Assessment of the effectiveness of import substitution in the aerospace segment of the military-industrial complex taking into account risk minimization

2020 ◽  
pp. 47-57
Author(s):  
К.О. Ушакова ◽  
В.Г. Исаев
Keyword(s):  
National Security ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Import Substitution ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Risk Minimization ◽  
Security Issues ◽  
Military Industrial Complex ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Military

В 2014 году странами НАТО были введены ограничения на поставку импортного оборудования и комплектующих в Российскую Федерацию. В связи с чем была актуализирована проблема национальной безопасности, решение которой требует разработки и применения целого комплекса мер - экономических, организационных и правовых. Государство впервые за много лет столкнулось с реальной необходимостью импортозамещения. Вопросы импортозамещения являются стратегически важными, от их решения зависит обеспечение обороноспособности национальной экономики. Государство перешло к стратегии импортозамещения и поддержке отечественного производителя. In 2014, Russian Federation was restricted in importing of foreign equipment and component parts by countries that were NATO members. In that situation, the importance of national security issues increased. To deal with those issues, a range of different measures such as economical, organizational and legal were to be applied. After a long time, once again Russian Federation faced the problems concerning import substitution. National security issues are strategically important, solving these issues effects national economics defense potential. Russian Federation followed the import substitution strategy and started to support domestic producers.

The influence of the state policy of import substitution on improving the quality of products of the military-industrial complex

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-138
Author(s):  
K. O. Ushakova ◽  
V. G. Isaev
Keyword(s):  
National Security ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Import Substitution ◽  
Economic Security ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Security Issues ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Quality Of Products

In 2014, Russian Federation was restricted in importing of foreign equipment and component parts by countries that were NATO members. In that situation, the importance of national security issues increased. To deal with those issues, a range of different measures such as economical, organizational and legal were to be applied. After a long time, once again Russian Federation faced the problems concerning import substitution. National security issues are strategically important, solving these issues effects national economics defense potential. Russian Federation followed the import substitution strategy and started to support domestic producers. According to the Russian Federation President Decree of 13.05.2017 № 208, Russian Federation Economic Security Strategy was approved up to 2030. That Strategy is to oppose to economic security threats, to prevent any slump in resource and raw materials sphere, production sphere, scientific and technological spheres as well as in financial sphere. Also, the Strategy is to avoid decrease in quality of life. Import substitution is one of the main factors of economic security of any state.

The aspects of the innovation of the military-industrial complex and its significance for the national security of Russia

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Irina Orlova ◽  
Artem Sukharev ◽  
Maria Sukhareva ◽  
Mikhail Deikun
Keyword(s):  
National Security ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Defense Industry ◽  
World Market ◽  
Modern World ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Military Industrial Complex ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Military

The main objective of the article is to substantiate a systematic approach to the introduction of all types of innovations in the development of the military-industrial complex of the Russian Federation. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that in the modern world it is especially important to ensure the national security of the country and the defense industry plays a crucial role in this. At the same time, one cannot but note the importance of the defense industry in the production of high-tech civilian products and dual-use products, which enhances the country's competitiveness in the world market. In addition, the relevance of the topic is due to the presence of rather serious problems in the Russian defense industry, which require immediate resolution. The article uses the methodology of structurally functional analysis, the institutional approach and the method of comparative assessments. The authors conclude that technological innovation alone will not be able to achieve strategic results for ensuring national security, only in conjunction with organizational, product, social and marketing innovations, the domestic defense industry is able to solve its tasks.

scholarly journals The influence of the cooperation between the military-Industrial complex and agro-industrial on the environment in the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 937 (2) ◽  
pp. 022032
Author(s):  
V Daroshka ◽  
I Aleksandrov ◽  
I Chekhovskikh ◽  
E Ol ◽  
V Trushkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
Smart Growth ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Military Industrial Complex ◽  
Financial Condition ◽  
Technological Gap ◽  
Firm Cooperation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Military

Abstract The relevance of the research topic is due to the strategic importance of the transition of Russian agro-industrial complex to innovative development path, which involves the formation of cooperative ties with the military-industrial complex as a driver of new technological solutions. Statement of the problem. The agro-industrial complex has a significant technological lag in terms of technological competitiveness. Statement of the problem. There is a significant technological gap in the agro-industrial complex in terms of smart growth of agribusiness based on digital technologies and solutions, which negatively affects its production, export potential and financial condition. The aim of the research is to study the development of inter-firm cooperation of military-industrial and agro-industrial complex of the Russian Federation which makes its influence on the environment. The study considers domestic and foreign experience in the implementation of inter-firm cooperation of industries, an analytical review of the main indicators of development and results of cooperation between the military-industrial complex and agro-industrial complex is given. The conclusion of the scientific research identifies the main problems and prospects for the development of cooperative links of industries, taking into account the external challenges and threats to the global economy.

MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-53
Author(s):  
Jarosław Nawrotek
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Typical Feature ◽  
The State ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Technical Equipment ◽  
Military Equipment ◽  
Military Industrial Complex ◽  
Defence Industry ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Military

Defence industry may be defined as a system of factories and organisations developing, manufacturing and selling military equipment, weapons and ammunition. In the case of the Russian Federation the terminology of “defence industry” and “military industry” is often used as an equivalent to the Military-Industrial Complex (MIC). The Military-Industrial Complex is a segment of the state industry involved in manufacture of the military equipment and performance of research-development projects in the defence sector. Typical feature of the Military-Industrial Complex is that the state is always its customer. Level of development for the Russian MIC plays a crucial role for maintaining the safety of the state and beside the supplies for the army it is responsible in a great degree for technical equipment of main segments of economy (medicine, transport, education, fuelenergetic complex, etc.). The governing board of the MIC in-cludes 18 persons led by the President of Russian Federation - Vladimir Putin.

scholarly journals Political and legal support of ensuring security and sustainable development of CIS member countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 05034
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Dolzhenkova ◽  
Dmitri Mokhorov ◽  
Tatiana Baranova
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
General Context ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
New Production ◽  
Member States ◽  
Military Industrial Complex ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Military

CIS member countries are interconnected by both historical, cultural and economic components. Russia and China, as two global actors, influence the economic situation and security in the CIS. The purpose of the paper is to identify the dependence of the CIS member countries on Russia and China, as well as to identify dependence of the economic development of the member states on import of armaments. Applying a regional approach, as well as analyzing economic indicators, supplies of weapons and presence of the military industrial complex production and service enterprises, we can define Belarus and Kazakhstan as the states with the largest share of foreign (Russian and Chinese) investments and weapons in their home markets. The Russian Federation stands out in the general context of dominance throughout the CIS. There are also Russian geopolitical interests, which include protection of external borders by ensuring security and stability in the member states bordering third countries. Chinese interests are focused mainly in the border area, namely, Chinese interests in Central Asia. The growing influence of global actors in the region, which is ensured through their investments in industry, military supplies and setting up new production complexes, establishes an ever closer relationship among the nations of the region. Thus, such an influence may lead certain CIS member countries to closer integration with China and Russia in the future, namely, to create bilateral alliances with a higher degree of dependence on global actors in comparison with other CIS member countries.

Military-Industrial Complexes and Their Variations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc R. DeVore
Keyword(s):  
National Security ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
National Politics ◽  
Military Industrial Complex ◽  
Iron Triangle ◽  
The First World War ◽  
Industrial Complexes ◽  
Analytic Models ◽  
The Military ◽  
Defense Firms

Dwight David Eisenhower delivered one final address to the American public on January 17, 1961, as he prepared to step down from the U.S. presidency. Often remembered as an inarticulate public speaker, Eisenhower surprised his audience with his clear warning that “in the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.” Eisenhower’s words resonated with both his audience and subsequent generations because he gave voice to the growing level of popular anxiety over whether armaments’ increasing importance to national security would ultimately endow defense firms with a degree of power incompatible with liberal democracy. Although Eisenhower’s concerns about defense firms’ antidemocratic potential echoed those of policymakers and scholars since the First World War, Eisenhower’s formulation of the military-industrial complex problématique followed on the heels of earlier analytic models—notably the “merchants of death” and “garrison state” hypotheses—and preceded later rearticulations, such as that of the “iron triangle.” It is possible now, with a century of perspective on this literature, to assess which hypotheses about defense firms’ deleterious impact on society and government have been borne out by subsequent events and which have not. Within this context, many of the worst fears embodied in the earlier theories have not been borne out by subsequent events. Defense firms did not “cause” wars as per the merchants-of-death hypothesis, and democracy did not give way in states where it already existed to the authoritarian rule of “specialists of violence.” Nonetheless, the core insight of the military-industrial complex and iron triangle schools of thought—that defense industries and their allies in the military and politics will act as an interest group to promote procurement projects—has proven robust. The way that these dynamics occur, however, varies from state to state as a function of their institutions. Even though the production of armaments by defense firms headquartered in one’s state exercises a distorting effect on national politics and military procurement, few states can escape this dynamic. The national security advantages of greater supply security and enhanced military adaptation, combined with the fear that once abandoned, defense-industrial capabilities cannot be quickly reconstituted, compels most states that can produce armaments to do so. A military-industrial complex, of some form, is thus a fatality for the modern state.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document