scholarly journals Reinforcement of the Papuan Traditional Communal Rights for the Control of Land and Natural Resources

2021 ◽  
pp. 17-23
Author(s):  
Alwiyah Sakti Ramdhon Syah Rakia ◽  

The ulayat rights of Papuan customary law communities over control of land and natural resources are rights granted by laws and regulations with a number of special powers. This study aims to analyze and provide a conception of strengthening the customary rights of the Papuan customary law community to control over land and natural resources. This research method uses a normative-juridical legal research type, which refers to the legal norms of legislation (statute approach), as well as legal theories and principles as supporters. This research is descriptiveanalytical, using qualitative analysis methods. The results of this study indicate that although the regulation of the customary rights of the Papuan customary law community has been in place for a long time, there are some basic things that need to be considered. Several regulations in the Perdasus do not represent the Papua Special Autonomy Law and tend to be contradictory. These provisions raise a number of problems for the Papuan indigenous peoples with regard to land ownership and the use of natural resources.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sakti Ramdhon Syah R.

The Papuan traditional communal rights for the Control of Land and Natural Resources, are rights granted by legislation with a number of special authorities. This study aims to analyze and provide a conception about Reinforcement of the Papuan traditional communal rights for the Control of Land and Natural Resources. This research method uses the type of normative-juridical legal research, which refers to the legal norms of statutory approach, as well as legal theories and principles as supporters. This research is descriptive-analytical, using qualitative analysis methods. The results of this study indicate that although the regulation of the customary rights of customary law communities in Papua has been enforced for a long time, but there are some fundamental things that need attention. First, there is no enforceable ownership rights over the land by the customary law community or Papuan individual indigenous people to land that has been owned by other individuals or legal entities, since the enactment of Perdasus. Second, the utilization of natural resources together must use business entities, without considering the skills of indigenous peoples in general are relatively low in relation to the format of business entities. Third, the lack of attention to the development of human resources in the utilization of natural resources.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 463
Author(s):  
Ahmad Redi ◽  
Yuwono Prianto ◽  
Tundjung Herning Sitabuana ◽  
Ade Adhari

Pasal 18B ayat (2) UUD NRI 1945 mengatur mengenai penghormatan dan pengakuan atas satuan-satuan masyarakat hukum adat beserta hak-hak tradisionalnya sepanjang keberadaannya masih ada. Salah satu hak masyarakat adat di masyarakat pesisir di Provinsi Lampung ialah hak rumpon sebagai hak ulayat laut. Rumpon laut secara bahasa merupakan jenis alat bantu penangkapan ikan yang dipasang di laut, baik laut dangkal maupun laut dalam. Saat ini eksistensi rumpon laut terancam keberadaannya karena untuk menjaga dan melestarikan sistem pengelolaan perikanan ini tidak didukung oleh tindakan nyata oleh Pemerintah dan masyarakat sekitar pesisir. Tulisan ini melakukan pengkajian atas hak masyarakat hukum atas hak ulayat rumpon di Provinsi Lampung dengan fokus penelitian pada eksistensi hak ulayat laut rumpon pada masyarakat Lampung dan perlindungan konstitusional atas hak ulayat rumpon laut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode socio-legal yang melakukan kajian terhadap aspek hukum dalam ranah das sollen dan das sein.Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia regulates the respect and recognition on customary law community units and their traditional rights as long as they still exist. One of the rights of indigenous peoples in coastal communities in Lampung Province is rumpon’s right as the ulayat right of the sea. Literaly, Rumpon laut is a type of fishing gear installed in the sea, both the shallow and the deep one. Currently the existence of rumpon laut is threatened because the maintenance is not supported by concrete actions by the Government and coastal communities. This paper conducts an assessment of the community’s right on customary rights of rumpon laut in Lampung Province. This paper focuses on the existence of the ulayat right of rumpon laut in Lampung and the constitutional protection of the ulayat right of rumpon laut. The research method used is a sociolegal method that studies the legal aspects in the realm of das sollen and das sein.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 313
Author(s):  
JT Pareke ◽  
Fahmi Arisandi

ABSTRAKPemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Rejang Lebong telah menerbitkan Peraturan Daerah No. 5 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Kabupaten Rejang Lebong. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mendeskripsikan siapa unit sosial yang diakui dan apa fungsi peraturan dearah tersebut bagi perlindungan wilayah adat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan kepustakaan atau data sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan kesimpulan bahwa: Pertama: Kutei adalah unit sosial asli yang diakui dalam Peraturan Daerah No. 5 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Kabupaten Rejang Lebong, pengakuan tersebut adalah pengakuan kutei sebagai subyek hukum dan dapat dibebani hak dan kewajiban. Kedua: Peraturan daerah tersebut berfungsi juga untuk melindungi wilayah adat mereka karena menyebutkan kewajiban dari masyarakat hukum adat untuk menjaga kelestarian lingkungan hidup dan sumber daya alam secara berkelanjutan sebagaimana telah diatur dalam hukum adat rejang.Kata kunci: masyarakat hukum adat; pengakuan; perlindungan.ABSTRACTRejang Lebong Regency Government has issued Regional Regulation No. 5 of 2018 concerning Recognition and Protection of Customary Law Communities in Rejang Lebong Regency. This research was conducted to describe who the recognized social unit is and what is the function of the regional regulation for the protection of indigenous territories. This study uses a normative juridical approach, which is legal research conducted by examining literature or secondary data. The results of this study indicate the conclusion that: First: Kutei is an original social unit that is recognized in Regional Regulation No. 5 of 2018 concerning Recognition and Protection of Customary Law Communities in Rejang Lebong Regency, the recognition is recognition of kutei as a legal subject and can be burdened with rights and obligations. Second: The regional regulation also functions to protect their customary territories because it states the obligations of indigenous and tribal peoples to preserve the environment and natural resources in a sustainable manner as stipulated in the customary law of the rejang.Keywords: indigenous peoples; recognition; protection.


Author(s):  
Ni Nyoman Sukerti ◽  
I Gst. Ayu Agung Ariani

Different weddings are still a polemic for the custom society of Bali until now, even though they have been normatively removed by Decree No. DPRD. 11 of 1951. This study aims to elaborate and analyze the notion of a marriage of different ancestors and the legal culture of Balinese indigenous peoples related to the marriage. The research method used is empirical legal research by prioritizing field data as primary data extracted by interviews. The type of pedestal is socio-legal. The results show that the marriage of different wangsa is a marriage between tri wangsa women and jaba wangsa men, while the legal culture of Balinese indigenous people towards marriage is as follows; most of the respondents no longer maintained their interfaith marriage in full meaning that the term was not discarded from the family, there was no ceremony for the decline of the house for the woman, and there was no change in calling her parents. This happens because of the development and progress in the fields of education, science, and information technology that change the mindset of some citizens. A small number of respondents still maintain an old tradition that is formally juridically revoked based on the Bali DPRD Decree No. 11 of 1951, wanted to maintain its nationality, respect the old customary law and lack of understanding of applicable law. Perkawinan beda wangsa masih merupakan polemik bagi masyarakat adat Bali hingga kini , walaupun secara normative sudah dihapus dengan Keputusan DPRD No. 11 Tahun 1951. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengelaborasi dan menganalisis pengertian perkawinan beda wangsa  dan budaya hukum masyarakat adat Bali terkait perkawinan tersebut. Metode penelitian yang dipakai adalah penelitian hukum empirik dengan mengutamakan data lapangan sebagai data primer yang digali dengan wawancara. Jenis pendekatannya adalah socio-legal. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa perkawinan beda wangsa adalah perkawinan antara perempuan tri wangsa dengan laki-laki jaba wangsa, sedangkan budaya hukum masyarakat adat Bali terhadap perkawinan tersebut adalah sebagai berikut; sebagian besar responden tidak lagi mempertahankan secara utuh perkawinan beda wangsa tersebut artinya tidak dilakukan istilah dibuang dari keluarga, tidak dilakukan upacara penurunan wangsa bagi si perempuan, dan tidak ada perubahan dalam memanggil orang tuanya. Hal tersebut terjadi karena perkembangan jaman dan kemajuan di bidang pendidikan, ilmu pengetahuan, dan teknologi informasi yang mengubah pola pikir dari sebagian warga masyarakat. Sebagian kecil responden masih ada mempertahankan tradisi lama yang secara yuridis formal sudah dicabut berdasarkan Keputusan DPRD Bali No. 11 Tahun 1951, ingin mempertahankan kewangsaannya, menghormati hukum adat yang sudah usang dan kurangnya pemahaman tentang hukum yang berlaku.


FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 181
Author(s):  
Agus Lanini ◽  
Sulbadana Sulbadana ◽  
Aminuddin Kasim ◽  
M. Yasin Nahar ◽  
Surahman Surahman

The research aims to know and comprehend the customary law principles as a rule in the exploration of natural resources, to know communities behavior on customary law in exploring the natural resources, and to explain the customary law as a beneficial rule to conserve the natural resources in lore lindu region. It will be conducted through the research method of socio-legal by data collecting will be done by direct observation of the research object as well as interview and participatory appraisal. Secondary data such as documented policy, law and regulations, political agreements, village demographic data, and other supporting data will be collected from various sources of concerns. The result of the research could be revealed as that the customary law principles as a rule in the explorations of natural resources still influence their rule in using its of course lead by head of tribe (totua Ngata) for a long time ago. As well as the communities behavior on customary law in using the natural resources in general. Then the customary law as a beneficial rule to conserve the natural resources in lore lindu region in particular can be assumed, but the intervention of state law or policy made it diminish gradually. Customary law related to forest conservation as a part of their values such as ombo (forbidden) cutting or bring tree or fish in a certain time. Keyword: Formation; Customary Law; Natural Resources; National Park


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
Padrisan Jamba, Irene Svinarky

Batam City, which is one of the cities whose rules are slightly different from other cities inIndonesia, is about administrative procedures for land ownership registration, but for permits toallocate land, it is still held by the Batam Entrepreneurs Agency, abbreviated as BP Batam. InBatam City, the provision of KSB is actually given to residents due to various things. To get KSBthe community needs to fulfill the procedure first. This is what makes the writer interested intaking the title of Juridical Review of Ready-to-Build Courts in Batam City. The purpose of thispaper is to find out that the Ready-to-Build plot can be owned by land users (general public) inBatam City. The legal research method used in this study is normative legal research. Normativeresearch in it is also permitted to use scientific analysis of other sciences (including empiricalscience) to explain the legal facts examined by scientific work and juridical thinking (dankenjuridical). Retrieval Data used is by using secondary data, where documentation and recordingtechniques are through the file system. The Research Result for Ready-to-Build Plots in BatamCity may be owned by individuals, but the provision of KSB can be given to the community.People who get it while the people who get the plot still have not built a plot even though theprovisions in the temporary agreement agreed upon by the applicant with the BatamEntrepreneurial Agency the applicant must immediately build a building on the land.


Author(s):  
Aarce Tehupeiory ◽  
Haposan Sahala Raja Sinaga ◽  
Lamhot Naibaho

This study discusses forest protection through Sasi (Local Environmental Law) in Ambon island post-COVID-19. Sasi is a customary norm and rules and sanctions regarding the prohibition of taking plant or plant products, fish and game time before the time agreed and determined by community leaders and leaders together with community members. The main goal is to conserve natural resources, control and limit human greed in overexploiting natural resources. The research method used is a qualitative research method with normative legal research. The research was conducted at Universitas Kristen Indonesia from January to March 2021. The objects studied were documents either in reports or regulations related to indigenous peoples' local wisdom. The research instrument used was a document checklist. The data analysis technique used is the descriptive analysis technique. The research results are that traditional Sasi wisdom has values ??and norms to protect forests, water sources, annual plants, and food plants. With the concept and understanding of how environmental managements with various customary rules to obtain benefits and maintain the kinship value of area units that already have an identity and must continuously be maintained in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-180
Author(s):  
I Gusti Agung Ayu Lita Pratiwi ◽  
Nella Hasibuan Oleary ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti

The sale and purchase transaction in Badung Regency which was made by both parties was in the form of an agreement of hands, but one of the parties who broke a promise or could be called a default. The purpose of this research is to see the legal dangers of underhand trading on land ownership in Badung Regency. This research method uses empirical legal research. In practice, the implementation of binding purchases and purchases under land ownership rights is often carried out by several parties, one of which occurred in Badung Regency. The practice of buying and selling land carried out under the hand is not in accordance with government regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration, which requires that the sale and purchase be made with an authentic deed, and not under hand. However, the buying and selling process in Lukluk District, Mengwi District, Badung Regency is still ready for those who, the deed, because the fulfillment of the legal requirements for buying and selling under the UUPA is material, formal and cash, clear and sincere. In principle, in fine sales agreements and notaries will be a legal approach as law for them made. And also according to article 1320 of the Civil Code the validity of an agreement if, among others: There is an agreement, skills, certain matters, and valid reasons. And although according to lawful compliance with the requirements according to article 1320 of the Civil Code, the sale and purchase of land must be carried out before the prohibited authority (PPAT).


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-247
Author(s):  
I Wayan Indra Adi Wicaksana ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti

Public interest in shoes is a special need, shoes are in great demand by millennials because they are useful for protecting feet. The habit of collecting these shoes arises from the desire of humans to keep their goods so they don't get damaged quickly and stay clean for a Long time. However, there are still cases of damage to shoes that cause Losses to consumers and there is no responsibility from the shoe washing service. The research method used is the type of empirical Law, empirical legal research aims to find facts, and conduct interviews. There are internal and external factors that cause damage to consumer shoes by business actors. So that responsibility for losses cannot be carried out unilaterally between business actors and consumers because there are Legal remedies that can be taken if they are harmed. Lack of knowledge and understanding fromconsumers, makes the position of consumers lower than business actors. So with the existence of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, both parties need to know so that their rights and obligations are not violated.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 134-160
Author(s):  
Alexander Paterson

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, recognises customary law as an independent and original source of law, subject to the Constitution itself and legislation that specifically deals with customary law. As recognised by the Constitutional Court in Alexkor Ltd vs the Richtersveld Community (2004), customary law, as an independent source of law, may give rise to rights including rights to access and use natural resources. Rights to access and use natural resources are often comprehensively regulated by legislation. Conflicts between customary law and legislation relevant to natural resources may arise, as evidenced in the case of Mr Gongqose, who along with several other community members were caught fishing in the Dwesa-Cwebe Marine Protected Area situated off the Eastern Cape coastline. Notwithstanding their claims to be exercising their customary rights to fish in the area, they were convicted in the Magistrate’s Court for certain offences in terms of the Marine Living Resources Act (1998), under which the marine protected area had been established. Their appeal to the High Court proved unsuccessful and the Supreme Court of Appeal was tasked with considering the relationship between their customary rights to fish and legislation purportedly extinguishing these rights. The SCA’s judgment in Gongqose & Others vs Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries & Others (2018) is the first of its kind in South Africa to consider the extinguishment of customary rights to access and use natural resources through post-constitutional legislation. This note critically considers the guidance the SCA provided on proving the existence of customary rights to access and use natural resources, and the manner in which they may be extinguished through legislation. While the focus is on marine living resources, the lessons emerging from this case are relevant to other natural resource sectors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document