scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Penyewa terhadap Objek Hak Tanggungan yang Dibebani Hak Sewa

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 404-408
Author(s):  
I Made Adi Saputra ◽  
A.A Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Third Party ◽  
District Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
The Public ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
Special Power ◽  
The Right

As a business entity collecting money from the public and channeling it back to the public, the bank principle stipulates that collateral is required to provide credit to customers. The legal problem related to the bank studied in this study is that the object leased by the debtor to a third party is not with the knowledge of the creditor, whose final object is the executable mortgage. This study examines the legal protection for tenants related to executed mortgage objects and what the procedures for implementing the leased mortgage object are. This research was conducted using a normative legal research design with a legislation study approach. The legislative approach is realized by examining the problems (legal problems) that are being faced. The research results reveal that the legal protection for tenants related to the leased mortgage object can be seen from the regulation of Article 1576 BW, which stipulates that tenants can retain their rights on the grounds that the seller is not permitted to cancel the lease, but shall only defend their rights and the lessee with compensation for the end of the lease relationship. Legal protection demands that the lessee in relation to the lease appears because the lessee has neglected its performance as referred to in Article 1550 BW. The procedure for executing an object of mortgage bearing lease rights begins with filing an application and ends with execution. Requests for execution are made by submitting an application directly to the Head of the District Court by attaching a photocopy of court decisions (District Court decisions and / or Supreme Court decisions) which have permanent legal force. The party having the right to request execution is the party declared superior in the content of the court decision, either personally or through the lawyer, accompanied by a special power of attorney.

scholarly journals Third Party Legal Protection in the Cooperation Agreement for Purchasing Company Assets (Analysis of the Decision of the Mataram High Court Number: 10 / PDT / 2018 / PT. MTR)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Michael Anshori ◽  
Zainal Asikin ◽  
Djumardin Djumardin
Keyword(s):  
Wildlife Conservation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Third Party ◽  
District Court ◽  
Cooperation Agreement ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
High Court ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
A Company

This study aims to determine the legal protection of third parties and analyze the legal protection of the parties and the position of the parties in the Cooperation agreement to purchase assets of companies owned by PT. Wildlife Conservation. This type of research is normative legal research, with the approach used is the legislative approach, conceptual approach and Case study approach. Position of the parties in the Cooperation agreement to purchase assets of a company owned by PT. Biodiversity Tourism, in the Deed of Cooperation Agreement Number 81. Based on the Deed of the Cooperation Agreement the Rights and Obligations of the Parties are subject to the Agreement made by the parties before a Notary. Because of the third party's legal protection in the Cooperation Agreement No. 81 is not contradictory to the provisions of Article 1338, then legally it is the legal basis for filing a default lawsuit at the Mataram District Court, the Mataram High Court.

scholarly journals The Certainty And Legal Protection To The Buyer's Auction Of The Mortgage Right Object On Online Auctions At The Service Of Wealth State Office And Auction (KPKNL)

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 481
Author(s):  
Arif Budi Pamungkas ◽  
Djauhari Djauhari
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Online Auctions ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Office ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Way

An auction is an activity of selling of goods in public by means of a verbal-bid to get the higher price or to get lower prices and the price quote can be done in a closed and written. This is done by the way of collecting the prospective buyers of the auction led by officials of the auction. In this case, the intended auction was the sale of goods that are held publicly. The auction, according to the regulations of security right, is when the debtor made a breach, the holder of the security rights have the right to sell the security rights’ objects over its own power through a public auction as well as taking payment of account receivable from the sale proceeds. An auction is an alternative to the sale of an undertaken asset by way of inviting prospective buyers at a particular time and place in which the last highest bidder in writing or orally is determined as the winner. The author used socio-legal research as his research method. To meet the forth standards set by the law, the auction should be widely announced to the public, either through printed file, electronic or visual. A legal certainty as a basis which concerned with propriety and justice is very closely related to the principle of auction sales in another. As the formulation of the problem of the form of identification of the problem, namely how the legal protection of the auction buyers encountered the obstacles as well as the solution.Keywords: Auction; Legal Protection; Mortgage Right

scholarly journals Selling Authorization Legal Agreement Status Will Be Weighed Against Collateral Mortgage (Case Study PT. Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk.)

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 823
Author(s):  
Rian Dwi Anggoro ◽  
Umar Ma'ruf
Keyword(s):  
Home Ownership ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Mortgage Loan ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Loan Repayment ◽  
Survey Results ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
Branch Office ◽  
The Right

This study aims to determine why the binding of collateral in the process of granting subsidized housing loans in PT. Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk. Pekalongan branch office is not binding perfectly implemented using the security rights, the legal position of the agreement of power sold to the collateral to be encumbered encumbrance in the process of providing subsidized credit facilities, and a form of legal protection for authorizing the use of certificate authority to sell. This study uses empirical juridical approach or Socio Legal Research. Data collected through literature, observation and interviews. The survey results revealed that the cause of non-performance perfect binding manner using the right mortgage loan process dala subsidized home ownership in PT. Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk. Pekalongan branch office is due to the type of housing loan subsidies are certain types of loans are regulated in the legislation which the binding process is limited to a power of attorney install security rights. On the basis of these reasons the bank asked the Notary / PPAT can issue certificates aimed at selling power if the debtor defaults, the creditor as the bank can make the sale to get the loan repayment. However, if the power of attorney install security rights has been upgraded to the Agreement of Encumbrances Encumbrance and has been registered to receive the certificate Encumbrance the collateral execution process should be subject to the laws Mortgage. Making the notarized agreement of power selling is a form of legal protection for the debtor as the authorizer.Keywords: Authorization Agreement Sell; Collateral Will Be Charged Mortgage; Credit Homeownership Subsidies.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR PEMEGANG HAK TANGGUNGAN TERHADAP SENGKETA AGUNAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN BATALNYA PERJANJIAN KREDIT

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Fransisca Kusuma Aryani ◽  
Gunawan Djajaputra
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Third Party ◽  
District Court ◽  
Good People ◽  
Warning Letter ◽  
The Law ◽  
Debt Repayment ◽  
Credit Agreement

The process of granting credit with the guarantee of Mortgage Rights experienced many obstacles, one of which is the cancellation of credit agreement due to a lawsuit from a third party. Examples of problems that will researchers take is a case between PT PNM as creditor and Erlinawati as a debtor. Erlinawati applied for credit to PT PNM and pledged SHM No. 1716 without her husband's agreement, Bagus Satriya. As time went by, Erlinawati could not fulfill its obligations as stipulated in the credit agreement, and then PT PNM sent a warning letter to Erlinawati. Good people who know the land and buildings of his property are used as a direct guarantee to file a lawsuit to the Blora District Court. The Blora District Court ruled that credit agreements and Deed of Mortgage Rights (APHT) are invalid and null and void. So far the legal protection for debtors who have sued from the other party on the guarantee given by the creditor has not been regulated specially in the legislation. The law only regulates bad debts and debt repayment through the execution process stipulated in the Law on Banking and Insurance Rights Act. Legal protection that creditor can use when obtaining a lawsuit from a third party is by using the general guarantees provided for in Articles 1131 and 1132 of the Civil Code.

scholarly journals PEMBATASAN HAK ATAS INFORMASI ELEKTRONIK DALAM YURISDIKSI CYBERSPACE

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-54
Author(s):  
Muh Effendi
Keyword(s):  
Virtual World ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Security ◽  
Use Of Technology ◽  
Right To Information ◽  
The Right ◽  
Thesis Writing

Writing this thesis aims to find out the form of legal protection and restrictions on the right to information that can be done in cyberspace. Because of the rapid advances in technology, there are also more problems that arise from this virtual world, this is the background of this thesis writing because it is very important to know what can and should not be done according to laws governing the world this virtual. Some countries, including Indonesia, restrict the right to electronic information, although this kind of regulation, both formally and materially, is contrary to the rights of individuals to privacy and information, but there are other people's rights that also need to be protected and state security that must be protected. The birth of law number 11 of 2008 which was revised to law number 19 of 2016 is clear evidence of the limitation of the right to information in Indonesia, because Indonesia upholds human rights but with this law Indonesia also aims to maintain security or country stability. The conclusion reached is: that the state protects the right to information and the use of technology but is also obliged to protect the public interest from all kinds of disturbances arising from misuse of information, especially through electronic media that disturb public order, or so-called jurisdiction.

scholarly journals Legal Protection of the Registered Trademark Owner in the Constitutive System (First to File) in Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 06014
Author(s):  
Raden Murjiyanto
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Registered Trademark ◽  
The Right

Since the enactment of Law Number 19 of 1992 on Trademarks that had been amended last with the enactment of Law Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks, it applies the Constitutive System (First to File) which is a change from the old system of the Declarative System (First to Use). Therefore, the legal protection is determined by a registration. However, there are still many lawsuit cases of trademark cancellation. Based on the Constitutive System, the right is granted to the first registrant. Some cases are based on a lawsuit from a party who feels as the owner of the trademark, but registered by another party. The research study, titled Legal Protection of the Registered Trademark Owner in the Constitutive System (First to File) in Indonesia, based on the problem: the first problem is how is the form of legal protection of registered trademark owner in the Constitutive System in Indonesia? The second problem is why with the Constitutive System are there still many trademarks that have not been registered? The research method used normative research method, by reviewing the documents, court decisions and applicable legislation.

scholarly journals LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST SALE AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT OF BUILDING USE TITLE IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
I Nyoman Gede Murdiana ◽  
A.A.A.N Sri Rahayu Gorda
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Case Study Approach ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Absolute Power ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
Buy Back

An agreement will not always be able to run according to the agreement of the parties. Certain conditions can be found, such as, the occurrence of various things that result in an agreement cannot be implemented, namely the buy-back right by the seller which has been agreed upon and results in losses for the buyer and on a court decision that sentences the seller to carry out the agreement seven days after the verdict, but the implementation of the sale and purchase agreement has not yet been carried out. This paper examines the legal protection for the buyer against the sale and purchase agreement for building use rights in terms of default. This type of research is a normative juridical legal research applying a case study approach and statue approach. The preventive legal protection for the buyer, namely legal protection is by requesting for irrevocable power of attorney, referred to as absolute power of attorney. Meanwhile, repressive legal protection is legal protection after the occurrence of a dispute, namely based on the consideration of a judge's decision which can provide a sense of certainty and justice to the aggrieved buyer.   Suatu perjanjian tidak selamanya akan dapat berjalan sesuai dengan kesepakatan para pihak. Kondisi tertentu dapat ditemukan terjadinya berbagai hal yang berakibat suatu perjanjian tidak dilaksanakan yaitu dengan hak membeli kembali oleh penjual yang telah disepakati dan mengakibatkan kerugian bagi pihak pembeli dan atas putusan pengadilan yang menghukum pihak penjual untuk melaksanakan perjanjian tujuh hari setelah putusan, akan tetapi pelaksanaan perjanjian jual beli tersebut belum juga terlaksana. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Perlindungan hukum secara preventif bagi pihak pembeli yaitu perlindungan hukum yaitu permintaaan pemberian kuasa yang tidak dapat ditarik kembali yang disebut surat kuasa mutlak. Sedangkan perlindungan hukum secara represif adalah perlindungan hukum setelah terjadinya sengketa yaitu berdasarkan pertimbangan putusan hakim yang bisa memberikan rasa kepastian dan keadilan terhadap pembeli yang dirugikan.

scholarly journals Self-representation of the legal sentity in gourt in accordance with theeхіsting legisla- tion

2021 ◽  
pp. 128-132
Author(s):  
L.A. Kondratyeva
Keyword(s):  
Complete List ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Labor Contract ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The People ◽  
Administrative Code ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Entities

The article is dedicated to the research of the institution of representation in courts, in particular self-representation of the legal entity. This problem has become relevant in connection with the changes in the Constitution of Ukraine under which was introduced so-called monopoly of the attorney. Such changes provide for representation in court solely by attorneys exception of cases listed in articles 131-2 Constitution of Ukraine. At the same time physical persons and the legal entities can represent themselves independently. To that end in the procedural law introduces the concept of self-representation that is the representation different from the attorney representation. The concept of self-representation is enshrined in code of civil procedure art.58, code of commercial procedure art. 56, administrative code art. 55. With the promulgation of Law of Ukraine “On the amendment of some legal acts of Ukraine regarding expansion of possibilities of self-representation in court of the public bodies, authorities of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, local authorities, other legal entities regardless of the order of creation” dated December 18, 2019 №390-IX significantly expanded circle of persons that can represent legal entity in accordance with the self-representation. According to the author such legislative position establishes the right to represent legal entity in the court not only by the director or by member of the Executive Committee of the legal entity but also by the people who are in an employment relationship. The author considers despite the legal certainty of the norms of Law №390-IX it contains no complete list of persons that can undertake self-representation and the complete list of required documents that is necessary to provide the court. The author suggests which documents can confirm the authorization of the person that exercise self-representation of the legal entity. According to the author self-representation of the legal entity includes participation of the representative of the legal entity which has direct relationship to the legal entity and its powers already exist by internal documents in particular by labor contract. Regarding the attorney representation of the legal entity it arises by force of power of attorney. The author also claims that personal participation in the proceedings which provides self-representation of the legal entity doesn’t waive the right of the legal entity to have the representative in the case i.e. the attorney.

scholarly journals Authorization Entities (Legal Guarantee Review)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Hari Wibisono ◽  
H. Moch. Isnaeni ◽  
Endang Prasetyawati
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Bank Credit ◽  
Direct Power ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Business Transactions ◽  
Doing Business ◽  
Special Power ◽  
Credit Contracts ◽  
Ultimate Purpose ◽  
Made In

The guarantee agreement for guarantee rights is flexible to be implemented, it does not have to be carried out alone by the party that guarantees it. If represented, it is made in the form of SKMHT that must be made in a notarial deed or PPAT deed. If it follows the provisions in Article 15 of the UUHT, credit is a daily necessity for the community both in the context of meeting consumption needs and in terms of doing business in various business fields, compared also with bank credit contracts as stated by Kevin Kogin. Today's business transactions move quickly and increasingly involve all elements of society as a business. The ultimate purpose of the prohibition of the Power of Attorney Imposing Mortgage Rights (SKMHT) as a special power of attorney is to provide legal protection to creditors. SKMHT is a special power of attorney that can only be controlled by the direct power of attorney because it is only related to the power of making APHT with a creditor in the presence of PPAT. If the power of attorney is substituted, it will make creditors difficult if there is a dispute to conduct legal relations because there are too many parties to be able to connect directly with the debtor. In addition, if it is substituted, the creditor will lose his rights and position as the preferred creditor to the receivables that have been given to the debtor.

scholarly journals Health Workers' Legal Protection Policy to the Coronavirus Disease 19 (Covid-19) Containment Measures

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-74
Author(s):  
Hafrida Hafrida ◽  
Helmi Helmi ◽  
Retno Kusniati
Keyword(s):  
Health Worker ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Public Place ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Development ◽  
Containment Measures ◽  
The Right

This research aims to analyze protection policies for health workers amidst COVID-19. Through statute approach and based on the rights theory, this study examines legal development, or legal framework is needed to formulate and to protect health worker. Since the COVID-19 outbreak spreads quickly and massively, Health worker is at the forefront of handling COVID-19, but they are also vulnerable to get infected by the virus. Some cases showed that many health workers tested positive after providing health services. The findings of the research showed that the right of medical workers to get personal protective equipment and safety guarantees were not enough to protect them. On the other hand, the community was still ignoring the risk of this disease and broke the health protocol in the public place. Health workers can perform their job effectively if people are in healthy condition and do not need to go to the hospital. To containment measures of the COVID-19 State has to choose one of the effective ways to protect people and health workers by regulating and giving a penalty to the perpetrators of the COVID-19 protocol.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document