Mekanisme Impeachment Presiden dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia

In the course of the Indonesian Constitution, the president has been dismissed four times. This is the cause of the dispute between the two state institutions, namely the Representative Council (DPR) and the President. However, after reformation, the process of dismissing the President had to go through several stages. Based on these problems, this study aims to analyze the impeachment mechanism of the President in the Indonesian constitutional system and to find out the consequences of the Constitutional Court's legal decisions upon the DPR's request. This research uses the normative type by looking at the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia concerning impeachment. The data sources used were law and documentation. Then, all data is processed and analyzed with deductive-inductive legal arguments. The results showed that before the reformation, government power was very large and centralized, giving birth to an undemocratic government, and the impeachment process of the President used political rather than juridical reasons. However, after the reform era, the regulation was made clear by the changes to the three 1945 Constitution that gave birth to a new institution, namely the Constitutional Court, automatically the post-reform Impeachment must go through a new legal institution after that a political institution

Download Full-text

Karakter Final Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Melaksanakan Kewenangan Sesuai Pasal 24C Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha ◽

10.47532/jirk.v3i1.171 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 105-119

Author(s):

Zuhro Nuridahwati

Keyword(s):

Constitutional Court ◽

Final Decision ◽

State Institutions ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

The Reformation ◽

General Elections ◽

Strategic Position ◽

The Republic ◽

The Government ◽

Main Center

The Constitutional Court is within the scope of the Judicial Power and occupiesa strategic position in the Indonesian constitutional structure. MK as one of the stateinstitutions that was born from the reformation in 1998. MK as a judicial institution hasa very important and strategic task, said to be the sole interpreter of the Republic ofIndonesia's state constitution. Article 24C paragraph (1), of the 1945 Constitution of theRepublic of Indonesia, the Constitutional Court has the authority to adjudicate at the firstand last level the final decision to review the law against the Constitution, to decide ondisputes over the authority of state institutions whose authority is granted by theConstitution, to decide upon the dissolution of parties politics, and decide upon disputesabout the results of general elections. The results of the study and analysis, the provisionsof the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Law Number 24 Year 2003,found legal issues that become legal problems faced by the Constitutional Court, arerelated to their position, competence, and form of decisions, which often makes legalcertainty uncertain or absurd, and conflicts norm, it is very interesting to be studied as acentral theme of the dissertation. Understanding the Position, indicating the position anddegree of the Constitutional Court between state institutions and between the SupremeCourt and the Constitutional Court, while competency shows the competency boundarybetween the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, which has attributie authority,first and foremost authority, born from the format of the government system and thedistribution of state power . Attributie authority as the first and main center forresponsibility and at the same time the basis of delegating authority in the form of delegatie.

Download Full-text

The constitutional court function of the Indonesian state concerning system for the implementation impeachment of the president and/or vice president

Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist ◽

10.35326/volkgeist.v4i2.496 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

pp. 118-127

Author(s):

H Muhamad Rezky Pahlawan MP

Keyword(s):

House Of Representatives ◽

Vice President ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

History Of ◽

Three Stages ◽

The Republic ◽

Constitutional System

Impeachment is an accusation or indictment of the President or another country's high officials from his position. Impeachment is not new in the history of Indonesian constitution, but the change in the Constitution has caused a change in the constitutional system as well as related to the mechanism of the dismissal of the President and / or Vice President. how is the Impeachment reviewed globally, the history of impeachment in Indonesia and the implementation of impeachment in other countries, the impeachment process of the president according to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The process of impeachment in Indonesia after changing the constitution goes through three stages, namely impeachment in the House of Representatives, the Court The Constitution, and the People's Consultative Assembly. Keywords: Impeachment, Constitutional Court, Government

Download Full-text

II Constitutional Jurisprudence, 5 Powers and Conflicts

10.1093/law/9780190214555.003.0005 ◽

2016 ◽

Author(s):

Barsotti Vittoria ◽

Carozza Paolo G ◽

Cartabia Marta ◽

Simoncini Andrea

Keyword(s):

Separation Of Powers ◽

Case Law ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Reciprocal Relations ◽

The Republic ◽

Constitutional System ◽

Constitutional Jurisprudence ◽

The Relationship ◽

Principal Lines

By presenting the Court’s principal lines of case law regarding the allocation of powers in the Italian constitutional system, this chapter explores the constitutionally regulated relationships among the President, Executive, Parliament, and Judiciary. It reveals that rather than a “separation of powers” in the conventional sense of contemporary constitutional models, the Italian system is best described as instituting a set of reciprocal “relations of powers” with the Constitutional Court as the “judge of powers” that maintains and guarantees these interrelationships of constitutional actors. The chapter explores this role of the Constitutional Court in its relations with both Parliament and the President of the Republic, as well as the Court’s regulation of the relationship between the President and the Executive.

Download Full-text

Dynamics of Selection of Regional Heads in Indonesia in the Reformation Era

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics ◽

10.14505/jarle.v11.4(50).45 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 11 (4) ◽

pp. 1490

Author(s):

Fifiana WISNAENI

Keyword(s):

Political Parties ◽

Central Government ◽

Positive Impact ◽

National Development ◽

The Reformation ◽

The Republic ◽

The Government ◽

Constitutional System ◽

Regional Elections ◽

Selection Of

The regional head as the organizer of the government in the region is also an extension of the central government, has a pretty heavy task, therefore in order for the State's goals to be achieved, regional heads must be chosen that are truly credible, qualified and qualified, so that it can bring success to regional development in carrying out government affairs as mandated by the Act, which will ultimately have a positive impact, in the form of support for national development. This research is intended to examine, criticize and analyze which are expected to provide solutions related to the development of the authority to form laws in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia. The formulation of the problem in this study are the dynamics of regional elections in Indonesia in the reformation era and the implications of the dynamics of regional elections in the Indonesian constitutional system. The method of approach used in this study is normative juridical, which is an approach that uses the positivist concept which states that law is identical with written norms created and enacted by authorized institutions or officials. The dynamics of regional head elections in Indonesia in the Reformation era include the conditions for pairs of candidates for regional head elections and the mechanism for regional head elections. Pairs of regional head candidates must be proposed by political parties or a combination of eligible political parties.

Download Full-text

Menyoal Kebebasan Beragama dan Penodaan Agama Di Indonesia

JURNAL CITA HUKUM ◽

10.15408/jch.v2i2.2314 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

pp. 195-212

Author(s):

Yayan Sopyan

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Judicial Review ◽

Religious Beliefs ◽

Freedom Of Expression ◽

Freedom Of Speech ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Constitutional Rights ◽

Reform Era ◽

The Republic ◽

The Right

Abstract: Questioning the Religious Freedom and blasphemy in Indonesia. The presence of the Constitutional Court in the reform era is the strengthening of the foundations of constitutionalism in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945. The Court in this case a role to enforce and the protector of the citizen's constitutional rights and the protector of the human rights. Including in this case, the right to religion and religious practices and teachings of their respective religions, in accordance with the constitutional mandate. However, on the other hand there is the discourse of freedom of expression and freedom of speech includes freedom to broadcast religious beliefs and understanding of the "deviant" and against the "mainstream" religious beliefs and understanding in general, as in the case of Ahmadiyah. The Court in this case is required to provide the best attitude when faced judicial review in this case still required in addition to guarding the constitution in order to run properly. Abstrak: Menyoal Kebebasan Beragama dan Penodaan Agama di Indonesia. Kehadiran lembaga Mahkamah Konstitusi di era reformasi merupakan upaya penguatan terhadap dasar-dasar konstitusionalisme pada Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. MK dalam hal ini berperan menegakkan dan melindungi hak-hak konstitusional warga negara (the protector of the citizen’s constitutional rights) dan pelindung HAM (the protector of the human rights). Termasuk dalam hal ini, hak untuk memeluk agama dan menjalankan ibadah serta ajaran agamanya masing-masing, sesuai dengan amanat konstitusi. Namun, disisi lain ada wacana kebebasan berekspresi dan kebebasan berpendapat termasuk didalamnya kebebasan untuk menyiarkan keyakinan dan pemahaman keagamaan yang “menyimpang” dan bertentangan dengan “mainstream” keyakinan dan pemahaman keagamaan pada umumnya, seperti dalam kasus Ahmadiyah. MK dalam hal ini dituntut untuk mampu memberikan sikap terbaik saat dihadapkan judicial review dalam kasus ini selain tetap dituntut untuk mengawal konstitusi agar dapat berjalan sebagaimana mestinya. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v2i2.2314

Download Full-text

The Indonesian Constitutional System in the Post Amendement of the 1945 Constitution

Sriwijaya Law Review ◽

10.28946/slrev.vol2.iss1.109.pp45-55 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 45

Author(s):

Zen Zen Zanibar

Keyword(s):

Primary State ◽

The Reformation ◽

Presidential System ◽

The Republic ◽

Constitutional System ◽

Constitutional Changes

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia was amended for four times between 1999 and 2002) in the reformation era. These constitutional changes have altered the principles and the structure of the Indonesian primary state‟s institutions. Broadly speaking, all of the power branches – i.e. legislative, executive and judiciary organs– are now interrelated horizontally in running the country and none of them is superior to the others. Such constitu-tional system is generally found in countries that employ a presidential system. However, by reviewing the authority hold by the legislatures, it is found that some characteristics of a parlia-mentary system are also applied in Indonesia

Download Full-text

KEDUDUKAN KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM SISTEM PENYELENGGARAAN PENGAWASAN KODE ETIK HAKIM PASCA PUTUSAN MK NO 43/PUU-XIII/2015

Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani ◽

10.26623/humani.v6i2.948 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. 15

Author(s):

Heru Nuswanto ◽

Amri P. Sihotang,

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Code Of Conduct ◽

Regulatory System ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Court Ruling ◽

Basic Principles ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

The Republic ◽

Constitutional System ◽

Sense Of Justice

Kedudukan komisi yudisial sebagai pengawas system peradilan di Indonesia di rasa sangat penting untuk menjadikan system peradilan di Indonesia professional dan berintegritas. Persoalan kemudian hadir pasca putusan <a href="http://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/kegiatan/1181-putusan-mk-no-43-puu-xiii-2015-proses-seleksi-hakim-tingkat-pertama-tidak-perlu-melibatkan-ky">MK No 43/PUU-XIII/2015</a> dimana dalam putusan menjadikan Komisi Yudisial tidak lagi sebagai pihak yang ikut serta mengawasi perekrutan hakim tingkat pertama. Padahal dalam system ketatanegaraan jika lembaga komisi yudisial peran dan fungsinya dibatasi akan menjadikan mahkamah agung sebagai lembaga absolute dalam kekuasaan yudikatif..Pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi <a href="http://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/kegiatan/1181-putusan-mk-no-43-puu-xiii-2015-proses-seleksi-hakim-tingkat-pertama-tidak-perlu-melibatkan-ky"> No 43/PUU-XIII/2015</a> tidaklah menjadi penghambat Komisi Yudisial dalam melakukan penegakan kode etik. Bahkan pada sisi lain Komisi Yudisial harus mampu melakukan penerobosan penafsiran bahwa putusan tersebut semata-mata memberikan ruang dan kedudukan Komisi Yudisial untuk merespon upaya kemerdekaan kekuasaan kehakiman yang secara mandiri dan merdeka akan tetapi harus sesuai real nilai-nilai pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia dengan menempatkan Komisi Yudisial yang nantinya akan menguji idependensi hakim-hakim yang merupakan hasil seleksi dari Mahkamah Agung secara ketat dalam menjalankan tugas dan fungsinya sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip dasar kode etik yang telah telah dicanangkan sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku.Status of the Judicial Commission as the regulatory system in the sense of justice in Indonesia Sangat system makes for a review of integrity and professional judiciary in Indonesia. Present Problems then after the Constitutional Court ruling No. 43/PUU-XIII/2015 Where hearts Judicial Commission Decision making is NOT Again as parties Yang Participate oversee the recruitment of judges of first instance. Whereas hearts constitutional system if Institution Role and functions of the Judicial Commission shall be limited to make the Supreme Court as the Institute for Judicial power absolute hearts.Post a Constitutional Court decision No. 43/PUU-XIII/2015 does not become an obstacle to the Judicial Commission in enforcing the code of conduct. Even on the other side of the Judicial Commission should be able to make a breakthrough interpretation that the decision merely provides the space and the position of the Judicial Commission to respond to the efforts of the independence of judiciary is independent and free but must be corresponding real values of Pancasila and the Constitution of the Republic Indonesia by placing the Judicial Commission which will examine idependensi judges were selected from the Supreme Court strictly in performing their duties and functions in accordance with the basic principles of the code of conduct that has been implemented in accordance with the legislation in force.

Download Full-text

Analysis of Reduction of Authority of The Constitutional Court Through The Law on General Election

SHS Web of Conferences ◽

10.1051/shsconf/20185401001 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 54 ◽

pp. 01001

Author(s):

Budiman N.P.D Sinaga ◽

Sahat H.M.T Sinaga

Keyword(s):

House Of Representatives ◽

Vice President ◽

General Election ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

State Institutions ◽

General Elections ◽

The Law ◽

Election Results ◽

The Republic

In the 1945 Constitution of the Republic Indonesia, there is an order to further regulate in the Law such as the general election that has been enacted Law No. 7/ 2017 on General Election. In its Law, the results of the general election is merely a dispute over the result of the general election regarding the determination of the vote which may affect the election participants’ seats and the President and Vice President election results. The objective of this paper is to find out the legal consequences of the provisions of the law which reduce the authority of state institutions that have been regulated in the 1945 Constitution. The approach of this research is status approach that will be used by examining the laws and regulations relating to the problem. The provisions of the Law on General Elections can be said to have reduced the authority of the Constitutional Court granted the Constitution. There should be strong grounds for an amendment to this provision it can be done immediately by the House of Representatives and the President. Testing by the Constitutional Court may be done but it is better through changes by the House of Representatives and the President.

Download Full-text

Constitutional Court as Constitutional Complaint Institution: Evidence from Serbia

The Law and Development Review ◽

10.1515/ldr-2020-0013 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 0 (0) ◽

Author(s):

Konstantin Polovchenko

Keyword(s):

System Analysis ◽

Qualitative Change ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Analysis Method ◽

Judicial Control ◽

Noticeable Increase ◽

The Status ◽

Control Authority ◽

The Republic ◽

Constitutional System

AbstractA noticeable increase in the scope of powers of the constitutional supervisory body of Serbia is directly related with a qualitative change in the status of the Constitutional Court. The purpose of the article is to analyse the competences of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Serbia in protecting rights and freedoms as the most important area of its activity. The article presents a study of the increased powers of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Serbia, the purpose of which is to protect rights and freedoms. The leading method in this study is the system analysis method, which allows us to assess the significance of the constitutional complaints institution in Serbia. Studying the current regulation of the competence of the Constitutional Court of Serbia, the author concludes that the significantly expanded competence of the Constitutional Court of Serbia fully reflects its status as a constitutional body representing the fourth judicial control authority in the state. It also ensures the supremacy of the Constitution and protects the foundations of the constitutional system of Serbia, including protection of rights and freedoms in the Republic of Serbia.

Download Full-text

Perubahan Konstitusi dan Reformasi Ketatanegaraan Indonesiaa

JURNAL CITA HUKUM ◽

10.15408/jch.v2i1.1843 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Abu Tamrin

Keyword(s):

Constitutional Reform ◽

State Agency ◽

Advisory Council ◽

New Order ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Political Struggle ◽

Reform Era ◽

State Institutions ◽

The Past ◽

Basic Law

Abstract: Amendment of the Constitution and constitutional reform in Indonesia. The Constitution can be two meanings, namely: a broad sense and narrow sense. Meaning constitution means forming. Constitutional expert in Constitutional Law contains basic law is written. Act of 1945 is a formal document which is the result of political struggle in the past. In the era of the New Order Act of 1945 "sacred" so that the People's Consultative Assembly of Indonesia in the New Order era did not alter the Constitution of 1945. In the reform era to amend the Act of 1945. There was a change of articles of Law 1945. One only Article 1 (2) the first amendment of the Constitution of 1945. Sovereignty is in the people's hands and performed in accordance with the Constitution. There is a state agency that was formed, one of which the Constitutional Court and no state institutions were removed, the Supreme Advisory Council. With the change of the Constitution of 1945, then there was a constitutional reform in Indonesia Abstrak: Perubahan Konstitusi dan Reformasi Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Menurut K.C. Wheare kata konstitusi dapat menjadi 2 arti yaitu: arti luas dan arti sempit. Menurut Wirjono Projodikoro arti konstitusi berarti membentuk. Baik konstitusi maupun Undang-undang Dasar menurut Pakar Hukum Tata Negara berisi Hukum dasar tertulis. Konstitusi/Undang-undang Dasar 1945 merupakan dokumen formal yang merupakan hasil perjuangan politik bangsa di waktu lampau. Di era orde baru Undang-undang Dasar 1945 “disakralkan” sehingga Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat RI di era orde baru tidak mengubah Undangundang Dasar 1945. Di era reformasi dilakukan perubahan Undang-undang Dasar 1945. Ada perubahan pasal Undang-undang Dasar 1945. Salah satunya Pasal 1 ayat (2) perubahan pertama Undang-undang Dasar 1945.Kedaulatan ada di tangan rakyat dan dilakukan menurut Undang-undang Dasar. Ada lembaga negara yang dibentuk, salah satunya Mahkamah Konstitusi RI dan ada lembaga tinggi negara yang dihapus, yaitu Dewan Pertimbangan Agung RI.Dengan adanya perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, maka terjadi reformasi ketatanegaraan Indonesia. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v2i1.1843

Download Full-text