Predictors of Caring in the Context of Relationship-Based Care

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Nelson ◽  
Mary Ann Hozak
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Direct Care ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Health Care Staff ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Primary Nursing ◽  
Care Delivery Model ◽  
Relationship Based Care

The caring connection between patients and health-care staff members is important to both patients and staff. This connection is amplified in organizations implementing Relationship-Based Care (RBC), a patient care delivery model that has relationships with self and others as its central concept. A secondary analysis of data from 542 health-care workers in a health-care system in the northeastern United States was performed to identify a profile of staff factors that predict a caring connection as perceived by staff. Specifically, staff self-care, clarity (of self, role, and system), dimensions of job satisfaction, and demographics were examined in relationship to caring for patients. The study demonstrated that constructs within RBC do relate to the creation of a caring connection between health-care staff members and patients, including caring for self, having a direct relationship with the patient using concepts of Primary Nursing, clarity of role, and being a direct care provider.

scholarly journals Can the Health-Care System Meet the Challenge of Pandemic Flu? Planning, Ethical, and Workforce Considerations

2007 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 573-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Levin ◽  
Eric N. Gebbie ◽  
Kristine Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Health Care Staff ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
The Public ◽  
Health Care Delivery Systems ◽  
The Impact

The federal pandemic influenza plan predicts that 30% of the population could be infected. The impact of this pandemic would quickly overwhelm the public health and health-care delivery systems in the U.S. and throughout the world. Surge capacity for staffing, availability of drugs and supplies, and alternate means to provide care must be included in detailed plans that are tested and drilled ahead of time. Accurate information on the disease must be made available to health-care staff and the public to reduce fear. Spokespersons must provide clear, consistent messages about the disease, including actions to be taken to contain its spread and treat the afflicted. Home care will be especially important, as hospitals will be quickly overwhelmed. Staff must be prepared ahead of time to assure their ability and willingness to report to work, and public health must plan ahead to adequately confront ethical issues that will arise concerning the availability of treatment resources. The entire community must work together to meet the challenges posed by an epidemic. Identification and resolution of these challenges and issues are essential to achieve adequate public health preparedness.

scholarly journals DEMENTIA CARE AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: INNOVATIONS IN TRAINING ACROSS SETTINGS

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S379-S379
Author(s):  
Mary F Wyman ◽  
Verena R Cimarolli ◽  
Robyn Stone
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Behavioral Health ◽  
Workforce Development ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Direct Care ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Health Care Staff

Abstract It is well-established that there is a critical shortage of trained health care staff who can deliver high-quality behavioral health services to persons with dementia. The development of innovative professional training curricula, and effectively implementing and sustaining such programs, is a key element in addressing this workforce crisis. This symposium highlights cutting-edge efforts being conducted across the continuum of care, to train health care professionals to support optimal behavioral health for persons with dementia. In the outpatient setting, Wyman et al. present data from a survey of mental health clinicians on their perspectives about working with persons with dementia and caregivers, revealing critical gaps in knowledge and skills to target in continuing education programming. Wray and colleagues focus on integrated behavioral health in primary care, discussing how geriatric experts can most effectively contribute to improved assessment and treatment within this setting. Koepp presents an innovative program to transform outpatient mental health care for persons with dementia through provider training and consultation. In the residential care setting, Reinhardt and colleagues report on the implementation of a comprehensive approach to the alleviation of behavioral health problems through training direct care staff in person-directed care in nursing homes. Finally, Karel et al share how VA interprofessional nursing home teams learn and sustain an evidence-based program to address behavioral concerns among residents with dementia. The discussant will lend a deep expertise in research and policy related to the geriatric workforce to her remarks on the presentations.

Children’s Participation in the Decision-Making Process During Hospitalization: an observational study

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 583-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Runeson ◽  
Inger Hallström ◽  
Gunnel Elander ◽  
Göran Hermerén
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Health Care Staff ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Children’S Participation ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Children's Participation ◽  
Degree Of Participation

Twenty-four children (aged 5 months to 18 years) who were admitted to a university hospital were observed for a total of 135 hours with the aim of describing their degree of participation in decisions concerning their own care. Grading of their participation was made by using a 5-point scale. An assessment was also made of what was considered as optimal participation in each situation. The results indicate that children are not always allowed to participate in decision making to the extent that is considered optimal. In no case was it judged that a child participated in or was forced to make a decision that was too difficult for the child. The interactions between children, parents and staff were also described in connection with discussions and decision-making processes. This showed that parents do not always support their children in difficult situations and that health care staff often inform children about what is going to happen without presenting alternatives or asking for their views. Staff may, however, find themselves facing an ethical conflict in deciding between supporting a child’s view or following hospital routine. It is of great importance that children are looked upon as potentially autonomous individuals and that staff members realize that one of their core duties is to facilitate children’s participation in decision making concerning their health care.

COVID-19 Infection among the Health Care Staff at Frontier Medical and Dental College and Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 3328-3329
Author(s):  
Sadia Rashid ◽  
Saveela Sadaqat ◽  
Muhammad Adnan Iqbal ◽  
Shakeel Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Rizwan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Health Care Staff ◽  
Dental Hygienists ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
First Case ◽  
Infection Control Guidelines ◽  
Clinical Departments ◽  
Operation Center

Background: First case of pandemic COVID-19 was diagnosed in December 2019 in China from where it spread throughout the world. In Pakistan, first case was diagnosed in February 2020 which resulted in a complete and several smart national lockdowns. National Command and Operation Center (NCOC) and Ministry of Health published guidelines for patient’s treatments during pandemic which includes: 1) providing only emergency Treatments 2) Patient’s pre-admittance Questioning, 3) Increasing intervals between appointment, 4) prevent crowding in waiting rooms, 5) Wearing masks at all times. 6) Wearing PPE. Methods: Data from all clinical departments of Frontier Medical and Dental College and Hospital Abbottabad was collected between March and December 2020 which included Number of; 1) Patients treated 2) Medical Staff 3) patients with positive COVID-19 reports 4) healthcare workers suffering from COVID-19. And 6) Post treatment Virus Infected patients. Results: 291 health care staff including 135 medical and dental doctors, 4 dental hygienists, 82 paramedics and 70 Administrative staff worked during the study period and 3280 procedures were performed. Out of these, thirty-eight (38) staff members treated 190 verified COVID-19 patients. During the study period 6 dentists (2.06%) and 9 (3.09%) medical doctors, 2 (0.7%) assistants and 3 (1.03%) admin staff were tested positive for the virus. Conclusion: Present study highlights the importance of education and stickiness to the infection control guidelines thus minimizing the risk of transmission of corona virus among the Healthcare professionals in hospitals. Keywords: COVID-19; Infection control, PPE, NCOC

Mental illness among NHS health care workers: a survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-135
Author(s):  
Simon Sherring
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Health Care Workers ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Health Care Staff ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Causal Explanations ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Care Workers ◽  
Evil Spirits

The literature suggests that mental illness among UK health care staff is common. This study reports health care workers' knowledge and experience of mental illness. Medical staff, administration staff and other staff members employed in four NHS Trusts (n=2073) responded to a questionnaire survey. A proportion of health care workers in the NHS reported having personal (colleagues, family and self) experience of mental illness. Some health care workers held causal explanations of mental illness that are not evidence based. This study found that almost half of health care workers reported experiencing a mental illness, which could have significant implications for service delivery. Some health care workers held causal explanations of mental illness that were not evidence based; for example, some respondents reported that demonic possession or possession by evil spirits was a very good explanation for mental illness.

scholarly journals A CASE STUDY: THE INVISIBLE LABOR OF CULTURALLY SENSITIVE CARE

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S699-S700
Author(s):  
Mai See Thao ◽  
Odichinma C Akosionu ◽  
Heather Davila ◽  
Tetyana P Shippee
Keyword(s):  
Care Delivery ◽  
Ethnically Diverse ◽  
Culturally Sensitive ◽  
Direct Care ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Culturally Sensitive Care ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Language Needs

Abstract Nursing homes are increasingly becoming more racially/ethnically diverse yet racial disparities in resident’s quality of life and quality of care continue to persist. One reason for these disparities is lack of culturally-sensitive care and racial/ethnic similarity between residents and staff. This study examines a case of a high proportion minority nursing home with racially/ethnically diverse staff to understand how shared culture among direct care staff and residents may influence care delivery. We used three months of participant observation, supplemented by in-depth qualitative interviews with 8 Hmong residents and 5 Hmong staff to explore the labor of culturally sensitive care in a large, urban NH. We discovered four themes: 1) Culturally sensitive care was often equated to fulfilling language needs for residents who didn’t speak English. 2) Hmong staff members had to take the initiative to inform non-Hmong staff members how to care for Hmong residents. 3) Hmong staff members also had to communicate the culture of NH care and its limitations to Hmong residents and their families. 4) Hmong staff members have to advocate for the culturally relevant needs of Hmong residents. The findings of this case study illuminate that having staff members from diverse cultural backgrounds and meeting language needs of residents does not reflect the everyday practices of culturally sensitive care. This type of emotional labor can also result in higher levels of burn-out for staff of color. Additional research into what constitutes culturally sensitive care to NH residents and staff is needed.

scholarly journals Prevalence of hypertension and factors associated with screening uptake in Kanjongo, Nyamasheke District, Rwanda

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19
Author(s):  
Eléazar Ndabarora ◽  
Clemence Nishimwe ◽  
Clarte Ndikumasabo ◽  
Jean Claude Twahirwa ◽  
Jean de la Croix Muvandimwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Health Care Staff ◽  
Health Staff ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Perceived Susceptibility ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Screening Uptake ◽  
Factors Influencing

Hypertension in Africa was estimated to 30.8% in 2010 with dramatic increase in some regions ranging between 36.2%-77.3% (Adeloye & Basquill, 2014). In Rwanda, the prevalence of hypertension was estimated to 15.3%, but the factors associated with screening uptake were not explored (Nahimana et al., 2017). The study objectives were: (1) to determine the prevalence of hypertension among the population attending the monthly community work” Umuganda” in a selected sector, and (2) to identify the factors associated with screening uptake. Data were collected using an interview questionnaire, the blood pressure was at the same time measured, and analytic cross-sectional design was adopted. The respondents were 383, of them 60.3% were female and 39.7% were male, aged between 18-34 years old (30.5%), 35-49 years old (39.4%), and 50 years and above (30.0%). The prevalence of hypertension was 17.5%, and 46.5% have never been tested before. The majority (96.3%) planned to get tested regularly, 95.6% perceived hypertension as a serious disease, and 64.8% perceived themselves susceptible to get hypertension. Sources of information were media (89.6%), health staff (79.4%), campaigns (73.1%), Community Health Workers (CHWs) (67.1%), and neighbors (57.7%). Reported barriers to screening were lack of information (87.5%), delay of health insurance (79.1%), lack of readiness of the health care staff (75.7%), perceived quality of health care delivery (52.2%), and the perceived cost (46.5%). Factors influencing the screening were gender (Chi-square 7.82, p=0.004), age (Chi-square 8.35, p=0.015), and occupation (Chi-square 19.53, p˂0.000). The perceived susceptibility influenced the perceived severity (Chi-square 33.51, p˂0.000), community sensitization (Chi-square 5.52, p=0.019), and perceived benefits (Chi-square 9.08, p=0.003). Hypertension prevalence was higher than the national estimates. Perceived susceptibility, community sensitization, age, gender and occupation were the key factors influencing the screening uptake. Community-based interventions to increase awareness and screening of hypertension are highly recommended.  

Neither Medicine Nor Health Care Staff Members Are Violent By Nature: Obstetric Violence From an Interactionist Perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1308-1319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ximena Briceño Morales ◽  
Laura Victoria Enciso Chaves ◽  
Carlos Enrique Yepes Delgado
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Health Care Staff ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Obstetric Violence ◽  
Interactionist Perspective

scholarly journals Using patient experience data to develop a patient experience toolkit to improve hospital care: a mixed-methods study

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (36) ◽  
pp. 1-104
Author(s):  
Laura Sheard ◽  
Claire Marsh ◽  
Thomas Mills ◽  
Rosemary Peacock ◽  
Joseph Langley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Research Programme ◽  
Hospital Staff ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Health Care Staff ◽  
Patient Representatives

Background Patients are increasingly being asked to provide feedback about their experience of health-care services. Within the NHS, a significant level of resource is now allocated to the collection of this feedback. However, it is not well understood whether or not, or how, health-care staff are able to use these data to make improvements to future care delivery. Objective To understand and enhance how hospital staff learn from and act on patient experience (PE) feedback in order to co-design, test, refine and evaluate a Patient Experience Toolkit (PET). Design A predominantly qualitative study with four interlinking work packages. Setting Three NHS trusts in the north of England, focusing on six ward-based clinical teams (two at each trust). Methods A scoping review and qualitative exploratory study were conducted between November 2015 and August 2016. The findings of this work fed into a participatory co-design process with ward staff and patient representatives, which led to the production of the PET. This was primarily based on activities undertaken in three workshops (over the winter of 2016/17). Then, the facilitated use of the PET took place across the six wards over a 12-month period (February 2017 to February 2018). This involved testing and refinement through an action research (AR) methodology. A large, mixed-methods, independent process evaluation was conducted over the same 12-month period. Findings The testing and refinement of the PET during the AR phase, with the mixed-methods evaluation running alongside it, produced noteworthy findings. The idea that current PE data can be effectively triangulated for the purpose of improvement is largely a fallacy. Rather, additional but more relational feedback had to be collected by patient representatives, an unanticipated element of the study, to provide health-care staff with data that they could work with more easily. Multidisciplinary involvement in PE initiatives is difficult to establish unless teams already work in this way. Regardless, there is merit in involving different levels of the nursing hierarchy. Consideration of patient feedback by health-care staff can be an emotive process that may be difficult initially and that needs dedicated time and sensitive management. The six ward teams engaged variably with the AR process over a 12-month period. Some teams implemented far-reaching plans, whereas other teams focused on time-minimising ‘quick wins’. The evaluation found that facilitation of the toolkit was central to its implementation. The most important factors here were the development of relationships between people and the facilitator’s ability to navigate organisational complexity. Limitations The settings in which the PET was tested were extremely diverse, so the influence of variable context limits hard conclusions about its success. Conclusions The current manner in which PE feedback is collected and used is generally not fit for the purpose of enabling health-care staff to make meaningful local improvements. The PET was co-designed with health-care staff and patient representatives but it requires skilled facilitation to achieve successful outcomes. Funding The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document