scholarly journals PENGAKUAN MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT DAN PERLINDUNGAN WILAYAH ADAT DI KABUPATEN REJANG LEBONG

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 313
Author(s):  
JT Pareke ◽  
Fahmi Arisandi

ABSTRAKPemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Rejang Lebong telah menerbitkan Peraturan Daerah No. 5 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Kabupaten Rejang Lebong. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mendeskripsikan siapa unit sosial yang diakui dan apa fungsi peraturan dearah tersebut bagi perlindungan wilayah adat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan kepustakaan atau data sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan kesimpulan bahwa: Pertama: Kutei adalah unit sosial asli yang diakui dalam Peraturan Daerah No. 5 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Kabupaten Rejang Lebong, pengakuan tersebut adalah pengakuan kutei sebagai subyek hukum dan dapat dibebani hak dan kewajiban. Kedua: Peraturan daerah tersebut berfungsi juga untuk melindungi wilayah adat mereka karena menyebutkan kewajiban dari masyarakat hukum adat untuk menjaga kelestarian lingkungan hidup dan sumber daya alam secara berkelanjutan sebagaimana telah diatur dalam hukum adat rejang.Kata kunci: masyarakat hukum adat; pengakuan; perlindungan.ABSTRACTRejang Lebong Regency Government has issued Regional Regulation No. 5 of 2018 concerning Recognition and Protection of Customary Law Communities in Rejang Lebong Regency. This research was conducted to describe who the recognized social unit is and what is the function of the regional regulation for the protection of indigenous territories. This study uses a normative juridical approach, which is legal research conducted by examining literature or secondary data. The results of this study indicate the conclusion that: First: Kutei is an original social unit that is recognized in Regional Regulation No. 5 of 2018 concerning Recognition and Protection of Customary Law Communities in Rejang Lebong Regency, the recognition is recognition of kutei as a legal subject and can be burdened with rights and obligations. Second: The regional regulation also functions to protect their customary territories because it states the obligations of indigenous and tribal peoples to preserve the environment and natural resources in a sustainable manner as stipulated in the customary law of the rejang.Keywords: indigenous peoples; recognition; protection.

2021 ◽  
pp. 17-23
Author(s):  
Alwiyah Sakti Ramdhon Syah Rakia ◽  

The ulayat rights of Papuan customary law communities over control of land and natural resources are rights granted by laws and regulations with a number of special powers. This study aims to analyze and provide a conception of strengthening the customary rights of the Papuan customary law community to control over land and natural resources. This research method uses a normative-juridical legal research type, which refers to the legal norms of legislation (statute approach), as well as legal theories and principles as supporters. This research is descriptiveanalytical, using qualitative analysis methods. The results of this study indicate that although the regulation of the customary rights of the Papuan customary law community has been in place for a long time, there are some basic things that need to be considered. Several regulations in the Perdasus do not represent the Papua Special Autonomy Law and tend to be contradictory. These provisions raise a number of problems for the Papuan indigenous peoples with regard to land ownership and the use of natural resources.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sakti Ramdhon Syah R.

The Papuan traditional communal rights for the Control of Land and Natural Resources, are rights granted by legislation with a number of special authorities. This study aims to analyze and provide a conception about Reinforcement of the Papuan traditional communal rights for the Control of Land and Natural Resources. This research method uses the type of normative-juridical legal research, which refers to the legal norms of statutory approach, as well as legal theories and principles as supporters. This research is descriptive-analytical, using qualitative analysis methods. The results of this study indicate that although the regulation of the customary rights of customary law communities in Papua has been enforced for a long time, but there are some fundamental things that need attention. First, there is no enforceable ownership rights over the land by the customary law community or Papuan individual indigenous people to land that has been owned by other individuals or legal entities, since the enactment of Perdasus. Second, the utilization of natural resources together must use business entities, without considering the skills of indigenous peoples in general are relatively low in relation to the format of business entities. Third, the lack of attention to the development of human resources in the utilization of natural resources.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Rimbawanto ◽  
Doddy Kridasaksana ◽  
Ariyono

<p>Tujuan yang hendak dicapai dari penelitian ini dapat mengetahui perlindungan hukum terhadap perbatasan wilayah antara Negara Republik Indonesia dengan Timor Leste dan kendala dan upaya mengatasi masalah perbatasan wilayah antara Negara Republik Indonesia dengan Timor Leste.</p><p>Penelitian ini menggunakan yuridis normatif yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti atau mempelajari masalah dilihat dari segi aturan hukumnya, meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder</p><p>Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan secara umum berdasarkan hasil inventarisir peraturan perundang-undangan, pengakuan masyarakat adat di Indonesia tidak dalam posisi untuk mengakui keberadaan masyarakat adat, melainkan untuk membatasi keberadaan masyarakat adat.</p><pre>The objectives to be achieved from this research can be legal protection of the territorial border between the Republic of Indonesia and Timor Leste and the constraints and efforts to overcome the border issues between the Republic of Indonesia and Timor Leste.</pre><pre>               This study uses yuridis normative, namely legal research conducted by researching or studying the problem seen in terms of the rule of law, researching library materials or secondary data</pre><pre>               The results of this study show Generally based on the results of inventory of legislation, the recognition of indigenous peoples in Indonesia is not in a position to recognize the existence of indigenous peoples, but rather to limit the existence of indigenous peoples. </pre><pre> </pre>


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-173
Author(s):  
Jeane Neltje Saly ◽  
Journal Manager APHA

There are two aims of this paper: first to analyze the responsibility of the government in the commitment to protect the rights of indigenous and tribal peoples in natural resource management activities; secondly, to analyze the implementation of government responsibilities in mining management in relation to the rights of indigenous and tribal peoples in enjoying their rights in the ecosystem, such as the environment. The method used in the research is empirical normative method, namely research that emphasizes the secondary data that is by studying and reviewing the principles of law and positive law principles derived from the existing literature materials in legislation and the provisions especially in relation to the exclusion of indigenous people's rights in the obligation of the state to create a healthy environment for the management of natural resources as a manifestation of human rights protection, and supplemented by empirical data in the form of interviews with related parties in Balaesang Tanjung Donggala District. The results show that natural resource management activities, linked to indigenous and tribal peoples' rights in environmental protection are regulated in various laws, both nationally and internationally. Implementation of government responsibility in mining management is related to the right of customary law community in enjoying the environment has not been optimally done. From the case of Balaesang Tanjung Donggala, it is envisaged that local governments ignore the rights of indigenous and tribal peoples in enjoying a healthy environment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Jantje Tjiptabudy

In relation to the positive law, the management of marine and coastal natural resources, there is also the rule of customary law. Customary law that still lives and develops in indigenous peoples also regulates the management system and utilization of natural resources in coastal and marine areas. Recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples is constitutionally contained in the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia where the state recognizes the existence of the Customary Law Community. In Maluku, marine potency management in general is still done traditionally known as marine customary rights that have been going on for generations but not yet fully recognized either by the government or entrepreneurs who are actually important partners in the development process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Ni Made Radha Rani Devi ◽  
I Made Suta

<p>Bali Customary Law is a law or regulation written with unwritten conditions that contain commands and prohibitions for the behavior of indigenous peoples in matters governed by human relations with God, human relations with the environment, and human relations with humans, which in Bali is known as dialogue Tri Hita Karana. The imposition of traditional sanctions is a way to restore balance or neutralize the shock caused by traditional violations that have taken place in the Pakraman village environment. Such as the imposition of the Penyamil Customary Sanction which was handed down because the community committed acts that violated the existing provisions in Desa Pakraman Tanggahan Peken. Based on this, the issues discussed in this study include: What legal actions can be imposed by the Penyamil Customary Sanction in Pakraman Tanggahan Peken Village, Sulahan Village, Susut District, Bangli Regency? The problems that arise are examined using the theory of validity and effectiveness of the law in dissecting the formulation of problems regarding legal actions that can be subject to Penyamil Customary Sanctions in the Village of Pakraman Tanggahan Peken, Sulahan Village, Susut District, Bangli Regency. Data collection in this study used interview techniques, literature study techniques, questionnaire distribution and observation. In this study, the type of research used is a type of empirical legal research. Penyamil Customary Penalty Occurrence in Desa Pakraman Tanggahan Peken due to harsh/dirty words and misbehavior in a holy place or in a village meeting, and because of this error a<br />person who is violated is subject to Penyamil Customary Sanction which can be in the form of financial penalties or Maprayascita fines , depending on the mistakes made. The factors that influence the occurrence of violations of the Penyamil Customary Sanction due to community ignorance, emotional, and developments in the current era of globalization.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 12-28
Author(s):  
Wahyu Damon Prakoso

The problem that occurs is how the indigenous people of swamps interpret the lack of management territory, the loss of livelihood resources and organize themselves to seize opportunities for management rights. The problem of customary land and indigenous peoples above, the researchers felt the need to study more deeply on the Determination of Indigenous Areas and Customary Law Communities in Penyengat Village, Sungai Apit Subdistrict, Siak Regency, Based on the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 52 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Recognition and Protection of Indigenous Peoples. This type of research is sociological, so the data source used is primary data from interviews, secondary data from libraries and tertiary data from dictionaries, media, and encyclopedias. Data collection techniques are done by observation, interviews, and literature review.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-166
Author(s):  
Bakri Sulaiman

Regulations on the Recognition and Protection of Customary Law Communities are not always effective. This study was to determine the concept of recognition and protection of the Customary Law Community in Rawa Aopa Watumohai National Park. This research is a normative legal research. The results of the research are First, the law still provides conditional recognition of indigenous peoples, which limits their space. second, that the recognition and protection of the customary MHA of Moronene Hukaea Laea in Bombana Regency has not been maximized. They have received recognition and protection through a recognition of perda, but their customary territory still has the status of designating a National Park Area, so they cannot use it as customary land.


Author(s):  
Ni Nengah Budawati

This study aimed to know and understand about the legal culture of community on the phenomenon of different caste nyentana marriage. This research was empirical legal research legal research with behavioral approaches. The data source consisted of primary data sourced directly at the site of research and secondary data that included legislation, traditional laws, law books, magazines, dictionaries and newspapers. This study used qualitative data analysis which then produced descriptive data.Based on the national legal perspective, there are no differences in the position of husband and wife in different caste nyentana marriage. But in Balinese customary law, it resulted in the wife having a position that is more important than the husband in the family. As in the context of social life, especially in the capacity as krama in the sub-village, then the husband remains responsible for his obligations as krama muani while the wife still serves as krama luh. Related to the legal culture of indigenous people in Tabanan over different caste nyentana marriage, the fact that people are still of the view that marriage is an inter-caste marriage. Thus the legal culture of indigenous people in Tabanan tends to be static. This is motivated by many factors, one of which is either ignorance factor of traditional leaders or traditional krama of Decree of the Parliament No. 11 of 1951 which expressly has abolished inter-caste marriages that often lead to discrimination. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memahami tentang budaya hukum masyarakat terhadap fenomena hukum perkawinan nyentana beda wangsa. Penelitian ini ialah penelitian hukum penelitian hukum empiris dengan pendekatan pendekatan prilaku (behavioral approach). Data primer bersumber langsung dari lokasi penelitian, sedangkan data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, awig-awig­, literature hukum, majalah, kamus dan surat kabar. Pada penelitian ini data dianalisis secara kualitatif yang kemudian menghasilkan data deskriptif. Berdasarkan perspektif hukum secara nasional, tidak terdapat perbedaan kedudukan suami-isteri dalam perkawinan nyentana beda wangsa. Namun dalam Hukum adat Bali, justru mengakibatkan istri memiliki kedudukan yang lebih penting dibanding suami di dalam keluarga. Adapun dalam konteks kehidupan bermasyarakat, khususnya dalam kapasitas sebagai krama di banjar, maka si suami tetap bertanggung jawab pada kewajibannya sebagai krama muani sedangkan si istri tetap berkedudukan sebagai krama luh. Terkait dengan budaya hukum masyarakat hukum adat di Tabanan terhadap perkawinan nyentana beda wangsa, faktanya masyarakat tetap berpandangan bahwa perkawinan tersebut merupakan perkawinan antar kasta. Dengan demikian budaya hukum masyarakat hukum adat di Tabanan cenderung bersifat statis. Hal ini dilatarbelakangi oleh banyak faktor, salah satu diantaranya ialah faktor ketidaktahuan baik dari pemuka adat maupun krama adat tentang Keputusan DPRD  No. 11 Tahun 1951 yang secara tegas telah menghapus perkawinan antar kasta yang kerap menimbulkan diskriminasi.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 74-104
Author(s):  
Mulyanto

Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan penguatan masyarakat hukum adat dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif. Penelitian ini menempatkan sistem norma dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa sebagai objek kajian. Penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder yang terdiri dar bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik analisis data secara kualitatif dengan menggunakan theoritical interpretatif dengan menafsirkan data yang dikumpulkan berdasarkan teori sebagai kerangka berpikir. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengakuan masyarakat hukum adat telah dijamin dalam Konstitusi baik itu UUD 1945 Pra Amendemen maupun UUD 1945 Pasca Amendemen. Penguatan Masyarakat Hukum Adat dalam UU No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa dengan menganut asas rekognisi yang merupakan asas pengakuan dan penghormatan negara terhadap kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat berupa otonomi komunitas. Implikasinya terjadi peningkatan status hukum dari kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat menjadi desa adat dengan status sebagai subjek hukum. Kebijakan penguatan masyarakat hukum adat tersebut secara formil masih membutuhkan political will pemerintah daerah dan inisasi Masyarakat Hukum Adat untuk mengikuti prosedur menjadi Desa Adat. The objective of research to describe the understanding of indigenous people in Act No. 6 of 2014 concerning the village. The method used is the method descriptive normative law. This study puts the system of norms in Act No. 6 of 2014 on the village as an object of study. This study uses secondary data consisting dar primary legal materials and secondary law. Qualitative data analysis techniques using interpretative theoritical to interpret the data collected under the theory as a framework. The results showed that the recognition of indigenous people has been guaranteed in the Constitution is the Constitution of 1945 Before the Amendment and the Constitution of 1945 After the changes. Strengthening indigenous people in uUndang Act No. 6 of 2014 with the principles of recognition which is a principle of recognition and respect for the state of the law community unit in the form of community autonomy. The implication an increase in the legal status of customary law community unit into a traditional village with its status as a legal subject. Strengthening public policy formally customary law still requires the political will of local governments and the initiation indigenous people to follow the procedure becomes a traditional village.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document