scholarly journals The Methylation Inhibitor 5-Aza-2′-Deoxycytidine Induces Genome-Wide Hypomethylation in Rice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo Liu ◽  
Yu Bao ◽  
Hui Deng ◽  
Guanqing Liu ◽  
Yangshuo Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Epigenetic Modification ◽  
Homozygous Mutation ◽  
Global Methylation ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Methylation Inhibitor ◽  
Dna Methylation Inhibitor ◽  
Genomic Regions ◽  
Genome Scale

Abstract DNA methylation is a conserved epigenetic modification which is vital for regulating gene expression and maintaining genome stability in both mammals and plants. Homozygous mutation of rice methyltransferase 1 (met1) gene can cause host death in rice, making it difficult to obtain plant material needed for hypomethylation research. To circumvent this challenge, the methylation inhibitor, 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine (AzaD), is used as a cytosine nucleoside analogue to reduce genome wide hypomethylation and is widely used in hypomethylation research. However, how AzaD affects plant methylation profiles at the genome scale is largely unknown. Here, we treated rice seedlings with AzaD and compared the AzaD treatment with osmet1-2 mutants, illustrating that there are similar CG hypomethylation and distribution throughout the whole genome. Along with global methylation loss class I transposable elements (TEs) which are farther from genes compared with class II TEs, were more significantly activated, and the RNA-directed DNA Methylation (RdDM) pathway was activated in specific genomic regions to compensate for severe CG loss. Overall, our results suggest that AzaD is an effective DNA methylation inhibitor that can influence genome wide methylation and cause a series of epigenetic variations.

scholarly journals Integrated Methylome and Transcriptome Analyses Reveal the Molecular Mechanism by Which DNA Methylation Regulates Kenaf Flowering

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zengqiang Li ◽  
Meiqiong Tang ◽  
Dengjie Luo ◽  
Muhammad Haneef Kashif ◽  
Shan Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Differentially Methylated Genes ◽  
Methylation Inhibitor ◽  
Dna Methylation Inhibitor ◽  
Transcriptome Analyses ◽  
Flowering Regulation ◽  
Dna Methylation Analysis

DNA methylation regulates key biological processes in plants. In this study, kenaf seedlings were pretreated with the DNA methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine (5-azaC) (at concentrations of 0, 100, 200, 400, and 600 μM), and the results showed that pretreatment with 200 μM 5-azaC promoted flowering most effectively. To elucidate the underlying mechanism, phytohormone, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and starch contents were determined, and genome-wide DNA methylation and transcriptome analyses were performed on anthers pretreated with 200 μM 5-azaC (5-azaC200) or with no 5-azaC (control conditions; 5-azaC0). Biochemical analysis revealed that 5-azaC pretreatment significantly reduced indoleacetic acid (IAA) and gibberellic acid (GA) contents and significantly increased abscisic acid (ABA) and ATP contents. The starch contents significantly increased in response to 200 and 600 μM 5-azaC. Further genome-wide DNA methylation analysis revealed 451 differentially methylated genes (DMGs) with 209 up- and 242 downregulated genes. Transcriptome analysis showed 3,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with 2,171 up- and 1,815 downregulated genes. Integrated genome-wide DNA methylation and transcriptome analyses revealed 72 genes that were both differentially methylated and differentially expressed. These genes, which included ARFs, PP2C, starch synthase, FLC, PIF1, AGL80, and WRKY32, are involved mainly in plant hormone signal transduction, starch and sucrose metabolism, and flowering regulation and may be involved in early flowering. This study serves as a reference and theoretical basis for kenaf production and provides insights into the effects of DNA methylation on plant growth and development.

scholarly journals SPOP mutation induces DNA methylation via stabilizing GLP/G9a

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianong Zhang ◽  
Kun Gao ◽  
Hongyan Xie ◽  
Dejie Wang ◽  
Pingzhao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Tumor Suppressor Genes ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Methylome Analysis ◽  
Methylation Inhibitor ◽  
Dna Methylation Inhibitor ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

AbstractMutations in SPOP E3 ligase gene are reportedly associated with genome-wide DNA hypermethylation in prostate cancer (PCa) although the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate that SPOP binds and promotes polyubiquitination and degradation of histone methyltransferase and DNMT interactor GLP. SPOP mutation induces stabilization of GLP and its partner protein G9a and aberrant upregulation of global DNA hypermethylation in cultured PCa cells and primary PCa specimens. Genome-wide DNA methylome analysis shows that a subset of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) including FOXO3, GATA5, and NDRG1, are hypermethylated and downregulated in SPOP-mutated PCa cells. DNA methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine effectively reverses expression of the TSGs examined, inhibits SPOP-mutated PCa cell growth in vitro and in mice, and enhances docetaxel anti-cancer efficacy. Our findings reveal the GLP/G9a-DNMT module as a mediator of DNA hypermethylation in SPOP-mutated PCa. They suggest that SPOP mutation could be a biomarker for effective treatment of PCa with DNA methylation inhibitor alone or in combination with taxane chemotherapeutics.

Examination of the dynamics of global DNA methylation pattern establishment during spermatogenesiss

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Kirsten Niles ◽  
Sophie La Salle ◽  
Christopher Oakes ◽  
Jacquetta Trasler
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Epigenetic Modification ◽  
Methylation Pattern ◽  
Chromosome 9 ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Global Methylation ◽  
Dna Methylation Pattern ◽  
Methylation Patterns

Background: DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification involved in gene expression, genome stability, and genomic imprinting. In the male, methylation patterns are initially erased in primordial germ cells (PGCs) as they enter the gonadal ridge; methylation patterns are then acquired on CpG dinucleotides during gametogenesis. Correct pattern establishment is essential for normal spermatogenesis. To date, the characterization and timing of methylation pattern acquisition in PGCs has been described using a limited number of specific gene loci. This study aimed to describe DNA methylation pattern establishment dynamics during male gametogenesis through global methylation profiling techniques in a mouse model. Methods: Using a chromosome based approach, primers were designed for 24 regions spanning chromosome 9; intergenic, non-repeat, non-CpG island sequences were chosen for study based on previous evidence that these types of sequences are targets for testis-specific methylation events. The percent methylation was determined in each region by quantitative analysis of DNA methylation using real-time PCR (qAMP). The germ cell-specific pattern was determined by comparing methylation between spermatozoa and liver. To examine methylation in developing germ cells, spermatogonia from 2 day- and 6 day-old Oct4-GFP (green fluorescent protein) mice were isolated using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Results: As compared to liver, four loci were hypomethylated and five loci were hypermethylated in spermatozoa, supporting previous results indicating a unique methylation pattern in male germ cells. Only one region was hypomethylated and no regions were hypermethylated in day 6 spermatogonia as compared to mature spermatozoa, signifying that the bulk of DNA methylation is established prior to type A spermatogonia. The methylation in day 2 spermatogonia, germ cells that are just commencing mitosis, revealed differences of 15-20% compared to day 6 spermatogonia at five regions indicating that the most crucial phase of DNA methylation acquisition occurs prenatally. Conclusion: Together, these studies provide further evidence that germ cell methylation patterns differ from those in somatic tissues and suggest that much of methylation at intergenic sites is acquired during prenatal germ cell development. (Supported by CIHR)

scholarly journals DNA Methylation in T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: In Search for Clinical and Biological Meaning

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1388
Author(s):  
Natalia Maćkowska ◽  
Monika Drobna-Śledzińska ◽  
Michał Witt ◽  
Małgorzata Dawidowska
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Epigenetic Modification ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
Global Methylation ◽  
Current State ◽  
History Of ◽  
Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Distinct DNA methylation signatures, related to different prognosis, have been observed across many cancers, including T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), an aggressive hematological neoplasm. By global methylation analysis, two major phenotypes might be observed in T-ALL: hypermethylation related to better outcome and hypomethylation, which is a candidate marker of poor prognosis. Moreover, DNA methylation holds more than a clinical meaning. It reflects the replicative history of leukemic cells and most likely different mechanisms underlying leukemia development in these T-ALL subtypes. The elucidation of the mechanisms and aberrations specific to (epi-)genomic subtypes might pave the way towards predictive diagnostics and precision medicine in T-ALL. We present the current state of knowledge on the role of DNA methylation in T-ALL. We describe the involvement of DNA methylation in normal hematopoiesis and T-cell development, focusing on epigenetic aberrations contributing to this leukemia. We further review the research investigating distinct methylation phenotypes in T-ALL, related to different outcomes, pointing to the most recent research aimed to unravel the biological mechanisms behind differential methylation. We highlight how technological advancements facilitated broadening the perspective of the investigation into DNA methylation and how this has changed our understanding of the roles of this epigenetic modification in T-ALL.

scholarly journals Zebularine: A Novel DNA Methylation Inhibitor that Forms a Covalent Complex with DNA Methyltransferases

2002 ◽  
Vol 321 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Zhou ◽  
X. Cheng ◽  
B.A. Connolly ◽  
M.J. Dickman ◽  
P.J. Hurd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferases ◽  
Methylation Inhibitor ◽  
Dna Methylation Inhibitor ◽  
Covalent Complex

scholarly journals Methylome and transcriptome analyses of soybean response to bean pyralid larvae

BMC Genomics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Ying Zeng ◽  
Yu-Rong Tan ◽  
Sheng-Feng Long ◽  
Zu-Dong Sun ◽  
Zhen-Guang Lai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Protein Biosynthesis ◽  
Cell Structure ◽  
Methylation Profile ◽  
Primary Metabolism ◽  
Global Methylation ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Differentially Methylated Genes ◽  
Dna Methylation Profile ◽  
Soybean Resistance

Abstract Background Bean pyralid is one of the major leaf-feeding insects that affect soybean crops. DNA methylation can control the networks of gene expressions, and it plays an important role in responses to biotic stress. However, at present the genome-wide DNA methylation profile of the soybean resistance to bean pyralid has not been reported so far. Results Using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), we analyzed the highly resistant material (Gantai-2-2, HRK) and highly susceptible material (Wan82–178, HSK), under bean pyralid larvae feeding 0 h and 48 h, to clarify the molecular mechanism of the soybean resistance and explore its insect-resistant genes. We identified 2194, 6872, 39,704 and 40,018 differentially methylated regions (DMRs), as well as 497, 1594, 9596 and 9554 differentially methylated genes (DMGs) in the HRK0/HRK48, HSK0/HSK48, HSK0/HRK0 and HSK48/HRK48 comparisons, respectively. Through the analysis of global methylation and transcription, 265 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were negatively correlated with DMGs, there were 34, 49, 141 and 116 negatively correlated genes in the HRK0/HRK48, HSK0/HSK48, HSK0/HRK0 and HSK48/HRK48, respectively. The MapMan cluster analysis showed that 114 negatively correlated genes were clustered in 24 pathways, such as protein biosynthesis and modification; primary metabolism; secondary metabolism; cell cycle, cell structure and component; RNA biosynthesis and processing, and so on. Moreover, CRK40; CRK62; STK; MAPK9; L-type lectin-domain containing receptor kinase VIII.2; CesA; CSI1; fimbrin-1; KIN-14B; KIN-14 N; KIN-4A; cytochrome P450 81E8; BEE1; ERF; bHLH25; bHLH79; GATA26, were likely regulatory genes involved in the soybean responses to bean pyralid larvae. Finally, 5 DMRs were further validated that the genome-wide DNA data were reliable through PS-PCR and 5 DEGs were confirmed the relationship between DNA methylation and gene expression by qRT-PCR. The results showed an excellent agreement with deep sequencing. Conclusions Genome-wide DNA methylation profile of soybean response to bean pyralid was obtained for the first time. Several specific DMGs which participated in protein kinase, cell and organelle, flavonoid biosynthesis and transcription factor were further identified to be likely associated with soybean response to bean pyralid. Our data will provide better understanding of DNA methylation alteration and their potential role in soybean insect resistance.

scholarly journals Control of the DNA Methylation System Component MBD2 by Protein Arginine Methylation

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (19) ◽  
pp. 7224-7235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Choon Ping Tan ◽  
Sara Nakielny
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Complex Formation ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Epigenetic Modification ◽  
Arginine Methylation ◽  
System Component ◽  
Transcription Repression ◽  
Mbd Proteins

ABSTRACT DNA methylation is vital for proper chromatin structure and function in mammalian cells. Genetic removal of the enzymes that catalyze DNA methylation results in defective imprinting, transposon silencing, X chromosome dosage compensation, and genome stability. This epigenetic modification is interpreted by methyl-DNA binding domain (MBD) proteins. MBD proteins respond to methylated DNA by recruiting histone deacetylases (HDAC) and other transcription repression factors to the chromatin. The MBD2 protein is dispensable for animal viability, but it is implicated in the genesis of colon tumors. Here we report that the MBD2 protein is controlled by arginine methylation. We identify the protein arginine methyltransferase enzymes that catalyze this modification and show that arginine methylation inhibits the function of MBD2. Arginine methylation of MBD2 reduces MBD2-methyl-DNA complex formation, reduces MBD2-HDAC repression complex formation, and impairs the transcription repression function of MBD2 in cells. Our report provides a molecular description of a potential regulatory mechanism for an MBD protein family member. It is the first to demonstrate that protein arginine methyltransferases participate in the DNA methylation system of chromatin control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document