scholarly journals PROBLEMS OF POWER DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PUBLIC AUTHORITIES AND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES OF SUBORDINATE ENTITIES OF THE FEDERATION IN THE SPHERE OF ELECTORAL RELATIONS REGULATION

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-124
Author(s):  
Екатерина Валерьевна Кетова ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ksenia Minakova

The article analyzes methods of ensuring the migrants rights by the public authorities of the Russian Federation, the individual elements of the migration policy of the Russian Federation relating to the activities of public authorities. It considers the activities in the field of protection of the migrants rights by such authorities as the Russian President's Office for Constitutional Rights of Citizens, the Presidential Council for Civil Society and Human Rights, the Council for Interethnic Relations, General Directorate for Migration, Chief Directorate for Migration Issues of Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, their normative documents, that regulate their activities. It examines separately the activities of the RF Government in the field of protection of the migrants rights, as well as judicial authorities; it identifies the special role of the RF Constitutional Court in the field of ensuring the rights of migrants, refugees, the internally displaced and stateless persons. It underlines the role of authority bodies of the RF entities in ensuring the migrants rights in terms of Irkursk Oblast. The article offers to differentiate strictly the role of each authority body in the field of migrants rights protection, as well as to pay specific attention to regulation of activities of the FR entities authority bodies in this direction.


Author(s):  
Evgeniya E. Nemeryuk ◽  
◽  
Olga A. Romanovskaia ◽  
Galina A. Kantemirova ◽  
◽  
...  

The article examines the main problems of such a social institution`s functioning in the Russian state as a public service. The particular attention is paid to the ethical principles of the state and municipal employees in the context of the administrative ethics. It is noted that one of the problems of the civil service as a social institution in the country is the lack of citizens` awareness of the civil servants` activities results as well as the excessive bureaucratization of the internal activities of public authorities in the country.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-163
Author(s):  
Ivan N. Melnikov ◽  
Ivan A. Samakov

This paper discusses the current issues of legal regulation in the field of artificial intelligence in the state and municipal service in the Russian Federation in order to ensure and protect the rights and freedoms of man and citizen. The article highlights the current problems that arise in the implementation of certain state functions, such as – the work of state bodies with citizens' appeals and the lack of regulatory regulation of the use of artificial intelligence technology in this process, the use of which will contribute to meeting the deadlines for working with citizens' appeals, as well as increase the overall level of quality of interaction between citizens and public authorities. Specific measures are proposed for the development of legislation in order to introduce artificial intelligence in solving the problems facing the public authorities. The article formulates the main conclusion regarding the trend of using the artificial intelligence system in the issue under consideration.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Bakhtairova

The article carries out a study of the current status of public councils in the executive authorities of the Russian Federation entities. Public councils appeared in 2014 as an instrument of public control, but during five years of their existence they failed to become an effective instrument of openness and accountability of the authorities to the civil society institutions. The article examines the experts opinions and the results of investigating the practice of public councils by the All-Russian Popular Front in the Russian Federation entities. The author analyzes the issue of motives and incentives of public councils members which are called upon to perform control of the activities of public authorities on a voluntary basis, brings forth the data on citizens involvement in volunteer activities. The analysis of the literature devoted to volunteers shows that this activity involves mainly young people. As they grow up, while keeping an active civil position, it is young people who can become participants of the public control and express their civil position exactly in this way, without the use of protest activity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 29-34
Author(s):  
Pavel E. Spiridonov ◽  

The introduction of the terms “public power”, “public administration bodies” in official documents marked the beginning of the resumption of discussions on the peculiarities of legal relations that are included in the subject of the legal regulation of administrative law. The work attempts to analyze the terms “public authorities” and “public administration bodies”, their relationship with each other. In the Russian Federation, a specific system of government with decentralization elements has begun to take shape. Such a system includes, in addition to traditional state authorities, specially created state bodies that are entrusted with the functions of organization and coordination, public authorities in federal territories, state and non-state organizations that are delegated public power.


Author(s):  
Vladimir T. Kabyshev ◽  
◽  
Tamara V. Zametina ◽  
Elena V. Kombarova ◽  
◽  
...  

The problems of transparency as an economic, social, political and legal phenomenon attract the attention of scientists in various fields of liberal arts - economics, sociology, political science, and jurisprudence. In this article, the authors are primarily interested in legal and political aspects of this phenomenon, since the current Constitution of the country pays considerable attention to the issues of democratic organization of power and the institutions of participation of citizens in the management of state affairs. Describing the real state of transparency in the public authorities of the Republic of Crimea, both static (institutional, organizational) and dynamic (functional, procedural) aspects of this phenomenon are taken into account. The current Constitution of the Russian Federation 1993 does not have the concept of "transparency". The analysis of Russian legislation shows that the principle of transparency, even without being enshrined at the highest constitutional level, has been adequately reflected in federal laws and other regulations. Legislatively enshrined transparency, openness, publicity, accessibility of information together create a regime of transparency of the activities of the three branches of state and local government, ensure the access of citizens to information and determine the forms of interaction and cooperation of citizens and power institutions in this area. The authors emphasize that the principle of transparency plays an important role in the system of principles of the organization and functioning of the public authorities of the modern democratic state. Its further legislative development will promote the confidence of citizens in public authorities, establish the dialogue between the state and civil society, and strengthen anti-corruption measures. Legal regulation of openness, publicity, accessibility of information about the activities of public authorities is carried out within the framework of several legislative acts ("On the media," "On ensuring access to information on the activities of state and local governments" and others). It seems appropriate not only to generalize these norms but also to include other ones developing this institution within the framework of a single federal law on the transparency of state authorities in the Russian Federation. The authors believe that we need the measures to improve the effectiveness of the institu-tion of transparency, including, for example, the consolidation of criteria (indicators) of trans-parency of public authorities The study of the principle of transparency of public authorities in the Republic of Crimea shows that the new subjects of the Federation have created legal and organizational conditions for the implementation of the principle of transparency. Though, there are some problems including the lack of developed and accessible telecommunication infrastructure, the orienta-tion of the Crimean providers to Ukraine, formalism in the consideration of citizens' appeals, not always prompt and objective information about the activities of the authorities of the new subjects of the Russian Federation, the need to ensure information security, the development of cooperation between Crimean and foreign organizations in the field of information and communication technologies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-203
Author(s):  
М. N. Kobzar-Frolova

The entry into force of the Law of the Russian Federation on the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the qualitative changes that were made to the text of the latter led to legislative activity. Laws were adopted, reflecting the changes made to the text of the Constitution, and containing new and / or little-studied terms, concepts, phenomena. Special attention of scientists and researchers was attracted by the Federal Law “On the State Council of the Russian Federation”, which came into force in December 2020, which for the first time legalized such terms as “public power”, “unified system of public power”, etc. The position is also of interest, expressed in the conclusion of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated March 16, 2020 No. 1-З in connection with the request of the President of the Russian Federation. It became necessary to give explanations and Author’s comments on the positive law of the country caused by these novelties. The term “public authority” is not a novelty for Russian legal science, but it has not been widely studied, and in connection with legislative changes it acquires new qualities, characteristics that need explanation and justification. The legislator provides an extensive definition of these terms. This makes it necessary to comprehend their essence, highlight the main elements of the public power system and demonstrate their political and legal ties, as well as the forms of interaction that take place in the public law regulation of relations between the subjects (elements) of a unified system of public power. Purpose: to investigate the essence of the concepts of “public power”, “unified system of public power”, to identify the characteristic features of the concept of “unified system of public power”. Among the main tasks: to show the political and legal ties and forms of interaction that arise between the subjects (elements) of a single system of public authority. Methods: logical, analytical, comparative legal, dialectical methods, allowing to reveal the essence, internal connections and the ratio of concepts enshrined in the federal law “On the State Council of the Russian Federation”, to reveal the features of a unified system of public authority. Results: state authorities are listed that correspond to the characteristics specified by the legislator, political and legal ties and forms of interaction that arise between the subjects (elements) of a unified system of public authority are identified, conclusions corresponding to the study are drawn.


Author(s):  
Евгений Николаевич Зиньков

В настоящей статье рассматривается процедура правовой регламентации общественного контроля, который предоставляет возможность открыто и доступно осуществлять наблюдение за деятельностью органов государственной власти. В ст. 1 Конституции Российской Федерации отмечается, что Россия - правовое государство, следовательно, обеспечение и защита прав и свобод человека и гражданина является высшей ценностью. Сам общественный контроль, как правило, является отдельной частью и не входит в систему контрольной власти государства, он реализуется, прежде всего, путем самоорганизации граждан. На сегодняшний день в России существует множество нормативных документов, регламентирующих деятельность общественных объединений. В Российской Федерации лица, находящиеся в местах изоляции от общества (подозреваемые, обвиняемые и осужденные), обладают всем комплексом прав, что и другие граждане нашего государства, за исключением тех ограничений, которые были установлены приговором суда и федеральными законами. Ст. 32 Конституции РФ наделяет граждан правом участия в управлении некоторых государственных дел, что и позволяет общественности осуществлять контрольные функции. Однако далеко не все общественные объединения обладают полномочиями по детальному изучению той или иной сферы государственной деятельности, к примеру, средства массовой информации (далее - СМИ) имеют возможность лишь поверхностно осветить деятельность конкретного объекта внимания. Однако это тоже является неким способом общественного контроля, так как позволяет общественности получить определенную информацию об изучаемом феномене. This article discusses the procedure for legal regulation of public control, which provides an opportunity to openly and easily monitor the activities of public authorities. Article 1 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation States that Russia is a legal state, therefore, ensuring and protecting human and civil rights and freedoms is the highest value. Public control itself, as a rule, is a separate part and is not included in the system of control power of the state, it is implemented primarily by self-organization of citizens. Today, in Russia there are many regulatory documents regulating the activities of public associations. In the Russian Federation, persons who are in places of isolation from society (suspects, accused and convicted) have all the rights that other citizens of our state have, with the exception of those restrictions that were established by a court verdict and Federal laws. Article 32 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation grants citizens the right to participate in the management of certain state Affairs, which allows the public to exercise control functions. However, not all public associations have the authority to study a particular sphere of state activity in detail.for example, mass media (hereinafter referred to as mass media) can only cover the activities of a specific object of attention. At the same time, this is also a way of public control, since it allows the public to get certain information about the phenomenon being studied.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 2277-2292
Author(s):  
Nina I. MAK

Subject. This article discusses the importance of project management in the activities of public authorities. Objectives. The article aims to determine the current level of development of project management techniques and trends in their progress with the public authorities of the Russian Federation. Methods. For the study, I used general scientific and special research methods. Results. The article describes the advantages of the project management methodology, which can contribute to saving from 20 to 30% of time and from 15 to 20% of the funds spent. Conclusions. The development of a fair system of motivation for project stakeholders, helping ensure a higher level of responsibility, is an important step in the development of project management in the public sector.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document