scholarly journals Association Between Dementia and Clinical Outcome After COVID-19: A Nationwide Cohort Study with Propensity Score Matched Control in South Korea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng-Min Wang ◽  
Si-Hyun Park ◽  
Nak-Young Kim ◽  
Dong Woo Kang ◽  
Hae-Ran Na ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Matched Control ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Group Pair ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
High Prevalence

Abstract Despite a high prevalence of dementia in older adults hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection (COVID-19), research investigating association between preexisting diagnoses of dementia and prognosis of COVID-19 is scarce. We explored a nationwide cohort with a total of 2,800 subjects older than 50 years who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between January and April 2020. Among them, 223 patients had underlying dementia (dementia group). We matched 1:1 for each dementia-non-dementia group pair yielding 223 patients without dementia (no dementia group) using propensity score matching. The primary outcome measure was group difference in mortality after COVID-19. Mortality rate after COVID-19 were significantly higher in dementia group than in no dementia group (33.6% vs. 20.2%, p=0.002). In addition, dementia group had higher proportion of patients requiring invasive ventilatory support than no dementia group (34.1% vs. 22.0%, p=0.006). Multivariable analysis showed that dementia group had a higher risk of mortality than no dementia group (odds ratio=3.05, p<0.001). We also found that patients in dementia group had a higher risk of needing invasive ventilatory support than those in no dementia group. Our results suggest that system including strengthen quarantines are required for patients with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

scholarly journals Association between Dementia and Clinical Outcome after COVID-19: A Nationwide Cohort Study with Propensity Score Matched Control in South Korea

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 523-529
Author(s):  
Sheng-Min Wang ◽  
See Hyun Park ◽  
Nak-Young Kim ◽  
Dong Woo Kang ◽  
Hae-Ran Na ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Matched Control ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Group Pair ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
High Prevalence

Objective Despite a high prevalence of dementia in older adults hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection (SARS-CoV-2), or so called COVID-19, research investigating association between preexisting diagnoses of dementia and prognosis of COVID-19 is scarce. We aimed to investigate treatment outcome of patients with dementia after COVID-19. Methods We explored a nationwide cohort with a total of 2,800 subjects older than 50 years who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between January and April 2020. Among them, 223 patients had underlying dementia (dementia group). We matched 1:1 for each dementia- non-dementia group pair yielding 223 patients without dementia (no dementia group) using propensity score matching. Results Mortality rate after COVID-19 was higher in dementia group than in no dementia group (33.6% vs. 20.2%, p=0.002). Dementia group had higher proportion of patients requiring invasive ventilatory support than no dementia group (34.1% vs. 22.0%, p=0.006). Multivariable analysis showed that dementia group had a higher risk of mortality than no dementia group (odds ratio=3.05, p<0.001). We also found that patients in dementia group had a higher risk of needing invasive ventilatory support than those in no dementia group. Conclusion Our results suggest that system including strengthen quarantines are required for patients with dementia during the COVID- 19 pandemic.

Phacoemulsification plus endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation versus phacoemulsification alone in primary open-angle glaucoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Pérez Bartolomé ◽  
Ian A. Rodrigues ◽  
Saurabh Goyal ◽  
Edward Bloch ◽  
Wei S. Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Matched Control ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Normal Limits ◽  
Clinical Records

Purpose: To examine the efficacy and safety of combined phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (phaco-ECP) compared to phacoemulsification alone in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: We performed a retrospective notes review of 99 consecutive clinical records of patients with POAG from 2 London eye departments. A total of 69 patients who underwent phaco-ECP and 30 sex- and age-matched control patients who underwent cataract surgery alone were included. Data on intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity (VA), number of ocular hypotensive medications, and postoperative complications were collected over 12 months. The primary outcome measure was defined as an IOP within normal limits (<21 mm Hg) and at least a 20% reduction in IOP from baseline. Results: Mean IOP was significantly decreased in both groups after 1 year (p<0.001 from baseline). The success rate was significantly higher in the phaco-ECP group (69.6%) than in the phaco group (40%) after 1 year (p = 0.004). Reduction in mean IOP and number of medications was also greater in the phaco-ECP group after 1 year (IOP reduction: 4.5 ± 5.13 mm Hg vs 1.83 ± 3.61 mm Hg; p = 0.007; number of medications reduction: 0.73 ± 0.71 vs 0.23 ± 0.56; p = 0.001). Both groups achieved a similar improvement in VA. There was a higher incidence of minor and self-limiting complications in the phaco-ECP group (p<0.047). Conclusions: Phaco-ECP resulted in a greater reduction in IOP and number of medications than phacoemulsification alone in POAG.

scholarly journals Clinical impact of left and right axis deviations with narrow QRS complex on 3-year outcomes in a hospital-based population in Japan

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Seko ◽  
Takao Kato ◽  
Yuhei Yamaji ◽  
Yoshisumi Haruna ◽  
Eisaku Nakane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Conduction Block ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Excess Risk ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Axis Deviation ◽  
The Right

AbstractWhile the prognostic impact of QRS axis deviation has been assessed, it has never been investigated in patients without conduction block. Thus, we evaluated the prognostic impact of QRS-axis deviation in patients without conduction block. We retrospectively analyzed 3353 patients who had undergone both scheduled transthoracic echocardiography and electrocardiography in 2013 in a hospital-based population, after excluding patients with a QRS duration of ≥ 110 ms, pacemaker placement, and an QRS-axis − 90° to − 180° (northwest axis). The study population was categorized into three groups depending on the mean frontal plane QRS axis as follows: patients with left axis deviation (N = 171), those with right axis deviation (N = 94), and those with normal axis (N = 3088). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events. The cumulative 3-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in the left axis deviation group (26.4% in the left axis deviation, 22.7% in the right axis deviation, and 18.4% in the normal axis groups, log-rank P = 0.004). After adjusting for confounders, the excess risk of primary outcome measure remained significant in the left axis deviation group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–1.95; P = 0.02), while the excess risk of primary outcome measure was not significant in the right axis deviation group (HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.76–1.96; P = 0.41). Left axis deviation was associated with a higher risk of a composite of all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events in hospital-based patients without conduction block in Japan.

scholarly journals Computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy for adults with intellectual disability: randomised controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 211 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Cooney ◽  
Catherine Jackman ◽  
David Coyle ◽  
Gary O'Reilly
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Randomised Controlled

BackgroundDespite the evidence base for computer-assisted cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) in the general population, it has not yet been adapted for use with adults who have an intellectual disability.AimsTo evaluate the utility of a CBT computer game for adults who have an intellectual disability.MethodA 2 × 3 (group × time) randomised controlled trial design was used. Fifty-two adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability and anxiety or depression were randomly allocated to two groups: computerised CBT (cCBT) or psychiatric treatment as usual (TAU), and assessed at pre-treatment, post-treatment and 3-month follow-up. Forty-nine participants were included in the final analysis.ResultsA significant group x time interaction was observed on the primary outcome measure of anxiety (Glasgow Anxiety Scale for people with an Intellectual Disability), favouring cCBT over TAU, but not on the primary outcome measure of depression (Glasgow Depression Scale for people with a Learning Disability). A medium effect size for anxiety symptoms was observed at post-treatment and a large effect size was observed after follow-up. Reliability of Change Indices indicated that the intervention produced clinically significant change in the cCBT group in comparison with TAU.ConclusionsAs the first application of cCBT for adults with intellectual disability, this intervention appears to be a useful treatment option to reduce anxiety symptoms in this population.

scholarly journals Telephone-guided self-help for mental health difficulties in neurological conditions: a randomised pilot trial

2021 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2019-318577
Author(s):  
Sophie D Bennett ◽  
Isobel Heyman ◽  
Anna E Coughtrey ◽  
Sophia Varadkar ◽  
Terence Stephenson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Young People ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Self Help ◽  
Mental Health Difficulties ◽  
Neurological Conditions

ObjectiveThis study aimed to conduct a randomised pilot trial to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the effect of telephone-guided self-help for the treatment of mental health difficulties in children with neurological conditions.DesignPreliminary RCT. The primary outcome measure was the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.SettingNeurology clinics in a national tertiary paediatric hospital.PatientsYoung people attending neurology clinics who met criteria for mental health difficulties according to the Development and Wellbeing Assessment.Interventions12 weeks of telephone-guided self-help based on a modular approach to psychological therapy for children delivered to children and/or their parents (n=17; eight males; mean age 12.04 years, SD=3.34) or a waiting list for telephone-guided self-help with no additional intervention over 12 weeks (n=17; nine males; mean age 10.53 years, SD=3.14).Results124 participants completed the DAWBA, and 34 children and young people were entered into the trial. 65% of those randomised to the intervention arm completed the full intervention, and the intervention was acceptable to those completing it. However, there were significant problems related to lack of data completion (38% data loss for primary outcome measure), choice of control comparator and outcome measures. Due to significant loss of data at follow-up, the effect size findings are considered unreliable.ConclusionsFurther feasibility work should be conducted to improve data completeness before progression to a definitive trial of guided self-help for mental health problems in children with neurological conditions can be recommended.Trial registration numberISRCTN21184717.

scholarly journals COMPARISON RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT LOCALIZED AND EXTENDED UTERINE CANCER

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 56-61
Author(s):  
I I Ushakov ◽  
E A Artoshina ◽  
P G Brousov ◽  
I V Nazvantsev ◽  
S A Levakov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Uterine Cancer ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Peritoneal Washing ◽  
Comparison Results

We selected 145 patients with endometrial carcinoma who had been treated with standard surgery (hysterectomy and BSO, peritoneal washing, palpation pelvic and para-aortic nodes) and with complete systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (n=30 patients) or combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n=30). Patients at intermediate or high risk of recurrence were offered adjuvant radiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was results of the surgical therapy.

scholarly journals Change in timed walk as primary outcome measure of treatment response in HAMLET-P: HAM/TSP MuLticentre Efficacy trial-Prednisolone

Retrovirology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiola Martin ◽  
Eisuke Inoue ◽  
Maria Fernanda Rios Grassi ◽  
Ramon de Almeida Kruschewsky ◽  
Irene Cortese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Response ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Efficacy Trial

A phase III trial of intramuscular recombinant interferon beta as treatment for exacerbating-remitting multiple sclerosis: design and conduct of study and baseline characteristics of patients

1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
LD Jacobs ◽  
DL Cookfair ◽  
RA Rudick ◽  
RM Herndon ◽  
J R Richert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Interferon Beta ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Recombinant Interferon ◽  
Study Population ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

The design and conduct of a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase III study of recombinant interferon beta-1a (IFN-β-1a) as treatment for exacerbating-remitting MS are described, as are baseline characteristics of the study population. The purpose of the study was to determine if 6.0 × 106 IU (30 μg) of IFN-β-1a, administered by weekly intramuscular (i.m.) injections, was effective in delaying the onset of sustained disability. The primary outcome measure was time to onset of treatment failure, defined as a worsening on the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of greater than or equal to 1.0 point compared with baseline, persisting for at least 6 months. An intent-to-treat design was used. The primary outcome measure was analyzed using the Mantel-Cox log-rank statistic and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Secondary outcomes included quantitative measures of upper and lower extremity function, neuropsychological test performance, functional and quality of life assessments and several measures derived from annual brain MRI studies. Entry criteria included prestudy exacerbation rates of at least 0.67 per year and EDSS scores of 1.0–3.5. A total of 301 MS patients were randomly assigned to receive weekly i.m. injections of IFN-β-1a or placebo. The average age of the study population at entry was 37 years; 92% were Caucasian and 73% were women. The mean prestudy disease duration was 6.5 years, mean prestudy exacerbation rate was 1.2 per year and the mean EDSS score was 2.3. The randomization yielded well-balanced treatment arms. Various aspects of the study are discussed, including: (1) the decision to focus study design on sustained disability; (2) the rationale for the treatment regimen; (3) measures taken to assure the reliability of the primary outcome measure; and (4) a description of the secondary outcome measures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document