scholarly journals RECONCILE THE RELIGION AND SCIENCE EDUCATION MANAGEMENT IN ISLAM

Ta dib ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
Syamsul Kurniawan
Keyword(s):  
Science Education ◽  
Science And Religion ◽  
Islamic Education ◽  
Religion And Science ◽  
Education Management ◽  
History Of

<p class="Normal1"><span class="normalchar"><em><span lang="EN-US">This research is aimed to reconcile science and religion, and to seek its relevance in the management of non-dichotomous Islamic education.</span></em></span><span class="normalchar"><em><span lang="EN-US">In addition, this research departs from the researcher’s anxiety in response to the dichotomous thought between religion and science which in turn manifests in the separation of science and religion in the history of Islamic education management.</span></em></span><span class="apple-converted-space"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></span><span class="normalchar"><em><span lang="EN-US">This results in the current Islamic education that suffers a setback in the development of science.</span></em></span><span class="apple-converted-space"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></span><span class="normalchar"><em><span lang="EN-US">Therefore, in the management of Islamic education, reintegration needs to be done without any dichotomy between religion and science.</span></em></span></p>

IMPLEMENTASI MANAJEMEN HOLISTIK DALAM PENDIDIKAN ISLAM DI PONDOK PESANTREN AL HAMIDIYAH DEPOK KECAMATAN PANCORAN MAS KOTA DEPOK

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-172
Author(s):  
Jerry Hendrajaya ◽  
Nanat Fatah Natsir ◽  
Mohamad Jaenudin
Keyword(s):  
Boarding School ◽  
Holistic Education ◽  
Boarding Schools ◽  
Islamic Education ◽  
Present Condition ◽  
Education Management ◽  
Holistic Management ◽  
History Of ◽  
Management Functions ◽  
Document Review

          This study aims to determine the holistic education at Al Hamidiyah Islamic boarding school in Depok, the existence of Holistic education management at the Al Hamidiyah Islamic boarding school in Depok, which includes planning, organizing, implementing, and monitoring aspects, and to determine the efforts to improve Holistic management in Islamic Education in Islamic Boarding Schools Al Hamidiyah. Ideally Al Hamidiyah Islamic Boarding School has set the foundation for the implementation of Holistic education. From the management aspect, Holistic education management functions have also been established and implemented. Therefore a research with a qualitative approach was conducted. The research technique was carried out by interview, observation and document review techniques. The results showed that the Al Hamidiyah Sawangan Islamic Boarding School in Depok had organized a Holistic education as seen in its vision, mission, and special objectives and various activities. Such education is inseparable from the history of its founder and the environmental conditions that surround it, both at its inception, the history of its development, to the present condition. Holistic education management implemented or organized by the Al Hamidiyah Islamic Boarding School in Depok has used the stages of planning, organizing, implementing, and supervising in the education process in general and learning in particular at various types and levels of education at the Al Hamidiyah Islamic Boarding School. There are still a number of deficiencies in the implementation of Holistic education in Al Hamidiyah Islamic Boarding School, in addition to a number of advantages possessed. Among the shortcomings are superior human resources, incomplete facilities and infrastructure, and the use of information technology that has not been maximized. Keywords: Management, Islamic Education, Islamic Boarding Schools, Holistic.  

Who Wrote What When: The Bible, Science and Criticism

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-315
Author(s):  
Geert Lernout
Keyword(s):  
Seventeenth Century ◽  
Royal Society ◽  
Science And Religion ◽  
Religion And Science ◽  
Theory Of Evolution ◽  
The Bible ◽  
The World ◽  
History Of ◽  
John William Draper ◽  
Century Science

According to the traditional (or ‘whig’) interpretation of history, sometime in the seventeenth century science was born in the form that we know today, in a new spirit that can best be summed up by the motto of the Royal Society: nullius in verba, take nobody's word for it. In the next few centuries this new critical way of looking at reality was instrumental in the creation of a coherent view of the world, and of that world's history, which was found to be increasingly at odds with traditional claims, most famously in the case of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. By the end of the nineteenth century, the divide between science and religion was described by means of words such as ‘conflict’ and ‘warfare,’ the terms used by John William Draper and Andrew Dickson White in the titles of their respective books: History of the Conflict between Religion and Science (1874) and History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom (1896).

Fundamentalism and Folk Science between the Wars

1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-248
Author(s):  
Edward B. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Science And Religion ◽  
Religion And Science ◽  
Complex Situation ◽  
History Of Religion ◽  
The Past ◽  
Real Lesson ◽  
The World ◽  
Death Experience ◽  
History Of ◽  
Comprehensive Study

Reports of the demise of the “warfare” school of writing the history of religion and science may yet be premature, but it seems safe to say that it has had a near-death experience. Much recent historiography has underscored the shallowness, futility, and wrongheadedness of treating controversies involving religion and science simply as skirmishes in an ongoing, inevitable conflict between contradictory ways of viewing the world. We have been urged, as historians, to probe beneath the surface of apparent conflicts in search of the underlying reasons why people with different beliefs have come to disagree so deeply about matters involving science and to accept the realities of an historically complex situation. After showing the inadequacy of the warfare thesis, David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers note sadly that “we will never find a satisfactory alternative of equal simplicity.” John Hedley Brooke, the author of a recent comprehensive study, concludes that “Serious scholarship in the history of science has revealed so extraordinarily rich and complex a relationship between science and religion in the past that general theses are difficult to sustain. The real lesson turns out to be the complexity.”

Of Popes and Unicorns

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hutchings ◽  
James C. Ungureanu
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
History Of Science ◽  
Science And Religion ◽  
Religion And Science ◽  
The Earth ◽  
The Face ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Common ◽  
Science And Theology ◽  
John William Draper

This book is a popular-level study of the conflict thesis: the notion that science and religion have been at war with each other throughout history, and that humanity must ultimately make its choice between the two. The origins of the conflict thesis are usually given as two works by nineteenth-century Americans, John William Draper and Andrew Dickson White, who wrote History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science (1876) and A History of the Warfare Between Science and Theology in Christendom (1896), respectively. In these volumes, Draper and White relate stories such as the Church’s suppression of the sphericity of the Earth and of heliocentrism; its banning of dissection, anesthetic, and inoculation; its persecution of scientists; its dedication to irrationality in the face of reason; and much more. Yet their thesis has been thoroughly debunked in the literature, and their tales largely found to be myths. Despite this, they still circulate today, and many still believe that we must pick a side: God or science. This book uses accessible stories and anecdotes to analyze Draper, White, their true motivations, their books, their thorough debunking, the modern persistence of their flawed views, and the possibility of moving beyond them—toward true reconciliation. It is a history of science and religion, and of how, despite the common acceptance of the contrary, the latter has actually been of great benefit to the former. Rumors of a centuries-old war between God and science, it turns out, have been greatly exaggerated.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI PENGEMBANGAN MATERI PAI MI PERSPEKTIF INTEGRASI INTERKONEKSI

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Imron
Keyword(s):  
Science Education ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Science And Religion ◽  
Islamic Education ◽  
Development Model ◽  
Material Development ◽  
Left Behind

AbstrakFenomena dikotomi bidang keilmuan yakni antroposentris dan teosentris menjadi fakta sejarah. Pendidikan antroposentris penting untuk pembinaan dan penyempurnaan kepribadian anak. Sedangkan pendidikan teosentris/sain (ilmu non agama-teosentris) juga dibutuhkan untuk melengkapi pengetahuannya. Keberadaannya dianggap sebagai pelengkap, sehingga umat Islam mengesampingkan ilmu non agama atau sebaliknya. Hal ini mengakibatkan umat Islam terbelakang dalam hal sains dan teknologi. Pengembangan materi PAI MI persepektif integrasi interkoneksi baik internal maupun eksternal dapat menjadi salah satu tawaran model pengembangan materi guna membekali pengetahuan yang komprehensif, sebab Islam tidak pernah menganggap adanya dikotomi ilmu pengetahuan (sain) dan agama.Kata Kunci : dikotomi, materi PAI MI, Integrasi, Interkoneksi. Abstact Dichotomy phenomenon devided into 2 parts in science, they are antropocentris and teocentris which are called history fact. Antropocentris education is very important to construct and to complete students personality. Science education (non religion-teocentris science) also needed by Moslem generation to complete their knowledge. Its existance considered as complement, so Moslems put a side non-religion science or on contrary. It makes Moslem left behind in science and technology. Material development for Islamic Education in MI in perspective integrative interconnection both internal or external can be one of offered material development model to give comprehensive science for students in MI, because Islam never consider science and religion dichotomy.Keywords: dichotomy, material for Islamic education in MI, interconnection

scholarly journals Differences in Knowledge Science in Islamic Education Philosophy Perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Sukman Sappe
Keyword(s):  
Science And Religion ◽  
Islamic Education ◽  
Spiritual Values ◽  
General Science ◽  
Education Philosophy ◽  
Historical Literature ◽  
History Of ◽  
Islamic Civilization ◽  
Education Science

The dichotomy of science is the separation between general science and religion, which then develops into other dichotomic phenomena. The term science dichotomy in various historical literature, including the afterlife and world sciences, syar'iyah science and ghairu syar'iyyah Science, al-'ulum al-diniyyah and al-'ulum al-'aqliyyah, Islamic Knowledge and Non-Islamic Knowledge ( English), Hellenic and Semitic (Greek). The consequences of the dichotomy, as mentioned as the terms of the dichotomy, have implications for the alienation of the religious sciences to modernity and keep the progress of science away from spiritual values. In the perspective of Islamic education, science is an in-depth knowledge of the results of earnest efforts (ijtihād) from Muslim scientists ('ulamā' / mujtahīd) on practical and ukhrāwī issues by originating from the revelations of Allah Almighty so that science grows and develops hand in hand with religion. In the history of Islamic civilization, scholars live in harmony with scientists, many scientists found in Islam, as well as scholars.

Fooling the World

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
David Hutchings
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
Science And Religion ◽  
Christian Faith ◽  
Religion And Science ◽  
The World ◽  
History Of ◽  
Science And Theology ◽  
John William Draper

This chapter recounts how two nineteenth-century gentlemen, John William Draper and Andrew Dickson White, managed to fool much of the world by insisting in two landmark books that science and religion have always been opposed to one another, and that humanity must therefore make its choice between the two. Their books are History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science (1876) and A History of the Warfare Between Science and Theology in Christendom (1896), respectively. These texts are largely responsible for launching the conflict thesis: the now commonplace idea usually characterized as “God versus science.” And yet bizarrely, both men had intended to do precisely the opposite: they sought to reconcile their own Christian faith with science. This chapter tells the men’s stories, and asks how on earth they ended up getting things so wrong.

scholarly journals Pembelajaran Terpadu Dalam Perspektif K.H. Ahmad Dahlan

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Pera Ika Fidayanti ◽  
Tukinah Tukinah
Keyword(s):  
Science Education ◽  
Common Sense ◽  
Educational Philosophy ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Science And Religion ◽  
Islamic Education ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
General Science ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Human Need

K.H. Ahmad Dahlan compiled Islamic education institutions in Indonesia which involved several factors, one of which was due to K. H. Ahmad Dahlan's concerns against indigenous Muslims, facilitating religious science education and general science. The purpose of this study was to study K. H. Ahmad Dahlan's educational concepts and question K. H. Ahmad Dahlan's educational philosophy. This research method is literature study (library research). The results of this study discuss the concept of K. H. Ahmad Dahlan's education, namely the integration of science and religion, the integration of religious science and general science, and freedom of thought. Furthermore K. H. Ahmad Dahlan's educational philosophy is the first, the highest knowledge can be achieved through common sense and istiqamah towards the truth of reason and based on a pure heart. Second, reason is a basic human need. Third, the science of mantiq or logic is the highest education for humans which can only help if humans escape God's guidance.

Science as an ally of religion: a Muslim appropriation of ‘the conflict thesis’

2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. ALPER YALCINKAYA
Keyword(s):  
Ottoman Empire ◽  
Science And Religion ◽  
Religion And Science ◽  
Attitudes Towards Science ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Geographical Context

AbstractJohn W. Draper's History of the Conflict between Religion and Science (1874) is commonly regarded as the manifesto of the ‘conflict thesis’. The superficiality of this thesis has been demonstrated in recent studies, but to read Draper's work only as a text on ‘science versus religion’ is to miss half of its significance, as it also involved evaluations of individual religions with respect to their attitudes towards science. Due to Draper's favourable remarks on Islam, the Ottoman author Ahmed Midhat translated his work into Turkish, and published it along with his own comments on Draper's arguments. Midhat interpreted Islam using the cues provided by Draper, and portrayed it as the only religion compatible with science. While his Christian readers condemned Draper for his approach to Islam, Midhat transformed the ‘conflict thesis’ into a proclamation that Islam and science were allies in opposition to Christian encroachment on the Ottoman Empire. This paper analyses Midhat's appropriation of Draper's work and compares it to the reaction of Draper's Christian readers. It discusses the context that made an alliance between Islam and science so desirable for Midhat, and emphasizes the impact of the historico-geographical context on the encounters between and representations of science and religion.

scholarly journals Argumentation and interdisciplinarity: reflections from the Oxford Argumentation in Religion and Science Project

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibel Erduran ◽  
Liam Guilfoyle ◽  
Wonyong Park ◽  
Jessica Chan ◽  
Nigel Fancourt
Keyword(s):  
Science Education ◽  
Religious Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Science And Religion ◽  
Religion And Science ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Considerable Debate ◽  
Interdisciplinary Nature ◽  
Knowledge Claims

AbstractArgumentation has emerged as a key area of research and development in science education in recent years. Simply defined, argumentation is about the justification of knowledge claims with evidence and reasons. Although there is now a vast amount of work in argumentation, much research remains to be pursued. Given the interdisciplinary nature of argumentation, the dialogue between science education and other relevant domains can potentially produce constructive research agendas that could profit argumentation research and lead to practical applications. Following an overview of the relevant interdisciplinary investigations that can be pursued in science education, the paper subsequently focuses on the interphase of science and religion. Although science education research has witnessed considerable debate about particular issues related to science and religion such as the teaching and learning of evolution and creationism, the role of argumentation remains an uncharted territory. Hence, the paper focuses on how argumentation may be explored in science and religious education in comparison. Some preliminary observations from the Oxford Argumentation in Religion and Science (OARS) Project are reported including a comparative analysis of curricula and teachers’ views. Implications for interdisciplinarity in the context of argumentation in science education are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document