-building practice and sustaining health and wellbeing evolved from a partnership between a Community Researchers Advisory Group and a Partners Advisory Group. BAME ‘community connectors’ were key to obtaining feedback from 213 women from 16 ethnic groups, which influenced the development of bespoke interventions and local sport and physical activity long-term policy, as one means of reducing social inequalities for women from BAME backgrounds. Conclusion: This feasibility study demonstrates the effectiveness and limitations of partnership working as a public health tool. The local Sport and Physical Activity Alliance and council department worked together to promote the sustainability of BAME-focused programmes as part of their governance and policy frameworks.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-126
Author(s):  
Pedro Manonelles Marqueta ◽  
Luis Franco Bonafonte ◽  
Carlos De Teresa Galván ◽  
Miguel Del Valle Soto ◽  
Teresa Gaztañaga Aurrekoetxea ◽  
...  

The regular practice of physical exercise is extraordinarily effective in the management of a growing number of chronic diseases, some of them with a prevalence of pandemic magnitude, for which the society must assume the incorporation of physical activity as a health strategy to prevent and to serve as a complementary treatment of the disease. Not only medicine and physiotherapy play a fundamental role in the management of exercise for health but also, outside of health, Sports science and physical education degree is crucial in this field of work. From a health point of view, medicine and physiotherapy have a primary role in the management of exercise for health and also, outside of health, sports science and physical education degree occupy a very prominent role in the promotion and implementation of strategies for the promotion of health. These professions have been occupying a position in addressing this problem that, on some occasions, has led to points of friction with respect to their role, responsibilities and function. On the other hand, there is a need to resolve the question of the professions’ areas of competence while maintaining the will to simultaneously recognize the growing areas of competence shared interprofessionally and the highly relevant areas specific to each profession. This document is based on the need to address the incorporation of exercise in the prevention and management of disease in a solid and consistent way, considering the contribution of the professions involved from the perspective of multidisciplinary work and with a non-conflictual but cooperative, transparent and respectful collaboration. In addition, this collaboration should always aim at serving society in the most effective way possible, clearly defining the professional attributions of medicine, physiotherapy and physical activity and sport sciences in everything related to the use of exercise as a tool for health.


Author(s):  
Michael K. Gross

With the advent of national and international concern about children’s decreasing activity levels, a number of interventions have been put in place that aim to promote cardiovascular health. These include national trials such as CATCH (Perry, Sellers, & Johnson, 1997) and SPARK (Sallis, McKenzie, Alcaraz, Kolody, Faucette, & Hovell, 1997). At a more programmatic level, there has been increasing attention towards the expansion of school physical education, dissuading children from pursuing sedentary activities, providing suitable role models for physical activity, and making activity-promoting changes in the environment (Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness, 2006).


Retos ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 434-441
Author(s):  
Miguel Ángel De la Cámara ◽  
Manel Valcarce Torrente ◽  
Óscar L Veiga

El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar las tendencias de fitness en España para el año 2020 según la opinión de los profesionales del sector a través de una encuesta online, así como comparar los resultados obtenidos con las tendencias identificadas por la Encuesta Nacional sobre Tendencias en Fitness en España y la internacional del Colegio Americano de Medicina del Deporte (ACSM) del año 2019. La encuesta fue enviada a 6835 profesionales del sector del fitness de todas las comunidades autónomas españolas, incluidas las ciudades de Ceuta y Melilla y se recogieron un total de 513 respuestas (tasa de respuesta de 7,5%). Las tendencias más relevantes para 2020 en España son: “entrenamiento de fuerza”, “contratación de profesionales certificados” “equipos multidisciplinares de trabajo”, “entrenamiento funcional” y “regulación ejercicio profesionales fitness”. Además, las tendencias identificadas para 2020 indican una destacada importancia e interés hacia la profesionalización del sector del fitness y el fitness relacionado con la salud. Los resultados mostraron en gran medida una reproducción del top 20 de tendencias de la encuesta nacional de 2019 (16 tendencias coincidentes), aunque con cambios relevantes en las posiciones ocupadas y una diferenciación clara respecto a la encuesta internacional del ACSM (14 tendencias coincidentes) y con una importante divergencia en relación con sus posiciones.Abstract. The objective of this study was to identify the fitness trends in Spain for the year 2020 according to the opinion of professionals in the sector through an online survey, as well as compare the results obtained with the trends identified by the National Surveys on Fitness Trend in Spain and the international survey of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) in 2019. The survey was sent to 6835 fitness professionals from all Spanish autonomous communities, including the cities of Ceuta and Melilla. A total of 513 responses were collected (response rate of 7.5%). The most relevant trends for 2020 in Spain are: "strength training", " employing certified fitness professionals", "multidisciplinary work teams", "functional training" and "licensure for fitness professionals". In addition, the trends identified for 2020 indicate an outstanding importance and interest towards the professionalization of fitness sector and the health-related fitness . The results largely showed a reproduction of the top 20 trends of the 2019 national survey (16 coinciding trends), although with relevant changes in terms of positions and a clear differentiation from the 2019’s ACSM international survey (14 coinciding trends) and with a significant divergence in relation to their positions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-17
Author(s):  
John Saunders ◽  
Rusli Lutan

This paper considers the current status of physical education and sport science in Indonesia from the perspective of the development of the professional knowledge base and research culture surrounding its practice. It seeks to place the field’s development within the broader context of international sport studies from 1945 to 2020. It identifies as major influences the process of globalisation and the growth of international sport as a significant political and economic entity. Physical education is acknowledged as a common historical base for the three modern strands within contemporary sports studies – medical /and health science, high performance studies, and sports business management. Future developments are considered in the context of the current pandemic. Covid19 and the world’s response to it has impacted on some key dimensions which underpin the current global sports economy – namely easy and convenient travel and the gathering of crowds in the widespread consumption of live sport. It is suggested that this might cause a major reset in the conduct of elite sport and sport festivals. The continuing growth of the physical activity and health sector is predicted and in the context of the serious challenges facing the sporting sector a case is made for increased resources to be moved back into the educational study and practice of sport and physical activity as a universal good.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document