scholarly journals MENCIPTAKAN SISTEM PERADILAN EFISIEN DENGAN SISTEM E-COURT PADA PENGADILAN NEGERI DAN PENGADILAN AGAMA SE-TANGERANG RAYA

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Susanto Susanto ◽  
Muhamad Iqbal ◽  
Wawan Supriyatna
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
District Court ◽  
Court System ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Effective Role ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Based on the Decree of the Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 305/SEK/SK/VII/2018, the Supreme Court has chosen 17 District Courts, 6 State Administrative Courts and 9 Religious Courts as the Pilot Project Court for the e-court Application. On this basis, the sample of the court taken by the author is the District Court and Religious Court which is located in Tangerang Raya. The author will focus on the effectiveness and efficiency with regard to the role of the e-court system in the administrative system of the district and religious courts in Tangerang Raya. The large amount of time and files involved are considered far from the principles of fast, simple and low cost trial. It is hoped that time and cost efficiency problems can be resolved with E-court. To prove the test of the effective role of e-court in realizing fast, simple and low cost judiciary from the segmentation of district and religious courts in Tangerang Raya, the E-court system in state and religious courts in the Greater Tangerang area in segmentation creates efficiency in the case administration service process.

scholarly journals THE ROLE OF RELIGIOUS COURT IN ISLAMIC LAW REFORM IN INDONESIA

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-134
Author(s):  
Amran Suadi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
New Formula ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Legal Opinion

Abstract: Law, including Islamic law, will evolve with the changes of time, place, situation and tradition. New social problems grow gradually and pose challenges to Islamic law. Reconstruction and reform are inevitable for Islamic law to respond to the current issues. The Islamic law reforms in Indonesia performed through legal enactment, legal opinion (fatwa), and the Religious Courts decisions. New formula for Islamic law in addressing contemporary issues can be built through three processes: conservation, innovation process, and creation. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia fully supports the development of Islamic law in Indonesia. The reform of Islamic law by the Supreme Court has been carried out through several instruments, such as the issuance of Perma and SEMA, agreement among justices within the Chamber of the Religious Courts, and creation of jurisprudence.Abstrak: Hukum, termasuk hukum Islam, akan berubah seiring dengan perubahan waktu, tempat, situasi dan tradisi. Masalah sosial baru yang tumbuh secara bertahap tumbuh dan menimbulkan tantangan bagi hukum Islam. Rekonstruksi dan reformasi tidak dapat dihindarkan agar hukum Islam merespons masalah saat ini. Ada tiga tipologi reformasi hukum Islam di Indonesia yang dilakukan melalui pengesahan hukum, pendapat hukum (fatwa), dan keputusan pengadilan dari keputusan Pengadilan Agama. Formula baru untuk hukum Islam dalam menangani masalah kontemporer dapat dibangun berdasarkan tiga proses: proses konservasi, proses inovasi, dan proses penciptaan. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia sepenuhnya mendukung pengem­bangan hukum Islam di Indonesia. Reformasi hukum Islam oleh Mahkamah Agung telah dilakukan melalui beberapa instrumen, seperti penerbitan Perma dan SEMA, kesepakatan di antara para hakim di Kamar Pengadilan Agama, dan penciptaan yurisprudensi yang diambil dari kasasi.

scholarly journals PERAN LEMBAGA PERADILAN DALAM PEMBATASAN UPAYA HUKUM DALAM PERKARA PERDATA

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Bambang Sugeng Ariadi ◽  
Trisadini P. Usanti ◽  
Johan Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Legal Remedy ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Court Of Appeal

In order to application of judicial principle is simple, fast and low cost is to reduce accumulation of cases in the Supreme Court especially at the level of Cassation. Along with the increasing number of incoming cases, and was sentenced in the District Court and Court of Appeal, the amount of the proposed decision legal remedy of Cassation to the Supreme Court also increased and began to be a serious problem. For that we need to do some research on role of Judiciary in Legal action restrictions in order to reduce the accumulation of civil cases. Penerapan asas peradilan yang sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan bertujuan untuk mengurangi penumpukkan perkara di Mahkamah Agung, terutama pada tingkat Kasasi. Seiring dengan makin meningkatnya jumlah perkara yang masuk, dan diputus di PN dan PT, jumlah putusan yang diajukan upaya hukum Kasasi ke MA juga semakin meningkat dan mulai menjadi masalah serius. Untuk itu perlu dilakukan suatu penelitian tentang Peran Lembaga Peradilan dalam Pembatasan Upaya Hukum dalam rangka mengurangi penumpukkan perkara perdata.

scholarly journals PEMBATASAN UPAYA HUKUM PERKARA PERDATA GUNA MEWUJUDKAN ASAS PERADILAN SEDERHANA, CEPAT DAN BIAYA RINGAN

Yuridika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Bambang Sugeng Ariadi S ◽  
Johan Wahyudi ◽  
Razky Akbar
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
District Court ◽  
Annual Session ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Court Of Appeal

The most important thing for any regulation judicial principle is simple, fast and low cost is to reduce the accumulation of cases in the Supreme Court. That is because, line with the increasing increasing number of incoming cases, and also that successfully terminated in the District Court and Court of Appeal, then the incoming number of decisions in the Supreme Court also increased and began to be a serious problem. In this regard, People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) seriously consider this and responded by provisions, that is TAP MPR No. VIII/MPR/2000 about of the Annual Report of State High Institutions at the Annual Session of the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia in 2000 which one substance recommend that the Supreme Court immediately resolve pending lawsuits by increasing the number and quality of decisions and that the Supreme Court makes the rules o restrict the entry of cassation cases. Following up on the existence of the MPR decrees, he Supreme Court has issued several provisions n order to limit legal action in order to realize judicial principle is simple, fast and low cost, either in the form of the Supreme Court Rules (Perma) nor Supreme Court Circular Letter (Sema). This article is useful for know and understand how much has been the implementation judicial principle is simple, fast and low cost, in order to reduce the buildup of civil cases. 

scholarly journals Peran Pengadilan Agama dalam Mendukung Perkembangan Industri Keuangan Syariah di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahadil Amin Al Hasan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Financial Industry ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Economic Climate ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Hukum dan ekonomi memiliki hubungan timbal balik dan saling mempengaruhi. Artinya, suatu kegiatan ekonomi yang tidak didukung oleh perangkat hukum yang baik memungkinkan akan mengakibatkan terjadinya kekacauan. Hal ini disebabkan karena para pelaku ekonomi akan melakukan aktivitasnya dengan tanpa standar norma yang pada akhirnya menyebabkan  kerugian di antara salah satu pihak yang melakukan aktivitas ekonomi. Jika dibiarkan begitu saja, hal tersebut akan menyebabkan iklim ekonomi di masa depan menjadi terganggu. Begitupun halnya dengan ekonomi syariah. Jika proses hukum, dalam hal ini penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah dilaksanakan dengan baik, maka pengembangan ekonomi dan keuangan syariah akan semakin baik. Pengadilan Agama sebagai salah salah satu pelaksana kekuasaan kehakiman di bawah Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia memiliki peranan yang penting dalam memajukan industri keuangan syariah di Indonesia. Hal ini didasarkan karena Pengadilan Agama merupakan lembaga negara yang memiliki kewenangan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa ekonomi syariah di Indonesia. Makalah ini mencoba membahas mengenai beberapa aspek penting yang terkait dengan penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama, serta beberapa usaha yang dilakukan oleh Mahkamah Agung dalam menguatkan peran Pengadilan Agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa ekonomi syariah. AbstractThe legal relationship with the economy has a reciprocal and mutually influencing relationship. That is, an economic activity that is not supported by a good legal tool will result in chaos, this is because the economic actors will perform its activities without standard norms that caused the loss of one party in conducting economic activities. If left alone, this will cause the economic climate in the future to be disturbed. Likewise with the sharia economy. If the legal process, in this case the sharia economic dispute resolution carried out well, then the development of sharia economic and financial industry will be better. The Religious Courts as one of the judicial authorities under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia plays an important role in advancing the sharia financial industry in Indonesia. This is because the Religious Courts are state institutions that have the authority to resolve the dispute of sharia economy. This paper tries to discuss some important aspects related to the settlement of sharia economic dispute in the Religious Courts, as well as some efforts made by the Supreme Court in strengthening the role of Religious Courts in solving the dispute of sharia economy.

scholarly journals EFFECTIVENESS IN IMPLEMENTING SUPREME COURT REGULATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 2 YEAR 2015 ON PROCEDURES SETTLEMENT OF SIMPLE LAWSUIT IN SETTLING THE CIVIL CASES

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Wiryatmo Lukito Totok ◽  
Anik Iftitah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
District Court ◽  
Code System ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Effectiveness Index

President Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2015 on the National Medium Term Development Plan 2015-2019 mandates to carry out Reformation of the Civil Code system which is easy and fast, in an effort to improve the competitiveness of national economy. Related to this, the Supreme Court answered the vacancy of a simple lawsuit by issuing Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (PERMA) Number 2 Year 2015 on procedures for settlement of simple suit in settling civil cases. The empirical juridical research in the Court of Kediri showed that the implementation of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2015 made the lawsuit procedure simpler and very effective and in accordance with the principle of simple, fast and light cost. Effectiveness Index of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 year 2015 at Kediri District Court Class I B was in the "good" category, influenced by substance rule of the law, legal culture, structure of the law, and community knowledge. Keywords: Effectiveness, Simple Lawsuit Received: 07 January, 2017; Accepter: 15 March, 2017

scholarly journals MODEL PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN SATU ATAP MELALUI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 247
Author(s):  
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Regulatory Testing ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
New Ideas ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Bureaucratic Reform

Post-reform of the role of judicial institution is run by two institutions namely the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. The duties and authorities of the two institutions are regulated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 and the act that addresses the three institutions more specifically. Several powers possessed by the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court, one of them is the authority to judicial review. The Constitutional Court is authorized to review the act on the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945, while the Supreme Court is authorized to review under the Act on the above legislation.The unfairness of the regulatory testing function is feared to trigger bureaucratic inefficiency. Based on data released by the Supreme Court Clerk, it was recorded during 2016 that the Supreme Court received 18,514 cases, including the Hak Uji Materi (HUM) subject to legislation under the Act. While the number of cases of judicial review of the Constitutional Court in 2016-2017 amounted to only 332 cases. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a bureaucratic reform and provide new ideas related to the model of one court of judicial review in Indonesia. So that in this paper will be discussed deeply about problematic of judicial review in Indonesia and the authority of the Constitutional Court to review the act under one roof with SIJURI mechanism.

PENEGAKAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA DALAM MENANGANI KASASI PERKARA KARTEL PUTUSAN KPPU YANG MENGGUNAKAN ALAT BUKTI TIDAK LANGSUNG (INDIRECT EVIDENCE)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-101
Author(s):  
Fransiska Lestari Simanjuntak
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Is Research ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Republic

Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) is an institution authorized to handle unfair business competition violation. In fact, in several KPPU decisions it was revealed that KPPU prioritizes indirect evidence in handling cartel cases in Indonesia. KPPU's decision is not final and binding. Business actors who do not accept the decision of KPPU may file an objection at the District Court. The parties who do not accept the decision of the district court, may file an appeal in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The type of research is used in this research is normative legal research, that is research done by reviewing the rules of law applicable or applied to a certain legal problem. The result of the research shows that in the Supreme Court appeal, KPPU's decision was upheld and canceled by Supreme Court to KPPU's decision uses indirect evidence in handling cartel case. The basis of consideration of the Supreme Court Justices ruling the KPPU's decision in the case of the tire cartel and the cement cartel is the Chief Justice accepting and acknowledging the indirect evidence as valid evidence, since the evidence is sufficient and logical evidence, and there is no evidence the more powerful that can weaken the indirect evidence. While the consideration of the Supreme Court Judge overturning the KPPU's decision in the case of cartel fuel surcharger is not accepting and acknowledging indirect evidence as valid evidence, because the evidence is insufficient and illogical, and there is stronger evidence that can weaken the tool indirect evidence

scholarly journals Urgensi Penyederhanaan Agenda Sidang Pada Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Syahrul Sajidin
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Business World ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Hours

Court beside as a judicial institution, have other function to give public service. One of the good and excellent services is realized by the existence of a simple service procedure. One of the most highlighted is that there are still many trial agendas that are considered unnecessary to be delivered directly in front of the panel of judges (during the hearing). Some of these stages include the agenda for reading answers, replicating and duplicating. So that from some of these backgrounds it is necessary to examine the urgency of simplifying the civil procedure law in Indonesia. From the description of the background of the research, the formulation of the problem can be arranged as follows, what is the urgency of simplifying the session agenda by submitting the answers, replicating and duplicating in writing and how is the simplifi  cation of the Civil Procedure Law in supporting the implementation of the judicial principle fast, simple and low-cost?. Simplification of civil procedural law is expected to be able to reduce the hours of the trial so that with fewer trial agendas the session becomes effective and efficient. In order for the simplification of civil procedural law to be able to bring maximum results, the Supreme Court needs to prepare several things. With the stages of building the system, managing the system, utilizing technology, increasing the role of the business world, developing HR capacity and implementing development in a systematic and measurable manner.

scholarly journals Solusi Hukum Mengatasi Masalah Menumpuknya Perkara di Tingkat Kasasi Mahkamah Agung RI (Usulan Perubahan Kelima UUD RI Tahun 1945)

2017 ◽  
pp. 90-100
Author(s):  
Lufsiana
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Employment Opportunities ◽  
Legal Professionals ◽  
Legal Principle ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

The accumulation of cases at the Cassation level of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has not been resolved, even though there are internal rules that determine the deadline for case settlement for 250 days and the distribution of rooms in the environment of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. violating the legal principle of the administration of simple, fast and low-cost justice has even opened the door of corruption, because justice seekers will try to accelerate to get a verdict on the case. This paper provides a legal solution to the problem, namely by forming a representative of the Supreme Court of Indonesia in every province in Indonesia and empowering the nation's children to become Supreme Court Justices (opening employment opportunities that are wide enough for legal professionals) by using the legislation approach.

scholarly journals GUIDELINES FOR PRESIDENTING WOMEN FACING THE LAW IN DIVORCE WITH JUSTICE BASED IN KEBUMEN RELIGION COURT (IMPLEMENTATION OF PERMA NO. 3 YEAR 2017)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trubus Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Gender Perspective ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

An effort to improve the quality of justice with a gender perspective on July 11, 2017 the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has issued PERMA Number 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Judging Women Against the Law. In line with this study, researchers assume specifically the implementation of Perma Number 3 of 2017 is related to women dealing with law in divorce cases related to the protection of women's rights (ex-wife) along with children's rights due to divorce based on justice. the implementation of PERMA No. 3 of 2017 in the field of litigation duties in the Religious Courts. In the end, judges in trying women's cases dealing with the law must reveal factors based on principles: Appreciation for human dignity, Non-discrimination, Gender Equality, Equality before the law, Justice, Utilization, for the sake of legal certainty.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document