scholarly journals Non-compliance with the Constitutional Court's Decision from the Perspective of Constitutional Law

Academia Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narwoko ◽  
Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy ◽  
Abdul Fatah
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Legislative Process ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Form Of Government

This study aims to determine the forms of non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower and to find a constitutional solution to the problem of non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower.This research is a juridicial normative study using a statutory, case, and conseptual approach.Using legal materials in the form of a Constitutional Court Decision related to Manpower.From the research results, it can be concluded that the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower are not obeyed by the adressats. Various forms of non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower-related Laws were not followed up and partially fulfilled in the form of government policies such as the Regulation of Minister of Manpower, Circular of the Minister of Manpower. Some laws are in the legislative process. The constitutional solution that has the potential to realized for non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision is the implementation of the concept of judicial order, judicial defferal, and imposition of sanctions.

scholarly journals The Mediation Committee of the Bundestag and Bundesrat: A Special Institution of German Constitutional Law

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
Claus Koggel
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Political Power ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legislative Process ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Current Case ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
Federal Constitutional ◽  
Legislative Procedure ◽  
German Constitutional Law

AbstractThe Mediation Committee of the Bundestag and Bundesrat – is it “one of the most felicitous innovations in our constitutional activities”, “the most positive institution in the entire Basic Law” or, as some critics assert “a substitute and superordinate parliament” or indeed the “mysterious darkroom of the legislative process”? This article seeks to provide answers to these questions. It is however clear that the Mediation Committee has become an important instrument for attaining political compromises in Germany's legislative procedure. The Committee's purpose is to find a balance between the differing opinions of the Bundestag and Bundesrat concerning the content of legislation, and, through political mediation and mutual concessions, to find solutions that are acceptable to both sides. Thanks to this approach, the Mediation Committee has helped save countless important pieces of legislation from failure since it was established over 65 years ago, thus making a vital contribution to ensure the legislative process works efficiently. The lecture will address the Mediation Committee's status and role within the German legislative process. It will explain the composition of this body as well as its most important procedural principles also against the backdrop of current case law from the Federal Constitutional Court. Finally, the lecture will consider how particular constellations of political power impact on the Mediation Committee's work.

scholarly journals KONSEKUENSI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN ANAK ASTRA DALAM HUKUM ADAT BALI

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Gede Pasek Pramana
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Law

This research aims to analyze about the significance of the Constitutional Court Decision No.46/PUU-VIII/2010 the position of anak astra in Bali customary law. The research method used is a normative study by selecting the type of statue approach and the conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials that were examined in this study consisted of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials and techniques were analyzed with the description, systematic, evaluation and argumentation. Based on the perspective ( review ) Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, anak astra have a civil relationship with her biological father and his family along can be proved by science and technology and / or other evidence according to the law. The juridical consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 to the norms of Bali customary law about anak astra Bali is must conform to the directions of law in the Decision of the Constitutional Court.

scholarly journals Pengujian Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Marwan Hsb
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Form Of Government ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Article 24C Section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia authorizes the Constitutional Court to reviewthe law against the constitution. However, when referring to the hierarchy of legislation, the law has the equal hierarchy with government regulation in lieu of law. It makes a question whether the Constitutional Court truly has the authority to review government regulation in lieu of law against the constitution? Based on the research in this paper, it was found that by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 138/PUU-VII/2009, the Constitutional Court stated that the authority to review government regulation in lieu of law under the authority of the Constitutional Court because the substance of government regulation in lieu of law is similar with the substance of law. So, the Constitutional Court has the authority to review a government regulation in lieu of law materially. Such decision is correct; the Constitutional Court has the authority to review a government regulation in lieu of law in material because the substance is similar with the law. While formally reviewing should be the authority of the Supreme Court due to government regulation in lieu of law formally is in the form of government regulation

scholarly journals The Validity Of Marriages Agreement Made After Ongoing Based Marriage Law In Indonesia

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 937
Author(s):  
Intan Fajriyanti ◽  
Munsharif Abdul Chalim
Keyword(s):  
Civil Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Results ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Marriage ◽  
Legal Consequences

Mating agreement has been stipulated in Article 29 of Act No. 1 Of 1974. Married to the present agreement remains in the society. The problems examined in this study is: what are the factors occurrence marriage agreement, how the validity of the agreement to marry, and the legal consequences mating agreement executed after the course of the marriage. The method used is a normative legal research. The result of the first conclusion that the arrangement agreement are married in Indonesia in the Act include the Civil Code, the Marriage Act No. 1 of 1974, KHI and the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2016, and at the conclusion of research results mating agreement made after the course of a legal marriage do not violate the boundaries of the law, religion, and morality.Keywords: Agreement; Mating Agreement; Marriage Law.

scholarly journals PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 68/ PUU-XII/2014 DALAM PERSPERKTIF HAM

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Danu Aris Setiyanto
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Interfaith Marriage ◽  
Contentious Issue ◽  
The Family ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Interfaith Marriages

Interfaith marriage, in fact, is a contentious issue in the family law. The arrangement of interfaith marriage in Indonesia is experiencing a change since before and after the establishment of the constitutional Law of R.I. No. 1 of 1974 regarding Marriage. Although there are changes in the regulations but some parties consider that arrangement of interfaith marriage is not firm, it is unclear / smuggling law in it. Regulation of interfaith marriage in Indonesia is considered to have reduced the freedom to choose a mate and find the happiness with a partner of different religions. This is considered by the applicant that Article 2, paragraph 1 does not comply with the principle of freedom of human rights. This paper focuses on studying the problems of the interfaith marriages after a Constitutional Court decision No. 68 / PUU-XII / 2014 in the perspective of human rights. Constitutional Court rejected entirely about judicial interfaith marriage, as it is considered unreasonable under the law and marriage in Indonesia is based on religion. Constitutional Court's decision contains the values of human rights with a particular meaning and is limited by the limited freedom of religion in Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution.[Perkawinan beda agama secara fakta merupakan persoalan yang menjadi perdebatan dalam hukum keluarga. Pengaturan perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia mengalami perubahan sejak sebelum dan setelah adanya UU R.I. Nomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Walaupun ada perubahan secara regulasi tetapi beberapa pihak menganggap bahwa pengaturan perkawinan beda agama tidak tegas, ada ketidakjelasan/penyelundupan hukum di dalamnya. Regulasi perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia dianggap telah mengurangi kebebasan untuk memilih jodoh dan menemukan kebahagiaan bersama pasangannya yang berbeda agama. Hal inilah yang dianggap oleh para pemohon bahwa Pasal 2 ayat 1 tidak sesuai dengan prinsip kebebasan dalam HAM. Tulisan ini difokuskan untuk mengkaji permasalahan perkawinan beda agama pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 68/ PUU-XII/2014 dalam perspektif HAM. Mahkamah Konstitusi menolak seluruhnya tentang uji materiil perkawinan beda agama, karena dinilai tidak beralasan menurut hukum dan perkawinan di Indonesia yang berdasarkan agama. Putusan MK mengandung nilai-nilai HAM yang bermakna partikular dengan kebebasan terbatas dan dibatasi oleh agama dalam Pancasila dan UUD 1945]

scholarly journals DISKURSUS KEWENANGAN AUDIT BPK TERHADAP KEUANGAN BUMN (PERSEROAN) PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 62/PUU-XI/2013

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merdiansa Hamsa Paputungan
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Regulatory Issues ◽  
Research Results ◽  
State Finance ◽  
Legal Entities

AbstractConstitutional Court Decision Number: 62 / PUU-XI / 2013, confirmed the duties and authority of the Indonesian Supreme Audit Institution (BPK) in examining the management and financial responsibilities of all that elements, including the state finance of company that separated on country / region as stated in Law No. 17 Year 2003 on State Finance. This research aimed to answer three problems: (1) Does the financial state separated in State Owned Enterprises (SOE) is a state finance ?; (2) How is the authority of BPK  to examine the management and responsibility of state assets set aside in the SOE after Constitutional Court Decision Number: 62 / PUU-XI / 2013 ? To answer these problems, the authors conducted a juridical-normative research involves studying legal materials in the form of Constitutional Court decisions and Laws and Regulatory Issues, and the theory of legal entities to sharpen the research results. IntisariPutusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 62/PUU-XI/2013 mengukuhkan tugas dan wewenang BPK dalam memeriksa pengelolaan dan tanggung jawab keuangan negara termasuk yang dipisahkan pada perusahaan negara/daerah sebagaimana dalam Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara. Penelitian ini ingin menjawab tiga persoalan, (1) Apakah keuangan negara yang dipisahkan pada BUMN (Perseroan) merupakan keuangan negara?; (2) Bagaimana kewenangan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan dalam memeriksa pengelolaan dan tanggungjawab kekayaan negara yang dipisahkan di BUMN (Perseroan) pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 62/PUU-XI/2013? Untuk menjawab permasalah tersebut, penulis melakukan penelitian yuridis-normatif, yakni meneliti bahan hukum berupa Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, serta  menggunakan teori badan hukum untuk mempertajam hasil penelitian. 

scholarly journals HAK ANGKET DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT REPUBLIK INDONESIA (DPR RI) TERHADAP KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI (KPK)

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-202
Author(s):  
Dasep Muhammad Firdaus
Keyword(s):  
Human Resources ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Institutional Authority ◽  
Balance Principle ◽  
Democratic State ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

AbstractIndonesia as a constitutional and democratic state has three governmental branches which are executive, legislative and judicial power; and executed on the check and balance principle. One of the check and balance principles implementation can be seen in the House of Representatives of Indonesia (DPR)’s Parliamentary Scrutiny function which is mandated by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945), the right of inquiry to investigate all forms of implementation of laws and government policies that are allegedly contrary to the legislation. Recently the rights had been applied to evaluate KPK (corruption eradication commission) as an independent institution and free from any authority. Substantially the inquiry right was applied to evaluate KPK regarding the following aspects: institutional, authority, human resources, and expenditure budgets. Through legal tracing on related laws and regulations, that were descriptively analyzed regarding the DPR's inquiry right implementation towards KPK; it was found the DPR's inquiry rights to the KPK is constitutionally regulated in Article 20A of the UUD 1945, Law Number 17 of 2014 Article 79 paragraph (1), (2) and (3) and Constitutional Court Decision Case No. 36 and 37 / PUU-XV / 2017. Based on those regulations, DPR has rights to ask for KPK’s accountability upon their duties and authority and KPK is obliged to respect and implement DPR recommendations produced from the inquiry rights.Keywords:People’s Representative Council, Rights of Inquiry, Corruption Eradication Commission AbstrakIndonesia sebagai negara demokrasi kontitusional terdiri dari cabang kekuasaan eksekutif, legislatif, dan yudikatif berdasar prinsip check and balance. Wujud prinsip tersebut ada dalam ketatanegaraan Indonesia terlihat pada fungsi pengawasan DPR RI yang diamanatkan oleh UUD NRI Tahun 1945, antara lain melalui hak angket untuk menyelidiki segala bentuk pelaksanaan UU maupun kebijakan pemerintah yang diduga bertentangan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Salah satunya adalah hak angket yang ditujukan terhadap KPK sebagai lembaga bersifat independen dan bebas dari kekuasaan manapun. Secara subtantif pelaksanaan hak dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi KPK dari sisi kelembagan, kewenangan, sumber daya manusia hingga anggaran belanja. Melalui penelusuran peraturan perundang-undangan yang dianalisis secara deskriptif atas hak angket DPR terhadap KPK; ditemukan bahwa landasan hukum hak angket DPR terhadap KPK secara konstitusional diatur di dalam Pasal 20A UUD NKRI Tahun 1945, Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 Pasal 79 ayat (1), (2) dan (3) dan Putusan MK No. Perkara 36 dan 37/PUU-XV/2017 . Atas dasar ketentuan tersebut, DPR berhak meminta pertanggungjawaban pelaksanaan tugas dan kewenangan KPK dan KPK sebagai lembaga penegak hukum harus menghormati dan melaksanakan rekomendasi yang telah dihasilkan pansus angket dan.Kata Kunci:DPR, Hak Angket, KPK

scholarly journals Providing of Reasonableness in Decisions of the Constitutional Court in the Scope of Recognition of the Echr’s Decisions

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Laura BZOVA ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Constitutional Reform ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
European Court ◽  
Judicial Reasoning

The relevance of the study of judicial reasoning in public law is related to the challenges of modern litigation, which require new approaches to the construction of a court decision. This is also due to the constitutional reform in Ukraine, in particular the latest amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine in the field of justice. The emergence of the priority issue of constitutionality led to the rupture of the system, where the protection of fundamental rights in a particular issue was essentially ensured in accordance with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The Constitutional Court of Ukraine always uses the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights to form its own legal positions, after which they actually become a substantive element of the motivating part of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. It is concluded that regardless of whether the decision of the European Court of Human Rights has been ruled on Ukraine or not, it is a source of constitutional law of Ukraine.

EKSISTENSI PENERAPAN HUKUMAN MATI DI INDONESIA

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Ahmad Muhammad Mustain Nasuha
Keyword(s):  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The State ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Draft Bill

This study aims the death penalty in Indonesia. We know where the death penalty is contrary or not in terms of the constitution and Islamic law, then we can conclude that if the legal implementation of the death penalty in Indonesia continue to be done or should be abolished. Based on research and the analysis conducted, conclude that Indonesia According to the Indonesian Constitution that the death penalty in Indonesia is constitutional. Constitutional Court Decision No. 2-3 / PUU-V / 2007 states that the imposition of the death penalty was constitutional. Any law governing capital punishment is not contrary to the Constitution of the State of Indonesia. However the legislation in Indonesia death penalty is still recognized in some legislation. There are three groups of rules, namely: Criminal Dead in the Criminal Code, Criminal die outside the Criminal Code, Criminal die in the Draft Bill. According to Islamic law that the death penalty could be applied to some criminal act or jinazah, either hudud qishahs, diyat or ta'zir among others to: Apostate, Rebel, Zina, Qadzaf (Allegations Zina), Steal (Corruption), Rob (Corruption), Murder.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document