Early Venous Thromboembolism Is A Strong Prognostic Factor In Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde Barrau ◽  
Khawla Maoui ◽  
Bertrand Le Roy ◽  
Xavier Roblin ◽  
Patrick Mismetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Proportional Hazard ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Abstract BackgroundThere is still controversial data regarding prognostic value of Venous ThromboEmbolism (VTE) in advanced Pancreatic Ductal AdenoCarcinoma (PDAC) and thromboprophylaxis is poorly prescribed despite international recommendations.MethodsMedical charts of patients consecutively treated for advanced PDAC from 2010 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic Factors were identified using a multivariate Cox’s proportional hazard model. Early VTE was defined as VTE occurring within the third months from PDAC diagnosis.ResultsA total of 174 patients were included (median age: 67 years; males: 55.2%; performance status (PS) 0-1: 88.5%) with metastatic disease in 74.7%. At baseline, Khorana score was high (≥3) in the vast majority of cases (93.7%). The cumulative incidences of VTE were 12.4% (95% CI: 7.3-17.2) at 3 months, 20.4% (95% CI: 13.9-26.4) at 6 months and 28.1% (95% CI: 20.0-35.3) at 12 months. Early VTE was associated with shorter PFS (3.8 months vs. 7.1 months; HR=2.02; 95%CI: 1.21-3.37; p=0.006) and shorter OS (8.0 months vs. 14.1 months; HR=2.42; 95%CI: 1.37-4.30; p=0.002) compared to the remnant patients, independently of the other prognostic factors including PS, liver metastases, carcinomatosis, and chemotherapy regimen.ConclusionEarly VTE is a strong prognostic factor in advanced PDAC and occurs in about 1 in 10 patients.

Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Patients Treated with NAb-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: The NAPA Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 887-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Catalano ◽  
Giandomenico Roviello ◽  
Raffaele Conca ◽  
Alberto D’Angelo ◽  
Valeria Emma Palmieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Prognostic And Predictive Markers

Background: The phase III MPACT trial demonstrated the superiority of gemcitabine (Gem) combined with Nab-paclitaxel (Nab-P) versus gemcitabine alone in previously untreated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Gem/Nab-P in routine clinical practice. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2018, patients with metastatic PDAC receiving firstline treatment with a combination of gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel were included in a multicentre retrospective observational study. Exploratory analyses of efficacy, and prognostic and predictive markers, were performed. Results: The cohort comprised 115 patients (median age 65 [range 50-84] years) with good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1). The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95% CI; 9-13) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months (95% CI 5-7). Partial response and stable disease were achieved in 44 and 30 patients, respectively, yielding an overall disease control rate (DCR) of 64.3%. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity frequency was 22.61% for neutropenia, 5.22% for anemia, and 3.48% for thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 asthenia was recorded in 2.61% of patients. No grade 4 non-hematological events were reported. Dose reduction was necessary in 51.3% of the patients. Conclusions: Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of a first-line regimen comprising gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel in metastatic PDAC in a real-life population.

scholarly journals Complete Radiologic Response of Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma to Microwave Ablation Combined with Second-Line Palliative Chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Hakon Blomstrand ◽  
Karin Adolfsson ◽  
Per Sandström ◽  
Bergthor Björnsson
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a bleak prognosis, especially for the majority of patients diagnosed with metastatic disease. The primary option for palliative treatment is chemotherapy, and responses beyond first-line treatment are rare and typically short. Here, we report a case of a 63-year-old woman with PDAC in the head of the pancreas who was initially successfully treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine. However, disease recurrence with liver and para-aortic lymph node metastases was detected only two months after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. First-line palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine-nab/paclitaxel was commenced. The results were discouraging, with disease progression (liver and lung metastases) detected at the first evaluation; the progression-free survival was just two months (64 days). Surprisingly, the response to second-line palliative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin was excellent; in combination with the ablation of a liver metastasis, this treatment regimen resulted in a complete radiological response and an 11-month treatment-free interval with a sustained good performance status.

KOC (K homology domain containing protein overexpressed in cancer) overexpression and progression-free survival after curative intent resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 48-48
Author(s):  
Benny Johnson ◽  
Maged F. Khalil ◽  
Fan Lin ◽  
Shaobo Zhu ◽  
Lester Kirchner
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Free Survival

48 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Unfortunately, effective screening and early detection mechanisms are currently unavailable, thereby 80% of patients present with distant metastasis. Of the subset of patients eligible for curative intent surgery, the 5-year survival rate is only 20%. Negative surgical margins, tumor size, stage, and node negative disease are traditional prognostic indicators. However, these can be limited in their ability to predict patient specific prognosis. KOC is an oncofetal RNA-binding protein involved in RNA stabilization and cell growth during embryogenesis. Previous studies have revealed that KOC mRNA is inappropriately overexpressed in pancreatic cancer and that increased expression correlates with tumor stage. In this study, we attempt to identify whether KOC expression in patients who undergo curative intent surgery correlates with progression free survival. Methods: Tissue microarrays prepared from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of patients with PDAC who underwent curative intent surgery were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Results: A total of 35 patients were included. Comparisons between groups on progression free survival are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. KOC was overexpressed in 23.6% of tumors. It was found that there were zero patients with a high KOC expression and no distant metastasis. Patients with a high KOC expression were more than 3 times more likely to progress compared to those with a low KOC expression (HR=3.54, 95% CI: 1.34, 9.36, p=0.011). Conclusions: KOC is a useful prognostic biomarker for predicting those patients with PDAC who have a high risk for early progression and distant metastasis. Identifying patients with high KOC expression upon initial diagnosis can serve as a way to risk stratify patients to aggressive treatment regimens upfront and early exposure to clinical trials.

Results of subset analyses on overall survival (OS) from study CA184-043: Ipilimumab (Ipi) versus placebo (Pbo) in post-docetaxel metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles G. Drake ◽  
Eugene D. Kwon ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Alberto Bossi ◽  
Alfons JM van den Eertwegh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

2 Background: The CA184-043 phase 3 study did not reach statistical significance for its primary endpoint of OS (HR=0.85, p=0.053). However, antitumor activity was observed in other efficacy endpoints, including progression-free survival. Prespecified subset analyses were performed to understand if any prognostic features may identify mCRPC patients (pts) more likely to benefit from Ipi treatment. Methods: 799 pts were randomized to receive a single dose of radiotherapy (RT) followed by either Ipi (N=399) or Pbo (N=400). Prespecified subset analyses based on Kaplan-Meier/Cox methodology were performed using known prognostic factors for OS in mCRPC. Results: Prespecified subset analyses suggested that Ipi may be more active in pts with favorable prognostic factors, including no visceral disease, alkaline phosphatase <1.5 ULN, and hemoglobin ≥11 g/dL (Table). The safety profile in this study was consistent with previous reports of Ipi. Conclusions: Based on these subset analyses, Ipi added to RT appears to have greater activity than RT alone in pts with a favorable prognostic profile. These results support continued investigation of Ipi in the ongoing CA184-095 study in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT00861614. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Impact of Superselective Intra-Arterial and Systemic Chemoradiotherapy for Gingival Carcinoma; Analysis of Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicity between radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemotherapy (IACRT) and RT with concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT), for gingival carcinoma (GC).　Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: Median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT group: 60 Gy; SCRT group:69 Gy). At 3 years, the two groups significantly differed in overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.75%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.00–87.62; SCRT: 50.37%, 95% CI: 27.58–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.64%, 95% CI: 62.69–85.17; SCRT: 41.96%, 95% CI: 17.65–70.90; P = 0.028) and local control (LC; IACRT: 77.17%, 95% CI: 64.23–86.41; SCRT: 41.96%, 95% CI: 17.65–70.90; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with poor OS (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had significantly worse PFS.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. IACRT is an effective and organ-preserving treatment for GC.Trial registration: retrospectively registered

scholarly journals Prognostic factors for disease-free survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Tian ◽  
Jisong Li ◽  
Hongqiao Gao ◽  
Yan Zhuang ◽  
Yongsu Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine after progression on FOLFIRINOX for unresectable or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: multicenter retrospective analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592092342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heejung Chae ◽  
Hyehyun Jeong ◽  
Jaekyung Cheon ◽  
Hong Jae Chon ◽  
Hyewon Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Background: FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan plus oxaliplatin) is an effective standard first-line treatment option for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). There is no clear consensus on the second-line treatment following progression on FOLFIRINOX. In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of second-line nab-P/Gem (nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine) after progression on FOLFIRNOX in PDAC. Methods: Patients with unresectable or metastatic PDAC who received nab-P/Gem after progression on FOLFIRINOX between February 2016 and February 2019 were identified from five referral cancer centers in South Korea. Baseline characteristics, treatment history, survival outcomes, and toxicity profile were obtained retrospectively from medical records. Results: A total of 102 patients treated with second-line nab-P/Gem for advanced PDAC after progression on FOLFIRINOX were included. At the time of nab-P/Gem, the median age was 60 years, with males comprising 49.0%, and most (75.5%) had metastatic disease. Patients received a median of three cycles (range 1–12) of nab-P/Gem. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of second-line nab-P/Gem therapy were 9.8 (95% CI, 8.9–10.6) and 4.6 months (3.7–5.5), respectively. A partial response was achieved in 8.5%, and the disease control rate was 73.6%. From the start of first-line FOLFIRIOX, the OS1+2 and PFS1+2 were 20.9 (15.7–26.1) and 13.9 (10.8–17.0) months, respectively, with a 2-year survival rate of 45.1%. There was no treatment-related mortality and grade ⩾3 toxicity was observed in 60.2%. Conclusion: Our results showed that nab-P/Gem was an effective and tolerable second-line treatment option in medically fit patients with advanced PDAC who progressed on first-line FOLFIRNOX. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04133155

DocOx (AIO-PK0106): A phase II trial with docetaxel and oxaliplatin as a second-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—Final results.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 352-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Jens Ettrich ◽  
Lukas Perkhofer ◽  
Volker Kaechele ◽  
Andreas W. Berger ◽  
Melanie Guethle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

352 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma still remains a major cause of cancer related deaths in the western world. The current study was conducted to confirm the activity and feasibility of docetaxel/ oxaliplatin combination in second line treatment of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods: Prospective single arm, non-randomized, multi-center, Simon’s two stage phase II trial using docetaxel (75 mg/m2, 60 min, d 1) and oxaliplatin (80 mg/m2, 120 min, d 2) in 21-day cycles. Duration of the trial was scheduled up two 8 cycles. Primary endpoint was tumor response according to RECIST 1.0. Secondary endpoints were progression free survival, overall survival, safety/toxicity, quality of life and clinical benefit. Results: Data represents the intention to treat analysis of 44 patients included between 2008 and 2012. The majority of patients received a gemcitabine based first-line chemotherapy (95.5%). The primary endpoint of tumor response was achieved in 15.9% (7 partial remissions, no complete remission), with a disease control rate of 48% after the first two treatment cycles. Median progression free survival was 7 weeks (CI 6-15.9 weeks) and overall survival 40 weeks (CI 20.4-56.4 weeks). No unexpected adverse events occured. The recorded AEs were mainly hematologic (neutropenia grade 3/4 63.6%, febrile neutropenia 4.6%), gastrointestinal (29.6% grade 3/4 AEs) and infectious (18.2% grade 3/4 AEs). Conclusions: In this single-arm second line trial for the treatment of advanced PDAC, the combination of docetaxel and oxaliplatin shows promising results comparable with other second line protocols such as OFF (oxaliplatin, 5-FU, leucovorin) or liposomal irinotecan (MM-398) plus 5-FU/leucovorin (NAPOLI 1-trial). Some patients seem to benefit particularly as indicated by long periods of treatment in this setting. Even after 8 cycles of treatment with DocOx, partial response was observed in 2 patients and stable disease in another 6 patients corresponding to a disease control rate of 18%. The toxicity profile was quite tolerable and comparable to other second line studies. Clinical trial information: NCT00690300.

Characteristics of long- versus short-surviving patients (Pts): An analysis of the ARIES Observational Cohort Study (OCS) of bevacizumab (BV)-treated pts with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 702-702
Author(s):  
Mark Kozloff ◽  
Axel Grothey ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Allen Lee Cohn ◽  
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Characteristics ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Observational Cohort

702 Background: Median overall survival (OS) in mCRC has significantly improved over the past 20 yrs, but the observed range of OS in pts remains wide; a large percentage of pts have OS <1 yr or >4 yrs. ARIES was a prospective OCS conducted from 2006–2012 that evaluated outcomes in pts receiving BV + chemotherapy (CT) for mCRC in general clinical practice. The objective of this analysis is to examine clinical characteristics of pts with long vs short OS. Methods: This analysis included 1,417/1,550 first-line (1L) BV-treated mCRC pts who died or had complete follow-up on study. Long OS was defined as OS within the upper quartile of the analysis population (range 42–67 mos); short OS was defined as OS within the lower quartile (range 0.3–12 mos). Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Pt and disease characteristics and treatment patterns were described using summary statistics. Results: Pt and disease characteristics are shown in the Table. Median PFS was 22.3 mos (95% CI, 19.9–23.3) vs. 4.9 mos (95% CI, 4.6–5.4), in the long-OS vs. short-OS groups. More pts with long OS received any second-line (2L) therapy (71% vs. 46%), and were exposed to 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan throughout the course of their disease (53% vs. 32%) compared with pts with short OS. KRAS/BRAF mutation status was not collected. Conclusions: Pts with long OS had better baseline performance status, primary tumors more likely to have been resected, and were more likely to have received 2L CT. Additional analyses of detailed treatment patterns and safety are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00388206. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document