scholarly journals Transcription Factors in Hematological Malignancies

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi Wang ◽  
Pan Wang ◽  
Yanan Li ◽  
Hongling Peng ◽  
Yu Zhu ◽  
...  

AbstractHematopoiesis requires finely tuned regulation of gene expression at each stage of development. The regulation of gene transcription involves not only individual transcription factors (TFs) but also transcription complexes (TCs) composed of transcription factor(s) and multisubunit cofactors. In their normal compositions, TCs orchestrate lineage-specific patterns of gene expression and ensure the production of the correct proportions of individual cell lineages during hematopoiesis. The integration of posttranslational and conformational modifications in the chromatin landscape, nucleosomes, histones and interacting components via the cofactor–TF interplay is critical to optimal TF activity. Mutations or translocations of cofactor genes are expected to alter cofactor–TF interactions, which may be causative for the pathogenesis of various hematologic disorders. Blocking TF oncogenic activity in hematologic disorders through targeting cofactors in aberrant complexes has been an exciting therapeutic strategy. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge regarding the models and functions of cofactor–TF interplay in physiological hematopoiesis and highlight their implications in the etiology of hematological malignancies. This review presents a deep insight into the physiological and pathological implications of transcription machinery in the blood system.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1206-1206
Author(s):  
Keiki Kumano ◽  
Shunya Arai ◽  
Koki Ueda ◽  
Kumi Nakazaki ◽  
Yasuhiko Kamikubo ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1206 Introduction: Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be generated from various cell types by the expression of defined transcription factors. In addition to the regenerative medicine, iPSCs have been used for the study of the pathogenesis of inherited genetic disease. Recently, it was reported that iPSCs were generated not only from normal tissue, but also from malignant cells. In those cases, cancer cells themselves must be the starting material from which iPSCs are derived. However, in almost all the cases, they used the established cell lines (chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), gastrointestinal cancers, and melanoma) except for the JAK2-V617F mutation (+) polycythemia vera (PV) patient. In this study, we established the iPSCs from primary CML patient sample. Results: After obtaining informed consent, bone marrow cells from CML patient were reprogrammed by introducing the transcription factors Oct3/4, Sox2, KLF4, and c-myc. To improve the efficiency of the development of iPSCs, we added valproic acid (VPA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, to the culture. Two CML derived iPSCs (CML-iPSCs) were generated. CML-iPSCs expressed the pluripotency markers such as SSEA-4 and Tra-1-60, and the endogenous expression of embryonic stem cell (ESC) characteristic transcripts (Oct3/4, Sox2, KLF4, Nanog, LIN28, REX1) was confirmed by RT-PCR. Oct4 and Nanog promoter regions were demetylated in the CML-iPSCs. Although CML-iPSCs expressed bcr-abl, they were resistant to the imatinib. Then we differentiated them into hematopoietic progenitors within the ‘unique sac-like structures’ (iPS-sacs). This method was reported to be able to produce the hematopoietic progenitors with higher efficiency than the usual embryoid body formation method using human ESCs (Takayama et al., Blood, 111, 5298–306, 2008). The hematopoietic progenitors showed the hematopoietic marker CD45 and immature marker CD34, and recovered the sensitivity to the imatinib, which recapitulated the feature of initial CML disease. Then we investigated the mechanism of the resistance to the imatinib in CML-iPSCs. The phosphorylation state of ERK1/2, AKT, and STAT5, which are the essential for the survival of bcr-abl (+) hematopoietic progenitors, were evaluated after imatinib treatment in CML-iPSCs. The phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and AKT, which were also essential for the maintenance of iPSCs, were unchanged after treatment, although STAT5 was not activated both before and after treatment. These results showed that the signaling for iPSCs maintenance compensated for the inhibition of bcr-abl in CML-iPSCs and that the oncogene addiction was lost in CML-iPSCs. Conclusion: We generated the iPSCs from primary CML patient samples, re-differentiated them into hematopoietic lineage and showed the recapitulation of the features of initial disease. Primary samples of hematological malignancy are usually difficult to be expanded. However, if once they are reprogrammed to iPSCs, they can expand unlimitedly. As a result, we can obtain the genetically abnormal hematopoietic cells continuously by re-differentiating them into hematopoietic cells and use them for the studies which require the large number of living cells such as the analysis for leukemia stem cells or drug screening. Thus iPSCs technology would be useful for the study of hematological malignancy, especially for which animal model was not established such as myelodysplastic syndrome and be applicable for other cancers than hematological malignancies. We are now trying to establish the iPSCs derived from other hematological malignancies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2009 ◽  
pp. 193-198
Author(s):  
Masahiro Nakagawa ◽  
Susumu Goyama ◽  
Motoshi Ichikawa ◽  
Mineo Kurokawa

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4814-4814
Author(s):  
Samantha Kaufhold ◽  
Hermes Garban ◽  
Benjamin Bonavida

Abstract Introduction: Yin Yang 1 (YY1) is a transcription factor, (a 44 kDa protein), ubiquitously expressed in many tissues and cancers. YY1 exerts multiple functions, including transcriptional regulation of many genes involved in cell proliferation, chromatin remodeling, drug and immune resistance, and metastasis [1].Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a small subset of cancer cells that drive tumorigenesis and metastasis and are considered to be resistant to cytotoxic therapies; they are pluripotent and capable of self-renewal. Objective: To determine if YY1 is a transcription factor that regulates CSCs. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that YY1 may be overexpressed in CSCs, and its expression may be coordinated with the expression of CSC transcription factors. The overexpressions and activities of SOX2, OCT4 (POU5F1), BMI1 and NANOG are characteristics of the CSC phenotype in many cancers. Methods: The above hypothesis was tested by comparing the expression patterns of the four CSC markers and YY1 in hematological malignancies. The data were collected from the Human Protein Atlas proteomics database, and only high and medium expressions were considered positive. Results: From the data that were collected, the overall percentage of positively stained cells was determined. Our preliminary findings demonstrated that there was a strong correlation between the expression patterns of YY1 and BMI1, some correlation between YY1, OCT4 and SOX2, and no correlation between YY1 and NANOG, which was usually underexpressed. The interactomes of OCT4 and SOX2 are important parts of the regulatory network of hESCs. Further, multiple DNA binding proteins, including YY1, are enriched in both interactomes [2]. Conclusion: The findings suggest strongly that CSCs may overexpress YY1 in coordination with the overexpressions of SOX2, BMI1, and OCT4. They further suggest that YY1 may constitute a CSC biomarker, and they revealed potential therapeutic targets. [1] Critical Reviews™ in Oncogenesis Volume 16, 2011 [2] Gao F et al., Sci Report 3:1588,2013. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 728-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Yu ◽  
Dapeng Wang ◽  
Kenrick Semple ◽  
Claudio Anasetti ◽  
Xue-Zhong Yu

Abstract Abstract 728 Background: Allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is an effective therapy with potential cure of hematological malignancies through T cell-mediated graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects. However, beneficial GVL effects are frequently offset by the development of destructive graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) also induced by donor T cells. Recent studies including ours have demonstrated that donor T cells differentiated into type 1 or type 17-subset contribute to GVHD. Thus, we hypothesize that blocking both Th1 and Th17 lineage via disrupting Th1-specific (T-bet) and Th17-specific (RORγt) transcription factors can significantly reduce GVHD after allo-HCT. Method: Two murine models of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) that represent clinical GVHD and GVL were used: C57BL/6 (B6)→BALB/c and B6→(B6 × DBA2)F1. To mimic clinical residual hematological malignant disease, B cell lymphoma (A20) and mastocytoma (p815) were infused into BALB/c and (B6 × DBA2)F1 mice, respectively. Results: We first compared the ability of WT, T-bet−/−, RORγt−/−, and T-bet−/−/RORγt−/− T cells in the induction of GVHD, and found that RORγt−/− T cells had a comparable ability to cause GVHD as WT T cells, whereas T-bet−/− T cells were less pathogenic. The T-bet−/−/RORγt−/− T cells failed to induce acute GVHD but caused minor to modest chronic GVHD in some of recipients at the doses tested. To investigate whether recipients of T-bet−/−/RORγt−/− T cells had less severe target organ GVHD damage, we analyzed GVHD associated organ damage in liver, lung and bowel. Fourteen days after adoptive transfer of WT, T-bet−/−, RORγt−/−, and T-bet−/−/RORγt−/− T cells, recipients which received T-bet−/−/RORγt−/− donor T cells showed markedly reduced T cell infiltration and tissue damage in liver, lung, and bowel. Mechanistic studies revealed that T-bet−/−/RORγt−/− T cells produced significantly less IFNγ (Th1 cytokine) and IL-17 (Th17-cytokine) but significantly more IL-4 and IL-5 (Th2-cytokines) as compared to WT T cells. In addition, T-bet−/−/RORγt −/− donor T-cells express significantly less CXCR3 and CCR6, chemokine receptors required for infiltration of alloreactive T cells into GVHD targeted organ, which could be the reason that significantly fewer T-bet−/−/RORγt−/− T cells were accumulated in recipient liver and lung than WT T cells. Furthermore, we tested the ability of WT and T-bet−/−/RORγt−/− T cells in mediating GVL effect. Although T-bet−/−/RORγt−/− T cells failed to induce acute GVHD, their ability to reject A20 or p815 cells was comparable to that of the WT T cells at the dose tested. Conclusions: These results indicate that blocking T-bet and RORγt prevents acute GVHD by suppressing donor T cell differentiation towards Th1 and Th17 and promoting differentiation towards Th2, and inhibiting donor T cell expansion and infiltration into GVHD target organs. Furthermore, blocking T-bet and RORγt could preserve GVL effect. Thus, the current study validates new targets for the separation of donor T cell–mediated GVHD and GVL activity, which could eventually be beneficial to patients with hematological malignancies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document