The Effects of Interfacial Tension Dependent Relative Permeability on Sweep Efficiency and Oil Recovery Under Different Gas Injection Composition

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohd Ghazali Abd Karim ◽  
Wahyu Hidayat ◽  
Alzahrani Abdulelah
Keyword(s):  
Interfacial Tension ◽  
Simulation Model ◽  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Relative Permeability Curve ◽  
Compositional Model ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The objective of this paper is to investigate the effects of interfacial tension dependent relative permeability (Kr_IFT) on oil displacement and recovery under different gas injection compositions utilizing a compositional simulation model. Oil production under miscible gas injection will result in variations of interfacial tension (IFT) due to changes in oil and gas compositions and other reservoir properties, such as pressure and temperature. Laboratory experiments show that changes in IFT will affect the two-phase relative permeability curve (Kr), especially for oil-gas system. Using a single relative permeability curve during the process from immiscible to miscible conditions will result in inaccurate gas mobility against water, which may lead to poor estimation of sweep efficiency and oil recovery. A synthetic sector compositional model was built to evaluate the effects of this phenomenon. Several simulation cases were investigated over different gas injection compositions (lean, rich and CO2), fluid properties and reservoir characterizations to demonstrate the impact of these parameters. Simulation model results show that the application of Kr_IFT on gas injection simulation modelling has captured different displacement behavior to provide better estimation of oil recovery and identify any upside potential.

Experimental Investigation of Near-Miscible Water-Alternating-Gas Injection Performance in Water-Wet and Mixed-Wet Systems

SPE Journal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (01) ◽  
pp. 114-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mobeen Fatemi ◽  
Mehran Sohrabi
Keyword(s):  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
Water Alternating Gas ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Wag Injection

Summary Laboratory data on water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection for non-water-wet systems are very limited, especially for near-miscible (very low IFT) gas/oil systems, which represent injection scenarios involving high-pressure hydrocarbon gas or CO2 injection. Simulation of these processes requires three-phase relative permeability (kr) data. Most of the existing three-phase relative permeability correlations have been developed for water-wet conditions. However, a majority of oil reservoirs are believed to be mixed-wet and, hence, prediction of the performance of WAG injection in these reservoirs is associated with significant uncertainties. Reliable simulation of WAG injection, therefore, requires improved relative permeability and hysteresis models validated by reliable measured data. In this paper, we report the results of a comprehensive series of coreflood experiments carried out in a core under natural water-wet conditions. These included water injection, gas injection, and also WAG injection. Then, to investigate the impact of wettability on the performance of these injection strategies, the wettability of the same core was changed to mixed-wet (by aging the core in an appropriate crude oil) and a similar set of experiments were performed in the mixed-wet core. WAG experiments under both wettability conditions started with water injection (I) followed by gas injection (D), and this cyclic injection of water and gas was repeated (IDIDID). The results show that in both the water-wet and mixed-wet cores, WAG injection performs better than water injection or gas injection alone. Changing the rock wettability from water-wet to mixed-wet significantly improves the performance of water injection. Under both wettability conditions (water-wet and mixed-wet), the breakthrough (BT) of the gas during gas injection happens sooner than the BT of water in water injection. Ultimate oil recovery by gas injection is considerably higher than that obtained by water injection in the water-wet system, while in the mixed-wet system, gas injection recovers considerably less oil.

scholarly journals Enhanced Oil Recovery: Chemical Flooding

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Ragab ◽  
Eman M. Mansour
Keyword(s):  
Interfacial Tension ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Mobility Ratio ◽  
Chemical Flooding ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Oil Displacement ◽  
Remaining Oil ◽  
Oil Displacement Efficiency

The enhanced oil recovery phase of oil reservoirs production usually comes after the water/gas injection (secondary recovery) phase. The main objective of EOR application is to mobilize the remaining oil through enhancing the oil displacement and volumetric sweep efficiency. The oil displacement efficiency enhances by reducing the oil viscosity and/or by reducing the interfacial tension, while the volumetric sweep efficiency improves by developing a favorable mobility ratio between the displacing fluid and the remaining oil. It is important to identify remaining oil and the production mechanisms that are necessary to improve oil recovery prior to implementing an EOR phase. Chemical enhanced oil recovery is one of the major EOR methods that reduces the residual oil saturation by lowering water-oil interfacial tension (surfactant/alkaline) and increases the volumetric sweep efficiency by reducing the water-oil mobility ratio (polymer). In this chapter, the basic mechanisms of different chemical methods have been discussed including the interactions of different chemicals with the reservoir rocks and fluids. In addition, an up-to-date status of chemical flooding at the laboratory scale, pilot projects and field applications have been reported.

An In-Depth Review of the Recovery Mechanisms for the Cyclic Gas Injection Process in Shale Oil Reservoirs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilario Martin Rodriguez ◽  
Yalda Barzin ◽  
Gregory James Walker ◽  
Markus Gruenwalder ◽  
Matias Fernandez-Badessich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Simulation Model ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Hydraulic Fracture ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Pressure Profile ◽  
Shale Oil ◽  
Gas Composition ◽  
Pure Methane ◽  
Recovery Mechanisms ◽  
Incremental Oil Recovery

Abstract This study has double objectives: investigation of the main recovery mechanisms affecting the performance of the gas huff-n-puff (GHnP) process in a shale oil reservoir, and application of optimization techniques to modelling of the cyclic gas injection. A dual-permeability reservoir simulation model has been built to reproduce the performance of a single hydraulic fracture. The hydraulic fracture has the average geometry and properties of the well under analysis. A history match workflow has been run to obtain a simulation model fully representative of the studied well. An optimization workflow has been run to maximize the cumulative oil obtained during the GHnP process. The operational variables optimized are: duration of gas injection, soaking, and production, onset time of GHnP, injection gas flow rate, and number of cycles. This optimization workflow is launched twice using two different compositions for the injection gas: rich gas and pure methane. Additionally, the optimum case obtained previously with rich gas is simulated with a higher minimum bottom hole pressure (BHP) for both primary production and GHnP process. Moreover, some properties that could potentially explain the different recovery mechanisms were tracked and analyzed. Three different porosity systems have been considered in the model: fractures, matrix in the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV), and matrix in the non-SRV zone (virgin matrix). Each one with a different pressure profile, and thus with its corresponding recovery mechanisms, identified as below: Vaporization/Condensation (two-phase system) in the fractures.Miscibility (liquid single-phase) in the non-SRV matrix.Miscibility and/or Vaporization/Condensation in the SRV matrix: depending on the injection gas composition and the pressure profile along the SRV the mechanism may be clearly one of them or even both. Results of this simulation study suggest that for the optimized cases, incremental oil recovery is 24% when the gas injected is a rich gas, but it is only 2.4% when the gas injected is pure methane. A higher incremental oil recovery of 49% is obtained, when injecting rich gas and increasing the minimum BHP of the puff cycle above the saturation pressure. Injection of gas results in reduction of oil molecular weight, oil density and oil viscosity in the matrix, i.e., the oil gets lighter. This net decrease is more pronounced in the SRV than in the non-SRV region. The incremental oil recovery observed in the GHnP process is due to the mobilization of heavy components (not present in the injection gas composition) that otherwise would remain inside the reservoir. Due to the main characteristic of the shale reservoirs (nano-Darcy permeability), GHnP is not a displacement process. A key factor in success of the GHnP process is to improve the contact of the injected gas and the reservoir oil to increase the mixing and mass transfer. This study includes a review of different mechanisms, and specifically tracks the evolution of the properties that explain and justify the different identified mechanisms.

scholarly journals An evaluation on mechanisms of miscibility development in acid gas injection for volatile oil reservoirs

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erhui Luo ◽  
Zifei Fan ◽  
Yongle Hu ◽  
Lun Zhao ◽  
Jianjun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Simulation Method ◽  
Carbonate Reservoir ◽  
Gas Oil ◽  
Oil Composition ◽  
Acid Gas ◽  
Compositional Model ◽  
Injection Process ◽  
Acid Gas Injection

Produced gas containing the acid gas reinjection is one of the effective enhanced oil recovery methods, not only saving costs of disposing acid gases and zero discharge of greenhouse gases but also supporting reservoir pressure. The subsurface fluid from the Carboniferous carbonate reservoir in the southern margin of the Pre-Caspian basin in Central Asia has low density, low viscosity, high concentrations of H2S (15%) and CO2 (4%), high solution gas/oil ratio. The reservoir is lack of fresh water because of being far away onshore. Pilot test has already been implemented for the acid gas reinjection. Firstly, in our work a scheme of crude oil composition grouping with 15 compositions was presented on the basis of bottomhole sampling from DSTs of four wells. After matching PVT physical experiments including viscosity, density and gas/oil ratio and pressure–temperature (P–T) phase diagram by tuning critical properties of highly uncertain heavy components, the compositional model with phase behavior was built under meeting accuracy of phase fitting, which was used to evaluate mechanism of miscibility development in the acid gas injection process. Then using a cell-to-cell simulation method, vaporizing and/or condensing gas drive mechanisms were investigated for mixtures consisting of various proportions of CH4, CO2 and H2S in the gas injection process. Moreover, effects of gas compositions on miscible mechanisms have also been determined. With the aid of pressure-composition diagrams and pseudoternary diagrams generated from the Equation of State (EoS), pressures of First Contact Miscibility (FCM) and Multiple Contact Miscibility (MCM) for various gases mixing with the reservoir oil sample under reservoir temperature were calculated. Simulation results show that pressures of FCM are higher than those of MCM, and CO2 and H2S are able to reduce the miscible pressure. At the same time, H2S is stronger. As the CH4 content increases, both pressures of FCM and MCM are higher. But incremental values of MCM decrease. In addition, calculated envelopes of pseudoternary diagrams for mixtures of CH4, CO2 and H2S gases of varying composition with acid gas injection have features of bell shape, hourglass shape and triangle shape, which can be used to identify vaporizing and/or condensing gas drives. Finally, comparison of the real produced gas and the one deprived of its C3+ was performed to determine types of miscibility and calculate pressures of FCM and MCM. This study provides a theoretical guideline for selection of injection gas to improve miscibility and oil recovery.

An Improved Three-Phase Relative Permeability and Hysteresis Model for the Simulation of a Water-Alternating-Gas Injection

SPE Journal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (05) ◽  
pp. 841-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.. Shahverdi ◽  
M.. Sohrabi
Keyword(s):  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Relative Permeabilities ◽  
Water Alternating Gas ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Three Phase Flow ◽  
Oil Water ◽  
Wag Injection

Summary Water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection in waterflooded reservoirs can increase oil recovery and extend the life of these reservoirs. Reliable reservoir simulations are needed to predict the performance of WAG injection before field implementation. This requires accurate sets of relative permeability (kr) and capillary pressure (Pc) functions for each fluid phase, in a three-phase-flow regime. The WAG process also involves another major complication, hysteresis, which is caused by flow reversal happening during WAG injection. Hysteresis is one of the most important phenomena manipulating the performance of WAG injection, and hence, it has to be carefully accounted for. In this study, we have benefited from the results of a series of coreflood experiments that we have been performing since 1997 as a part of the Characterization of Three-Phase Flow and WAG Injection JIP (joint industry project) at Heriot-Watt University. In particular, we focus on a WAG experiment carried out on a water-wet core to obtain three-phase relative permeability values for oil, water, and gas. The relative permeabilities exhibit significant and irreversible hysteresis for oil, water, and gas. The observed hysteresis, which is a result of the cyclic injection of water and gas during WAG injection, is not predicted by the existing hysteresis models. We present a new three-phase relative permeability model coupled with hysteresis effects for the modeling of the observed cycle-dependent relative permeabilities taking place during WAG injection. The approach has been successfully tested and verified with measured three-phase relative permeability values obtained from a WAG experiment. In line with our laboratory observations, the new model predicts the reduction of the gas relative permeability during consecutive water-and-gas-injection cycles as well as the increase in oil relative permeability happening in consecutive water-injection cycles.

scholarly journals Characteristics and quantitative study on gas breakthrough in developing Yaha-2 condensate gas reservoir in Tarim Basin, China

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-800
Author(s):  
Jing Xia ◽  
Pengcheng Liu ◽  
Yuwei Jiao ◽  
Mingda Dong ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tarim Basin ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Graphical Representation ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Dew Point ◽  
Breakthrough Time ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Gas Reservoir ◽  
Point Pressure

In order to keep the formation pressure be larger than the dew-point pressure to decrease the loss of condensate oil, cyclic gas injection has been widely applied to develop condensate gas reservoir. However, because the heterogeneity and the density difference between gas and liquid are significant, gas breakthrough appears during cyclic gas injection, which apparently impacts the development effects. The gas breakthrough characteristics are affected by many factors, such as geological features, gas reservoir properties, fluid properties, perforation relations between injectors and producers, and operation parameters. In order to clearly understand the gas breakthrough characteristics and the sensitivity to the parameters, Yaha-2 condensate gas reservoir in Tarim Basin was taken as an example. First, the gas breakthrough characteristic of different perforation relations by injecting natural gas was studied, and the optimal relation was achieved by comparing the sweep efficiency. Then, the designs of orthogonal experiments method were employed to study the sensitivity of gas breakthrough to different parameters. Meanwhile, the characteristic parameters, such as gas breakthrough time, dimensionless gas breakthrough time, and sweep volume, were calculated and the prediction models were achieved. Finally, the prediction models were applied to calculate the gas breakthrough time and sweep volume in Yaha-2 condensate gas reservoir in Tarim Basin. The reliability of the model was verified at the same time. Please see the Appendix for the graphical representation of the abstract.

scholarly journals The efficiency of gas injection into low-permeability multilayer hydrocarbon reservoirs

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 100-108
Author(s):  
Sudad H AL-Obaidi ◽  
Miel Hofmann ◽  
Falah H. Khalaf ◽  
Hiba H. Alwan
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Recovery Factor ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Compositional Model ◽  
Multistage Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs ◽  
Working Agent

The efficiency of gas injection for developing terrigenous deposits within a multilayer producing object is investigated in this article. According to the results of measurements of the 3D hydrodynamic compositional model, an assessment of the oil recovery factor was made. In the studied conditions, re-injection of the associated gas was found to be the most technologically efficient working agent. The factors contributing to the inefficacy of traditional methods of stimulating oil production such as multistage hydraulic fracturing when used to develop low-permeability reservoirs have been analyzed. The factors contributing to the inefficiency of traditional oil-production stimulation methods, such as multistage hydraulic fracturing, have been analysed when they are applied to low-permeability reservoirs. The use of a gas of various compositions is found to be more effective as a working agent for reservoirs with permeability less than 0.005 µm2. Ultimately, the selection of an agent for injection into the reservoir should be driven by the criteria that allow assessing the applicability of the method under specific geological and physical conditions. In multilayer production objects, gas injection efficiency is influenced by a number of factors, in addition to displacement, including the ratio of gas volumes, the degree to which pressure is maintained in each reservoir, as well as how the well is operated. With the increase in production rate from 60 to 90 m3 / day during the re-injection of produced hydrocarbon gas, this study found that the oil recovery factor increased from 0.190 to 0.229. The further increase in flow rate to 150 m3 / day, however, led to a faster gas breakthrough, a decrease in the amount of oil produced, and a decrease in the oil recovery factor to 0.19 Based on the results of the research, methods for stimulating the formation of low-permeability reservoirs were ranked based on their efficacy.

scholarly journals Optimization of triple-alternating-gas (TAG) injection technique for enhanced oil recovery in tight oil reservoirs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mvomo Ndzinga Edouard ◽  
Pingchuan Dong ◽  
Chinedu J. Okere ◽  
Luc Y. Nkok ◽  
Abakar Y. Adoum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Recovery Factor ◽  
Injection Technique ◽  
Tight Oil ◽  
Compositional Model ◽  
Injection Scheme ◽  
Tight Oil Reservoirs

AbstractAfter single-gas (SG) injection operations in tight oil reservoirs, a significant amount of oil is still unrecovered. To increase productivity, several sequencing gas injection techniques have been utilized. Given the scarcity of research on multiple-gas alternating injection schemes, this study propose an optimized triple-alternating-gas (TAG) injection for improved oil recovery. The performance of the TAG process was demonstrated through numerical simulations and comparative analysis. First, a reservoir compositional model is developed to establish the properties and composition of the tight oil reservoir; then, a suitable combination for the SG, double alternating gas (DAG), and TAG was selected via a comparative simulation process. Second, the TAG process was optimized and the best case parameters were derived. Finally, based on the oil recovery factors and sweep efficiencies, a comparative simulation for SG, DAG, and TAG was performed and the mechanisms explained. The following findings were made: (1) The DAG and TAG provided a higher recovery factor than the SG injection and based on recovery factor and economic advantages, CO2 + CH4 + H2S was the best choice for the TAG process. (2) The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that the critical optimization factors for a TAG injection scheme are the injection and the production pressures. (3) After optimization, the recovery factor and sweep efficiency of the TAG injection scheme were the best. This study promotes the understanding of multiple-gas injection enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and serves as a guide to field design of gas EOR techniques.

Horizontal Versus Vertical Wells: Assessment of Sweep Efficiency in a Multi-Layered Reservoir Based on Consecutive Inter-Well Tracer Tests - A Comparison Between Water Injection and Polymer EOR

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bogdan-George Davidescu ◽  
Mathias Bayerl ◽  
Christoph Puls ◽  
Torsten Clemens
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Tracer Tests ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Flow Paths ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Polymer Injection ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Enhanced Oil Recovery pilot testing aims at reducing uncertainty ranges for parameters and determining operating conditions which improve the economics of full-field deployment. In the 8.TH and 9.TH reservoirs of the Matzen field, different well configurations were tested, vertical versus horizontal injection and production wells. The use of vertical or horizontal wells depends on costs and reservoir performance which is challenging to assess. Water cut, polymer back-production and pressures are used to understand reservoir behaviour and incremental oil production, however, these data do not reveal insights about changes in reservoir connectivity owing to polymer injection. Here, we used consecutive tracer tests prior and during polymer injection as well as water composition to elucidate the impact of various well configurations on sweep efficiency improvements. The results show that vertical well configuration for polymer injection and production leads to substantial acceleration along flow paths but less swept volume. Polymer injection does not only change the flow paths as can be seen from the different allocation factors before and after polymer injection but also the connected flow paths as indicated by a change in the skewness of the breakthrough tracer curves. For horizontal wells, the data shows that in addition to acceleration, the connected pore volume after polymer injection is substantially increased. This indicates that the sweep efficiency is improved for horizontal well configurations after polymer injection. The methodology leads to a quantitative assessment of the reservoir effects using different well configurations. These effects depend on the reservoir architecture impacting the changes in sweep efficiency by polymer injection. Consecutive tracer tests are an important source of information to determine which well configuration to be used in full-field implementation of polymer Enhanced Oil Recovery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document