scholarly journals Influence of desensitizers agents on the dentin bond strength after one-year water storage

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. e201602
Author(s):  
Gabriel Nima ◽  
Renata Bacelar Sá ◽  
Marcelo Giannini
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Test Data ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Mixed Anova ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Aim: Evaluate the effect of adhesives systems combined with desensitizer agents on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a composite resin to dentin. Methods: Cervical dentin of thirty-two human molars were used to simulate hypersensitivity areas. The teeth were divided into four groups (n=8), according to the type of adhesive system and desensitizer agents. No desensitizer was used in the control (Clearfil SE Bond – CS). Two experimental groups were pretreated with either MS Coat Bond (MS) or Biofluorid 12 (BF) immediately prior to bonding with CS. The last group corresponded to Gluma Comfort Bond + Desensitizer (GC) application. After dentin treatments, a composite block was built-up on dentin surface and after 24 hours teeth were serially sectioned to obtain bonded bean specimens. Beams were stored in water for 24 hours or one year. Subsequently, the specimens were submitted to the μTBS test. Data were analyzed by two-way mixed ANOVA and Bonferroni’s test (α = 0.05). Results: At 24 hours, there was no significant difference in μTBS among groups. However, at one year, dentin treated with MS or BF demonstrated significantly lower μTBS of CS to dentin compared to control and GC, which kept their μTBS stable. Conclusion: The effect of MS and BF desensitizer agents on the μTBS of CS to dentin did not reduce the μTBS at 24 hours, but it decreases significantly after one year.

scholarly journals Bond strength of universal adhesive applied to dry and wet dentin

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. e201662
Author(s):  
Maria Luísa de Alencar e Silva Leite ◽  
Caroline de Farias Charamba ◽  
Renally Bezerra Wanderley e Lima ◽  
Sônia Saeger Meireles ◽  
Rosângela Marques Duarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Bonding Quality ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Aim: This study evaluated the influence of dentin wettability on the immediate and extended microtensile bond strength (mTBS) of a universal adhesive system used in the etch-and-rinse strategy. Methods: Twenty human third molars were selected and divided into four groups according to the adhesive system and dentin wettability. The mTBS values of each group were registered 24 h and one year after adhesive system application and resin composite block build-up (n=30). Data were analyzed by the t-test (p<0.05). Results: When both adhesive systems were compared, there was no statistically significant difference when they were applied following wet bonding (p>0.05). However, the dry bonding reduced μTBS values of the Adper Single Bond 2 adhesive (p<0.05). Regarding storage time, both groups presented similar μTBS values at 24 h and one year (p>0.05). Conclusions: Therefore, the Scotchbond Universal Adhesive can be applied to dry or wet dentin without compromising the etch-and-rinse bonding quality and the durability of the restorations.

scholarly journals Influence of Water Aging on Microtensile Bond Strength of a Flowable and a Packable Bulk-fill Resin Composites to Dentin

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (D) ◽  
pp. 112-117
Author(s):  
Ayah Atif Selim ◽  
Ahmed Fawzy Abo Elezz ◽  
Rehab Khalil Safy
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Aging Effect ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Influence Of Water

AIM: Investigation of the aging effect on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of bulk-fill resin composite (RC) versus a conventionally incrementally applied one. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 45 sound human impacted third molars extracted molars have been selected to prepare specimens for the μTBS test. Teeth were randomly divided into three groups (C) according to type of RC material which used for restoring the teeth. Where nanohybrid RC (Grandio®SO) was used as the control Group (C1), packable bulk-fill RC (X-tra fil®) was used for restoring teeth in C2 group and flowable bulk-fill RC (X-tra base®) was used for restoring teeth in C3 group. Each group was further subdivided into 3 subgroups (n = 5) according to the water storage time, where in subgroup 1; teeth were stored for 24 h, subgroup 2; teeth were stored for 3 months while for subgroup 3; and teeth were stored for 6 months. After water storage, teeth were sectioned for preparation of μTBS testing beams. Maximum tensile stresses were recorded in megapascal (MPa). RESULTS: After 24 h of water storage, the X-tra base® showed a higher statistically significant μTBS to dentin (33.82 ± 9.84 MPa) than did the other two types of RCs. After 3 months, the X-tra fil® showed the lowest mean value of μTBS (10.90 ± 5.66 MPa), meanwhile, after 6 months of water storage Grandio®SO showed the highest mean value of μTBS (15.85 ± 6.76 MPa). Regardless of the time the X-tra fil® showed the lowest mean of μTBS (15.07 ± 11.73 MPa), while there is no significant difference between the X-tra base® and Grandio®SO. Furthermore, the water aging adversely affects μTBS values which deceased gradually by time. CONCLUSION: The packable bulk-fill RC characterized by lower μTBS to dentin in comparison to the flowable bulk fill and the incrementally applied nanohybrid RCs. Furthermore, the μTBS of the three tested materials decreased gradually by aging.

scholarly journals Microtensile Bond Strength of Methacrylate and Silorane Resins to Enamel and Dentin

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisele Rodrigues da Silva ◽  
Isabela Sousa Araújo ◽  
Rodrigo Dantas Pereira ◽  
Bruno de Castro Ferreira Barreto ◽  
Célio Jesus do Prado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Aging Time ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Plate ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Bonding Interaction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Storage

The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of two substrates (enamel and dentin) considering two study factors: type of composite resin [methacrylate-based (Filtek Supreme) or silorane-based (Filtek LS)] and aging time (24 h or 3 months). Twenty human molars were selected and divided into 2 groups (n=10) considering two dental substrates, enamel or dentin. The enamel and dentin of each tooth was divided into two halves separated by a glass plate. Each tooth was restored using both tested composite resins following the manufacturer's instructions. The samples were sectioned, producing 4 sticks for each composite resin. Half of them were tested after 24 h and half after 3 months. µTBS testing was carried out at 0.05 mm/s. Data were analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD tests at α=0.05. Significant differences between composite resins and substrates were found (p<0.05), but no statistically significant difference was found for aging time and interactions among study factors. The methacrylate-based resin showed higher µTBS than the silorane-based resin. The µTBS for enamel was significantly higher than for dentin, irrespective of the composite resin and storage time. Three months of storage was not sufficient time to cause degradation of the bonding interaction of either of the composite resins to enamel and dentin.

scholarly journals Effect of Immediate Dentin Sealing and Surface Conditioning on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Resin-based Composite to Dentin

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. E289-E298 ◽  
Author(s):  
CRG van den Breemer ◽  
M Özcan ◽  
MS Cune ◽  
AP Almeida Ayres ◽  
B Van Meerbeek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Conditioning ◽  
Clinical Procedures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The One ◽  
Storage Times

SUMMARY This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of resin-based composite (RBC) to dentin after different immediate dentin sealing (IDS) strategies and surface-conditioning (SC) methods and on two water storage times. Human molars (n=48) were randomly divided into eight experimental groups involving four different IDS strategies—IDS-1L with one layer of adhesive, IDS-2L with two layers of adhesive, IDS-F with one layer of adhesive and one layer of flowable RBC, and DDS (delayed dentin sealing) with no layer of adhesive (control)—and two different SC methods—SC-P with pumice rubbing and SC-PC with pumice rubbing followed by tribochemical silica coating. The μTBS test was performed after one week and after six months of water storage, being recorded as the “immediate” and “aged” μTBS, respectively. Composite-adhesive-dentin microspecimens (0.9×0.9×8–9 mm) were stressed in tension until failure to determine the μTBS. Failure mode and location of failure were categorized. Two-way analysis of variance was applied to analyze the data for statistically significant differences between the experimental groups (p&lt;0.05). Two-way analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between the one-week μTBS specimens for IDS strategy (p=0.087) and SC methods (p=0.806). However, the interaction of IDS strategy and SC methods appeared statistically significant (p=0.016). The six-month specimen evaluation showed no significant difference in μTBS for SC (p=0.297) and SC/IDS interaction (p=0.055), but the μTBS of the IDS strategies differed significantly among them (p=0.003). For tribochemical silica-coated IDS, no significant effect of aging on μTBS was recorded (p=0.465), but there was a highly significant difference in μTBS depending on the IDS strategy (p&lt;0.001). In addition, the interaction of IDS and aging was borderline statistically significant (p=0.045). The specimens failed mainly at the adhesive-dentin interface for all experimental groups. Dentin exposure during clinical procedures for indirect restorations benefits from the application of IDS, which was shown to result in higher bond strength. No significant differences were found between cleaning with solely pumice or pumice followed by tribochemical silica coating.

scholarly journals Influence of Air Abrasion and Sonic Technique on Microtensile Bond Strength of One-Step Self-Etch Adhesive on Human Dentin

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baraba Anja ◽  
Dukić Walter ◽  
Chieffi Nicoletta ◽  
Ferrari Marco ◽  
Sonja Pezelj Ribarić ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Human Dentin ◽  
One Step ◽  
Self Etch

The purpose of thisin vitrostudy was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesive to human dentin surface modified with air abrasion and sonic technique and to assess the morphological characteristics of the pretreated dentin surface. The occlusal enamel was removed to obtain a flat dentin surface for thirty-six human molar teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups (n= 12 per group), according to the pretreatment of the dentin: (1) control group, (2) air abrasion group, and (3) sonic preparation group. Microtensile bond strength test was performed on a universal testing machine. Two specimens from each experimental group were subjected to SEM examination. There was no statistically significant difference in bond strength between the three experimental groups (P> 0.05). Mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) values were 35.3 ± 12.8 for control group, 35.8 ± 13.5 for air abrasion group, and 37.7 ± 12.0 for sonic preparation group. The use of air abrasion and sonic preparation with one-step self-etch adhesive does not appear to enhance or impair microtensile bond strength in dentin.

scholarly journals Cavity Preparation by Laser in Primary Teeth: Effect of 2 Levels of Energy Output on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite Restoration to Dentin

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrsa Paryab ◽  
Shahrzad Sharifi ◽  
Mohammad Javad Kharazifard ◽  
Nazanin Kumarci
Keyword(s):  
Energy Level ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Energy Output ◽  
Primary Tooth ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Tooth Dentin ◽  
Self Etch

Introduction: One of the main applications of laser in dentistry is the removal of dental caries and preparation of restorative cavities. The morphology and wettability of laser prepared surfaces are different from that of those prepared with conventional method which may affect the quality of the adhesive potential of bonding agents in these surfaces. This study aimed to assess the shear bond strength of a total-etch and self-etch adhesive system to primary tooth dentin prepared by two different energy densities of Er:YAG laser in comparison with surfaces prepared by bur. Methods: A total of 60 human primary second molars extracted for orthodontic purposes were selected and randomly divided into 3 main groups of equal (n=20). Group A: Preparation of dentin surface by bur; group B: Preparation of dentin surface by laser with 300 mJ energy level; group C: Preparation of dentin surface by laser with 400 mJ energy level. In each of the main groups, the teeth were randomly assigned to 2 subgroups. Composite resin material was bonded with the total-etch adhesive system in subgroups A1, B1, and C1 and with the self-etch adhesive system in subgroups A2, B2, and C2. The samples were thermo-cycled, and composite restorations shear bond strength was measured in MPa. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The highest and the lowest shear bond strength values were observed in group A2 (Preparation by bur- Composite resin material bonded by Clearfil SE Bond) and group C2 (Preparation by laser with 400 mJ energy level - Composite resin material bonded by Clearfil SE Bond), respectively. The results showed no statistically significant differences between the study subgroups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: It is concluded that in terms of shear bond strength to dentin, Single Bond and Clearfil SE Bond adhesive agents adequately perform in primary tooth dentin prepared by Er: YAG laser with energy levels of 300 and 400 mJ and frequency of 10 Hz.

scholarly journals Effect of Metalloproteinase Inhibitors on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Er:YAG Laser-Irradiated Dentin

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 442-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz Carlos Correa ◽  
Rodrigo Galo ◽  
Camila Scatena ◽  
Maria Cristina Borsatto ◽  
Aloísio Oro Spazzin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Chemical Degradation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Cross Sectional

Abstract This study evaluated the effect of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors - 2% (CHX) and sodium fluoride (NaF) (5000 ppm) - on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of composite resin to Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin after chemical degradation of the bond interface. The occlusal surface of forty sound human molars was removed exposing the dentin surface (n=10), which was polished, irradiated with Er:YAG laser, acid etched and dried. Twenty specimens were rewetted with 2% CHX (control group) and 20 were rewetted with NaF (5000 ppm). The adhesive system was applied and a 4-mm-high plateau of light-cured composite resin was built up. Resin-dentin sticks were obtained with a rectangular cross-sectional area (0.8-1 mm2) and were either stored in water at 37 ?#61616;C for 24 h or submitted to chemical degradation. For chemical degradation, they were immersed in 10% NaOCl aqueous solution for 5 h and rinsed in water for 1 h. The sticks were submitted to microtensile test in a mechanical testing machine at 0.5 mm/min until failure. Fracture pattern was analyzed using SEM. μTBS values were calculated in MPa and submitted to analysis of variance ANOVA (α=0.05). The variance analysis showed that the 'MMP inhibitor' and 'degradation' factors (p=0.214 and p=0.093, respectively) and interaction between the factors were not statistically significant (p=0.143). Mixed failure predominated in all groups. In conclusion, the 2% CHX and NaF 5000 ppm presented similar μTBS of composite resin to laser-irradiated dentin before and after chemical degradation

scholarly journals Effect of Mode of Application on the Microtensile Bond Strength of a Self-etch and Etch-and-Rinse Adhesive System

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Reis ◽  
C. Zander-Grande ◽  
S. Kossatz ◽  
R. Stanislawczuk ◽  
A. Manso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Mode Of Application ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance All Bond 3 and All Bond Self-Etch are versatile systems, capable of being used either in the full or simplified version. Both showed adequate microtensile bond strength results in enamel and dentin after 24 hours of water storage.

In Vitro Evaluation of Onlay Restorations on Primary Teeth

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 709-713
Author(s):  
Kadriye G.U. Güzel ◽  
Ayşe C. Altun ◽  
Zuhal Kirzioğlu
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Primary Tooth ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Materials Used

Purpose Many novel materials have been developed such as composite resin, ceramic, zircon or metal-supported ceramic for use in aesthetic restoration of primary teeth and permanent teeth with extensive crown damage. The aim of the present study was to compare microtensile bond strengths on materials using the microtensile bond strength test. Materials and methods The microtensile bond strength on the primary tooth dentin was measured on extracted primary teeth using an indirect method and fracture patterns were evaluated. Results The analysis of bond strengths using the Mann-Whitney U-test did not show significant difference between the rank averages of the compomer and composite resin (p = 0.741). The dentin sections, from which test samples were obtained, contributed to the bond strength; dentin samples obtained just above the pulp had lower bond strength, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.005). The adhesive type fracture was the most prevalent fracture type for both materials. Conclusions When the chemical, physiological, and micromorphological differences between primary and permanent teeth are taken into consideration, the success of the materials used for restorations can be different between primary and permanent teeth. Therefore, materials used in the dentistry must be evaluated separately for primary teeth.

scholarly journals Bond strength of composite resin containing biomaterial S-PRG to eroded dentin

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Alessandra Sanchez Coelho Lourenço ◽  
Ana Paula Almeida Ayres ◽  
Taís Fonseca Mantilla ◽  
Marcelo Giannini ◽  
Patricia Moreira de Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Optical Microscope ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Supersaturated Solution ◽  
Solution Ph ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Two Factors

Aim: To evaluate the bond strength of composite resin containing or not biomaterial (S-PRG) to sound/eroded dentine. Methods: Occlusal dentin of 30 human molars (n=15) had half of its surface kept uneroded, while on the other half an erosive lesion was produced by cycling in citric acid (pH 2.3) and supersaturated solution (pH 7.0). On both eroded (ED) and non-eroded (SD) substrates, two restorative systems (containing or not S-PRG) were tested. Composite resin cylinders were built and, after storage in water (24h), were submitted to bond strength test. The analysis of the fracture pattern was performed under an optical microscope (40x). The obtained values of bond strength (MPa) were submitted to ANOVA (two factors) and Tukey multiple comparisons tests (p<0.05). Results: According to the results, there was difference between substrates (<0.001) and restorative materials (p=0.002) evaluated. For the microtensile bond strength, the values obtained were: SDNB (47.6±12.2 MPa), SDWB (34.1±15.8 MPa), EDNB (31.1±8.3 MPa) and EDWB (15.5±13.6 MPa), revealing a statistically significant difference in the evaluated substrates and restorative materials. Conclusion: Bond strength of eroded substrate is inferior to the sound substrate and the restorative system containing S-PRG biomaterial influences negatively the results of bonding to sound/eroded dentin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document