scholarly journals Evaluating the Association between CCR5delta32 Polymorphism (rs333) and the Risk of Breast Cancer in a Cohort of Iranian Population

Author(s):  
Amir TAJBAKHSH ◽  
Zahra FARJAMI ◽  
Abolfazl NESAEI-BAJESTANI ◽  
Fahimeh AFZALJAVAN ◽  
Mahdi RIVANDI ◽  
...  

Background: CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is introduced as an immune response modulator. The activity of CCR5 influences breast tumour development in a p53-dependent manner. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of CCR5delta32 and its association with the risk of breast cancer in 1038 blood samples in North East of Iran. Methods: In this case-control study, we genotyped 570 control samples and 468 breast cancer patients by a gel electrophoresis-based gap-polymerase chain reaction (gap-PCR) method Mashhad, Iran. The data were analyzed using the SPSS software. Results: Of 570 controls included, 542 (95.09%) had CCR5delta32 wild/wild (W/W) genotype, 28 samples (4.91%) had CCR5delta32 wild/deletion (W/D) genotype and none of them were CCR5delta32 deletion/deletion (D/D) genotype (0%). While 428 samples of patients (91.45%) had CCR5delta32 W/W genotype, 40 samples (8.55%) had CCR5delta32 W/D and CCR5delta32 D/D homozygous was nil (0%) amongst cases. All samples were in the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P>0.05). According to the allele frequency, D allele, as a risky allele, in the cases was more than the control samples (0.0427 vs 0.0245, respectively) (P=0.0206). Hence, W/D genotype may confer a risk effect (OR=1.77, CI: 1.09-2.90; P=0.0206) compared with WW genotype between case and control groups. Conclusion: There is a statistically significant association between CCR5W/D and breast cancer risk. CCR5 may be regarded as a target for the prevention of breast cancer in certain conditions such as interaction with p53 variants, which remains to be further investigated.

Author(s):  
Amal Ramadan ◽  
Maha Hashim ◽  
Amr Abouzid ◽  
Menha Swellam

Abstract Background Aberrant DNA methylation of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene has been found in many cancers. The object of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of PTEN methylation as a prognostic marker in breast cancer. The study includes 153 newly diagnosed females, and they were divided according to their clinical diagnosis into breast cancer patients (n = 112) and females with benign breast lesion (n = 41). A group of healthy individuals (n = 25) were recruited as control individuals. Breast cancer patients were categorized into early stage (0–I, n = 48) and late stage (II–III, n = 64), and graded into low grade (I–II, n = 42) and high grade (III, n = 70). Their pathological types were invasive duct carcinoma (IDC) (n = 66) and duct carcinoma in situ (DCI) (n = 46). Tumor markers (CEA and CA15.3) were detected using ELISA. DNA was taken away from the blood, and the PTEN promoter methylation level was evaluated using the EpiTect Methyl II PCR method. Results The findings revealed the superiority of PTEN methylation status as a good discriminator of the cancer group from the other two groups (benign and control) with its highest AUC and increased sensitivity (96.4%) and specificity (100%) over tumor markers (50% and 84% for CEA and 49.1% and 86.4% for CA15.3), respectively. The frequency of PTEN methylation was 96.4% of breast cancer patients and none of the benign and controls showed PTEN methylation and the means of PTEN methylation (87 ± 0.6) were significantly increased in blood samples of breast cancer group as compared to both benign and control groups (25 ± 0.7 and 12.6 ± 0.3), respectively. Methylation levels of PTEN were higher in the blood of patients with ER-positive than in patients with ER-negative cancers (P = 0.007) and in HER2 positive vs. HER2 negative tumors (P = 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis recognizes PTEN methylation status as a significant forecaster of bad progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), after 40 months follow-up. Conclusions PETN methylation could be supposed as one of the epigenetic aspects influencing the breast cancer prognosis that might foretell more aggressive actions and worse results in breast cancer patients.


Author(s):  
Rahim Asgari ◽  
Jafar Rezaie

Purpose: Breast cancer has become as a serious public health concern worldwide. Breast cancer cells release exosomes into the circulatory system, which are easily accessible for further analysis like cancer diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to investigate expression of circulating exosomal miRNAs (miRs) in the serum of individuals with breast cancer and healthy controls. Methods: Exosomes were collected from serum samples using a commercial kit and characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and flow cytometry analysis. Expression of miRs such as miR-21, miR-155, miR-182, miR-373, and miR-126 were evaluated by real-time PCR. Results: The result showed that the expression level of exosomal miR-21, miR-155, miR-182, and miR-373 in the serum of breast cancer patients was higher than of those controls (P<0.05). However, expression of miR-126 did not change between breast cancer and control individuals (P>0.05). Conclusion: Our results showed a different miRs expression pattern between breast cancer and healthy samples, supposing potential biomarkers for breast cancer. Further studies focusing on these miRs are required to confirm our findings.


Breast Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jan Žatecký ◽  
Otakar Kubala ◽  
Oldřich Coufal ◽  
Markéta Kepičová ◽  
Adéla Faridová ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Magseed magnetic marker in breast cancer surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Thirty-nine patients with 41 implanted Magseeds undergoing surgical treatment in 3 surgical oncology departments were included in the retrospective trial to study pilot use of the Magseed magnetic marker in the Czech Republic for localisation of breast tumours or pathological axillary nodes in breast cancer patients. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-four breast cancer and 7 pathological lymph node localisations were performed by Magseed implantation. No placement failures, or perioperative detection failures of Magseeds were observed (0/41, 0.0%), but one case of Magseed migration was present (1/41, 2.4%). All magnetic seeds were successfully retrieved (41/41, 100.0%). Negative margins were achieved in 29 of 34 (85.3%) breast tumour localisations by Magseed. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Magseed is a reliable marker for breast tumour and pathological axillary node localisation in breast cancer patients. Magseed is comparable to conventional localisation methods in terms of oncosurgical radicality and safety.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1037-1037
Author(s):  
J. C. Choi ◽  
J. D. Chang ◽  
B. Seal ◽  
M. Tangirala ◽  
C. D. Mullins

1037 Background: Onset of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity is well documented. However, information regarding the time of onset varies depending on literature. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of cardiotoxicity among three cohort groups: anthracycline-containing-chemotherapy (ACC), no-anthracycline-containing-chemotherapy (NACC), and no-chemotherapy (control) groups. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was designed using commercial managed care claims database. Adult subjects (≥18) diagnosed with breast cancer, between January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2005, (index-period) were followed for 24 months. Subjects with a previous cardiotoxic events (CE), breast cancer diagnosis, or anthracycline-use 12-months prior to index date were excluded. Index date was the first chemotherapy claim date for ACC and NACC and non-chemotherapy medication claim date for controls. Cohorts were matched by index date and year of birth. CE was defined based on ICD-9-CM and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes. Risk of CE was evaluated using a logistic model with and without adjusting for confounders. Results: 21,106 subjects were classified as ACC (n = 3,428), NACC (n = 7,125), and controls (n = 10,553). NACC cohort was significantly (p < 0.01) older (mean age: 62 years ±12.5) compared to ACC (53±9.7) or control cohorts (59±12.5). ACC cohort had a higher (p < 0.01) average degree of comorbidity, (1.8±0.8) compared to NACC (1.6±0.9) or control (1.3±0.8) as measured by Charlson comorbidity-index. Higher rates of CE were found within the ACC group compared to NACC and controls as early as month 3 post index-date and remained consistent over 24 months. At month 12 post index-date, 14% (n = 485) of ACC and 5% (n = 381) of NACC had CE compared to 3% (n = 310) of controls. After adjusting for all baseline differences, the odds ratio of CE compared to controls was 3.98 (95% CI: 3.27–4.85), and 1.31 (95% CI: 1.11–1.54) for ACC and NACC cohorts, respectively. The total mean costs were $59,287, $20,528, and $11,600, among ACC, NACC, and control cohorts respectively. Conclusions: Compared to NACC and controls, ACC cohorts had significantly higher risk of cardiotoxic events and seen as early as month 3 post treatment initiation. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
katsuhiko nakatsukasa ◽  
Naoki Niikura ◽  
Kosuke Kashiwabara ◽  
Takeshi Amemiya ◽  
Kenichi Watanabe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The Oral Care BC-trial reported that professional oral care (POC) reduces the incidence and severity of oral mucositis in patients receiving everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE). However, the effect of POC on clinical response among patients receiving EVE and EXE was not established. We compared outcomes for estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients that received POC to those that had not and evaluated clinical prognostic factors. All patients simultaneously received EVE and EXE. Methods: Between May 2015 and Dec 2017, 174 eligible patients were enrolled in the Oral Care-BC trial. The primary endpoint was the comparative incidence of grade 1 or worse oral mucositis, as evaluated by an oncologist over 8 weeks between groups. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Data were collected after a follow-up period of 13.9 months. Results: There were no significant differences in PFS between the POC and Control Groups ( P = 0.801). A BMI < 25 mg/m 2 and non-visceral metastasis were associated with longer PFS ( P = 0.018 and P = 0.003, respectively) and the use of bone modifying agents (BMA) was associated with shorter PFS ( P = 0.028). The PFS and OS between the POC and control groups were not significantly different in the Oral-Care BC trial. Conclusions: POC did not influence the prognosis of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients with non-visceral metastasis, a BMI < 25 mg/m 2 , and who did not receive BMA while receiving EVE and EXE may have better prognoses. Trial registration: The study protocol was registered online at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), Japan (protocol ID 000016109), on January 5, 2015 and at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02376985).


Author(s):  
Mouchumee Bhattacharyya ◽  
Apurba Kumar Kalita ◽  
Partha Pratim Medhi ◽  
Vikas Jagtap ◽  
Rubu Sunku ◽  
...  

Background: Adjuvant radiotherapy has increased local-regional and overall survival rates in breast cancer. Conventional fractionation delivering 50-60 Gray (Gy) over 5-6weeks is a standard approach. A shorter duration of hypofractionated treatment will be more convenient for patients and treatment providers if found safe and equally effective.Methods: Around 50 high risk breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy were enrolled and randomized into the study arms- CF (Conventional Fractionation) Arm (50Gy/25 Fr @ 2 Gy/fraction/day 5 days a week over 5weeks) and HF (Hypo-Fractionation) arm (40.05 Gy/15 Fr @ 2.67 Gy/fraction/day 5 days a week over 3weeks). Treatment related acute and late toxicities, loco-regional recurrence; distant metastasis and survival rates were recorded for comparison.Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled in each arm with baseline characters well matched. At median follow up of 44 months, OS was 80% in HF arm against 64% in CF arm (p-value: 0.292). HF arm also showed better DFS at 4 years of 76% compared to 64% in CF arm (p-value: 0.411). Although the difference was not significant statistically, the Hazard Ratio of 1.543 (95% CI: 0.549-4.339) for DFS and 1.801 (95% CI: 0.603-5.377) for OS indicated trends towards better outcomes in HF arm in terms of disease control and survival. Acute and late toxicities were also lesser in HF arm, though not statistically significant (all p-values >0.05).Conclusions: In post mastectomy setting, HFRT is comparable to CFRT in terms of safety and efficacy, will be more convenient for patients and care givers and hence can be a routine standard practice.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ngozi D Akingbesote ◽  
Aaron Norman ◽  
Wanling Zhu ◽  
Alexandra A Halberstam ◽  
Xinyi Zhang ◽  
...  

Increasing evidence highlights the possibility for approaches targeting metabolism as potential adjuvants to cancer therapy. Sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are the newest class of antihyperglycemic therapies and have recently been highlighted as a novel therapeutic approach to breast cancer. To our knowledge, however, SGLT2 inhibitors have not been applied in the neoadjuvant setting as a precision medicine approach to combining metabolic therapy with standard of care therapy for this devastating disease. In this study, we combine the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin with paclitaxel chemotherapy in both lean and obese mice. We show that dapagliflozin enhances the efficacy of paclitaxel, reducing tumor glucose uptake and prolonging survival in an insulin-dependent manner in some but not all breast tumors. Our data find a genetic signature for breast tumors most likely to respond to dapagliflozin in combination with paclitaxel. Tumors driven by mutations upstream of canonical insulin signaling pathways are likely to respond to such treatment, whereas tumors driven by mutations downstream of canonical insulin signaling are not. These data demonstrate that dapagliflozin enhances the response to chemotherapy in mice with breast cancer and suggest that breast cancer patients with driver mutations upstream of canonical insulin signaling may be most likely to benefit from this neoadjuvant approach. A clinical trial is currently in preparation, with an application recently submitted for Yale Human Investigations Committee approval, to test this hypothesis in breast cancer patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 699-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Carvalho de Arruda Veiga ◽  
Ricardo Simões ◽  
Vitor E Valenti ◽  
Jose Cipolla-Neto ◽  
Luiz Carlos Abreu ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Breast Cancer is common in women, but its etiology is not yet fully understood. Several factors may contribute to its genesis, such as genetics, lifestyle, and the environment. Melatonin may be involved in the process of breast cancer. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of the levels of melatonin on breast cancer through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA recommendations. The primary databases MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were consulted. There was no restriction on the year of publication and language. Data of systematic reviews from April 2017 to September to 2017 were analyzed. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. From a total of 570 articles, 9 manuscripts were included in this review. They analy onzed women with breast cancer and control patients, of which 10% and 90% were in the reproductive period and after menopause, respectively. The lowest level of melatonin was found in approximately 55% of studies with breast cancer in post-menopause. The metanalyses of the studies demonstrated low levels of melatonin in breast cancer patients (n=963) compared with control patients (n= 1332), with a mean difference between the studies of −3.54 (CI −6.01, −1.06). Another difference found was in the comparison between smoking patients, with an average difference between 1.80 [0.97-2.63]. Our data suggest that low levels of melatonin might be a risk factor for breast cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document