scholarly journals THE AUTHORITY OF PEOPLE’S CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY BY SUBSQUENT OF THE AMENDMENT OF THE 1945 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 681
Author(s):  
Sanidjar Pebrihariati R
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Problem Formulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Popular Sovereignty ◽  
Constitutional Democracy ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The People ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Republic

<p>People’s Consultative Assemly (hereinafter reffered to <em>MPR</em>) membership consisting of members of the House of Representative (hereinafter reffered to <em>DPR</em><em>)</em> and Regional Representative Council (hereinafter reffered to <em>DPD</em><em>)</em> members indicates that the <em>MPR</em> is still viewed as a representative body of the people because of its membership elected in the general election. The change of position of the People's Consultative Assembly (<em>MPR</em>), then the understanding of the form of popular sovereignty is reflected in three branches of power, namely the representative institution, the President, and the holder of the judicial power. Problem formulation discussed are: 1) How is the position of the People's Consultative Assembly as the implementer of people's sovereignty in Indonesia before the amendment of the 1945 Constitution? 2) How the position of MPR members coming from the <em>DPD</em> after the Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The research method used in this research is Normative Law research method, which uses secondary data. The discussion in this research: 1) the MPR as the executor of the sovereignty of the People in Indonesia, prior to the 1945 amendment, we see in the provisions On Article 1 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution stipulates that: "Sovereignty is in the hands of the people, and carried out according to the law basic". In the above article it contains three meanings, namely: a). The sovereignty of the people is implemented by all state institutions established in the Constitution, b). The sovereignty of the people must be subject to the constitution, c) constitutional supremacy. People's sovereignty is limited by the rules of the Constitution and constitutional democracy. 2) Position of MPR members originating from DPD after the Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. After the fourth amendment of the 1945 Constitution, (hereinafter referred to as the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia), there is a fairly fundamental change in both the state administration system and the state institutions in Indonesia .</p>

The Existence of People's Consultative Assembly in Indonesian State System in the Pancasila Democracy Perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 947
Author(s):  
Marzuki MARZUKI ◽  
Roswita SITOMPUL
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Liberal Democracy ◽  
State Institution ◽  
State System ◽  
Popular Sovereignty ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The People ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Comprehensive Study

The sovereignty of the people is one of the principles of Indonesian state administration, contained in the Preamble and Articles in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, implemented through the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR). But after the Amendment to the 1945 Constitution, the position of the MPR in the Proclamation Constitution has been placed as the highest state institution and the holder of popular sovereignty, and today based on the institutional structure of the state, the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR) has been degraded becoming an equal institution with other State institutions. Such implications, which are certainly seen from a constitutional perspective, have injured Pancasila democracy, which is based on deliberation and consensus, resulting in no more oversight mechanisms that can be carried out against various state institutions, including the President, and this in turn has led to liberal democracy based on individualism. Therefore, a comprehensive study is needed to reinstate the MPR as the highest state institution and holder of popular sovereignty in the format of State institutions in Indonesia as a representation of all Indonesian people based on deliberation and consensus in every decision making.  

scholarly journals Kajian Yuridis Tentang Kesadaran Warga Negara Untuk Menggunakan Hak Pilih Dalam Melaksanakan Demokrasi Pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 280
Author(s):  
Muzayanah Muzayanah
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Voting Rights ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Leadership Management ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The People ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Regional Leaders

The Republic of Indonesia is a state based on the rule of law in implementing state administration based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The administration of government with a democratic system in which the highest sovereignty is in the hands of the people and in its implementation the people elect a leader to run the government. To determine the regional leader / regional head must be carried out through regional head elections. Regional head elections are intended to continue the government which has ended its term of office. Therefore, regional head elections must be held simultaneously throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. The holding of regional head elections is a big job and is the responsibility of all parties, including all citizens of the Republic of Indonesia, so that the implementation of regional head elections runs well. The regional head elections in question have been held and are the result of the hard work of various relevant state institutions that have carried out their duties and responsibilities, in this case the General Election Commission (KPU) which has held regional head elections simultaneously throughout the territory of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI). ). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia regulates the voting rights of citizens to participate and actively participate in determining regional leaders / regional heads who will lead in their respective territories. Citizens have the right to vote to vote at regional head elections. This is of course an awareness and responsibility as citizens so that regional leaders / regional heads are elected who are able to organize government and create prosperity and justice based on the values contained in the principles of Pancasila. The problem in this research is how a juridical study of the awareness of citizens to use their voting rights in implementing democracy in regional head elections?This research is a normative juridical research with the Library Research research method. The data collection method uses secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary and tertiary legal materials. The population in this study is a random population of residents / community of Pengkol hamlet, Mangunsari village, Gunung pati District, Semarang City. The results of the research show that people in this region as citizens of the Republic of Indonesia have the awareness and responsibility to exercise their voting rights in the implementation of regional head elections, especially the election for Mayor and Deputy Mayor of Semarang on December 9, 2020. Regional head elections in this region have been going well and in a conducive situation even though it was held during the Covid-19 pandemic. It is hoped that the holding of this regional head election will produce regional leaders who have reliable and quality leadership management and are able to bring the community to realize social justice for all Indonesian people.

scholarly journals Legal Reconstruction of State Institutionalities of State Commissions to Suppress the Potential of Institutional Authority Dispute

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 1006-1011
Author(s):  
Lukman Hakim ◽  
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Popular Sovereignty ◽  
Checks And Balances ◽  
Structural Mechanism ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Know How ◽  
Institutional Authority ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Democratic System ◽  
Constitutional System

The main problem of this research triggers by the fact that Indonesia fundamental constitutional system changed into the 1945 Constitution. The changes affected the structure and structural mechanism of state institutions. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the philosophical question of the basic root formed in the 1945 Constitution as a new constitution of Indonesia. Regarding the organization and institution of the state can be started by questioning the essence of power that is institutionalized or organized into the state. The results showed that it is also important to know how the principle of popular sovereignty is reflected in the structure and mechanisms of state and government institutions that guarantee the establishment of the legal system and the functioning of the democratic system. At the theory level in terms of state institutions, with the various state commissions, how the principle of popular sovereignty is organized into institutional functions can be patterned into state institutions that are equal and mutually balanced in forms of checks and balances. From a normative perspective, the sources of state institutional authority can be used as a reference in the structuring of state institutions by considering shifts and the development of state administration, especially with the state commissions that occurred after changes to the 1945 Constitution.

scholarly journals PENGARUH PUTUSAN DEWAN KEHORMATAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILIHAN UMUM TERHADAP HASIL PEMILIHAN GUBERNUR LAMPUNG 2014

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 777
Author(s):  
Aryo Fadlian
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
State Institution ◽  
The State ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Gubernatorial Election ◽  
Ethics Council

AbstractThe implementation process of the election of Governor of Lampung in 2014was still a lot of controversy with the process so complicated that ultimatelyresulted elected leaders, after the long process, sprang DKPP decisionrelating to the election of the Governor of Lampung in 2014. The verdict ofDKPP generates convicted and fired Lampung Provincial ElectionSupervisory Board The purpose of this research was to determine andanalyze the strength of decision DKPP Lampung gubernatorial election in2014. In this study the authors discussed the use of theory and concepts;theory of legislation, the concept of the State institutions, the concept of anindependent State institution using normative juridical research method, i.e.obtaining secondary data obtained from the study of literature, books, andlegislation. Results of research and discussion show that many violations inthe elections in 2014 that resulted in the governor of Lampung in 2014resulted in the termination of the Election Supervisory Board membersLampung province because it violates the code of ethics. Strength HonorCouncil Election decision final and binding give lessons to the electionorganizer Lampung Province.Keywords: Verdict Strength, Election Organizer Ethics Council, ElectionViolationsAbstrakProses pelaksanaan pemilihan Gubernur Lampung tahun 2014 masih banyakkontroversi dengan prosesnya yang begitu rumit sehingga akhirnyamenghasilkan pemimpin terpilih, setelah proses yang panjang, munculkeputusan DKPP terkait pemilihan Gubernur Lampung tahun 2014. Putusantersebut DKPP menghasilkan terbukti dan dipecat Badan Pengawas PemiluProvinsi Lampung. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui danmenganalisis kekuatan keputusan pemilihan gubernur DKPP Lampung padatahun 2014. Dalam penelitian ini penulis membahas penggunaan teori dankonsep; Teori perundang-undangan, konsep lembaga negara, konseplembaga negara merdeka yang menggunakan metode penelitian yuridisnormatif, yaitu memperoleh data sekunder yang diperoleh dari studi literatur,buku dan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian dan pembahasanmenunjukkan bahwa banyak pelanggaran dalam Pemilu 2014 yangmengakibatkan Gubernur Lampung pada tahun 2014 mengakibatkanpenghentian anggota Badan Pengawas Pemilu Provinsi Lampung karenamelanggar kode etik. Keputusan Kehormatan Dewan Kehormatan keputusanfinal dan mengikat memberi pelajaran kepada penyelenggara pemiluProvinsi Lampung.Kata Kunci: Kekuatan Putusan, Dewan Kehormatan PenyelenggaraPemilihan Umum, Pelanggaran Pemilu

scholarly journals Penguasaan Negara terhadap Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Alam Ruang Angkasa Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 235
Author(s):  
Athari Farhani ◽  
Ibnu Sina Chandranegara
Keyword(s):  
Natural Resources ◽  
Natural Resource ◽  
Outer Space ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The State ◽  
Research Issues ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The People ◽  
The Republic ◽  
International Conventions

Pasca amandemen UUD Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 Pasal 33 ayat (3) yang berbunyi “Bumi, air dan kekayaan yang terkandung di dalamnya dikuasai oleh negara dan dipergunakan sebesar-besarnya bagi kemakmuran rakyat” penguasaan negara yang ada dalam Pasal 33 ayat (3) tersebut hanya mengatur pada bumi, air dan yang terkandung di dalamnya. Padahal saat ini keberadaan ruang angkasa berhubungan erat dengan hajat hidup orang banyak, salah satunya pemanfaatan GSO (geo stationary orbit) yang merupakan sumber daya alam terbatas. Sehingga hal tersebut menimbulkan masalah baru khususnya bagi Indonesia sebagai negara khatulistiwa yang mana penempatan GSO berada di atasnya. Masalah tersebut adalah bagaimana internalisasi terkait konsep penguasaan negara menurut Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD NRI 1945 terhadap pemanfaatan sumber daya alam yang ada dalam wilayah ruang angkasa, serta bagaimana regulasi-regulasi yang mengatur terkait pemanfaatan sumber daya alam di wilayah ruang angkasa apakah sudah sesuai dipergunakan sebesar-besarnya bagi kemakmuran rakyat. Dalam penelitian ini digunakan metode penelitian analisis kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini memberikan gambaran bahwa keberadaan ruang angkasa memiliki peranan penting bagi setiap negara, khususnya keberadaan GSO sebagai sumber daya alam terbatas, keberadan GSO hanya ada di atas khatulistiwa dan Indonesia salah satu negara yang dilalui garis khatulistiwa. Beragam konvensi internasional yang telah disahkan ke dalam peraturan di Indonesia maupun regulasi yang ada di Indonesia berkenaan dengan pemanfaatan ruang angkasa sampai saat ini belum memberikan manfaat dan pengaturan yang komprehensif terkait memanfaatkan sumber daya alam yang terkandung dalam wilayah ruang angkasa tersebut, sehingga menjadi suatu keharusan bagi Indonesia sebagai negara yang berdaulat untuk memberikan jaminan secara konstitusional bagi keberadaan sumber daya alam yang ada dalam wilayah ruang angkasa untuk dipergunakan sebesar-besarnya bagi kemakmuran rakyat.After the amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 33 paragraph (3) that stated "The land, the water and the natural resources within shall be under the powers of the State and shall be used to the greatest benefit of the people" the state authorities in Article 33 paragraph (3) only regulates earth, water and and the natural resources within. Whereas today, the existence of the outer space is closely associated with the lives of many people, as such, the utilization of GSO (Geostationary Orbit) which is a limited natural resource. So that it rises new issues, especially for Indonesia as an equatorial country where the placement of GSOs is above it. The problem is how to internalization the utilization of natural resources in outer space (related to the concept of state authorities according to Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia), and how the regulation that regulates the utilitazion of natural resources in outer space are appropriately used to the greatest benefit of the people. This study aims to answer these two issuess by investigating normatively or library research. This law research conducted by analyzing secondary data from primary, secondary and tertiary materials. In this qualitative analysis research, the secondary data from primary, secondary and tertiary materials connected to each other and interpreted in order to find answers to solve the research issues. The results of this study provide an overview about the existence of outer space which has an important role for every country, especially the existence of the GSO as a limited natural resource. GSO only exists above the equator and Indonesia is one of the countries which is passed by the equator. International conventions that have been ratified into Indonesian regulations and regulations in Indonesia relating to the utilization of outer space have not provided a comprehensive benefits and regulations related to utilizing natural resources contained in these outer space areas, so that it becomes a necessity for Indonesia as a sovereign country to provide constitutional guarantees for the existence of natural resources that exist in the outer space to be used as much as possible for the prosperity of the people.

scholarly journals Direct Election of President and Vice President In Pancasila Perspective

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-430
Author(s):  
Sonny Taufan ◽  
Risang Pujiyanto
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Direct Election ◽  
The People ◽  
The Republic

AbstractAfter the amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Election of President and Vice President was not conducted by the People's Consultative Assembly but voted directly by the people. Amendment to the provision for the election of President and Vice President have invited debate, partly because they are deemed incompatible with Pancasila. This study examines the appropriateness of the presidential and vice-presidential election based on Pancasila. The research method uses normative juridical, using secondary data obtained through literature study and qualitative analysis. The result and discussion of this research are that the implementation of the election of President and Vice President based is in accordance with Pancasila, especially with the fourth principle.Keywords: Democracy, Direct Election, and Pancasila AbstrakSetelah amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden tidak dilakukan oleh Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat tetapi dilaksanakan langsung oleh rakyat. Amandemen terhadap ketentuan untuk pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden telah mengundang perdebatan, sebagian karena mereka dianggap tidak sesuai dengan Pancasila. Studi ini mengkaji kelayakan ketentuan pemilihan presiden dan wakil presiden berdasarkan Pancasila. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, menggunakan data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi literatur dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil dan pembahasan penelitian ini adalah bahwa pelaksanaan pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden berdasarkan Pancasila sudah sesuai dengan Pancasila, terutama dengan prinsip keempatKata Kunci: Demokrasi, Pemilihan Langsung, Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, Pancasila. АннотацияПосле внесения поправки в Конституцию Республики Индонезия 1945 года выборы президента и вице-президента не проводились Народной Консультативной Ассамблеей, а проводились непосредственно всенародными выборами в Индонезии. Поправки к положениям о выборах президента и вице-президента вызвали дебаты, отчасти потому, что они считаются несовместимыми с Панчасилой. В этом исследовании рассматривается соответствие принятия положений о президентских и вице-президентских выборах на основе Панчасилы. Метод исследования – нормативно-юридический, используя вторичные данные, полученные в результате изучения литературы и проанализируемые качественным методом. Результаты и обсуждение этого исследования заключаются в том, что осуществление выборов президента и вице-президента на основе Панчасилы соответствует Панчасиле, особенно четвёртому принципу.Ключевые слова: Демократия, Прямые Выборы, Президент и Вице-Президент, Панчасила.

scholarly journals Penguatan Fungsi Legeslasi Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia Dalam Pembahasan Rancangan Undang-Undang

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 352-369
Author(s):  
Ahmad Dediansyah
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
National Policy ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Checks And Balances ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Central Level

This study aims to determine the position of the functions and authority of the Regional Representative Council based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the urgency of strengthening the function of the Regional Representative Council as a regional representative in national policy making at the central level. The research method used is a normative legal research method that focuses on library research, namely the search for legal materials consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. to obtain secondary data from legal materials. The normative approach is carried out by reviewing the provisions or regulations in force. Basically, the existence of the Regional Representative Council through an amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is based on the existence of 2 (two) factors, namely democratization and efforts to accommodate regions in making national policies, theoretically the existence of the Regional Representative Council is intended to apply the principle of checks and balances between state institutions, namely the process of mutual supervision and balance between State institutions. This was done to strengthen central and regional relations in order to maintain the integrity and unity of the unitary state of the Republic of Indonesia. However, based on the amendment results of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia the authority of the Regional Representative Council to carry out its function as a regional representative is still inadequate, so the desire to implement the principle of checks and balances between State institutions is still not realized.

scholarly journals Judicial Preview on the Bill on International Treaty Ratification

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Noor Sidharta ◽  
Sudarsono Sudarsono ◽  
I Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Bambang Sugiri
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
International Treaty ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Treaty Ratification ◽  
Administrative Practice ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Republic

This research is aimed to find and introduce a new idea on the state administration, which has implications on the international treaty ratification procedure followed by Indonesia and additional authorizations of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The judicial preview in this research is an international treaty examination procedure by the Constitutional Court before an international treaty is transformed into a law, i.e. such international treaty is a Bill. The judicial preview shall have different terms in each country, such as Review ex ante, abstract review, judicial review. This procedure is applied when an international treaty has not been validated as a country’s national law. The benefits of a judicial preview shall be a solution to connect an ambiguity between the state administrative law and international law. The judicial preview is also the inter-state institutions real check and balance on the international treaty. Out of benchmarking results of four countries following the monism doctrine, i.e. Russia, Germany, France, and Italty and two countries following the dualism doctrine, i.e. Hungary and Ecuador, several additional authorizations of the Constitutional Court shall be summarized, i.e. via the Amendment of 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and/or regulations via laws. If both manners are not possible, the Constitutional Court may apply the judicial preview as a state administrative practice. An international treaty draft, which has passed through the judicial preview, may not be submitted to the Constitutional Court to be performed a judicial review, unless 5 (five) year-period has passed since the bill is enacted as a law.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN KEJAKSAAN SEBAGAI PELAKSANA KEKUASAAN NEGARA DI BIDANG PENUNTUTAN DALAM STRUKTUR KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
DIAN ROSITA
Keyword(s):  
State Power ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The State ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
The Public ◽  
Executive Authority ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Judicial Authority ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Government Institution

<p align="center"><strong>ABSTRAK</strong></p><p align="center"> </p><p class="Style2">Selama ini pengaturan kedudukan Kejaksaan tidak diatur secara tegas dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 hanya disebut secara eksplisit dalam Pasal 24 ayat (3) UUD NRI Tahun 1945 yang menyatakan, “Badan-badan lain yang fungsinya berkaitan dengan kekuasaan kehakiman diatur dalan undang-undang.” Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang –Undang Kejaksaan No. 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan menyebutkan bahwa Kejaksaan adalan lembaga pemerintah yang melaksanakan kekuasaan Negara dibidang penuntutan serta kewenangan lain yang berdasarkan undang-undang. Sehingga secara kelembagaan berada di bawah kekuasaan eksekutif namun dalam menjalankan tugas dan fungsinya  merupakan bagian dari kekuasaan yudikatif yang menjadikan ketidakjelasan kedudukan Kejaksaan dalam struktur ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian yang bersifat preskriptis analitis. Jenis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder, yaitu data yang diperoleh melalui bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Simpulan yang diperoleh dari hasil penelitian ini adalah kedudukan Kejaksaan yang secara kelembagaan berada di bawah kekuasaan eksekutif dan secara kewenangan dalam melaksanakan tugas dan fungsinya termasuk bagian dari kekuasaan yudikatif menyebabkan Kejaksaan rawan terhadap intervensi kekuasaan lainnya dalam melaksanakan  tugas dan fungsinya sebagai pelaksana kekuasaan negara di bidang penuntutan. Serta untuk mewujudkan kekuasaan penuntutan yang independen maka perlu untuk melakukan reposisi kedudukan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia</p><p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong></p><p><em> </em></p><p><em>So far, the regulation of the Public Prosecutor's Office is not expressly stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia. It is only mentioned explicitly in Article 24 Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which states, "Other bodies whose functions relate to the judicial authority are regulated in legislation" Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Prosecutor's Law No. 16 of 2004 on the Prosecutor's Office. It states that the Attorney is a government institution that exercises state power in the field of prosecution and other authorities based on the law. So that institutionally, it is under the executive authority but in carrying out its duties and functions it is part of the judicial power that makes the ambiguity of the position of the Prosecutor in the structure of the state administration. This research used normative juridical method with analytic prescriptive research specification. The type of data used in this study is secondary data, data were secondary data which gained from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The conclusion derived from the results of this study is the position of the Attorney which is institutionally under the authority of the executive. Further, its authority in carrying out its duties and functions includes part of the judicial power, it causes the Attorney is prone to other power intervention in carrying out its duties and functions as the executor of state power in the field of prosecution. To realize the power of independent prosecution, it is necessary to reposition the position of the Prosecutor of the Republic of Indonesia.</em></p><p class="Style2"> </p>

scholarly journals PENGAWASAN OMBUDSMAN DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 25 TAHUN 2009

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Siti Hasanah ◽  
Idea Islami Parasatya
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
The State ◽  
Sound System ◽  
The People ◽  
Technical Instructions ◽  
The Republic

This paper discusses the supervision of the Ombudsman in the implementation of public services. The state is obliged to provide public services to every citizen as a form of the constitutional mandate. The duty of public service is carried out by the State Civil Apparatus. In the practice of carrying out the functions and authorities of public services to the people carried out by the State Civil Apparatus, they have not been maximally normative based on Law number 25 of 2009, as well as implement natively. Research is Normative legal research using descriptive qualitative methods and secondary data studies from several collections of literature studies. The results of the study show that the behavior and service patterns of the State Civil Apparatus still deviate a lot from what they should, even though they have been escorted through legal instruments, both in the form of regulations, technical instructions and implementing instructions as a legal umbrella and reference to the implementation of their functions and authorities. Internal control by the relevant agencies does not seem to have been able to be a solution in solving problems of poor quality public services. This pattern, if allowed to roll out, will have an impact on the failure to realize a sound system of public service delivery by the general principles of government and corporation. The presence of the Ombudsman Commission of the Republic of Indonesia is a solution to maximize the function of public services by the State Civil Apparatus.Keywords: ombudsman,  public services, supervision ABSTRAKTulisan ini membahas tentang pengawasan Ombudsman dalam pelaksanaan pelayanan publik. Negara berkewajiban untuk memberikan layanan publik kepada setiap warga negara sebagai bentuk amanat konstitusi. Tugas pelayanan publik dilakukan oleh Aparatur Sipil Negara. Dalam praktik menjalankan fungsi dan wewenang pelayanan publik kepada orang-orang yang dilakukan oleh Aparatur Sipil Negara, mereka belum secara normatif maksimal berdasarkan UU No. Penelitian adalah penelitian hukum normatif menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dan studi data sekunder dari beberapa kumpulan studi literatur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perilaku dan pola pelayanan Aparatur Sipil Negara masih menyimpang dari apa yang seharusnya, meskipun mereka telah dikawal melalui instrumen hukum, baik dalam bentuk peraturan, instruksi teknis dan instruksi pelaksanaan sebagai payung hukum dan referensi untuk pelaksanaan fungsi dan wewenang mereka. Pengendalian internal oleh instansi terkait tampaknya tidak mampu menjadi solusi dalam menyelesaikan masalah buruknya layanan publik. Pola ini, jika dibiarkan, akan berdampak pada kegagalan mewujudkan sistem pemberian layanan publik yang baik sesuai dengan prinsip umum pemerintah dan korporasi. Kehadiran Komisi Ombudman Republik Indonesia merupakan solusi untuk memaksimalkan fungsi pelayanan publik oleh Aparatur Sipil Negara.Kata kunci: layanan publik, ombudsman, pengawasan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document