scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin g (IgG) Kinetics in Healthcare Workers and Their Close Contacts Reduced Risk of Re-infection: South-East Asian Region

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mradul Kumar Daga ◽  
Govind Mawari ◽  
Vijay Kumar Karra ◽  
Meghachandra Singh ◽  
Siddharth Chand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immunoglobulin G ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Close Contact ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
New Delhi ◽  
Igg Antibody ◽  
Symptomatic Infection ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Reduced Risk ◽  
Close Contacts

Abstract BackgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for global pandemic, and it has caused more than 2.3 million deaths. Persistence and stability of immunoglobulin G (IgG) response after recovery from COVID-19 infection is still uncertain. MethodsWe performed a longitudinal cohort study in healthcare workers (HCW) and their close contacts (Non-HCW) with known resolved SARS-CoV-2 infection and undiagnosed infection at Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Lok Nayak hospital, New Delhi. Baseline IgG antibody titers was determined and the participants were followed over a period of six months. We also examined relationship between SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) response and new symptomatic infection in HCW and Non-HCW over time. Results176 (70.9%) healthcare workers and 72 (29.0%) non-healthcare workers were recruited from two cohorts. 82 subjects recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection and 166 undiagnosed for the infection having history of close contact with COVID-19 patients were followed up for a median of 227 days (interquartile range, 166 to 202) after a positive IgG antibody test. In the recovered subjects 70.7% (58) were seropositive for first anti-spike IgG assay at baseline, followed by 80.0%, 90.6% and 82.6% at three visits respectively. In undiagnosed subjects 37.3% (62) were seropositive at baseline, followed by 70.9%, 75.8% and 82.2% respectively. Also, 46.8% (29) were asymptomatic with no symptoms of COVID-19 and were seropositive at baseline. However, presence of IgG antibodies was associated with substantial reduced risk of re-infection over the follow up duration.ConclusionOur data showed that the antibodies levels measured increased over the first three months and decreased slightly after that and remained at a plateau and relatively stable for at least a period of six months.

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Healthcare Workers in Germany: A Follow-Up Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 4540
Author(s):  
Johannes Korth ◽  
Benjamin Wilde ◽  
Sebastian Dolff ◽  
Jasmin Frisch ◽  
Michael Jahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Close Contact ◽  
Virus Transmission ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Igg Antibody

SARS-CoV-2 is a worldwide challenge for the medical sector. Healthcare workers (HCW) are a cohort vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection due to frequent and close contact with COVID-19 patients. However, they are also well trained and equipped with protective gear. The SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody status was assessed at three different time points in 450 HCW of the University Hospital Essen in Germany. HCW were stratified according to contact frequencies with COVID-19 patients in (I) a high-risk group with daily contacts with known COVID-19 patients (n = 338), (II) an intermediate-risk group with daily contacts with non-COVID-19 patients (n = 78), and (III) a low-risk group without patient contacts (n = 34). The overall seroprevalence increased from 2.2% in March–May to 4.0% in June–July to 5.1% in October–December. The SARS-CoV-2 IgG detection rate was not significantly different between the high-risk group (1.8%; 3.8%; 5.5%), the intermediate-risk group (5.1%; 6.3%; 6.1%), and the low-risk group (0%, 0%, 0%). The overall SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence remained low in HCW in western Germany one year after the outbreak of COVID-19 in Germany, and hygiene standards seemed to be effective in preventing patient-to-staff virus transmission.

scholarly journals Comparative analysis of three point-of-care lateral flow immunoassays for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in COVID-19 confirmed healthcare workers

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Dias Conte ◽  
Joseane Mayara Almeida Carvalho ◽  
Luciano Kleber de Souza Luna ◽  
Klinger Soares Faíco-Filho ◽  
Ana Helena Perosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Igg Antibody ◽  
Serological Tests

AbstractSince the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Brazil has the third-highest number of confirmed cases and the second-highest number of recovered patients. SARS-CoV-2 detection by real-time RT-PCR is the gold standard in certified infrastructured laboratories. However, for large-scale testing, diagnostics should be fast, cost-effective, widely available, and deployed for the community, such as serological tests based on lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for IgM/IgG detection. We evaluated three different commercial point-of-care (POC) LFIAs for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG detection in capillary whole blood of 100 healthcare workers (HCW) previously tested by RT-PCR: 1) COVID-19 IgG/IgM BIO (Bioclin, Brazil), 2) Diagnostic kit for IgM/IgG Antibody to Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) (Livzon, China); and 3) SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test (Wondfo, China). A total of 84 positives and 16 negatives HCW were tested. The data was also analyzed by the number of days post symptoms (DPS) in three groups: <30 (n=26), 30-59 (n=42), and >59 (n=16). Overall detection was 85.71%, 47.62%, and 44.05% for Bioclin, Livzon, and Wondfo, respectively, with a specificity of 100%, and 98.75% for Livzon on storage serum samples. Bioclin was more sensitive (p<0.01), regardless of the DPS. Thus, the Bioclin can be used as a POC test to monitor SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in HCW.

scholarly journals Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in social housing areas in Denmark

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamille Fogh ◽  
Alexandra RR Eriksen ◽  
Rasmus B Hasselbalch ◽  
Emilie Sofie Kristensen ◽  
Henning Bundgaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Social Housing ◽  
Close Contact ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Epidemiological Surveillance ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Danish Population ◽  
Igg Antibody ◽  
Low Socioeconomic

Background COVID-19 is suggested to be more prevalent among ethnic minorities and individuals with low socioeconomic status. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies during the COVID-19 pandemic among citizens 15 years or older in Denmark living in social housing (SH) areas . Methods As part of Testing Denmark, a nationwide sero-epidemiological surveillance survey, we conducted a study between January 8th and January 31st, 2021 with recruitment in 13 selected SH areas in Denmark. Participants were offered a point-of-care rapid SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody test and a questionnaire concerning previous testing (viral throat- and nasopharyngeal swab or antibody test), test results for COVID-19, demographics, household characteristics, employment, risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and history of symptoms associated with COVID-19. Data on seroprevalence from Danish blood donors in same period using a total Ig ELISA assay were used as a proxy for the general Danish population. Findings Of the 13,279 included participants, 2,296 (17.3%) were seropositive (mean age 46.6 (SD 16.4) years, 54.2% female), which was 3 times higher than in the general Danish population (mean age 41.7 (SD 14.1) years, 48.5% female) in the same period (5.8%, risk ratios (RR) 2.96, 95% CI 2.78-3.16, p>0.001). Seropositivity was higher among males than females (RR 1.1, 95% CI 1.05-1.22%, p=0.001) and increased with age, with an OR seropositivity of 1.03 for each 10-year increase in age (95% CI 1.00-1.06, p=0.031). Close contact with COVID-19-infected individuals was associated with a higher risk of infection, especially among members of the same households (OR 5.0, 95% CI 4.1-6.2 p<0,001). Adjusted for age, gender and region living at least 4 people in a household significantly increased the OR of seropositivity (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6, p=0.02) as did living in a multi-generational household (OR 1.3 per generation, 95% CI 1.1-1.5, p=0.007). Only 1.6% of participants reported not following any of the national COVID-19 recommendations. Anosmia (RR 3.2 95% CI 2.8-3.7, p<0.001) and ageusia (RR 3.3, 95% CI 2.9-3.8, p<0.001) were strongest associated with seropositivity. Interpretation Danish citizens living in SH areas of low socioeconomic status had a three times higher SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence compared to the general Danish population. The seroprevalence was significantly higher in males and increased with age. Living in multiple generations or more than four persons in a household was an independent risk factor for being seropositive. Results of this study can be used for future consideration of the need for preventive measures in the populations living in SH areas.

scholarly journals Rapid Screening Diagnosis of SARS-COV-2 Infection With IgM-igG Combined Antibody Test Using Peripheral Blood

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengtu Li ◽  
Shaoqiang Li ◽  
Youwei Wang ◽  
Yongkang Liao ◽  
Hui Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Rapid Screening ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Asymptomatic Carriers ◽  
Test Characteristics ◽  
And Control ◽  
Close Contacts

Abstract Background Rapid and convenient screening for identification of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals are key to prevent and control this pandemic. Methods The peripheral blood samples were collected from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and asymptomatic carriers to evaluate the test characteristics of the IgM-IgG combined assay for SARS-CoV-2 compared to that of serum samples and enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay (ELISA). Close contacts, healthcare workers and workforces were recruited and screened using this assay. Results The sensitivity of the rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 using peripheral blood (sued as a POCT) was 97.0% and the specificity was 99.2%, which was consistent with the result obtained using serum sample (consistency is about 100%). Furthermore, this POCT assay also can detect IgM and IgG antibodies of SARS-CoV‐2 in asymptomatic carriers, with 19 of the 20 RT-PCR confirmed asymptomatic carriers testing positive. Therefore, this POCT assay was used for population screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis. First, it found 4 positive close contacts among the 10 cases, and there were three IgM positive cases and one IgG positive case among them. It is worth noting that the IgM positive cases also tested positive for the nucleic acid of the SARS-CoV-2. Second, there was one IgM positive assay among the 63 healthcare workers, but RT-PCR of SARS CoV-2 was negative. Third, for workforces screening, there were no positive cases. Conclusions The IgM-IgG combined antibody test of SARS-CoV-2 can be used as a POCT for rapid screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence among Healthcare Workers in General Hospitals and Clinics in Japan

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 3786
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Yoshihara ◽  
Kazuya Ito ◽  
Masayoshi Zaitsu ◽  
Eunhee Chung ◽  
Izumi Aoyagi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Social Support ◽  
General Population ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Immunoglobulin G ◽  
Health Problem ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
General Hospitals ◽  
Second Wave

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a serious public health problem worldwide. In general, healthcare workers are considered to be at higher risk of COVID-19 infection. However, the prevalence of COVID-19 among healthcare workers in Japan is not well characterized. In this study, we aimed to examine the seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies among 2160 healthcare workers in hospitals and clinics that are not designated to treat COVID-19 patients in Japan. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G was 1.2% in August and October 2020 (during and after the second wave of the pandemic in Japan), which is relatively higher than that in the general population in Japan (0.03–0.91%). Because of the higher risk of COVID-19 infection, healthcare workers should be the top priority for further social support and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.

scholarly journals Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of developed rapid SARS-COV-2 IgG antibody test kit using novel diluent system

VirusDisease ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vani Maya ◽  
Jyothi Embekkat Kaviyil ◽  
Dinoop Koral Ponnambath ◽  
Renjith P. Nair ◽  
Anugya Bhatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Igg Antibody ◽  
Test Kit

scholarly journals Effect of Antigen Coating Conditions on Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection of Immunoglobulin G Antibody to Neisseria meningitidis Serogroup Y and W135 Capsular Polysaccharide Antigens in Serum

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1136-1140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Giardina ◽  
Renee E. Evans ◽  
Daniel J. Sikkema ◽  
Dace Madore ◽  
Stephen W. Hildreth
Keyword(s):  
Immunoglobulin G ◽  
Capsular Polysaccharide ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Meningococcal Vaccine ◽  
Igg Antibody ◽  
Human Sera ◽  
Polysaccharide Antigens ◽  
Reference Serum ◽  
Adult Volunteers ◽  
Assay Conditions

ABSTRACT Human sera collected from 28 consenting adult volunteers were used to define assay conditions for meningococcal vaccine clinical trial serology. Immunoassay parameters were optimized with these test sera and the standard reference serum, CDC1992. Coating conditions for serogroup Y and W135 polysaccharide antigens were found to influence the predicted serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody concentrations. Sera that displayed IgG antibody binding profiles most unlike that of CDC1992 were influenced the most by coating conditions. Our results suggest that presentation of specific epitopes is influenced by antigen-coating concentrations for serogroup Y and W135 polysaccharides.

Antibody Responses After Oxford Astrazeneca (Covishield) Vaccine Among Healthcare Workers in Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nusrat Noor Tanni ◽  
Maherun Nesa ◽  
Rubaiya Binte Kabir ◽  
Farjana Binte Habib ◽  
Rizwana Zaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Medical College

scholarly journals COVID-19-related pneumonia with a predominant lymphocyte fraction in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsukasa Ueda ◽  
Taro Yoneda ◽  
Hayato Koba ◽  
Hiroko Morita ◽  
Kazuyuki Kakeshita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bronchoalveolar Lavage ◽  
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid ◽  
Close Contact ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Lavage Fluid ◽  
Positive Antibody ◽  
Lymphocyte Fraction

A 48-year-old woman, considered as a close contact of her husband who was diagnosed with COVID-19. She was clinically diagnosed with COVID-19-related pneumonia because of a positive antibody test. Her BALF contained an elevated lymphocyte fraction, which might explain why steroids are effective against COVID-19-related pneumonia.

scholarly journals Validation of a new automated chemiluminescent anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody assay system detecting both N and S proteins in Japan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
RIn Yokoyama ◽  
Makoto Kurano ◽  
Yoshifumi Morita ◽  
Takuya Shimura ◽  
Yuki Nakano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Measurement System ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Laboratory Testing ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Measurement Range ◽  
Antibody Assay ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Igg Antibody ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
Pcr Test

PCR methods are presently the standard for the diagnosis of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but additional methodologies are needed to complement PCR methods, which have some limitations. Here, we validated and investigated the usefulness of measuring serum antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using the iFlash3000 CLIA analyzer. We measured IgM and IgG titers against SARS-CoV-2 in sera collected from 26 PCR-positive COVID-19 patients, 53 COVID-19-suspected but PCR-negative patients, and 20 and 100 randomly selected non-COVID-19 patients who visited our hospital in 2020 and 2017, respectively. The within-day and between-day precisions were regarded as good, since the coefficient variations were below 5%. Linearity was also considered good between 0.6 AU/mL and 112.7 AU/mL for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and between 3.2 AU/mL and 55.3 AU/mL for SARS-CoV-2 IgG, while the linearity curves plateaued above the upper measurement range. We also confirmed that the seroconversion and no-antibody titers were over the cutoff values in all 100 serum samples collected in 2017. These results indicate that this measurement system successfully detects SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG. We observed four false-positive cases in the IgM assay and no false-positive cases in the IgG assay when 111 serum samples known to contain autoantibodies were evaluated. The concordance rates of the antibody test with the PCR test were 98.1% for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and 100% for IgG among PCR-negative cases and 30.8% for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and 73.1% for SARS-CoV-2 IgG among PCR-positive cases. In conclusion, the performance of this measurement system is sufficient for use in laboratory testing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document