scholarly journals THE EFFECTS OF INQUIRY TRAINING MODEL USING MIND MAPPING AND MOTIVATION ON STUDENTS’ SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS PHYSICS.

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Dara Fitrah Dwi ◽  
Mara Bangun Harahap ◽  
Derlina .
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Sample Selection ◽  
Training Model ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Science ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Mind Mapping ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

This study aims to analyze, student’s science process skills who are taught by inquiry training learning model using mind mapping is better than the students that taught with conventional learning, science process skills in students who have motivated above average are better compared with students who have the motivation below average, and the interaction between the inquiry training learning model using mind mapping and motivation in improving students' science process skills. This research was conducted by quasiexperimental. The sample selection was done by cluster random sampling that were class X2 and X1. The research instrument was using science process skills test in the form of descriptions and tests of motivation in the form of a questionnaire. The data were analyzed by ANOVA two lanes. The results showed that: The ability of students’ physics science process skills using inquiry training learning using mind mapping is better than the ability of students’ science process skills using conventional learning model. The ability of students’ physics science process skills in motivational groups are above average better than the ability of students’ physics science process skills  in conventional groups which are below average, and In this research, motivation above average dominant improves science process skills in Inquiry Training model using mind mapping rather than in conventional learning model

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF THE INQUIRY TRAINING MODEL TOWARDS SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS OF STUDENTS ON PHYSICS LESSON

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Abdul Hakim ◽  
Aisyah .
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Training Model ◽  
Test Design ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

This study aimed to know the effect of science process skills of students and activity among the inquiry training and the conventional learning. This research is quasi-experimental study using pre-test and post-test design. The population of the study was students in Medan. Techniques that used to gain a simple is cluster random sampling, the first was grade as experimental class used the inquiry training model and the second was grade as the control class used the conventional learning. The instruments of this study were the science process skills test. The activity, affective, and psychomotor was used observation sheet. The analysis results that the inquiry training was better than that conventional learning in improving the science process skills of students.

scholarly journals THE EFFECTS OF INQUIRY TRAINING LEARNING MODEL AND CRITICAL THINGKING ABILITY TOWARD SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS OF SMA

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Ferawati Hutapea ◽  
Motlan .
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Training Model ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of research are 1). To know are differences in science process skills of students with the applied of inquiry training learning model and direct instruction learning models, 2). To know are differences in science process skills of students who has high critical thinking ability and the  critically low ability, 3). To know the interaction inquiry training learning model and critical thinking ability toward students science process skills. The samples in this research conducted by cluster random sampling and  as many as two class , the first class (X-I) as experiment applied Inquiry Training learning model and the second class (X-2) as control class applied Direct Intruction learning model. The instrument used in this research is tests science process skills and critical thinking skills in the form of description and observation sheets science process skills. From these results it can be concluded that: 1) there are differences in students science process skills with applied inquiry training model and direct intruction model, 2) science process skills of students with high critical thinking ability is better than the science process skills of students with the ability to think critically low, and 3) the interaction inquiry training learning model and critical thinking ability toward the science process skills.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF INQUIRY TRAINING LEARNING MODEL DAN CREATIVITY ON SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Purnama Silitonga ◽  
Mara Bangun Harahap ◽  
Derlina .
Keyword(s):  
Interaction Model ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Model Training ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

This study aims: 1) to determine differences in science process skills of students with learning model inquiry training and conventional learning models, 2) to determine the difference science process skills of students who have high creativity and creativity is low, 3) to determine the interaction model of learning inquiry trainingwith creativity of the science process skills. The sampling technique conducted cluster random sampling two classes, where first class as a class experiment with the number of students 32 people applied learning model inquiry training (X-1) and the second class as a class control the number of students 32 people who applied conventional learning model ( X-2). Instruments in this study is the science process skills test and a test of creativity in the form of a description. From these results it can be concluded that: 1) science process skills of students that learned with a learning model inquiry training is better than the students that learned with conventional learning models, 2)science process skills of students with high creativity better than students with creativity is low, 3) there is interaction between inquirylearning model training and creativity in influencing the science process skills of students.

scholarly journals EFFECTS OF INQUIRY ON TRAINING AND CRITICAL THINKING PROCESS SKILL SCIENCE PHYSICS

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Tetty Ompusunggu ◽  
Betty M Turnip ◽  
Makmur Sirait
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Thinking Process ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

The aims of this research were to analyze the result of student’s Science Process Skills by using Inquiry Training Learning Model, to analyze the result of student’sScience Process Skills who had critical thinking ability above average better than critical thinking ability below average and to analyze the interaction between Inquiry training learning model and critical thinking ability of physics student’s Science Process Skills. This research was a quasi-experimental with two group pretest posttest design and anova design. The sample was conducted by cluster random sampling of two classes, the first class as experiment class with inquiry training Learning Model, and the second class as a control class with Conventional Learning. The research instrument consisted of science process skills test and critical thinking test. Data in this research was analyzed by using two ways Anova. The results of the research showed that student’s Science Process Skills using inquiry training learning model better than conventional learning, student’s Science Process Skills who had critical thinking above average better than critical thinking below average, and there was interaction between Inquiry training learning model and critical thinking to improve physics sudent’s Science Process Skills

scholarly journals THE INQUIRY TRAINING LEARNING MODEL USE MIND MAPPING AND FORMAL THINGKING ABILITY ON STUDENT’S SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bima Anggraini
Keyword(s):  
Learning Model ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Mind Mapping ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Control ◽  
Essay Test ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

The aim of this research were to analyzes: the different students’s science process skills by using inquiry training learning model and using conventional learning, the different students’s science process skills in the group of students who had formal thinking ability above average and below average, and the interaction inquiry training learning model and conventional learning with formal thinking ability of the students’s science process skills. This research carried out by a quasi-experimental with using two group pretest-postest design. The population of this study was class IX SMP IT An-Nizam Medan. The sample in this research was conducted by cluster random sampling of two classes, experiment class by using inquiry training learning model and control class by using conventional learning. The instruments of this study used science process skills in the perform work form and formal thinking ability test were collected by essay test. The data was analyzed by using two-way analysis of varians. The results of this research are  the different students’s science process skills of inquiry training learning model and conventional learning, the different students’s science process skills  who had formal thinking ability above average and below average, and there were an interactions between the inquiry training learning model with formal thinking ability in improving students's science process skills.

scholarly journals PERBEDAAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA ANTARA SISWA YANG BELAJAR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN KONVENSIONAL

Aksioma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-178
Author(s):  
Siti Hadijah ◽  
Sutji Rochaminah ◽  
Maxinus Jaeng
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Control Design ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Concept Understanding ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional di Kelas IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu. Hipotesis penelitian ini adalah pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan pembelajaran konvensional. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu. Desain penelitian ini adalah pre-post test control design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu dengan teknik pengambilan sampel cluster random sampling. Nilai rata-rata siswa kelas eksperimen 47 dan standar deviasi 17,04 sedangkan nilai rata-rata siswa kelas kontrol 40 dan standar deviasi 13,40. Data yang diperoleh berdistribusi normal dan homogen, maka pengujian hipotesis menggunakan teknis statistik parametris yaitu uji t. Hasil pengujian hipotesis diperoleh bahwa nilai ????tabel = 1,67 dan ????hitung = 2,96 sehingga H1 diterima dan H0 ditolak. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional di kelas IX MTsN 1 Kota Palu. Kata Kunci:   Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw, Model Pembelajaran Konvensional,  dan Pemahaman Konsep   Abstract: This research purposed to determine is mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model better than students who learn by using conventional learning model in class IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu. The hypothesis is that mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model better than students who learn by using conventional learning model. The type of research is a quasi experiment. Design of research is pre-post control design. The population of this research is all students of class IX  MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu with samples taken by cluster random sampling technique. The average score of the experiment class students is 47 and standard deviation is 17.04 and the average score of the control class students is 40 and standard deviation is 13.40. The data is normal distribution and homogen, hypothesis test using t test. Results of hypothesis test obtained value ????table = 1.67 and ????count = 2.96 it means H1 is accepted and H0 is rejected. This indicated that mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model have better than mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using conventional learning model in class IX MTsN 1 Kota Palu. Keywords:  Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model, Conventional Learning Model, and Concept Understanding

scholarly journals Keefektifan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Think Pair And Share Melalui Pendekatan Inquiry Ditinjau dari Kemandiriran Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Mutia Anggraeni ◽  
Paridjo . ◽  
Eleonora Dwi W
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Inquiry Approach ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan : (1) Untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dan model pembelajaran Ekspositori.(2) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik dari pada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi.(3) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembeljaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Brebes tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Sampel yang diambil sebanyak 2 kelas eksperimen, 2 kelas kontrol, dan 1 kelas ujicoba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan menetapkan taraf signifikansi 5% adalah uji Anava dengan Rancangan Acak Kelompok, uji-t satu pihak kanan, dan uji-t satu pihak kiri, yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Ekspositori. (2) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi. (3) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik atau sama dengan yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out whether there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students taught by using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach and Expository learning models. (2) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievements of students taught by the model Think Pair and Share learning through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is not better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learning independence. The population in this study were students of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Brebes academic year 2016/2017. Sampling uses cluster random sampling technique. Samples taken were 2 experimental classes, 2 control classes, and 1 trial class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used by setting the 5% significance level is the Anova test with the Randomized Group Design, the right-hand t-test, and the left-hand t-test, which has previously been carried out prerequisite tests namely normality test and homogeneity test. From the results of the study it can be concluded that: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students who are taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach with the Expository learning model. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) Mathematics learning achievements of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach are not better or the same as those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learningindependence. Keywords: ThinkPairandShare, InquiryApproach, Learning Independence, Mathematics Learning Achievement.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SITUATION-BASED LEARNING TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS X SMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
Beni Junedi ◽  
Ade Susanti
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Design ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematical Understanding ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

The research aims to find out the students' mathematical understanding using situation-based learning model students of class X IPA, the type of research used is quasi-experimental design research, taking class X IPA 3 as an experimental class and class X IPA 2 as a control class. The technique used in this sampling is cluster random sampling. Research instruments in the form of tests to determine the level of mathematical understanding of students. The data obtained will be analyzed with the hypothesis test t-test. Hypothesis test results obtained a significant value <0.05 which is 0.049 <0.05. Based on these results it was concluded to reject H0 and accept Ha. This means the average student's mathematical understanding ability using the Situation-Based Learning model is better than the average student's mathematical understanding ability using conventional learning.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF INQUIRY TRAINING LEARNING MODEL USING MACROMEDIA FLASH AND CREATIVE THINKING ABILITY ON SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS OF STUDENT

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Evadonna Siagian ◽  
Nurdin Bukit ◽  
Derlina .
Keyword(s):  
Test Data ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability ◽  
Research Type ◽  
Better Than

The aims of this research were to analyze science process skills of students using Inquiry Training Learning Model use Macromedia Flash on science process skills of students compare using conventional learning, analyze science process skills ofstudents who have high category in creative thinking ability better than low category in creative thinking ability, and analyze the interaction between Inquiry Training learning model use Macromedia Flash and the level of creative thinking ability in improving the science process skills. The research type was quasi experiment andtwo group pretest-posttest designs were used in this study. The sample was choosen by using cluster random class technique. The instrument was consist of science process skills test and creative thinking ability test. Data in this research was analyzed by using twoway Anova. The results of this research showed that the inquiry training learning model use macromedia flash was better than conventional learning in improving the students science process skills, the science process skills of the students who had highcategory in creative thinking ability was better than low category, and there was interaction between inquiry training learning model use macromedia flash and the level of creative thinking ability in improving students science process skills.

scholarly journals Experiential learning model with mind mapping on fungi: how to improve science process skills?

Biosfer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desi Indriani ◽  
Ixora Sartika Mercuriani
Keyword(s):  
Experiential Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Mind Mapping ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
School Year ◽  
Tenth Grade

This research aimed to find out the effectiveness of experiential learning (EL) model with mind mapping to improve the science process skills (SPS) on fungi materials. It was quasi-experiment research by using pre-test post-test control group design. The population of the study was all of the tenth-grade students of Kalasan State 1 Senior High School amount of 127 students in the odd semester in 2018/2019 of the school year. Sample techniques were cluster random sampling. The sample consisted of 26 students (10 students male and 16 students female) as the experiment class by implementing EL model with mind mapping and 26 students (9 students male and 17 students female) as control class by using 5M (observing, asking, collecting, associating, communicating) learning model. The used instrument was ten essay questions. The data of the research were analyzed by using t-test (independent sample t-test). Based on the result of the normalized gain score, it showed that there was an improve of SPS about 0,85 in the experiment class higher than that in the control class about 0,70. Besides, it also showed a significant value (2-tailed) that was 0,000 (<0,05). It meant that there was a difference in science process skills between the experiment class and control class, so the learning process through EL learning model with mind mapping proved useful to improve the students’ science process skills.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document