scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Para Pihak Yang Dirugikan Atas Penyuluhan Hukum Oleh Notaris

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Ferdiansyah Putra ◽  
Ghansham Anand
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Proper Solution ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public

<p>Pasal 15 ayat (2) huruf e Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) memberikan kewenangan bagi Notaris untuk memberikan penyuluhan hukum sehubungan dengan pembuatan akta, artinya Notaris berwenang memberikan penyuluhan hukum sehubungan dengan akta yang di buatnya. Berkaitan dengan kewenangan tersebut dapat terjadi permasalahan jika dikemudian hari penyuluhan hukum yang diberikan oleh Notaris tersebut kemudian di tindak lanjuti oleh para pihak dalam pembuatan akta namun ternyata akta tersebut dinyatakan batal dan bertentangan dengan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Penulis dalam penelitian ini ingin menelaah dan menganalisa lebih lanjut<strong> </strong>tentang bentuk penyuluhan hukum oleh Notaris serta tanggung gugat Notaris atas penyuluhan hukum yang merugikan para pihak Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau bahan hukum sekunder sedangkan pendekatan masalah dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bentuk penyuluhan hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh Notaris hanya sebatas pada hal yang berkaitan dengan pembuatan akta saja. Notaris dalam memberikan penyuluhan hukum harus memahami substansi permasalahan yang akan diberikan penyuluhan sehingga mampu memberikan solusi yang benar. Notaris hanya sebatas memberikan penyuluhan hukum kepada para pihak namun hasil akhirnya dikembalikan kepada para pihak untuk membuat perjanjian tersebut sehingga Notaris tidak dapat dimintakan tanggung gugat  atas kerugian para pihak.</p><p><em>Article 15 section 2e Legal Constitution of Notary Public Profession </em><em>(UUJN) provides authority for notary public to conduct legal counseling in related to publishing deed. In other words, notary public has authority to provide legal counseling about notarial deed. Concerning this authority, issue that might be occurred in the future is when the counseling given by notary public is regarded as breaching and the notarial deed is canceled by the court</em><em>. The present study aims to examine and elaborate further about counseling material conducted by notary public coupled with accountability of notary public in related to legal protection of aggrieved parties in related to the legal counseling conducted by notary public. The method used in the present study is a normative legal research, namely legal research which is conducted by examining the library materials or secondary law while in finding and collecting the data is done by two approaches, namely the law and conceptual approaches. The present study concluded that notary public only has authorization in conducting legal counseling concerning publication of notarial deed. Notary public in providing legal counseling shall comprehend substantial issue that is discussed in order to provide proper solution concerning the issue. Despite the outcome of the counseling will be applied or not it depends on the parties that consult to the notary public. Notary public cannot be asked for accountability for all losses that are experienced by the parties. </em><em></em></p><p> </p>

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PARA PIHAK YANG DIRUGIKAN ATAS PENYULUHAN HUKUM OLEH NOTARIS

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Ferdiansyah Putra ◽  
Ghansham Anand
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Proper Solution ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public

<p>Pasal 15 ayat (2) huruf e Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) memberikan kewenangan bagi Notaris untuk memberikan penyuluhan hukum sehubungan dengan pembuatan akta, artinya Notaris berwenang memberikan penyuluhan hukum sehubungan dengan akta yang di buatnya. Berkaitan dengan kewenangan tersebut dapat terjadi permasalahan jika dikemudian hari penyuluhan hukum yang diberikan oleh Notaris tersebut kemudian di tindak lanjuti oleh para pihak dalam pembuatan akta namun ternyata akta tersebut dinyatakan batal dan bertentangan dengan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.</p><p>Penulis dalam penelitian ini ingin menelaah dan menganalisa lebih lanjut<strong> </strong>tentang bentuk penyuluhan hukum oleh Notaris serta tanggung gugat Notaris atas penyuluhan hukum yang merugikan para pihak</p><p>Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau bahan hukum sekunder sedangkan pendekatan masalah dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual.</p><p>Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bentuk penyuluhan hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh Notaris hanya sebatas pada hal yang berkaitan dengan pembuatan akta saja. Notaris dalam memberikan penyuluhan hukum harus memahami substansi permasalahan yang akan diberikan penyuluhan sehingga mampu memberikan solusi yang benar. Notaris hanya sebatas memberikan penyuluhan hukum kepada para pihak namun hasil akhirnya dikembalikan kepada para pihak untuk membuat perjanjian tersebut sehingga Notaris tidak dapat dimintakan tanggung gugat  atas kerugian para pihak.</p><p><em>Article 15 section 2e Legal Constitution of Notary Public Profession </em><em>(UUJN) provides authority for notary public to conduct legal counseling in related to publishing deed. In other words, notary public has authority to provide legal counseling about notarial deed. Concerning this authority, issue that might be occurred in the future is when the counseling given by notary public is regarded as breaching and the notarial deed is canceled by the court</em><em>.</em></p><p><em>The present study aims to examine and elaborate further about counseling material conducted by notary public coupled with accountability of notary public in related to legal protection of aggrieved parties in related to the legal counseling conducted by notary public. </em></p><p><em>The method used in the present study is a normative legal research, namely legal research which is conducted by examining the library materials or secondary law while in finding and collecting the data is done by two approaches, namely the law and conceptual approaches. </em></p><p><em>The present study concluded that notary public only has authorization in conducting legal counseling concerning publication of notarial deed. Notary public in providing legal counseling shall comprehend substantial issue that is discussed in order to provide proper solution concerning the issue. Despite the outcome of the counseling will be applied or not it depends on the parties that consult to the notary public. Notary public cannot be asked for accountability for all losses that are experienced by the parties. </em><em></em></p>

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP NOTARIS ATAS PEMBUATAN AKTA OLEH PENGHADAP YANG DINYATAKAN PALSU (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 385 K/PID/2006)

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitto Odie Prananda ◽  
Ghansham Anand
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Ratio Decidendi ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Public Environment

Issues that are commonly occur within notary public environment is concerning fake information given by client. Numerous clients commonly provide fake information and evidence in order to achieve their goals in making notarial deed published by notary public. This condition makes notary public alleged as party that conducting criminal act.The present research tries to analyze further about validity of notarial deed that is based on fake information or evidence provide by the client. Moreover, the present study tries to ratio decidendi of Indonesia Supreme Court No 385 K/PID/2006The method used in the present study is a normative legal research, namely legal research which is conducted by examining the library materials or secondary law while in finding and collecting the data is done by two approaches, namely the law and conceptual approaches. The present study concludes that notarial deed based on fake information or evidence provided by the client is canceled. Notary public is not obliged to examine validity of information coupled with evidence provided by the client. Furthermore, notary public is not responsible for criminal act although he/she publishes notarial deed with fake information or evidence provided by the client. Keywords: Legal Protection, Notary Public, Fake Evidence

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pencipta atas Pencatatan Suatu Ciptaan yang Sama

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riko Sulung Raharjo ◽  
M. Khoidin ◽  
Ermanto Fahamsyah
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Similar Work ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences

Copyright recognizes a declarative system in which the state automatically protects a creation after it was born without having to be preceded by registration. Article 64 of Copyrights Act Number 28 of 2014 (Copyright Act) states the registration even though it is not a necessity for the creator. This study aims to examine and analyze the legal consequences, forms of legal protection, as well as the future conception of regulations relating to the recording of a work in common by using legal research as its method. The results of the study indicate that the legal consequences on the similar work to the registration, inter alia, the abolition of the power of law for the registration of works, compensation for the creator, and criminal threats. Based on the theory of legal certainty, a provision is a form of legal certainty provided by the Copyright Law. There is a form of legal protection against the creator of the registration of the similar creation, inter alia, the abolition of the power of the law for registration the work by the court, the creator has the right to compensation, and the creator has the right to sue criminal. Based on the theory of legal protection, a provision is a form of protection provided by the Copyright Law. The future conception of the regulation of registration of creation so that it can provide legal protection against the creator through the renewal related to the addition of authority and procedures in conducting checks for ministers in the case of the registration of creation since it was first realized and announced. Based on the theory of legal certainty and the benefits of law, change and renewal can provide legal certainty and legal benefit for the creator and his creation. Keywords: Creator, Recording of Creations, Same Creations

scholarly journals Legal Protection for Buyers in Buying and Selling with Counterfeit Certificate Object

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-144
Author(s):  
Putu Satria Fajar Purwanta ◽  
I Made Suwitra ◽  
Ketut Kasta Arya Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Future ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Law

The lack of precision between the buyer and the land deed official is a factor in the emergence of the uncertainty of the law against the certificate issue. In addition, the seller also intentionally does not notify that there is a defect in the certificate that causes the buyer to suffer a loss. It needs the protection of the buyer acting in good faith so that in the future no longer appears dispute regarding the certificate of a double or false which is used as the object of buying and selling. This study aims to know the certainty of the law, the transfer of rights over the land and the form of the legal protection of the buyer acting in good faith in buying and selling with counterfeit certificate object. The method used in this study is normative legal research. In addition, the legal materials are obtained by using a literature study. The results of this study showed that the transfer of rights over the counterfeit certificate object causes legal uncertainty because there is a violation of article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely the agreement and skills that can be requested for cancellation, the form of the legal protection of the buyer acting in good faith in the form of protection repressive where such protection can be provided in the form of criminal sanctions, administrative and civil to the seller.

LEGAL PROTECTION FOR ILLEGAL INDONESIAN WORKER IN MALAYSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asnu Fayakun Arohmi
Keyword(s):  
Migrant Workers ◽  
Migrant Worker ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
State Budget ◽  
Indonesian Government ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
The Law

This research examines the legal protection provided for illegal Indonesian workers in Malaysia and the obstacles to perform it. Malaysia are the largest number compared to another country in Asia in receiving migrant workers from Indonesia. In total there are 73.178 migrant workers. A large number of Indonesian migrant workers is caused by the lack of jobs vacancy in the country, so citizens look for a job abroad. The requirements to become Indonesian migrant workers are not easy, therefore many of them went abroad illegally. Illegal Indonesian workers often get inhuman treatment. Indonesian goverment should protect every citizen, even though they are illegal workers, since they are still Indonesian citizen. This paper is based on normative-empirical legal research with the data obtained from interviews, as well as from secondary sources provided in laws governing these matters, journals or from trusted sites of internet. The results of this study show that: first, the Law No. 18 of 2017 on Protection of Migrant Worker does not differentiate the protection for illegal and legal Indonesian migrant workers. Second, there are two obstacles faced by the Indonesian government: lack of data regarding the illegal Indonesian workers and lack of state budget to handle the protection of illegal Indonesian workers.

scholarly journals Kekuatan Hukum Pelekatan Sidik Jari Penghadap Oleh Notaris Pada Minuta Akta

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Wulan Wiryantari Dewi ◽  
Ibrahim R
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
The People ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Legal Consequences

The notary's role is to provide legal protection to the people who use his services. The presence of a Notary is indispensable for the community concerned to hold a legal relationship with other individuals so that the Notary may also be liable. In the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter c of the Amendment Law, it is stipulated that in carrying out his position, the Notary is required to attach fingerprints on the minutes of the deed, giving rise to various polemics, because the said provisions do not stipulate further if in this case the smoker suffers from finger defects or events that result in damage to fingerprints which makes the investigator unable to put his fingerprint. The purpose of this research is to find out how the efforts that can be done by a notary against those who are unable to put fingerprints and the legal consequences of the absence of fingerprints against the strength of the deed. This research is a type of normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that efforts can be made by a notary if there are those who suffer from finger defects or experience events that cause fingerprint damage so that they cannot attach their fingerprints to the minutes of the deed, the relevant Notary can explain the matter at the end of the deed. he made it because the fingerprints attached to the address are an act that is required to a notary that can lead to administrative sanctions as contained in the Amendment Law. Due to the legal absence of fingerprints attached to the strength of the deed that is the deed made by the relevant Notary Public remains an authentic deed even though the fingerprints of the tappers are not attached based on Article 1869 of the Civil Code and the deed is valid and legally binding as long as the provisions contained in Article 1320 are fulfilled Civil Code.

scholarly journals The Certainty And Legal Protection To The Buyer's Auction Of The Mortgage Right Object On Online Auctions At The Service Of Wealth State Office And Auction (KPKNL)

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 481
Author(s):  
Arif Budi Pamungkas ◽  
Djauhari Djauhari
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Online Auctions ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Office ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Way

An auction is an activity of selling of goods in public by means of a verbal-bid to get the higher price or to get lower prices and the price quote can be done in a closed and written. This is done by the way of collecting the prospective buyers of the auction led by officials of the auction. In this case, the intended auction was the sale of goods that are held publicly. The auction, according to the regulations of security right, is when the debtor made a breach, the holder of the security rights have the right to sell the security rights’ objects over its own power through a public auction as well as taking payment of account receivable from the sale proceeds. An auction is an alternative to the sale of an undertaken asset by way of inviting prospective buyers at a particular time and place in which the last highest bidder in writing or orally is determined as the winner. The author used socio-legal research as his research method. To meet the forth standards set by the law, the auction should be widely announced to the public, either through printed file, electronic or visual. A legal certainty as a basis which concerned with propriety and justice is very closely related to the principle of auction sales in another. As the formulation of the problem of the form of identification of the problem, namely how the legal protection of the auction buyers encountered the obstacles as well as the solution.Keywords: Auction; Legal Protection; Mortgage Right

scholarly journals Imunitas Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Membuka Rahasia Jabatan

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Rita Permanasari ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Political ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Law Regulation

ABSTRAKKetentuan Pasal 4 dan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris mewajibkan notaris untuk menjaga kerahasiaan segala sesuatu mengenai akta yang dibuatnya dan segala keterangan yang diperoleh guna pembuatan akta sesuai dengan sumpah janji jabatan kecuali undang-undang menentukan lain. Kemungkinan terhadap pelanggaran kewajiban tersebut berdasarkan Pasal 16 ayat (11) Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, seorang notaris dapat dikenai sanksi berupa teguran lisan sampai dengan pemberhentian dengan tidak hormat. Terlebih lagi dengan adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia dengan Nomor: 49/PUU–X/2012 memutuskan telah meniadakan atau mengakhiri kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) yang tercantum dalam Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN membuat notaris seakan-akan tidak ada perlindungan hukum bagi notaris dalam menjalankan tugas jabatannya. Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (INI) harus berusaha menjalankan peranan pembinaan dan perlindungan meningkatkan pengetahuan, kemampuan dan keterampilan para notaris. Demikian juga menjalin hubungan dengan para penegak hukum lainnya, agar penegak hukum lainnya yang ada hubungan dengan notaris dapat memahami kedudukan notaris sesuai UUJN.Berangkat dari pemikiran inilah kewajiban ingkar notaris masih tetap dipertahankan oleh pembuat undang-undang dalam revisi Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Tahun 2014 yang merupakan konfigurasi kekuatan perlindungan terhadap profesi dan jabatan notaris dari sisi politik.Kata Kunci : Jabatan Notaris, Hak Ingkar, Perlindungan Hukum.ABSTRACTThe provisions of Article 4 and Article 16 paragraph (1) sub-paragraph f of the Notary's Office Law require a notary to maintain the confidentiality of all matters concerning the deeds it has made and all the information obtained for the deed in accordance with the oath of pledge of office except the law otherwise. The possibility of breach of such obligation under Article 16 paragraph (11) of Notary Law Regulation, a notary public may be subject to sanctions in the form of oral reprimands until dismissal with disrespect. Moreover, with the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia with the number : 49 /PUU-X/2012 deciding to have canceled or terminated the authority of the Regional Supervisory Board (MPD) listed in Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN made a notary as if there was no legal protection for a notary in performing duties. The Indonesian Notary Bond (INI) should endeavor to undertake the role of guidance and protection to increase the knowledge, abilities and skills of the notaries. Likewise establish relationships with other law enforcers, so that other law enforcement who has relationship with the notary can understand the position of notary under the UUJN.Departing from this thought the obligation of notarization is still maintained by the lawmakers in the revision of the Law Regulation of Position Notary on Year 2014 which is the configuration of the strength of the protection of the profession and the notary's position from the political side.Keyword : Position of Notary, Right of Remedy, Legal Protection.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pekerja Dengan Perjanjian Kerja Tidak Tertulis pada Perusahaan Pemberi Kerja

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-162
Author(s):  
Robertus Berli Puryanto ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Work Relations ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Labor is something that is needed by an employing company in carrying out its economic activities. This can be seen in the constitutional arrangements of the Republic of Indonesia in Article 27 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In the implementation of the working relationship between workers and the employing company, there are several rights and obligations that must be fulfilled between the two parties. Because there are provisions regarding work agreements that are differentiated based on the form of the agreement, each worker has different rights where these rights must be guaranteed by the company based on law. From this, the problems that will be examined are legal protection for workers with an unwritten work agreement at the employing company, as well as legal remedies that can be taken by workers with an unwritten agreement in the event of a violation of rights by the company. The research method used is normative legal research, namely legal research conducted by examining existing library materials. By examining problems by looking at existing regulations, and describing problems that occur in practice or in everyday life in society. From the research conducted, it was found that legal protection for workers with an unwritten work agreement at the employing company is regulated based on Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower where the basis is that the applicable work agreement is an indefinite work agreement so that the rights obtained under the provisions of the law. Then efforts that can be made if there is a violation of the law in work relations is based on Law Number 20 of 2004 concerning Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement, namely in the form of Bipartite, Tripartite (Mediation, Consoliation and Arbitration) negotiations, as well as through Trials at the Industrial Relations Court.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERUSAHAAN FACTOR DALAM PENAGIHAN PIUTANG DAGANG PADA TRANSAKSI ANJAK PIUTANG (FACTORING)

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Accounts Receivable ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Law

Research in connection with jurnal writing thesis takes the theme the protection of the law against companies factor in billing accounts receivable factoring transactions. Problems studied involves two things; the first what factors the company’s legal position as a buyer on receivables in factoring and financing institution both what form of legal protection that can be given to companies factor of a possible failure of the trade receivables collection. This includes research conducted legal research categories, namely normative legal research literature or legal research based on secondary data. The approach used is the approach ot the laws and facts approach. Next to for further analysis techniques use the description legal interpretation techniques based argumentative theory, principles, and concepts relevan laws. The results showed that the company,s legal position as a purchaser of  factoring receivables is very weak and vulnerable than risk the possibility of failure of collection of accounts receivable due to non fulfillment of the achievements by the customer. In this context there is no guarantee of  legal protection for the company for the payment or refund factor its receivables in full. The next from legal protection that can be given to the factor as a buyer of receivables is; a) apply the type of recourse factoring in the factoring agreement with the burden of responsibility is on the client in case of failure of collection of accounts receivable, b) implement a system of personal/corporate guarantees, and c) apply the prudential banking principles

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document