MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-53
Author(s):  
Jarosław Nawrotek

Defence industry may be defined as a system of factories and organisations developing, manufacturing and selling military equipment, weapons and ammunition. In the case of the Russian Federation the terminology of “defence industry” and “military industry” is often used as an equivalent to the Military-Industrial Complex (MIC). The Military-Industrial Complex is a segment of the state industry involved in manufacture of the military equipment and performance of research-development projects in the defence sector. Typical feature of the Military-Industrial Complex is that the state is always its customer. Level of development for the Russian MIC plays a crucial role for maintaining the safety of the state and beside the supplies for the army it is responsible in a great degree for technical equipment of main segments of economy (medicine, transport, education, fuelenergetic complex, etc.). The governing board of the MIC in-cludes 18 persons led by the President of Russian Federation - Vladimir Putin.

Author(s):  
I. V. Kazmina ◽  
E. A. Titova

The article deals with the features of organizational and economic interaction between the state and business in the defense industry. Using the results of research, the mechanism of implementation of public-private partnership at the enterprises of the military-industrial complex in the creation of joint ventures for the production of new models of weapons and military equipment, which is based on a set of organizational structures and specific forms, tools, tools and methods of management, through which the public-private partnership in the military-industrial complex. The main reasons for the need to implement public-private partnership in the military-industrial complex are identified. These reasons will contribute to the withdrawal of the state from the organizational and technological method of management of the military-industrial complex and the introduction of appropriate mechanisms for the implementation of public-private partnership in order to develop and create new high-tech military equipment of the new generation. The article proves that public-private partnership is one of the tools of effective defense policy. At the same time, in the period of budget deficit in the Russian Federation, such a mechanism becomes an outlet for solving important tasks in the field of defense. Having received a certain distribution in the military-industrial complex, public-private partnership has already established itself as one of the effective ways to attract business to the implementation of projects in the field of military-industrial complex..


2020 ◽  
pp. 128-131
Author(s):  
И.В. Баранова ◽  
М.А. Власенко

В статье рассмотрен гособоронзаказ как драйвер развития предприятий оборонно-промышленного комплекса, требования обеспечения финансовой устойчивости предприятий при исполнении ими гособоронзаказа. Диверсификация оборонно-промышленного комплекса РФ и конверсия производства предприятий, входящих в данный комплекс, ориентированные на производство продукции двойного назначения, а также повышение объемов продаж в среднесрочной перспективе рассматриваются как факторы повышения их финансовой устойчивости. The article considers the defense procurement and acquisition as a driver for the development of enterprises of the military-industrial complex; the requirements for ensuring the financial stability of enterprises when they perform a state contract under the state defense order. The diversification of the Russian military-industrial complex and the conversion of production of enterprises included in this complex, focused on the production of dual-use products, increasing sales in the medium term, are considered as factors for increasing the financial stability of enterprises in the military-industrial complex.


2003 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
John B. Dunlop

A book published by the author in 1993 contained a lengthy chapter on the August 1991 coup attempt in the Soviet Union. This article builds on and updates that chapter, making use of a trove of newly available documents and memoirs. The article discusses many aspects of the coup attempt, but it particularly seeks to explain why the coup failed and what the implications were for the Soviet Union. The events of December 1991 that culminated in the dissolution of the Soviet Union were the direct result of changes set in motion by the failed coup. The major state and party institutions that might ordinarily have tried to hold the country together—the Communist Party apparatus, the secret police, the military-industrial complex, the Ministry of Defense, and the state administrative organs—all were compromised by their participation in the coup. As a result, when events pushed the Soviet Union toward collapse there was no way of staving off that outcome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 937 (2) ◽  
pp. 022032
Author(s):  
V Daroshka ◽  
I Aleksandrov ◽  
I Chekhovskikh ◽  
E Ol ◽  
V Trushkin ◽  
...  

Abstract The relevance of the research topic is due to the strategic importance of the transition of Russian agro-industrial complex to innovative development path, which involves the formation of cooperative ties with the military-industrial complex as a driver of new technological solutions. Statement of the problem. The agro-industrial complex has a significant technological lag in terms of technological competitiveness. Statement of the problem. There is a significant technological gap in the agro-industrial complex in terms of smart growth of agribusiness based on digital technologies and solutions, which negatively affects its production, export potential and financial condition. The aim of the research is to study the development of inter-firm cooperation of military-industrial and agro-industrial complex of the Russian Federation which makes its influence on the environment. The study considers domestic and foreign experience in the implementation of inter-firm cooperation of industries, an analytical review of the main indicators of development and results of cooperation between the military-industrial complex and agro-industrial complex is given. The conclusion of the scientific research identifies the main problems and prospects for the development of cooperative links of industries, taking into account the external challenges and threats to the global economy.


Author(s):  
И. Гаврилова ◽  
I. Gavrilova

The first persons of the state are interested in the projects on creation of the latest models of military equipment; however, in the official sources they also mention the upcoming diversification (conversion) of the enterprises of the military-industrial complex (MIC). In the organization of business processes of enterprises are using software that ensure the operation of individual units. Their main drawback is isolation. At the head of the project is the head in the person of the chief (General) designer. As a rule, he is not interested in individual economic or financial issues. Information on the progress of the project should be provided in a comprehensive manner to promptly resolve problematic issues. The article proposes a hierarchy of project management tools based on the principle of «matryoshka dolls».


2021 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 05034
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Dolzhenkova ◽  
Dmitri Mokhorov ◽  
Tatiana Baranova

CIS member countries are interconnected by both historical, cultural and economic components. Russia and China, as two global actors, influence the economic situation and security in the CIS. The purpose of the paper is to identify the dependence of the CIS member countries on Russia and China, as well as to identify dependence of the economic development of the member states on import of armaments. Applying a regional approach, as well as analyzing economic indicators, supplies of weapons and presence of the military industrial complex production and service enterprises, we can define Belarus and Kazakhstan as the states with the largest share of foreign (Russian and Chinese) investments and weapons in their home markets. The Russian Federation stands out in the general context of dominance throughout the CIS. There are also Russian geopolitical interests, which include protection of external borders by ensuring security and stability in the member states bordering third countries. Chinese interests are focused mainly in the border area, namely, Chinese interests in Central Asia. The growing influence of global actors in the region, which is ensured through their investments in industry, military supplies and setting up new production complexes, establishes an ever closer relationship among the nations of the region. Thus, such an influence may lead certain CIS member countries to closer integration with China and Russia in the future, namely, to create bilateral alliances with a higher degree of dependence on global actors in comparison with other CIS member countries.


Author(s):  
V. Dvorkin

In the present article, methodical guidelines and some specific approaches aimed at the military-technical cooperation efficiency improvement and Russia's status reinforcement are suggested. Problems of the above-mentioned multidimensional cooperation expansion and strengthening, possibilities of their solving are examined. The condition of the domestic military-industrial complex, the degree of the Russian armament and military equipment competitiveness, Russian military efficiency standard are investigated.


Author(s):  
К.О. Ушакова ◽  
В.Г. Исаев

В 2014 году странами НАТО были введены ограничения на поставку импортного оборудования и комплектующих в Российскую Федерацию. В связи с чем была актуализирована проблема национальной безопасности, решение которой требует разработки и применения целого комплекса мер - экономических, организационных и правовых. Государство впервые за много лет столкнулось с реальной необходимостью импортозамещения. Вопросы импортозамещения являются стратегически важными, от их решения зависит обеспечение обороноспособности национальной экономики. Государство перешло к стратегии импортозамещения и поддержке отечественного производителя. In 2014, Russian Federation was restricted in importing of foreign equipment and component parts by countries that were NATO members. In that situation, the importance of national security issues increased. To deal with those issues, a range of different measures such as economical, organizational and legal were to be applied. After a long time, once again Russian Federation faced the problems concerning import substitution. National security issues are strategically important, solving these issues effects national economics defense potential. Russian Federation followed the import substitution strategy and started to support domestic producers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document