Inline Setup Provides Automatic Measurement of PVT Behavior of Drilling Fluids

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (11) ◽  
pp. 55-56
Author(s):  
Chris Carpenter
Keyword(s):  
Temperature Dependence ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Mass Density ◽  
Automatic Measurement ◽  
Heating Element ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Systematic Bias ◽  
Temperature Conditions ◽  
True Value ◽  
Pvt Behavior

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 204084, “Automatic Measurement of the Dependence on Pressure and Temperature of the Mass Density of Drilling Fluids,” by Eric Cayeux, SPE, NORCE, prepared for the 2021 SPE/IADC International Drilling Conference and Exhibition, originally scheduled to be held in Stavanger, 9–11 March. The paper has not been peer reviewed. The mass density of drilling fluids usually is measured manually with a mud balance. The pressure and temperature dependence of the mass density of the fluid [i.e. its pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) behavior] then is estimated. Variations in the composition of the fluid mix and uncertainties regarding the PVT behavior of each component, however, may lead to inaccuracies. An apparatus that measures the PVT behavior of the drilling fluid contained in a pit directly and automatically has been designed. Inline PVT Measurement The pressure and temperature dependence of drilling fluids can be described by a biquadratic function. However, API Recommended Practice 13D recommends using a linear function of temperature combined with a quadratic form of pressure. Because this process involves six parameters, at least six measurements must be made under different conditions of pressure and temperature. A starting point is to measure the mass density of the fluid under six different pairs of pressures and temperatures. To keep the design of the apparatus as simple as possible, it ideally would not operate under high-pressure and -temperature conditions. Therefore, knowing the range of pressures and temperatures sufficient for taking sample measurements is useful in order to be able to extrapolate the model at higher pressure and temperature conditions with acceptable accuracy. The densitometer’s measurement precision of 0.05 kg/m3 and repeatability of 0.01 kg/m3 is known, so stochastic simulations of the possible measurement error for various spans of investigated pressures and temperatures can be performed. In this study, the authors con-sider that the calibrated PVT model shall be used for a range of pressure of 1000 bar and a range of temperature of 200°C. It is possible to calculate the root mean square of the proportion error between the predicted density value and the “true” value when varying stochastically the systematic bias on the density measurement when the calibration samples are spanning small ranges of pressure and temperature. A possible design for an inline apparatus could be to pump the drilling fluid past a controllable heating element and having a controllable choke downstream of the densitometer apply a pressure while measuring the mass density. The setpoints for the heating element and the choke would be changed six times in order to collect the necessary mass densities to calibrate the PVT model. Changing the temperature of the heating element, however, can require several minutes, and gathering a complete set of calibration measurements may easily take 15 to 30 minutes. An alternative could be to perform six measurements simultaneously. The densitometers can be mounted in series. The configuration could be with six parallel branches or any combinations between series and parallel branches. With two parallel branches, in one branch the temperature of the fluid is not modified, while it is modified in the second branch. For each of the two branches, back pressure is applied at two intermediate positions. This configuration has the advantage of using fewer chokes and pressure sensors (four instead of five).

Automatic Measurement of the Dependence on Pressure and Temperature of the Mass Density of Drilling Fluids

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Cayeux
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Conductivity ◽  
Heat Capacity ◽  
Specific Heat ◽  
Temperature Dependence ◽  
Speed Of Sound ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Mass Density ◽  
Adiabatic Compressibility ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Pvt Behavior

Abstract Drilling fluids are subjected to large variations of pressure and temperature while they are circulated in a well. This span of pressures and temperatures is so large that the mass density of the drilling mud differs from one depth to another. For a precise estimation of the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic pressures, it is therefore important to have a good estimation of the pressure and temperature dependence of the mass density of drilling fluids. Usually, the mass density of drilling fluids is manually measured with a mud balance. The pressure and temperature dependence of the mass density of the fluid, i.e. its PVT behavior, is then estimated based on the PVT behavior of its components and their relative proportions. However, variations in the composition of the fluid mix and uncertainties on the PVT behavior of each components, may lead to inaccuracies. To circumvent these limitations, an apparatus that measures directly and automatically the PVT behavior of the drilling fluid contained in a pit has been designed. The setup measures both the mass density and the speed of sound in the fluid at specific conditions of pressure and temperature. From the speed of sound in the liquid mix, it is possible to estimate the adiabatic compressibility. The device also utilizes a heat exchanger from which the thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity of the drilling fluid can be estimated. Combining the specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity and the adiabatic compressibility, the isothermal compressibility can be calculated. By combining measurements made at different conditions of pressure and temperature, a PVT model of the drilling fluid is estimated. By providing automatically, and on a continuous basis, the actual PVT behavior of drilling fluids, drilling automation systems can gain in precision and at the same time, their configuration can be simplified, therefore making them more accessible to any drilling operation.

Synthesis of a Novel Ester-Based Drilling Fluid Applicable to High Temperature Conditions

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Nasiri ◽  
S. N. Ashrafizadeh ◽  
A. Ghalambor
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Temperature Stability ◽  
Ester Hydrolysis ◽  
Favorable Effect ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Electrical Stability ◽  
Temperature Conditions ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Effect Of Hot Rolling

Ester-based drilling fluids based on aliphatic esters were introduced in 1990. Esters can be synthesized from fatty acids and alcohols. Previous studies indicated that ester hydrolysis in drilling fluids happens only under certain conditions. In order for ester hydrolysis to occur, two primary conditions must be present: high temperature and excessive hydroxyl. When the temperature exceeds 300°F, ester hydrolysis can occur under the presence of excessive hydroxyl. Hydrolysis breaks down the ester component into its parent carboxylic acid and alcohol. The current study shows that the stability of ester-based drilling fluids at high temperature conditions depends on the composition so that the selection of proper components and additives such as emulsifiers, stabilizers, copolymers, viscosifiers, and rheological modifiers can increase the temperature stability of the fluid. Hereby, the application of an ester-based drilling fluid is improved up to 350°F. The composition of the provided fluid is unique in the view point of its higher thermal stability against the previous formulations provided in literature. Furthermore, the experimental results of this study show the favorable effect of hot-rolling pressure on barite sag and electrical stability of the mud, i.e., increasing the pressure at three particular temperatures of 300°F, 325°F, and 350°F reduced the barite sag and at some instances increased the electrical stability.

Effect of Buoyancy and Inertia on Viscoplastic Fluid: Fluid Displacement in an Inclined Eccentric Annulus With an Irregular Section

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steinar Kragset ◽  
Hans Joakim Skadsem
Keyword(s):  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Mass Density ◽  
Density Difference ◽  
Regular Part ◽  
Viscoplastic Fluid ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Displacement Efficiency ◽  
Cement Slurry ◽  
Horizontal Section ◽  
Primary Cementing

Primary cementing is an important well construction process that should establish well control barriers and zonal isolation. Critical for primary cementing is the successful displacement of drilling fluid from the annulus between casing and formation by a sequence of spacer fluids and cement slurry. Failure to displace the drilling fluid may compromise the annular cement integrity and result in contaminated cement with degraded mechanical properties. Issues such as eccentricity, washouts and other geometric irregularities in the wellbore can complicate the displacement processes, and their effect on the quality of the cementing job and the final result is linked to uncertainty. We present numerical simulations of the displacement process between two viscoplastic fluids in the vicinity of a symmetric local hole enlargement. The study is limited to laminar flow regimes in the regular part of the annulus, and we focus on a near-horizontal section with significant eccentricity and small annular clearance. We vary the volumetric flow rate and the mass density difference between the fluids, and study how the irregularity affects the displacement efficiency and the presence of residual fluid in and after the irregularity. In the regular part of the geometry, eccentricity favors flow in the wider, upper part of the annulus, while density difference leads to azimuthal flow from the top to the low side of the annulus. The results support the assumption that increasing the mass density difference improves the displacement efficiency. In the laminar regime, lower flow rates can be favorable over higher ones in terms of efficiency measured as a function of volume that is pumped into the enlarged section. Displacement of drilling fluids for primary cementing is a rich flow problem involving different non-Newtonian fluids and possibly irregular geometry. Simulations of the displacement process can aid in optimizing fluid properties and injection rates for primary cementing operations, and assist cement log interpretation after the operation.

scholarly journals Developing a Thermally Stable Ester-Based Drilling Fluid for Offshore Drilling Operations by Using Aluminum Oxide Nanorods

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3399
Author(s):  
Alaa Ahmed ◽  
Amin Sharifi Haddad ◽  
Roozbeh Rafati ◽  
Ahmed Bashir ◽  
Ahmed M. AlSabagh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elevated Temperature ◽  
Aluminum Oxide ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Normal Pressure ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Temperature Conditions ◽  
Oxide Nanorods ◽  
Ethyl Octanoate ◽  
Drilling Operations ◽  
Filtration Properties

Esters were found to be promising alternatives to oil, as a constituent of drilling fluids, due to their biodegradability and bioaccumulation attributes. In this study, we used ethyl octanoate ester (EO) as a low molecular weight synthetic oil for formulating an ester-based drilling fluid (EBDF). Aluminum oxide nanorods (nanoparticles) were introduced as a Pickering emulsion stabilizer. Like the commercial emulsifiers, they showed that they stabilized the invert emulsion drilling fluid in our study. The rheological and filtration properties of the EBDF were tested at normal pressure and three temperatures: low temperature deepwater (LT) conditions of 2.6 °C, normal pressure and normal temperature (NPNT) conditions of 26.8 °C, and elevated temperature conditions of 70 °C. To enhance the stability and filtration properties of the drilling fluid, aluminum oxide nanoparticles (NPs) were used. An optimum concentration of 1 wt% was found to provide superior rheological performance and higher stability than samples without NPs at NPNT, LT, and elevated temperature conditions. Steadier gel rheology was exhibited at elevated temperature conditions, and a slow rate of an increasing trend occurred at the lower temperatures, with increasing NP concentrations up to 1.5 wt%. Filtration loss tests presented a reduction of fluid loss with increasing the NP concentration. The results demonstrate that a reduction of up to 45% was achieved with the addition of 1 wt% NP. These results show that nano-enhancement of ethyl octanoate drilling fluids would suffice to provide a wider range of operational temperatures for deepwater drilling operations by providing better thermal stability at elevated temperatures and maintaining stability at lower temperatures.

scholarly journals Application of Thermal Resistant Gemini Surfactants in Highly Thixotropic Water-in-oil Drilling Fluid System

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1435-1441
Author(s):  
Yonggui Liu ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Jing Yan ◽  
Tao Song ◽  
Yongjun Xu
Keyword(s):  
Gemini Surfactants ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Excellent Thermal Stability ◽  
Oil Drilling ◽  
Low Viscosity ◽  
Emulsion Drops ◽  
Oil Emulsions ◽  
Building Capability ◽  
Liquid Precipitation

AbstractTraditional water-in-oil drilling fluids are limited by their shear thinning behavior. In this article, we propose the synthesis of a thermal resistant quaternary ammonium salt gemini surfactant DQGE-I. This surfactant was synthesized using monomers such as N,N-dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine, organic acids and epichlorohydrin, as well as blocking groups such as N-vinylpyrrolidone (NVP). The prepared surfactant exhibited various advantages over traditional surfactants, including excellent thermal stability, good emulsifying and wetting capability. The use of these surfactants was shown to improve the compactness of emulsifier molecules at the oil/water interface, as well as the overall emulsificaiton effect. Laboratory studies revealed that water-in-oil emulsions prepared using DQGE-I showed high emulsion breaking voltage, low liquid precipitation and small and uniformly distributed emulsion drops. Highly thixotropic water-in-oil drilling fluids based on DQGE-I showed low viscosity, high shear rate and thermal tolerance up to 260oC. Additionally, the proposed fluid was applied in 16 wells (including WS1-H2, GS3 and XS1-H8) in the Daqing Oilfield. Testing showed that DQGE-1 exhibited excellent rheological behavior and wall-building capability. The emulsion breaking voltage exceeded 1500 V, and the yield point/ plastic viscosity ratio exceeded 0.4. The use of this surfactant can help to solve problems such as high formation temperature and poor well wall stability.

scholarly journals Wet Drilled Cuttings Bed Rheology

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1644
Author(s):  
Camilo Pedrosa ◽  
Arild Saasen ◽  
Bjørnar Lund ◽  
Jan David Ytrehus
Keyword(s):  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Parallel Plates ◽  
Single Particles ◽  
Cuttings Transport ◽  
Transport Studies ◽  
Water Based ◽  
Fluid Properties ◽  
External Forces ◽  
Cuttings Bed

The cuttings transport efficiency of various drilling fluids has been studied in several approaches. This is an important aspect, since hole cleaning is often a bottleneck in well construction. The studies so far have targeted the drilling fluid cuttings’ transport capability through experiments, simulations or field data. Observed differences in the efficiency due to changes in the drilling fluid properties and compositions have been reported but not always fully understood. In this study, the cuttings bed, wetted with a single drilling fluid, was evaluated. The experiments were performed with parallel plates in an Anton Paar Physica 301 rheometer. The results showed systematic differences in the internal friction behaviors between tests of beds with oil-based and beds with water-based fluids. The observations indicated that cutting beds wetted with a polymeric water-based fluid released clusters of particles when external forces overcame the bonding forces and the beds started to break up. Similarly, it was observed that an oil-based fluid wetted bed allowed particles to break free as single particles. These findings may explain the observed differences in previous cutting transport studies.

Development of a Reproducible Method of Formulating and Testing Drilling Fluids

1969 ◽  
Vol 9 (04) ◽  
pp. 403-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.K. Sinha ◽  
Harvey T. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Flow Characteristics ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
Water Evaporation ◽  
Fluid Loss ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Testing Procedures ◽  
Asymptotic Values

Abstract Recommendations are made for obtaining consistent and reproducible test data on drilling fluids having identical composition. Previously, such a procedure has been difficult to accomplish even when the fluids were mixed in similar equipment. A survey of work in this area indicates that previous methods have been unsatisfactory because previous methods have been unsatisfactory because (1) the muds are extremely sensitive to the duration and violence of agitation during a normal mixing routine, and (2) gelling of the muds occurs before the properties can reach constant values. This gelling is caused by water evaporation resulting from the increase in temperature associated with the agitation. The work shows that these problems largely can be overcome by (1) agitating the constituents of the drilling fluid more vigorously, (2) maintaining a fairly constant temperature, and(3) Protecting the fluid from evaporation. When these steps are followed, the fluid properties approach asymptotic values that do not change by prolonged or accelerated agitation or by aging for a month. The time required to reach asymptotic values or a stabilized state is from 2 to 6 hours and is a function of the mud composition. Introduction Preparation of drilling fluids in the laboratory to determine their suitability to meet specific drilling requirements or to serve as a base fluid to evaluate the effectiveness of thinners, dispersants or other additives normally begins with combining measured quantities of the constituents and stirring them for a short time in a low-speed mixer. This is done to obtain a uniform mixture and to hydrate clays. Then the fluid is further agitated in a higher-speed device (Hamilton Beach mixer or Waring blender) to disperse more thoroughly and clay particles The biggest obstacle in the laboratory investigation of drilling fluids has been the lack of a method of producing a mixture by which reproducible results of the measured properties could be obtained. Numerous investigators have encountered this difficulty. Prior to 1929, density was the only property of mud that customarily was measured. The use of Wyoming bentonite on a large scale after 1929 was mainly responsible for the development of more elaborate testing procedures and for the application of the principles of colloid chemistry to the drilling fluids. Ambrose and Loomis in 1931 were among the first to recognize the plastic flow characteristics of drilling fluids, although Bingham in 1916 had observed The same phenomenon with dilute clay suspensions. Marsh introduced the Marsh funnel for field testing in 1931. By this time, non-Newtonian characteristics of drilling fluids were established. The Stormer and MacMichael viscometers were used to study the rheological properties of the fluids. In the 1930's and early 1940's, the work conducted by several investigators contributed toward a better understanding of drilling fluids. In the mid 1930's, fluid-loss and the associated mud-cake-forming properties of drilling fluids were recognized as important to the behavior of these fluids. The other properties of drilling fluids, including gel strength, pH, and sand content soon were recognized. In 1937, API published its first recommended procedure for test methods. Since that time, these procedures have been revised periodically. The latest edition, RP-13B, was published in 1961 However, in spite of the recognized need for a method of mixing that provides drilling fluids with stabilized properties, no such method previously has been described. SPEJ P. 403

Annular Frictional Pressure Losses During Drilling—Predicting the Effect of Drillstring Rotation

2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arild Saasen
Keyword(s):  
Rheological Properties ◽  
Pressure Loss ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Axial Flow ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Unstable Flow ◽  
Pressure Losses ◽  
Shear Dependent Viscosity ◽  
Water Based ◽  
Dependent Viscosity

Controlling the annular frictional pressure losses is important in order to drill safely with overpressure without fracturing the formation. To predict these pressure losses, however, is not straightforward. First of all, the pressure losses depend on the annulus eccentricity. Moving the drillstring to the wall generates a wider flow channel in part of the annulus which reduces the frictional pressure losses significantly. The drillstring motion itself also affects the pressure loss significantly. The drillstring rotation, even for fairly small rotation rates, creates unstable flow and sometimes turbulence in the annulus even without axial flow. Transversal motion of the drillstring creates vortices that destabilize the flow. Consequently, the annular frictional pressure loss is increased even though the drilling fluid becomes thinner because of added shear rate. Naturally, the rheological properties of the drilling fluid play an important role. These rheological properties include more properties than the viscosity as measured by API procedures. It is impossible to use the same frictional pressure loss model for water based and oil based drilling fluids even if their viscosity profile is equal because of the different ways these fluids build viscosity. Water based drilling fluids are normally constructed as a polymer solution while the oil based are combinations of emulsions and dispersions. Furthermore, within both water based and oil based drilling fluids there are functional differences. These differences may be sufficiently large to require different models for two water based drilling fluids built with different types of polymers. In addition to these phenomena washouts and tool joints will create localised pressure losses. These localised pressure losses will again be coupled with the rheological properties of the drilling fluids. In this paper, all the above mentioned phenomena and their consequences for annular pressure losses will be discussed in detail. North Sea field data is used as an example. It is not straightforward to build general annular pressure loss models. This argument is based on flow stability analysis and the consequences of using drilling fluids with different rheological properties. These different rheological properties include shear dependent viscosity, elongational viscosity and other viscoelastic properties.

Low ECD High Performance Invert Emulsion Drilling Fluids: Lab Development and Field Deployment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikrant Wagle ◽  
Abdullah Yami ◽  
Michael Onoriode ◽  
Jacques Butcher ◽  
Nivika Gupta
Keyword(s):  
High Performance ◽  
Filter Cake ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Field Performance ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Core Material ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Invert Emulsion ◽  
Field Deployment ◽  
Permeability Studies

Abstract The present paper describes the results of the formulation of an acid-soluble low ECD organoclay-free invert emulsion drilling fluid formulated with acid soluble manganese tetroxide and a specially designed bridging package. The paper also presents a short summary of field applications to date. The novel, non-damaging fluid has superior rheology resulting in lower ECD, excellent suspension properties for effective hole cleaning and barite-sag resistance while also reducing the risk of stuck pipe in high over balance applications. 95pcf high performance invert emulsion fluid (HPIEF) was formulated using an engineered bridging package comprising of acid-soluble bridging agents and an acid-soluble weighting agent viz. manganese tetroxide. The paper describes the filtration and rheological properties of the HPIEF after hot rolling at 300oF. Different tests such as contamination testing, sag-factor analysis, high temperature-high pressure rheology measurements and filter-cake breaking studies at 300oF were performed on the HPIEF. The 95pcf fluid was also subjected to particle plugging experiments to determine the invasion characteristics and the non-damaging nature of the fluids. The 95pcf HPIEF exhibited optimal filtration properties at high overbalance conditions. The low PV values and rheological profile support low ECDs while drilling. The static aging tests performed on the 95pcf HPIEF resulted in a sag factor of less than 0.53, qualifying the inherent stability for expected downhole conditions. The HPIEF demonstrated resilience to contamination testing with negligible change in properties. Filter-cake breaking experiments performed using a specially designed breaker fluid system gave high filter-cake breaking efficiency. Return permeability studies were performed with the HPIEF against synthetic core material, results of which confirmed the non-damaging design of the fluid. The paper thus demonstrates the superior performance of the HPIEF in achieving the desired lab and field performance.

A Generalized Model for the Field Assessment of Drilling Fluid Viscoelasticity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Hongbo ◽  
Okesanya Temi ◽  
Kuru Ergun ◽  
Heath Garett ◽  
Hadley Dylan
Keyword(s):  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Field Application ◽  
Testing Equipment ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Rotational Viscometer ◽  
Generalized Model ◽  
Fluid Elasticity ◽  
Field Samples ◽  
Drilling Operations

Abstract Recent studies highlight the significant role of drilling fluid elasticity in particle suspension and hole cleaning during drilling operations. Traditional methods to quantify fluid elasticity require the use of advanced rheometers not suitable for field application. The main objectives of the study were to develop a generalized model for determining viscoelasticity of a drilling fluid using standard field-testing equipment, investigate the factors influencing drilling fluid viscoelasticity in the field, and provide an understanding of the viscoelasticity concept. Over 80 fluid formulations used in this study included field samples of oil-based drilling fluids as well as laboratory samples formulated with bentonite and other polymers such as partially-hydrolyzed polyacrylamide, synthesized xanthan gum, and polyacrylic acid. Detailed rheological characterizations of these fluids used a funnel viscometer and a rotational viscometer. Elastic properties of the drilling fluids (quantified in terms of the energy required to cause an irreversible deformation in the fluid's structure) were obtained from oscillatory tests conducted using a cone-and-plate type rheometer. Using an empirical approach, a non-iterative model for quantifying elasticity correlated test results from a funnel viscometer and a rotational viscometer. The generalized model was able to predict the elasticity of drilling fluids with a mean absolute error of 5.75%. In addition, the model offers practical versatility by requiring only standard drilling fluid testing equipment to predict viscoelasticity. Experimental results showed that non-aqueous fluid (NAF) viscoelasticity is inversely proportional to the oil-water ratio and the presence of clay greatly debilitates the elasticity of the samples while enhancing their viscosity. The work efforts present a model for estimating drilling fluid elasticity using standard drilling fluid field-testing equipment. Furthermore, a revised approach helps to describe the viscoelastic property of a fluid that involves quantifying the amount of energy required to irreversibly deform a unit volume of viscoelastic fluid. The methodology, combined with the explanation of the viscoelasticity concept, provides a practical tool for optimizing drilling operations based on the viscoelasticity of drilling fluids.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document