scholarly journals Determination Of Legal Remedies For Civil Cases To Make The Principles Of Justice Simple, Fast And Lighting Cost

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Andrianantenaina Fanirintsoa Aime ◽  
Zulfikar Dori Ad’ha
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Principles Of Justice ◽  
The Republic

One of the principles in the justice system is justice that is simple, fast and low cost. In this regard, the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) takes this matter seriously and responds to it by issuing a decree, namely TAP MPR No. VIII/MPR/2000 concerning the Annual Report of High State Institutions at the 2000 Annual Session of the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia, which one of its substances recommends that the Supreme Court immediately resolve delinquent cases by increasing the number and quality of decisions and that the Supreme Court makes regulations to limit entry cassation case. With this principle, it is necessary to conduct a study regarding the application of these principles.

scholarly journals PEMBATASAN UPAYA HUKUM PERKARA PERDATA GUNA MEWUJUDKAN ASAS PERADILAN SEDERHANA, CEPAT DAN BIAYA RINGAN

Yuridika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Bambang Sugeng Ariadi S ◽  
Johan Wahyudi ◽  
Razky Akbar
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
District Court ◽  
Annual Session ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Court Of Appeal

The most important thing for any regulation judicial principle is simple, fast and low cost is to reduce the accumulation of cases in the Supreme Court. That is because, line with the increasing increasing number of incoming cases, and also that successfully terminated in the District Court and Court of Appeal, then the incoming number of decisions in the Supreme Court also increased and began to be a serious problem. In this regard, People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) seriously consider this and responded by provisions, that is TAP MPR No. VIII/MPR/2000 about of the Annual Report of State High Institutions at the Annual Session of the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia in 2000 which one substance recommend that the Supreme Court immediately resolve pending lawsuits by increasing the number and quality of decisions and that the Supreme Court makes the rules o restrict the entry of cassation cases. Following up on the existence of the MPR decrees, he Supreme Court has issued several provisions n order to limit legal action in order to realize judicial principle is simple, fast and low cost, either in the form of the Supreme Court Rules (Perma) nor Supreme Court Circular Letter (Sema). This article is useful for know and understand how much has been the implementation judicial principle is simple, fast and low cost, in order to reduce the buildup of civil cases. 

scholarly journals Pravni položaj poštenog i nepoštenog posjednika u odnosu na vlasnika stvari

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 527-543
Author(s):  
Jadranko Jug
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Basic Method ◽  
Unjust Enrichment ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Basic Characteristics ◽  
The Right

This paper deals with the problems related to the legal position of honest and dishonest possessors in relation to the owner of things, that is, it analyses the rights belonging to the possessors of things and the demands that possessors may require from the owners of things to whom the possessors must submit those things. Also, in contrast, the rights and requirements are analysed of the owners of things in relation to honest and dishonest possessors. In practice, a dilemma arises in defi ning the essential and benefi cial expenditure incurred by honest possessors, what the presumptions are for and until when the right of retention may be exercised for the sake of remuneration of that expenditure, when the statute of limitations expires on that claim, and the signifi cance of the provisions of the Civil Obligations Act in relation to unjust enrichment, management without mandate and the right of retention, and which provisions regulate these or similar issues. The answers to some of these dilemmas have been provided in case law, and therefore the basic method used in the paper was analysis and research of case law, especially decisions by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia. The introduction to the paper provides the basic characteristics of the concept of possession and possession of things, and the type and quality of possession, to provide a basis for the subsequent analysis of the legal position of the possessor of a thing in relation to the owner of that thing.

scholarly journals Solusi Hukum Mengatasi Masalah Menumpuknya Perkara di Tingkat Kasasi Mahkamah Agung RI (Usulan Perubahan Kelima UUD RI Tahun 1945)

2017 ◽  
pp. 90-100
Author(s):  
Lufsiana
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Employment Opportunities ◽  
Legal Professionals ◽  
Legal Principle ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

The accumulation of cases at the Cassation level of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has not been resolved, even though there are internal rules that determine the deadline for case settlement for 250 days and the distribution of rooms in the environment of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. violating the legal principle of the administration of simple, fast and low-cost justice has even opened the door of corruption, because justice seekers will try to accelerate to get a verdict on the case. This paper provides a legal solution to the problem, namely by forming a representative of the Supreme Court of Indonesia in every province in Indonesia and empowering the nation's children to become Supreme Court Justices (opening employment opportunities that are wide enough for legal professionals) by using the legislation approach.

scholarly journals THE CHANGES IN CRIMINAL TRIAL PROCEEDINGS DURING COVID-19: CHALLENGES AND PROBLEMS

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-135
Author(s):  
Dewa Gede Giri Santosa
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Trial ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Principles Of Justice ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Made In

COVID-19 pandemic forced the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia to make several adjustments to the courts system of all in Indonesia, one of which was the adjustment of criminal procedural law in criminal trial proceedings. Some regulations were made related to the criminal trial proceedings in Indonesia to adjust to government policies that limit physical interaction between people. However, those regulations made by the Supreme Court also comes with challenges and problems in its implementation. This research was made using the normative legal research method, in purpose to find the changes made in the criminal trial proceedings in Indonesia due to the COVID-19 pandemic and also the challenges and problems encountered in its implementation. Through this research, several things that should be addressed for the change in the criminal trial proceedings amid the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia will not only accommodate the principle of expediency, but also the principles of justice and legal certainty .

scholarly journals GUIDELINES FOR PRESIDENTING WOMEN FACING THE LAW IN DIVORCE WITH JUSTICE BASED IN KEBUMEN RELIGION COURT (IMPLEMENTATION OF PERMA NO. 3 YEAR 2017)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trubus Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Gender Perspective ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

An effort to improve the quality of justice with a gender perspective on July 11, 2017 the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has issued PERMA Number 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Judging Women Against the Law. In line with this study, researchers assume specifically the implementation of Perma Number 3 of 2017 is related to women dealing with law in divorce cases related to the protection of women's rights (ex-wife) along with children's rights due to divorce based on justice. the implementation of PERMA No. 3 of 2017 in the field of litigation duties in the Religious Courts. In the end, judges in trying women's cases dealing with the law must reveal factors based on principles: Appreciation for human dignity, Non-discrimination, Gender Equality, Equality before the law, Justice, Utilization, for the sake of legal certainty.

scholarly journals SOLUSI HUKUM MENGATASI MASALAH MENUMPUKNYA PERKARA DI TINGKAT KASASI MAHKAMAH AGUNG RI (Usulan Perubahan Kelima UUD RI Tahun 1945)

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Lufsiana Lufsiana
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Employment Opportunities ◽  
Legal Professionals ◽  
Legal Principle ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

<p><em>The accumulation of cases at the Cassation level of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has not been resolved, even though there are internal rules that determine the deadline for case settlement for 250 days and the distribution of rooms in the environment of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. violating the legal principle of the administration of simple, fast and low-cost justice has even opened the door of corruption, because justice seekers will try to accelerate to get a verdict on the case. This paper provides a legal solution to the problem, namely by forming a representative of the Supreme Court of Indonesia in every province in Indonesia and empowering the nation's children to become Supreme Court Justices (opening employment opportunities that are wide enough for legal professionals) by using the legislation approach.</em><strong><em></em></strong></p>

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN INDONESIAN GENERAL COURTS(BASED ON THE DECREE OF THE DIRECTOR- GENERAL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 424-434
Author(s):  
Haposan Sahala Raja Sinaga
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Director General ◽  
Supreme Courts ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
The Republic

The shift in punishment in the criminal justice system prioritizes justice for victims and perpetrators of criminal acts in addition to alternative punish- ments such as social work and others carried out with a restorative justice approach. Focusing on the process  of  direct  criminal  responsibility  from the perpetrator to the victim and society, if the perpetrator and victim and  the community whose rights have been violated feel that justice has been achieved through collective deliberation efforts, punishment can be avoided. The perpetrator is not the main object of the restorative justice approach,   but the sense of justice and conflict recovery itself are the main objects. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, on December 22 2020, through the Director-General of the General Courts Agency, has made Decree Number: 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020 concerning the Enforcement of Guidelines for the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the Indonesian General Courts. With the normative juridical research method, with the nature of qualitative descriptive research, by examining secondary data obtained through the Decree of the Director-General of the General Courts of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020 and other related regulations which has relevance to the implementation of restorative justice in the Indonesian general courts’ environment. The results of the research show the implementation of restorative justice in the Indonesian general courts, as stated in the Decree of the Director-General of the Supreme Courts Number: 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020, which must apply and be applied by all district courts in Indonesia, especially in terms of case settlement in action. Minor offenses, child cases, women in conflict with the law and nar- cotics cases. The existence of alternative case resolution through restorative justice can realize the principles of fast, simple and low cost with balanced justice.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MEREK TERKENAL ASING DI INDONESIA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMA AGUNG NOMOR: 165/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2016 DAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMA AGUNG NOMOR: 557K/Pdt.sus-HKI/2015)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1026
Author(s):  
Ronald Kurniawan ◽  
Simona Bustani
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Main Issue ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Case Number

The first dispute with Case Number MA Decree 557 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2015 that occurred between the designer clothing (designer) from France, Pierre Cardin owner of the Brand Business Pierre Cardin as the claimant, whose brand is a popular brand and has been used since the beginning In March 1974, in this matter the prosecutor against the defendant Alexander Satryo Wibowo, was a local businessman who owned the Trademark Pierre Cardin, who had registered his trademark since July 29, 1977 in Indonesia, where there were similarities in essence or overall in the use of the trademark between the claimant and defendant. Therefore Pierre Cardin, hereby as the prosecutor, demanded the cancellation of the registered mark Card Pierre Cardin used by the defendant, against this demand the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court has determined the determination of Ms. 15 / Pdt.Sus-Trademark / 2015 / PN.Niaga.Jkt .Pst., Dated June 9, 2015 which in the main issue rejected the claim of the prosecutor for the whole. Furthermore, the Plaintiff requested the appeal of the appeal to the Supreme Court. Legal remedies requested by the claimant in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 6 point (3) letter b of Law Number 15 of 2001 concerning Trademarks. In carrying out the appeal appeal law, the Supreme Court has decided on decision number 557 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2015 which in its stipulation stipulates rejecting an appeal request from the appealer Pierre Cardin.

scholarly journals MENCIPTAKAN SISTEM PERADILAN EFISIEN DENGAN SISTEM E-COURT PADA PENGADILAN NEGERI DAN PENGADILAN AGAMA SE-TANGERANG RAYA

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Susanto Susanto ◽  
Muhamad Iqbal ◽  
Wawan Supriyatna
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
District Court ◽  
Court System ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Effective Role ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Based on the Decree of the Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 305/SEK/SK/VII/2018, the Supreme Court has chosen 17 District Courts, 6 State Administrative Courts and 9 Religious Courts as the Pilot Project Court for the e-court Application. On this basis, the sample of the court taken by the author is the District Court and Religious Court which is located in Tangerang Raya. The author will focus on the effectiveness and efficiency with regard to the role of the e-court system in the administrative system of the district and religious courts in Tangerang Raya. The large amount of time and files involved are considered far from the principles of fast, simple and low cost trial. It is hoped that time and cost efficiency problems can be resolved with E-court. To prove the test of the effective role of e-court in realizing fast, simple and low cost judiciary from the segmentation of district and religious courts in Tangerang Raya, the E-court system in state and religious courts in the Greater Tangerang area in segmentation creates efficiency in the case administration service process.

scholarly journals Peran Pengadilan Agama dalam Mendukung Perkembangan Industri Keuangan Syariah di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahadil Amin Al Hasan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Financial Industry ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Economic Climate ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Hukum dan ekonomi memiliki hubungan timbal balik dan saling mempengaruhi. Artinya, suatu kegiatan ekonomi yang tidak didukung oleh perangkat hukum yang baik memungkinkan akan mengakibatkan terjadinya kekacauan. Hal ini disebabkan karena para pelaku ekonomi akan melakukan aktivitasnya dengan tanpa standar norma yang pada akhirnya menyebabkan  kerugian di antara salah satu pihak yang melakukan aktivitas ekonomi. Jika dibiarkan begitu saja, hal tersebut akan menyebabkan iklim ekonomi di masa depan menjadi terganggu. Begitupun halnya dengan ekonomi syariah. Jika proses hukum, dalam hal ini penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah dilaksanakan dengan baik, maka pengembangan ekonomi dan keuangan syariah akan semakin baik. Pengadilan Agama sebagai salah salah satu pelaksana kekuasaan kehakiman di bawah Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia memiliki peranan yang penting dalam memajukan industri keuangan syariah di Indonesia. Hal ini didasarkan karena Pengadilan Agama merupakan lembaga negara yang memiliki kewenangan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa ekonomi syariah di Indonesia. Makalah ini mencoba membahas mengenai beberapa aspek penting yang terkait dengan penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama, serta beberapa usaha yang dilakukan oleh Mahkamah Agung dalam menguatkan peran Pengadilan Agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa ekonomi syariah. AbstractThe legal relationship with the economy has a reciprocal and mutually influencing relationship. That is, an economic activity that is not supported by a good legal tool will result in chaos, this is because the economic actors will perform its activities without standard norms that caused the loss of one party in conducting economic activities. If left alone, this will cause the economic climate in the future to be disturbed. Likewise with the sharia economy. If the legal process, in this case the sharia economic dispute resolution carried out well, then the development of sharia economic and financial industry will be better. The Religious Courts as one of the judicial authorities under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia plays an important role in advancing the sharia financial industry in Indonesia. This is because the Religious Courts are state institutions that have the authority to resolve the dispute of sharia economy. This paper tries to discuss some important aspects related to the settlement of sharia economic dispute in the Religious Courts, as well as some efforts made by the Supreme Court in strengthening the role of Religious Courts in solving the dispute of sharia economy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document