scholarly journals Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Warga Negara Asing yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-111
Author(s):  
Made Dwi Kurnia Dananjaya ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani

Indonesia in this era of globalization was made as a country that can include foreigners in carrying out activities in the form of industry, tourism and commerce in Indonesia. The development of technological science, allows people to be more consumptive in using it. Viewed from a psychological perspective, it is often found that foreign tourists have deviant behavior from legal norms that exist in Indonesia. One of the deviant acts is the criminal treatment of persecution of a foreign citizen to Indonesian citizens who are in the Republic of Indonesia. There is also a problem statement. The purpose of this study is to determine criminal liability and criminal sanctions given to foreign citizens who commit criminal acts of persecution. This study uses a normative method because there are still vague norms, based on the opinions of legal scholars and the Law. One person can have a personality in criminal liability if some things or actions made by someone in violating positive law, if one can eliminate the sense of responsibility in someone who found an element of a person's ability to lose responsibility.

Author(s):  
Dragan Jovašević

In 2008, the Republic of Serbia adopted a special Law on Liability of Legal Persons for Criminal Offenses. In doing so, on the basis of the international standards contained in the relevant international documents, it joined a large number of countries that introduced criminal liability of legal persons for crimes committed in addition to their responsible persons at the end of the 20th century. For legal persons, the law prescribed a disparate system of criminal sanctions in response to the state-society’s response to such unlawful and punishable conduct. The system of criminal sanctions in the law of the Republic of Serbia includes: penalties, probation and security measures. The law defined the concept, character, legal nature, manner, procedure, pronouncement and execution of criminal sanctions, whose characteristics this particular work speaks of.


TEME ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1187
Author(s):  
Darko Dimovski ◽  
Ivan Milić

In the Republic of Serbia, there are more than thirty penitentiary institutions in which convicted offenders serve their prison sentences. These are prisons of different types: closed, semi-closed and open prisons. At the same time, convicts are not the only ones placed in prisons, but also other persons deprived of their liberty by law. Apart from offenders convicted for the commission of criminal offences, these penitentiary institutions also house other persons who are lawfully deprived of liberty under the law for the commission of a misdemeanour or for the failure to pay a fine or do community service. A common feature shared by all these categories of people is the liability for the committed offence but, depending on the specific type of liability, they are subject to different treatment in penal institutions. In such circumstances, penal institutions have to take relevant measures to maintain order and security in prisons.The paper explores a number of issues related to convicts and other inmates in prisons. The authors first focus on three different types of liability: criminal liability, disciplinary liability, and material liability, which clearly imply different treatments of convicts and inmates in the course of serving their term of imprisonment. Then, the authors address the problems of maintaining order and security in prisons. Generally speaking, the law that applies to persons serving their sentences in a penal institution is the Act on the Execution of Criminal Sanctions but, depending on the committed crime, they may also be subject to the Act on the Execution of Imprisonment for Organized Crime. Thus, the authors discuss the legal solutions pertaining to this subject matter as contained in both legislative acts.


2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-144
Author(s):  
Ermek B. Abdrasulov

This article examines the issues of differentiation of legislative and subordinate regulation of public relations. It is noted that in the process of law-making activities, including the legislative process, practical questions often arise about the competence of various state bodies to establish various legal norms and rules. These issues are related to the need to establish a clear legal meaning of the constitutional norms devoted to the definition of the subject of regulation of laws. In particular, there is a need to clarify the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 61 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan in terms of the concepts "the most important public relations", "all other relations", "subsidiary legislation", as well as to establish the relationship between these concepts. Interpretation is also required by the provisions of p. 4 of Article 61 of the Constitution in terms of clarifying the question of whether the conclusion follows from mentioned provisions that all possible social relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan are subject to legal regulation, including those that are subject to other social and technical regulators (morality, national, business and professional traditions and customs, religion, standards, technical regulations, etc.). Answering the questions raised, the author emphasizes that the law and bylaws, as a rule, constitute a single system of legislation, performing the functions of primary and secondary acts. However, the secondary nature of subsidiary legislation does not mean that they regulate "unimportant" public relations. The law is essentially aimed at regulating all important social relations.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Ira Alia Maerani

This study aims to find out to know the form of violations and witnesses to the notary position based on Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary and the perspective of Islamic justice in viewing a notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in connection with an authentic deed he made.            This research uses normative law research or dogmatic law research using the doctrinal method. Normative legal research includes research on legal principles, research on legal systematics, research on vertical and horizontal synchronization stages, comparison of law and legal history.            This research concludes that the notary public is a public official who makes an authentic deed and has the authority as regulated in Article 15,16, 17 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public. The notary is obliged to act on trust; honest; independent; objective and safeguard the interests of parties involved in legal actions. Notaries in carrying out their duties and positions if convicted of violations, may be subject to sanctions or sanctions in the form of civil, administrative, and notary code of ethics in accordance with Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Positions. Even so, the Notary Position Law does not regulate criminal sanctions against Notaries. Whereas in practice there is an opportunity for a legal action or violation by a notary related to an authentic deed he made that can be qualified as a criminal offense. A notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in carrying out his authority as a Public Official, of course, must be a concern of the government and law enforcement because the law must be upheld against anyone who commits indiscriminate violations. This rule is a manifestation of the principle of "equality before the law" (equality before the law) which is a fundamental element in the concept of the rule of law. Honesty values; keep the mandate; fair; and this objective is synergistic with the values of justice in an Islamic perspective that promotes justice and problems. Described in the Qur'an An-Nisa verses 58 and 135 and QS. Al Ma'idah verse 8. Islamic law also regulates justice in recording a deed, for example just in recording accounts receivable debts (Q.S. Al Baqoroh: 282)Keywords: Islamic Perspective; Justice; Notary Public; Perpetrators; Criminal Act


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 73-80
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  

The article is dedicated to the review of the laws of the Republic of Macedonia (the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) on criminal liability of legal entities established in 2004 by introduction of amendments and supplements to the Criminal Code of the Republic of Macedonia. The article analyzes legal resolutions allowing consideration of a legal entity as a criminal liability subject; gives a scope of legal entities which can be brought to criminal liability; focuses on the fact that legal entities in the Republic of Macedonia may not be brought to criminal liability for any acts acknowledged as punishable by the national criminal laws, rather for the acts which are specifically addressed in the articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Macedonia or other criminal laws. The author reviews such types of criminal sanctions applicable to legal entities as a fine, legal entity liquidation, forfeiture and sentence publication; notes the circumstances taken into account at punishment imposition and conditions for release from punishment as well as criminal and procedural peculiarities of bringing legal entities to liability including indication of broad discretionary powers of a prosecutor in solution of issues on bringing legal entities to criminal liability.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  

The article is dedicated to review of the laws of the Republic of Slovenia on the criminal liability of legal entities; the main acts are the Special Law on the Liability of Legal Entities for Criminal Offenses of 1999 and the Criminal Code of the Republic of Slovenia. The article reviews statutory resolutions making it possible to review a legal entity as a criminal liability subject; gives a number of persons, which can be brought to criminal liability; focuses on the fact that legal entities can be brought to criminal liability in the Republic of Slovenia for a limited number of acts (crimes) defined by the law; considers criminal sanctions applicable to legal entities: fi ne, forfeiture of property, legal entity liquidation, prohibition to place securities held by a legal entity; reviews the possibility of imposition of a conditional sentence on a legal entity and the security measures applicable to legal entities, including: sentence publication and prohibition to engage in specific commercial activities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 474
Author(s):  
Elisabet . ◽  
Cut Memi

One of the authorities of the Constitutional Court governed by the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945 was the examining of laws against the contitution or judicial review. Inside the regulations which governing the implementation of this authority, the Constitutional Court only acts as a negative legislator, namely canceling or reinforcing a norm tested by the Petitioner. But in practice, the Constitutional Court has changed its role to become a positive legislator, who is forming a new legal norm, which is the authority of legislators. The Constitutional Court should not be able to form a new legal norm because there is no legal basis which regulate that. But Constitutional Court can form a new legal norm in some urgent circumstances, relating to Human Rights, and preventing legal vacuum. In addition, the establishment of laws by lawmakers that require a long process and time. This is compelling Constitutional Court to make substitute norm before the law was established by the legislators. In the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUU-XVI/2016, the Court actually wants to establish a new legal norm, but because the articles in the petitioned have criminal sanctions, and if the Constitutional Court approves the petition, the Constitutional Court has formulated a new criminal act that can only be formed by the lawmaker. Whereas in the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 21/PUU-XII/2014, the Constitutional Court established a new norm because in the article a quo there were no criminal sanctions.


Author(s):  
Ахметкали Шаймуханов

В статье рассматриваются и анализируются некоторые положения действующего оперативно-розыскного законодательства Республики Казахстан. На основе сравнительного анализа и изучения юридической литературы поднимаются проблемы, возникающие в правоприменительной деятельности при реализации отдельных положений закона. Автором вносятся предложения и рекомендации по совершенствованию правовых норм, направленные на решение задач, связанных с профилактикой, предупреждением и пресечением наиболее опасных уголовных преступлений. Мақалада Қазақстан Республикасының қолданыстағы жедел-іздестіру заңнамасының кейбір ережелері талқыланып, талданған. Салыстырмалы талдау және заң әдебиеттерін зерттеу негізінде заңның белгілі бір ережелерін жүзеге асыру кезінде құқық қорғау органдарында туындайтын проблемалар көтеріледі. Автор аса қауіпті қылмыстық құқық бұзушылықтардың алдын алуға, алдын алуға және жолын кесуге байланысты мәселелерді шешуге бағытталған құқықтық нормаларды жетілдіру бойынша ұсыныстар мен ұсыныстар енгізеді. The article discusses and analyzes some of the provisions of the current operational-search legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Based on comparative analysis and study of legal literature, the problems arising in law enforcement activities in the implementation of certain provisions of the law are raised. The author makes suggestions and recommendations for improving legal norms aimed at solving problems related to the prevention, prevention and suppression of the most dangerous criminal offences.


2021 ◽  
Vol LXXXII (2) ◽  
pp. 153-160
Author(s):  
Michał Długosz

Giving too much complex homework has become a significant social problem and the subject of unsuccessful activities of constitutional state authorities. In light of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, international agreements that Poland is bound by, as well as domestic regulations, the practice of giving homework to students seems to be unjustified or even to be in breach with numerous legal norms.


2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suwari Akhmaddhian

A defense against criminal liability of a health worker who commit criminal acts of malpractice can be argued that the criminal liability lies in the form of omission errors or omissions when power kesehatantersebut their profession . As a result of mistakes resulting in death or injury , an element of health personnel mistakes made in this case is the gross negligence or culpa lata which will be requested a defense response of the consequences of his actions . In the application of the criminal law against the perpetrators of malpractice , the application of positive law for perpetrators of malpractice contained in Article 361 and Article 359 of the Code of Criminal Law and Law no . 36 of 2009 on Health . But in the application of these articles dilemma arises in understanding the elements of negligence which measures whether the health worker negligence or not in terms of their profession , to the order of the Book  of the  Law is  being revised  Criminal Law should  regulate the issue of negligence is regulated in detail and.clear.Keywords : Health , Criminal , Malpractice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document