scholarly journals PUBLIC INFORMATION DISCLOSURE IN GOOD GOVERNANCE FOR THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA (Study: The Implementation of Public Information Disclosure in LIPI)

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Dewi Saraswati
Keyword(s):  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Information ◽  
General Information ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Access ◽  
Public Agency ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Right To Information

ABSTRACTThe right to information is crucial because the more open the public scrutiny of the state administration, the more accountable the state administration is. Each public agency has the obligation to open public access to information relating to the Public Agency for the wider community, especially LIPI (Indonesian Institute of Sciences). Therefore, it is important to examine the implementation of the Public Information in LIPI in order to prevent acts of corruption. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that as the implementation of good governance, especially the embodiment of the principles of transparency in order to prevent acts of corruption, LIPI has conducted Public Information Disclosure. LIPI has provided Whistle-blowing System (WBS) as a means to facilitate information providers who want to report allegations of corruption in LIPI. For general information requests related to LIPI can be accessed via http://wbs.lipi.go.id/ 

scholarly journals Dualisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Permohonan Informasi Publik

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 672-676
Author(s):  
Kartika Widya Utama ◽  
Yudhitiya Dyah Sukmadewi
Keyword(s):  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Information ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Access ◽  
Open Government ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Information Transparency ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Body

Public Information Transparency after 1998 reformation has gained momentum since the issuance of Law No. 14 of 2008 concerning Transparency of Public Information. Public access to obtain information owned by the state administrative body does not always run smoothly. The role of the Administrative Court as a Judiciary that guarantees the upholding of Good Public Order Principles, especially the principle of public transparency, was tested. This article will discuss the extent of the role of PTUN in disputes over requests for public information, which in the process will also discuss the part of the Public Information Commission in requests for public information in terms of authority and competence. As a conceptual article, the conclusion that can be drawn is that the state administrative dispute procedure needs to be clearly stated, whether it is mandatory to use the procedure for requesting public information through the Public Information Commission or whether it can use a claim mechanism through the State Administrative Court. Keyword: Open Government, Administrative Court, Good Governance Principle Abstrak Keterbukaan Informasi Publik pasca reformasi semakin mendapatkan momentum semenjak diterbitkannya Undang-Undang No. 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik. Akses masyarakat untuk mendapatkan informasi yang dimiliki oleh badan administrasi negara tidak selalu berjalan dengan lancar. Peran PTUN sebagai Badan Peradilan yang menjamin tegaknya Asas-asas Umum Ketertiban yang Baik khususnya asas keterbukaan publik pun diuji. Artikel ini akan membahas sejauh mana peran dari PTUN dalam sengketa permohonan informasi publik yang dalam prosesnya akan membahas pula mengenai peran Komisi Informasi Publik dalam permohonan informasi publik dari sisi kewenangan dan kompetensi. Sebagai artikel konseptual, kesimpulan yang dapat diambil adalah perlu ditegaskan dengan jelas prosedur sengketa administrasi negara apakah diwajibankan menggunakan prosedur permohonan informasi publik melalui Komisi Informasi Publik ataukah dapat menggunakan mekanisme gugatan melalui Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Kata Kunci: Keterbukaan informasi publik, PTUN, Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik

scholarly journals MANAGEMENT OF CASE'S ARCHIVES IN THE COURT FOR ACCESS TO PUBLIC INFORMATION AT THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF MAKASSAR

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-170
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rizaldi Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Field Observations ◽  
Reform Era ◽  
Public Agency ◽  
The Public

Since the birth of the reform era in Indonesia the administration of government refers to the principles of Good Governance and General Principles of Good Governance. In order to accommodate the realization of good governance, a Law on Public Information Disclosure was established which mandates that every Public Agency must develop a system of information and documentation to manage Public Information properly and efficiently so that it can be easily accessed. No exception with the Mahkamah Agung which is committed to providing the best service to the public by realizing openness of information in the Court. Administrative Court of Makassar as a judicial body is also inseparable from the obligation to realize information disclosure in the Court. The purpose of this paper is to find out the implementation of the information disclosure service regarding archives at the Administrative Court of Makassar. Data collection is done through field observations and interviews with several related parties.

scholarly journals Urgensi Keterbukaan Informasi dalam Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik (Urgency of Disclosure of Informationin The Implementation of Public Service)

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 231
Author(s):  
Eko Noer Kristiyanto
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Public Agency ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
Right To Information ◽  
The Right ◽  
Democratic Country

Since 2008, Indonesia has started a new momentum in the era of openness, related to the passing of Law No. 14 of 2008 on Public Information (KIP). Disclosure of public information is very important because people can control every step and measures taken by the government, especially the Public Agency. Operation of power in a democratic country should at all times be accountable back to the community. Accountability brings to the good governance that leads to the guarantee of human rights (HAM). Public disclosure is an important part of public service is also a right that is very important and strategic for citizens to get access to other rights, because of how it might be to get the rights and other services properly obtained information regarding such rights it is not obtained appropriately and correctly. The poor performance of public services for, among others, have not been implemented because of transparency and participation in public service delivery. This paper attempts to explain the correlation and importance of the right to information of the public service.Keywords: Public Service, Transparency, Participation, Accountabilitys ABSTRAKSejak Tahun 2008, Indonesia telah memulai sebuah momentum baru dalam era keterbukaan, terkait dengan disahkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik (KIP). Keterbukaan informasi publik sangat penting oleh karena masyarakat dapat mengontrol setiap langkah dan kebijakan yang diambil oleh Badan Publik terutama pemerintah. Penyelenggaraan kekuasaan dalam negara demokrasi harus setiap saat dapat dipertanggungjawabkan kembali kepada masyarakat. Akuntabilitas membawa ke tata pemerintahan yang baik yang bermuara pada jaminan hak asasi manusia (HAM). Keterbukaan informasi publik merupakan bagian penting dari penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik juga merupakan hak yang sangat penting dan strategis bagi warga negara untuk menuju akses terhadap hak-hak lainnya, karena bagaimana mungkin akan mendapatkan hak dan pelayanan lainnya dengan baik jika informasi yang diperoleh mengenai hak-hak tersebut tidaklah didapatkan secara tepat dan benar.Buruknya kinerja pelayanan publik selama ini antara lain dikarenakan belum dilaksanakannya transparansi dan partisipasi dalam penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik. Tulisan ini mencoba menjelaskan korelasi dan pentingnya hak atas informasi terhadap penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik.Kata Kunci: Pelayanan Publik, Transparansi, Partisipasi, Akuntabilitas

scholarly journals Pemenuhan Hak atas Informasi Publik sebagai Tanggung Jawab Negara dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Adam Muhshi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Logical Consequence ◽  
Public Information ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Institutions ◽  
The Public ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
The Right

There are two legal issues proposed in this study, inter alia, the nature of the right to public information and state's responsibility for the fulfillment of the right to public information. This study uses legal research with statute and conceptual approaches. The results of this study shows that the right to public information becomes part of the human rights as guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution. Public information has become a logical consequence of the obligation of the state to account for the implementation of its government to the citizens as its main purpose is to ensure the accountability and credibility of public institutions through the provision of information and documents at the public request so that the principle of information disclosure is one component in the realization of good governance. As a constitutional right of citizens, it also shows that ‘a contrario’ the fulfillment of public information is the responsibility of the state. According to this view, the fulfillment of the right to public information is not only related to obligations, but the content must be true and provided openly and honestly. It concludes that the fulfillment of public information conducted openly and honestly will contribute to an attempt to realize good governance Keywords: Human Rights, Public Information, Good Governance

scholarly journals An Existence of State Administration Court in Establishing Good Governance

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ruslin Ruslin
Keyword(s):  
Good Governance ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Judicial Control ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Functions ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Good Government ◽  
Executive Agencies

Administration officials have broad authority in carrying out the affair of government. With this broad authority tends to be misused to cause harm and injustice in the society, therefore there must be other institutions that control it. Based on the theory of Trigs Politico executive agencies are politically controlled by the legislative and juridical institutions controlled by the judiciary, because the officials running the state administration executive functions that control the judiciary is legally the state administrative court. Judicial control of administrative functions of the state administrative court in addition aims to provide legal protection for the public and state administration officials themselves, as well as state administrative law enforcement agencies who aspire to realize a good and authoritative government. Keywords: Good government, State administration court

scholarly journals UU KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PUBLIK ANTARA HARAPAN DAN KENYATAAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Suko Widodo
Keyword(s):  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Public Institutions ◽  
Freedom Of Information ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Property ◽  
Information Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

Disclosure of public information is one manifestation of the implementation of good governance where the public information disclosure is the duty of government and public institutions. It refers to the fact that the public information is public property and is not owned by the government and public institutions. Therefore, to be able to meet these conditions, the Freedom of Information Law was established, despite the fact that the law is not so popular in the community, so it is still necessary

scholarly journals PERAN KOMISI INFORMASI PUBLIK DALAM PROSES EKSEKUSI TERHADAP PUTUSAN SENGKETA INFORMASI YANG BERKEKUATAN HUKUM TETAP DALAM TINJAUAN UU NO.14 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PUBLIK

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Slamet Haryanto ◽  
Kadi Sukarna
Keyword(s):  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The State ◽  
District Court ◽  
The Public ◽  
Commission Decision ◽  
Disclosure Management ◽  
Public Entity

<p>The community as the users of information has sufficiently important rights <br />in the context of information disclosure. When the right to obtain information is<br />inhibited because the public entity or governor is not available in the execution of<br />the information disclosure management, then public information lawsuit will<br />emerge in the implementation of the public information disclosure. <br />The public information lawsuit happens when public entity and the user of<br />information disputes with something related to the rights to acquire information<br />and to use information based on legislation. The completion of the lawsuit<br />through nonlitigation ajudication is the process of the completion of public<br />information lawsuit. The completion of the information through nonlitigation<br />ajudication is hopefully able to resolve the dispute fast, low cost, and simple. <br />The problems in this thesis are: a) how the mechanisms of the settlement of<br />public information lawsuit in the Information Commission, b) what obstacles and<br />solutions of the execution implementation of the Information Commission<br />decisions which have been legally binding. <br />Answering the problem, research with juridical normative approach method<br />with analytical descriptive research specification was conducted. The type of data<br />used in this study is secondary data. <br />Based on the research that had been conducted, it was found that Public<br />Information Lawsuit Settlement Procedure, the execution of the decision or the<br />execution of the Information Commission decision which had been legally<br />binding was conducted by the competent Court, in the context that the public<br />information lawsuit settlement was the court within the jurisdiction of the pleated.<br />In this case if the pleated is State or Government public entity then the court in<br />question is the Administrative Court of the State, whereas if the execution pleated is a party outside the State or Government public entity then the competent court is the competent District Court. <br />The execution authority of the Information Commission decision granted to<br />the State Administrative Court as well as the District Court, causes the<br />information users to experience the long process of obtaining information which<br />is their needs or constitutional rights.</p>

scholarly journals PELAYANAN INFORMASI PUBLIK PADA DINAS KOMUNIKASI DAN INFORMASI KABUPATEN DONGGALA

Kinesik ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-250
Author(s):  
Ade Irma
Keyword(s):  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Information Services ◽  
Quality Of Services ◽  
Five Dimensions ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Body ◽  
The Government

Pillars of democracy, transparency and good governance are the objectives of public information services carried out, through Law No. 14 of 2008 on Public Information Disclosure. The form of service organized by the Government is a service in an effort to meet the needs of the public or the community. Communication, Public information is information generated, stored, managed, sent, and / or received by a public body, this research is a qualitative approach, a research paradigm to describe events, locus research located in the Department of Communication and Informatics Donggala Regency, this study uses Informants as many as 4 (four) people, using the theory of Pararusman, et al .Tjiptnono, 1996) there are five dimensions in assessing the quality of services or  services, namely, Tangibles, Realibility, Responsiveness, Assurance, Emphathy. 1) Tangibles; reflected in physical facilities, equipment, personnel and communication materials have not been effective and optimal.2) Realibility, i.e. lack of accuracy or lack of reliable information. Responsiveness: lack of sensitivity to respond to information. 4) Assurance; Knowledge is less effective and efficient. 5) Emphathy. Still lacking, officers in the process of public information services

scholarly journals Pola Pengawasan Komisi Informasi Aceh Dalam Mewujudkan Keterbukaan Informasi Publik di Propinsi Aceh

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-155
Author(s):  
Syifa Maisarah
Keyword(s):  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Public Agency ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
The Public ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
The Right

Amanat Undang-Undang No. 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik telah mewajibkan setiap badan publik untuk dapat memiliki keterbukaan dalam pelayanan informasi kepada masyarakat. Dengan kehadiran aturan hukum tersebut telah menjamin hak masyarakat untuk memperoleh dan mengakses informasi yang dibutuhkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menjelaskan pola pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh Komisi Informasi Aceh (KIA) dalam mewujudkan keterbukaan informasi publik di lingkungan Satuan Kerja Perangkat Aceh (SKPA). Penelitian ini berjenis kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif, informan dalam penelitian ini ditentukan melalui teknik purposive sampling. Teori pengawasan dari Sondang P. Siagian digunakan untuk menganalisis permasalahan. Dari hasil analisis, penulis menilai bahwa pelaksanaan pengawasan KIA terhadap implementasi keterbukaan informasi publik di SKPA telah berjalan dengan efektif. Tinggal mengupayakan bagaimana KIA dapat meningkatan kinerja keterbukaan informasi publik oleh sebagian SKPA yang masih rendah.Mandate of Law No. 14 of 2008 concerning Openness of Public Information has required every public agency to be able to have openness in providing information to the public. The presence of these laws has guaranteed the right of the community to obtain and access the information they need. This study aims to identify and explain the pattern of supervision carried out by the Aceh Information Commission (KIA) in realizing public information disclosure within the Aceh Working Unit (SKPA). This research is a qualitative type with a descriptive approach, the informants in this study were determined through purposive sampling technique. Supervision theory from Sondang P. Siagian is used to analyze the problem. From the results of the analysis, the authors consider that the implementation of MCH supervision on the implementation of public information disclosure in SKPA has been running effectively. It remains only to find out how MCH can improve the performance of public information disclosure by some SKPAs, which are still low.

Online information disclosure in Spanish municipal-owned enterprises

2019 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Andrades ◽  
Domingo Martinez-Martinez ◽  
Manuel Larran ◽  
Jesus Herrera
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Web Pages ◽  
Online Information ◽  
Legal Requirements ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Public ◽  
Spanish Law ◽  
State Administration

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the amount of online information reported by Spanish municipal-owned enterprises (MOEs) according to the legal requirements indicated in the Spanish Law 19/2013 on Transparency and Good Governance. In addition, the authors analyze how different variables can affect the extent of online information reported by such enterprises. Design/methodology/approach To do this, we conducted a content analysis of the web pages of Spanish MOEs located in cities with more than 100.000 habitants, as well as those cities that are provincial capitals. To find information about these enterprises, the authors accessed the General Intervention Board of the State Administration (IGAE) webpage (www.igae.pap.minhafp.gob.es/sitios/igae/es-ES/Paginas/inicio.aspx). This sample was composed of 273 enterprises majority owned and controlled by local governments. Findings The findings reveal that the amount of information reported by Spanish MOEs, in accordance with the legal requirements, is quite reduced. The most influential variables for explaining Spanish MOEs’ commitment to information disclosure are population size, political positioning of the local government and reputation. Originality/value This study seeks to contribute to the scarce literature on mandatory transparency in the public sector as well as to reinforce the degree of compliance with requirements of information disclosure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document