scholarly journals Humanizing the Chart: Becoming More Responsive to Patient Needs Through Implementation of PatientWisdom (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley Crotty ◽  
Jeana Holt ◽  
Rachel Cusatis ◽  
Onur Asan ◽  
Joni Williams ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Over the past several decades, health care has been shifting to a care model that more fully values patient engagement. Recently, there has been increased attention on the role of health information technology that enables patients to collaborate with clinicians through the sharing of patient-generated contextual data. We implemented the PatientWisdom tool using a sociotechnical model to improve patient experience and visit effectiveness. OBJECTIVE To understand the facilitators and barriers to the routine incorporation of patient contextual data into the record, and the subsequent initial impact on the experience of care within academic and community practices affiliated with an academic health system. METHODS Our health system co-developed the PatientWisdom tool, which elicits patient values, preferences, and other contextual data ahead of visits through an email invitation to a secure Web application. Results are summarized and viewable within the EHR. To assess the implementation, we performed workflow shadowing and semi-structured interviews of clinical staff from April through July 2018. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided the collection and analysis of qualitative data. Researchers used the PatientWisdom platform to elicit patient data ahead of visits and summarize insights in the EHR. The researchers conducted sampling and data analysis in tandem; sampling concluded when the researchers determined no new themes were surfacing; therefore reaching data saturation. To assess the impact of the program on health care operations, including patient experience, a random sample of clinicians and patients (both users and non-users) was performed. RESULTS In workflow assessment and clinician interviews, we learned that the data needed to be more visible within the chart, and we made improvements within our electronic health record to make link to the data more apparent and visible when data were available. Main themes from our interviews were: Patient contextual information fosters a holistic approach to care; PatientWisdom is an innovative tool used to sync clinician-patient goals; clinicians may have an incorrect perception of PatientWisdom adopters (expecting millennials); and clinicians who proactively integrate PatientWisdom into their workflow identified it as an asset to care. In our initial assessment of impact, 945 patients completed surveys following their visits. Of participating patients, 87% say it improves communication and 90% rate the visit as going “extremely well” (compared to 82% when not used P<.05). Clinicians were significantly more likely to ask patients about barriers to care using the tool (65% vs 48%). The tool surfaced information about patient needs for clinicians and leaders. For example, we identified that 47% of participants did not have a health care proxy, and 60% of these patients were ready to talk about it with their clinician. CONCLUSIONS Consumer informatics tools that link with electronic health records may help “humanize” the record and improve patient centeredness. This session highlights the initial implementation of an effort to collect patient-contextual data through the PatientWisdom tool and highlights the use of the tool to drive clinical and operational improvement.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352110340
Author(s):  
Dajun Tian ◽  
Christine M. Hoehner ◽  
Keith F. Woeltje ◽  
Lan Luong ◽  
Michael A. Lane

Transitioning from one electronic health record (EHR) system to another is of the most disruptive events in health care and research about its impact on patient experience for inpatient is limited. This study aimed to assess the impact of transitioning EHR on patient experience measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems composites and global items. An interrupted time series study was conducted to evaluate quarter-specific changes in patient experience following implementation of a new EHR at a Midwest health care system during 2017 to 2018. First quarter post-implementation was associated with statistically significant decreases in Communication with Nurses (−1.82; 95% CI, −3.22 to −0.43; P = .0101), Responsiveness of Hospital Staff (−2.73; 95% CI, −4.90 to −0.57; P = .0131), Care Transition (−2.01; 95% CI, −3.96 to −0.07; P = .0426), and Recommend the Hospital (−2.42; 95% CI, −4.36 to −0.49; P = .0142). No statistically significant changes were observed in the transition, second, or third quarters post-implementation. Patient experience scores returned to baseline level after two quarters and the impact from EHR transition appeared to be temporary.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman Abu-Rumman ◽  
Ata Al Shraah ◽  
Faisal Al-Madi ◽  
Tasneem Alfalah

Purpose This study aims to explore if the application of the customer results criteria contained within the King Abdullah II Award for Excellence (KAIIAE) is correlated with high levels of patient satisfaction within a large hospital based in Jordan. Design/methodology/approach Using a mixed methodology, supported by a pragmatist theoretical approach, a satisfaction survey was conducted with patients accessing the hospital as an in-patient across a range of specialities gathering feedback about different aspects of their care. The results were compared with a self-assessment completed by different speciality teams about the existence and maturity of customer result arrangements implemented as a result of the (KAIIAE). Findings The findings confirmed that quality awards such as the KAIIAE can effectively be applied in a health-care setting and can help provide a framework for improving patient experience and satisfaction. A correlation was found with those specialties that self-assessed themselves more highly in terms of these arrangements and the overall levels of patient satisfaction with that specialty, suggesting that the products of working towards the KAIIAE such as establishing effective patient experience monitoring arrangements and improved learning from complaints, has a positive impact on patient satisfaction. Originality/value There are limited studies which focus specifically on customer results and on the use of the KAIIAE more generally. This study therefore makes a valuable contribution in adding to the debate about the strategic value of working towards formal quality improvement models and awards in health-care settings.


10.2196/25148 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e25148
Author(s):  
Ahmed Umar Otokiti ◽  
Catherine K Craven ◽  
Avniel Shetreat-Klein ◽  
Stacey Cohen ◽  
Bruce Darrow

Background Up to 60% of health care providers experience one or more symptoms of burnout. Perceived clinician burden resulting in burnout arises from factors such as electronic health record (EHR) usability or lack thereof, perceived loss of autonomy, and documentation burden leading to less clinical time with patients. Burnout can have detrimental effects on health care quality and contributes to increased medical errors, decreased patient satisfaction, substance use, workforce attrition, and suicide. Objective This project aims to improve the user-centered design of the EHR by obtaining direct input from clinicians about deficiencies. Fixing identified deficiencies via user-centered design has the potential to improve usability, thereby increasing satisfaction by reducing EHR-induced burnout. Methods Quantitative and qualitative data will be obtained from clinician EHR users. The input will be received through a form built in a REDCap database via a link embedded in the home page of the EHR. The REDCap data will be analyzed in 2 main dimensions, based on nature of the input, what section of the EHR is affected, and what is required to fix the issue(s). Identified issues will be escalated to relevant stakeholders responsible for rectifying the problems identified. Data analysis, project evaluation, and lessons learned from the evaluation will be incorporated in a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) manner every 4-6 weeks. Results The pilot phase of the study began in October 2020 in the Gastroenterology Division at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City, NY, which includes 39 physicians and 15 nurses. The pilot is expected to run over a 4-6–month period. The results of the REDCap data analysis will be reported within 1 month of completing the pilot phase. We will analyze the nature of requests received and the impact of rectified issues on the clinician EHR user. We expect that the results will reveal which sections of the EHR have the highest deficiencies while also highlighting issues about workflow difficulties. Perceived impact of the project on provider engagement, patient safety, and workflow efficiency will also be captured by evaluation survey and other qualitative methods where possible. Conclusions The project aims to improve user-centered design of the EHR by soliciting direct input from clinician EHR users. The ultimate goal is to improve efficiency, reduce EHR inefficiencies with the possibility of improving staff engagement, and lessen EHR-induced clinician burnout. Our project implementation includes using informatics expertise to achieve the desired state of a learning health system as recommended by the National Academy of Medicine as we facilitate feedback loops and rapid cycles of improvement. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/25148


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18785-e18785
Author(s):  
Isabella Batista Martins Portugal ◽  
Luis Eduardo Werneck De Carvalho ◽  
Jean Henri Schoueri ◽  
Leandro Fórnias Machado Rezende ◽  
Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca ◽  
...  

e18785 Background: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted health care systems worldwide. In Brazil, the disease had its first case in the city of São Paulo, thus being the starting point and epicenter of this disease in Latin America. Neurological features are currently well recognized in COVID-19 indicating the neurotropic nature of the virus and include anosmia, myalgia, myositis, encephalitis, meningitis, cerebrovascular disease, Guillain–Barré syndrome, and post-infectious myelitis. CNS tumors though relatively rare (> 2% of all cancers) are a relevant source of cancer-related morbi-mortality worldwide. Although studies have reported higher COVID-19 severity in cancer patients, the consequences of the pandemic on health care for CNS tumors remain inconclusive and will probably be felt for decades. This study aimed to determine the impact of pandemic on the hospital admissions (HA) due to CNS tumors in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of the HAs due to CNS tumors in the city of São Paulo comparing the outbreak period (January-June 2020) and a pre-pandemic corresponding period of the years 2017-2019. Data were obtained from the Brazilian Unified Health System - Hospital Information System database according to the chapter II of the International Classification of Diseases - 10th revision (ICD-10). Linear regression was used to analyze the relationship between the incidence of HAs and time (months). Results: A significant reduction in HAs due to CNS tumors was observed during the outbreak period (January-June 2020). Benign neoplasm of brain and other parts of CNS (-2, CI -2 to -1) and malignant neoplasm of brain (-5, CI -7 to -3) showed to be remarkably affected (see table). To our knowledge, this is the first scientific report of significant reduction of HAs due to CNS tumors during COVID-19 era. Conclusions: Our findings seem to be associated to delayed oncological diagnose and care to CNS tumor patients during the lockdown and health system collapse. A rebound help-seeking effect as well as more severe complications may present in the post‐pandemic. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of the ongoing pandemic in CNS neoplasms in order to strategically corroborate public health actions for short- and long-term implications of COVID-19 pandemic. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 994-997
Author(s):  
Agnes Barden ◽  
Nicole Giammarinaro ◽  
Leah Petrosino

Leadership drives quality, experience, and engagement. It is the responsibility of the organization to equip its leaders with ongoing education and professional development. This case article explores the development, implementation, and impact of an immersive patient experience leadership education course across a large, integrated health system. Placing senior leaders on the “other side of the hospital bed,” they were able to emotionally connect and personalize to the human side of health care. Post-course surveys validated that experiential role play was a positive and insightful method to teach and bring heightened awareness to patient and family member experience.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 141-141
Author(s):  
Carla Biella ◽  
Viviane Pereira ◽  
Fabiana Raynal ◽  
Jorge Barreto ◽  
Vania Canuto ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION:The increase of litigation in Brazil on the right to health, and the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS) targets of litigation, are phenomena that generate discussions both in the judiciary, and among researchers and managers of health. The lawsuits are based on the integrality that includes the right to any health technology. Our aim was to gather information on the use of scientific evidence by judges and other law professionals to support their decisions in lawsuits involving health care in Brazil.METHODS:A narrative review by literature search using key terms of legalization in specific databases was conducted.RESULTS:Twenty-five studies showed litigation matters relating to health care which were focused on legal claims about drugs. In general, law operators used the scientific evidences in a limited way when making decisions, by considering the medical report and medication label indications and disregarding therapeutic alternatives contemplated in the SUS list. The access to health technologies, by litigation, reveals that the gap between scientific knowledge and legal practice are similar to those found between science and decision-making in the formulation and implementation of health policies. The Health Technology Assessment studies have high potential for use by the judiciary as a reference source to support technical and scientific decisions in lawsuits on health care.CONCLUSIONS:For the judiciary to ensure not only access to health technologies, but also the efficacy and safety of technologies to system users, their decisions must be substantiated by scientific evidence. The National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) in SUS has established actions in conjunction with law operators and society, such as a communication using e-mail, aiding the decision for the injunction and elaboration of technical reports and a policy brief, with the intention that the decisions are taken with the greatest possible knowledge about technologies provided by SUS, and based on scientific evidence.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haylee Fox ◽  
Stephanie M. Topp ◽  
Emily Callander ◽  
Daniel Lindsay

Abstract Background The World Health Organization states there are three interrelated domains that are fundamental to achieving and maintaining universal access to care - raising sufficient funds for health care, reducing financial barriers to access by pooling funds in a way that prevents out-of-pocket costs, and allocating funds in a way that promotes quality, efficiency and equity. In Australia, a comprehensive account of the mechanisms for financing the health system have not been synthesised elsewhere. Therefore, to understand how the maternal health system is financed, this review aims to examine the mechanisms for funding, pooling and purchasing maternal health care and the influence these financing mechanisms have on the delivery of maternal health services in Australia. Methods We conducted a scoping review and interpretative synthesis of the financing mechanisms and their impact on Australia’s maternal health system. Due to the nature of the study question, the review had a major focus on grey literature. The search was undertaken in three stages including; searching (1) Google search engine (2) targeted websites and (3) academic databases. Executive summaries and table of contents were screened for grey literature documents and Titles and Abstracts were screened for journal articles. Screening of publications’ full-text followed. Data relating to either funding, pooling, or purchasing of maternal health care were extracted for synthesis. Results A total of 69 manuscripts were included in the synthesis, with 52 of those from the Google search engine and targeted website (grey literature) search. A total of 17 articles we included in the synthesis from the database search. Conclusion Our study provides a critical review of the mechanisms by which revenues are raised, funds are pooled and their impact on the way health care services are purchased for mothers and babies in Australia. Australia’s maternal health system is financed via both public and private sources, which consequentially creates a two-tiered system. Mothers who can afford private health insurance – typically wealthier, urban and non-First Nations women - therefore receive additional benefits of private care, which further exacerbates inequity between these groups of mothers and babies. The increasing out of pocket costs associated with obstetric care may create a financial burden for women to access necessary care or it may cause them to skip care altogether if the costs are too great.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigge Andersson

The impact of occupation on health and access to health care is a significant issue for the state, health sector and citizens of Palestine, who struggle with difficulties related to an enduring sociopolitical stalemate. The study presents narratives from the field, conceptually exploring if and how occupation affects health and access to health care and how the situation is tackled by Palestinians in general and by health system actors specifically. A grounded theory approach analyzing in-depth interviews with health staff and field memos was used, with semi-quantification of emerging concepts through surveys of Hebron students that assessed health-related quality of life and health literacy with psychometric instruments (SF36 and GSE) and assumed health determinants. One key theme in the data analysis was isolation as a result of multiple barriers, including the wall and checkpoints, imprisonment and violence, which have an impact on determinants of health and quality of life in Palestine. In the survey 54% (n=90) were affected by such factors of occupation. Barriers affect access to health care, especially in rural areas. Mentally and materially breaking free from barriers of occupation seems to be a common task in all levels of Palestinian society. Achieving this goal requires different counter strategies and tactics. Presently, Palestine depends on ad hoc coping strategies, including the use of mobile clinics. Other ways to cope emerged in the data as well. Results from this mixed-methods study suggest that isolation is a main concern for Palestinians, resulting from barriers in policies of occupation that affect health and access to health care. Another concept emerging from the analysis was tactics and strategies against occupation in society.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 147s-147s
Author(s):  
J.M.V. Dusengimana ◽  
T. Mpunga ◽  
C. Shyirambere ◽  
L.N. Shulman ◽  
E. Mpanumusingo ◽  
...  

Background and context: Promoting earlier detection of breast cancer is critical in low-income countries like Rwanda where symptomatic women face long diagnostic delays and most patients present with advanced disease. In these settings, promoting earlier clinical diagnosis should be the initial priority before screening of asymptomatic women. However, there are few data to guide such early detection policies. Aim: Develop a pilot breast cancer early detection program in a rural Rwandan district to evaluate its clinical and health system impact, identify the most effective and feasible roles for staff from each health care system level, and inform national policy. Strategy/Tactics: From 2015-2017 we implemented a training program for 12 randomly selected health centers (HCs) in Burera District, where Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence is located. We trained 1076 community health workers in breast awareness and 127 HC nurses in clinical breast exam (CBE) and management of breast concerns. We trained 9 hospital-level nurses and doctors in diagnostic breast ultrasound to facilitate evaluation of palpable masses. We used pre- and posttests, focus groups, patient surveys, HC registries, and hospital medical records to determine the impact of the training on trainees' knowledge and skills, the volume of patients presenting to health facilities and services provided, cancer detection rate, and clinical stage at diagnosis. Program/Policy process: We met regularly with cancer policy leaders in the Ministry of Health (MOH) and Rwanda Biomedical Centre (RBC) to share findings, identify successes and challenges and build support. Clinicians trained through the project have been invited to serve as national trainers in CBE and contribute to national cancer strategy discussions. Outcomes: Trainings significantly improved knowledge and skills among trainees and increased the number of patients with breast concerns at HCs and the hospital. There was an increase in the proportion of patients with benign disease and the number of needed ultrasounds and biopsies. HCs and the hospital were able to accommodate the increased volume without compromising other services. We had limited power to assess the impact on cancer stage, but noted a nonsignificant increase in incidence of early stage disease among patients referred by intervention HCs. We are now working with MOH/RBC in planning scale-up of the program to other districts and identify a strategy of diagnostic breast ultrasound at the DH level to facilitate evaluation of patients referred from HCs. What was learned: A strategy to promote earlier detection of symptomatic breast cancer was feasible in a rural Rwandan district, effectively strengthened health system capacity to care for patients with breast concerns, and suggests promising impact on patient outcomes. Engagement of key stakeholders in implementation science can help foster evidence-based national cancer control policy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tecla Chelagat ◽  
James Rice ◽  
Joseph Onyango ◽  
Gilbert Kokwaro

Introduction: The provision of health care services in Kenya was devolved from the national government to the counties in 2013. Evidence suggests that health system performance in Kenya remains poor. The main issue is poor leadership resulting in poor health system performance. However, most training in Kenya focuses on “leaders” (individual) development as opposed to “leadership” training (development of groups from an organization). The purpose of that study was to explore the impact of leadership training on health system performance in selected counties in Kenya.Methods: A quasi-experimental time-series design was employed. Pretest, posttest control-group design was utilized to find out whether the leadership development program positively contributed to the improvement of health system performance indicators compared with the non-trained managers. Questionnaires were administered to 31 trained health managers from the public, private for-profit, and private not-for-profit health institutions within the same counties.Results: The pretest and posttest means for all the six health system (HS) pillar indicators of the treatment group were higher than those of the control group. The regression method to estimate the DID structural model used to calculate the “fact” and “counterfactual” revealed that training had a positive impact on the intended outcome on the service delivery, information, leadership and governance, human resources, finance, and medical products with impact value ≥1 (57.2).Conclusion: The study findings support both hypotheses that trained health care management teams had a significant difference in the implementation status of priority projects and, hence, had a significant impact on health system performance indicators compared with non-trained managers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document