scholarly journals The preventive effect of dexmedetomidine on adverse reactions induced by uterotonics in cesarean section: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingxi Kong(Former Corresponding Author) ◽  
Xuefeng Shan ◽  
Hongmei Wang ◽  
Yingying Ren ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Preventive Effect ◽  
Facial Flushing ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Abstract Background: To evaluate the preventive effect of dexmedetomidine(DEX) on adverse reactions induced by uterotonics used in cesarean section. Methods: Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) comparing dexmedetomidine with placebo on preventing the side effects of uterotonics in cesarean section were searched in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and CNKI. Results: Fifteen articles with 1174 patients were included in this study. Compared with placebo, DEX significantly reduced the incidence of adverse drug reactions, such as nausea, vomiting, facial flushing, chest distress, hypertension and tachycardia ([OR = 0.12, 95% CI (0.09, 0.17), P < 0.00001], [OR = 0.12, 95% CI (0.09, 0.18), P < 0.00001], [OR = 0.21, 95% CI (0.16, 0.29), P < 0.00001], [OR = 0.19,95%CI (0.12,0.30), P < 0.00001], [OR=0.09, 95%CI (0.05,0.14), P < 0.00001], [OR=0.04, 95%CI (0.02,0.07), P < 0.00001]),which were induced by uterotonics used in cesarean section. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine can prevent adverse reactions including nausea, vomiting, facial flushing, chest distress, hypertension and tachycardia caused by uterotonics used in cesarean section.

scholarly journals Impact of Ketamine on Pain Management in Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2;23 (4;2) ◽  
pp. 135-148
Author(s):  
Zifeng Xu
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Control Effect ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Time Required ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Background: The pain control effect of ketamine versus control in women during cesarean operation is not well determined. Objectives: The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ketamine versus control in cesarean section anesthesia for reducing the postoperative pain and analgesia. Study Design: We used meta-analysis to address this concern. Setting: Meta-analysis-based study. Methods: The databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ketamine versus control in controlling pain after cesarean section from inception to August 2018. Based on the Cochrane Handbook, the combined analysis was performed using Revman 5.3 software. Results: A total of 20 RCTs with 1,737 patients who underwent cesarean section were included. Meta-analysis showed that the pain score in the ketamine group was less than that of the control group (mean difference [MD], –1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], –1.61, –0.59; P < 0.0001). Application of ketamine during cesarean section also resulted in decreased consumption of morphine when compared with the control group (MD, –6.11 mg; 95% CI, –9.93, –2.29; P = 0.002). In addition, the first time required for analgesia was significantly longer in the ketamine group than that of the control group (MD, 72.48 minutes; 95% CI, 50.85, 94.11; P < 0.00001). Limitations: Limited patients were included with moderate strength. Conclusions: Ketamine supplementation during cesarean section reduces pain and morphine consumption and prolongs the postoperative analgesia. Key words: Ketamine, cesarean section, randomized controlled trials, meta-analysis

scholarly journals Efficacy of ondansetron for spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 654-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengmao Zhou ◽  
Yu Zhu ◽  
Zeqing Bao ◽  
Xianxue Wang ◽  
Qili Liu
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of ondansetron during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methods We sought randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ondansetron during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from their inception to September 2016. Results Altogether, 21 RCTs were included in this study. Meta-analysis showed that the ondansetron group had a lower incidence of nausea/vomiting and bradycardia than the placebo group during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia [relative risk (RR) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.36, 0.51) and RR = 0.45, 95% CI (0.26, 0.80), respectively]. There were no significant differences in the incidences of pruritus, hypotension, or shivering during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia [RR = 0.92, 95% CI (0.83, 1.02); RR = 0.72 (0.50, 1.06), 95% CI (0.50, 1.06); and RR = 0.89, 95% CI (0.71, 1.11), respectively]. Conclusion Ondansetron effectively reduces the incidences of nausea/vomiting and bradycardia under spinal anesthesia during cesarean section.

scholarly journals Granisetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: A meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 904-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Zhu ◽  
Chengmao Zhou ◽  
Bing Huang ◽  
Lin Ruan ◽  
Rui Liang
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Laparoscopy Surgery ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Objective This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of granisetron plus dexamethasone for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Methods We searched the literature in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and CNKI. Results In total, 11 randomized controlled trials were enrolled in this analysis. The meta-analysis showed that granisetron in combination with dexamethasone was significantly more effective than granisetron alone in preventing PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopy surgery. No significant differences in adverse reactions (dizziness and headache) were found in association with dexamethasone. Conclusion Granisetron in combination with dexamethasone was significantly more effective than granisetron alone in preventing PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, with no difference in adverse reactions between the two groups. Granisetron alone or granisetron plus dexamethasone can be used to prevent PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

scholarly journals Profile and frequency of antiparkinsonian drugs adverse reactions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
A. A. Tappakhov ◽  
T. E. Popova ◽  
A. I. Vasilev ◽  
T. G. Govorova ◽  
Yu. I. Khabarova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Ci Calculation ◽  
Antiparkinsonian Drugs

Objective: to assess the predictors and prevalence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with antiparkinsonian drugs.Materials and methods. 18 clinical studies and randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. We combined all registered ADRs for each drug and made direct comparisons with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) calculation.Results and discussion. Levodopa/benserazide (LB) had the best safety profile among levodopa drugs. Levodopa/carbidopa (LC) compared with LB was associated with more frequent development of nausea (OR=2.8; 95% CI: 1.51–5.21), aggravation of parkinsonism (OR=4.44; 95% CI: 2.12–9.28) and dizziness (OR=3.32; 95% CI: 1.5–7.33; p=0.002). Piribedil had the lowest number of ADRs among dopamine receptor agonists. Dizziness was more common with pramipexole and ropinirole than with levodopa (OR=1.82; 95% CI: 1.21–2.74 and OR=1.65; 95% CI: 1.11–2.44 respectively). Increased daytime sleepiness and peripheral edema have also been associated with pramipexole. Arterial hypertension was present in 9.6% of patients prescribed with piribedil. Amantadine compared with pramipexole was associated with a higher risk of hallucinations (OR=2.27; 95% CI: 1.24–4.12) and constipation (OR=2.40; 95% CI: 1.14–5.05). Patients prescribed with selegeline had higher odds of dizziness (OR=3.40; 95% CI: 1.76–6.55) and hallucinations (OR=4.30; 95% CI: 1.83–10.09) compared to rasagiline.Conclusion. Based on the results, we propose a diagram of the relationship between ADRs and their frequency with antiparkinsonian drugs. We hope that the study will find clinical application and allow neurologists to consider the effectiveness and the expected risks of ADRs in the treatment of PD.

scholarly journals Activity and Safety of Tegafur, Gimeracil, and Oteracil Potassium for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Ximing Zhang ◽  
Xiumei Tian ◽  
Yuezi Wei ◽  
Hao Deng ◽  
Lichun Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

In clinical practice, tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium (S-1) therapy is commonly administered to treat nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, its efficacy and safety remain controversial in both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 treatment for NPC. We searched PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and VIP databases for RCTs of chemotherapy with or without S-1 for NPC, from 2001 to 2020. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 and Stata15. Randomized controlled trials published in journals were included irrespective of blinding and language used. Patients were diagnosed with NPC through a clinicopathological examination; patients of all cancer stages and ages were included. Overall, 25 trials and 1858 patients were included. There were significant differences in the complete remission (OR = 2.42, 95% CI (1.88–3.10), P < 0.05 ) and overall response rate (OR = 2.68, 95% CI (2.08–3.45), P < 0.05 ) between the S-1 and non-S-1 groups. However, there was no significant difference in partial remission (OR = 1.10, 95% CI (0.87–1.39), P = 0.42 ) and seven adverse reactions (leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, dermatitis, oral mucositis, and anemia) between the S-1 and non-S-1 groups. Additionally, statistical analyses with six subgroups were performed. S-1 was found to be a satisfactory chemotherapeutic agent combined with radiotherapy, intravenous chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy for NPC. As an oral medicine, the adverse reactions of S-1, especially gastrointestinal reactions, can be tolerated by patients, thereby optimizing their quality of life. S-1 may be a better choice for the treatment of NPC. This trial is registered with CRD42019122041.

scholarly journals Pharmacological treatment for bipolar mania: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taro Kishi ◽  
Toshikazu Ikuta ◽  
Yuki Matsuda ◽  
Kenji Sakuma ◽  
Makoto Okuya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Bipolar Mania ◽  
The Cochrane Library

AbstractA systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of pharmacological interventions for adults with acute bipolar mania. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for eligible studies published before March 14, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of oral medication monotherapy lasting ≥10 days in adults with mania were included, and studies that allowed the use of antipsychotics as a rescue medication during a trial were excluded. The primary outcomes were response to treatment (efficacy) and all-cause discontinuation (acceptability). The secondary outcomes were the improvement of mania symptoms and discontinuation due to inefficacy. Of the 79 eligible RCTs, 72 double-blind RCTs of 23 drugs and a placebo were included in the meta-analysis (mean study duration = 3.96 ± 2.39 weeks, n = 16442, mean age = 39.55 years, with 50.93% males). Compared with the placebo, aripiprazole, asenapine, carbamazepine, cariprazine, haloperidol, lithium, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, tamoxifen, valproate, and ziprasidone outperformed response to treatment (N = 56, n = 14503); aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone had lower all-cause discontinuation; however, topiramate had higher all-cause discontinuation (N = 70, n = 16324). Compared with the placebo, aripiprazole, asenapine, carbamazepine, cariprazine, haloperidol, lithium, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, tamoxifen, valproate, and ziprasidone outperformed the improvement of mania symptoms (N = 61, n = 15466), and aripiprazole, asenapine, carbamazepine, cariprazine, haloperidol, lithium, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, valproate, and ziprasidone had lower discontinuation due to inefficacy (N = 50, n = 14284). In conclusions, these antipsychotics, carbamazepine, lithium, tamoxifen, and valproate were effective for acute mania. However, only aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone had better acceptability than the placebo.

scholarly journals 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the prevention of postoperative shivering: a meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1174-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengmao Zhou ◽  
Yu Zhu ◽  
Zhen Liu ◽  
Lin Ruan
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Objective We evaluated the efficacy of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the prevention of postoperative shivering. Methods We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Knowledge to find randomized controlled trials (RCT) of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the prevention of postoperative shivering. Two researchers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then conducted a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.2. Results Ultimately, 14 RCTs that included 980 patients were included in the analysis. We found that: 1) the incidence of shivering was significantly lower in 5-HT3 groups than placebo groups (relative risk, [RR] = 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40 – 0.58); 2) there was no significant difference in the incidence of shivering between 5-HT3 groups and meperidine groups (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.60 – 1.34). Conclusion 5-HT3 receptor antagonists appear to prevent postoperative shivering, with a broadly comparable efficacy to meperidine.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Suxiao Jiuxin Pill on Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Ren ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Ling Feng ◽  
Shuli Wang ◽  
Jun Li
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Plasma Viscosity ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Suxiao jiuxin pill is considered an effective ancillary drug in patients with coronary heart disease. Although numerous small, single-center clinical trials have been conducted, the benefits and harms of suxiao jiuxin pill remain controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to clarify the efficacy of suxiao jiuxin pill on patients with coronary heart disease. Randomized controlled trials were identified by using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Wanfang, Weipu, and China Knowledge Resource Integrated databases (until June 2016). Pooled relative risks (RR), weighted mean differences (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated using random-effects models. Forty-one trials involving 6276 patients were included in our analysis. Administration of suxiao jiuxin pill significantly improved electrocardiogram (ECG) results when compared with other therapies (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.38, and P<0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that suxiao jiuxin pills improve ECG results more than salvia tablets (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.67, and P<0.001), isosorbide dinitrate (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.44, and P=0.001), nitroglycerin (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.56, and P<0.001), and other drugs (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.44, and P<0.001). Available evidence additionally suggests that suxiao jiuxin pills could significantly reduce total cholesterol (WMD −0.62 mmol/L, 95% CI −1.06 to –0.18 mmol/L, and P=0.005) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels (WMD −1.12 mmol/L, 95% CI −1.42 to −0.82 mmol/L, and P<0.001) and increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels (WMD 0.32 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.58 mmol/L, and P=0.014). However, no significant differences were observed in total triglyceride levels, plasma viscosity, hematocrit, and fibrinogen. No incidences of adverse reactions were observed after administration of suxiao jiuxin pill. Improvements in ECG results and lipid profiles were also observed after suxiao jiuxin administration compared to other therapies. It also decreased low-cut and high-cut whole blood viscosity without significant adverse reactions.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Dan’e-Fukang Soft Extract in the Treatment of Endometriosis: A Meta-Analysis of 39 Randomized Controlled Trials Enrolling 5442 Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Yantao Li ◽  
Te Li ◽  
Shilin Song
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Outcome Indicators ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Objective. To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dan’e-fukang soft extract in endometriosis treatment. Method. PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP, SinoMed, and Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of Dan’e-fukang soft extract and conventional western medicines for endometriosis treatment were included. The data were extracted independently by two people and analyzed using RevMan 5.2.0 software. The relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals were considered as effective outcome indicators. Results. Thirty-nine papers including 5442 patients with endometriosis were included in this study. A meta-analysis revealed that Dan’e-fukang soft extract was more efficient than gestrinone in the treatment of endometriosis (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.15, I2 = 71%, REM, 18 trials) and its efficacy was comparable to that of danazol and mifepristone. Dan’e-fukang soft extract was also as effective as gestrinone and mifepristone in terms of relapse rate and relieving dysmenorrhea. The incidence of adverse reactions was lower than that of conventional western medicines. Conclusions. The results of this study showed that Dan’e-fukang soft extract offers certain advantages in endometriosis treatment, but rigorously designed, strictly implemented RCTs are needed to further validate its efficacy.

scholarly journals Acupuncture for Spasticity after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Min Lim ◽  
Junghee Yoo ◽  
Euiju Lee ◽  
Hyun Jung Kim ◽  
Seungwon Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Knowledge Resources ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Modified Ashworth Scale ◽  
The Cochrane Library

The aim of this systematic review was to determine how effective acupuncture or electroacupuncture (acupuncture with electrical stimulation) is in treating poststroke patients with spasticity. We searched publications in Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library in English, 19 accredited journals in Korean, and the China Integrated Knowledge Resources Database in Chinese through to July 30, 2013. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with no language restrictions that compared the effects of acupuncture or electroacupuncture with usual care or placebo acupuncture. The two investigators assessed the risk of bias and statistical analyses were performed. Three RCTs in English, 1 in Korean, and 1 in Chinese were included. Assessments were performed primarily with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Meta-analysis showed that acupuncture or electroacupuncture significantly decreased spasticity after stroke. A subgroup analysis showed that acupuncture significantly decreased wrist, knee, and elbow spasticity in poststroke patients. Heterogeneity could be explained by the differences in control, acupoints, and the duration after stroke occurrence. In conclusion, acupuncture could be effective in decreasing spasticity after stroke, but long-term studies are needed to determine the longevity of treatment effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document