scholarly journals PERBEDAAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA ANTARA SISWA YANG BELAJAR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN KONVENSIONAL

Aksioma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-178
Author(s):  
Siti Hadijah ◽  
Sutji Rochaminah ◽  
Maxinus Jaeng
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Control Design ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Concept Understanding ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional di Kelas IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu. Hipotesis penelitian ini adalah pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan pembelajaran konvensional. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu. Desain penelitian ini adalah pre-post test control design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu dengan teknik pengambilan sampel cluster random sampling. Nilai rata-rata siswa kelas eksperimen 47 dan standar deviasi 17,04 sedangkan nilai rata-rata siswa kelas kontrol 40 dan standar deviasi 13,40. Data yang diperoleh berdistribusi normal dan homogen, maka pengujian hipotesis menggunakan teknis statistik parametris yaitu uji t. Hasil pengujian hipotesis diperoleh bahwa nilai ????tabel = 1,67 dan ????hitung = 2,96 sehingga H1 diterima dan H0 ditolak. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional di kelas IX MTsN 1 Kota Palu. Kata Kunci:   Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw, Model Pembelajaran Konvensional,  dan Pemahaman Konsep   Abstract: This research purposed to determine is mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model better than students who learn by using conventional learning model in class IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu. The hypothesis is that mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model better than students who learn by using conventional learning model. The type of research is a quasi experiment. Design of research is pre-post control design. The population of this research is all students of class IX  MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu with samples taken by cluster random sampling technique. The average score of the experiment class students is 47 and standard deviation is 17.04 and the average score of the control class students is 40 and standard deviation is 13.40. The data is normal distribution and homogen, hypothesis test using t test. Results of hypothesis test obtained value ????table = 1.67 and ????count = 2.96 it means H1 is accepted and H0 is rejected. This indicated that mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model have better than mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using conventional learning model in class IX MTsN 1 Kota Palu. Keywords:  Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model, Conventional Learning Model, and Concept Understanding

scholarly journals PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SITUATION-BASED LEARNING TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS X SMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
Beni Junedi ◽  
Ade Susanti
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Design ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematical Understanding ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

The research aims to find out the students' mathematical understanding using situation-based learning model students of class X IPA, the type of research used is quasi-experimental design research, taking class X IPA 3 as an experimental class and class X IPA 2 as a control class. The technique used in this sampling is cluster random sampling. Research instruments in the form of tests to determine the level of mathematical understanding of students. The data obtained will be analyzed with the hypothesis test t-test. Hypothesis test results obtained a significant value <0.05 which is 0.049 <0.05. Based on these results it was concluded to reject H0 and accept Ha. This means the average student's mathematical understanding ability using the Situation-Based Learning model is better than the average student's mathematical understanding ability using conventional learning.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Facilitator And Explaining Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP Negeri 2 Somagede

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Febri Intan Ratmadani ◽  
Ahmad Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Communication Skills ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Control Design ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Learning Research ◽  
Direct Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

This study aimed to detemine whether Student Facilitator And Explaining cooperative learning model affected students mathematical communication skills. The research design used was Posttest Only Control Design. The population in this study was entire seventh grade students in SMP Negeri 2 Somagede. Sampling was determined using Cluster Random Sampling technique. Two classes of sample were obtained. Class VII B, consistend of 23 students, selected as the experimental class which employed cooperative tipe Student Facilitator And Explaining learning model and class VII D, consisted of 23 students, was as the control class which used direct learning. Research results indicated that mathematical communication skills of students who attended Student Facilitator And Explaining learning was better than that of students who attended direct learning. So it can be interpreted that Student Facilitator And Explaining learning cooperative model affected students mathematical communication skills

scholarly journals Studi Perbandingan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray dan Jigsaw Ditinjau dari Hasil Belajar Matematika

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 180
Author(s):  
Sibtil Hasaniah ◽  
Laila Hayati ◽  
Nani Kurniati
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Written Test ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

This study was aimed to discover the comparison of the cooperative learning model between two stay two stray type and jigsaw typeon thesubject of patterns and row of numbers in SMPN 1 Gunungsari academic year 2019/2020. This researchis considered as quasi experiment group design in whish post test was used. The sample was taken using cluster random sampling, students of VIII-A and VIII-C were used as the sampel. The instruments used in this research were written test and observation sheets consisting of learning process, teacher and student’s activities.The students’ score in using the two sttay two stray class shows an average score 63,67 with 26.66% classical completeness. While in the jigsaw class,the average of students’ score was 65,33 with 30.00% classical completeness. Although the result of both classes are low, but both classes have  increased learning activities each meeting. The implementation of the learning model has been carried out 97%. Furthermore, teacher activities were coresponded with the study plans. The result of this study shows that there is no significant differences between two stay two stray typeand jigsaw type in cooperative learning modelon thesubject of patterns and row of numbers in VIII grade SMPN 1 Gunungsari academic year 2019/2020.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES AND TOURNAMENT (TGT) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR DASARLISTRIK DAN ELEKTRONIKA

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Dyan Novi Rezki Situmorang ◽  
Wanapri Pangaribuan
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Homogeneous Distribution ◽  
Electrical Measurements ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Team Game ◽  
And Control

AbstrakJenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian quasi eksperimen. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X semester genap SMK Swasta Imelda Medan Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan mengambil 2 kelas, yaitu kelas X TITL 1 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas X TITL 2 sebagai kelas kontrol, yang masing-masing kelas berjumlah 28 orang siswa. Instrument yang digunakan untuk mengetahui hasil belajar siswa adalah tes hasil belajar dalam bentuk pilihan berganda dengan jumlah soal 30 butir. Hasil pengujian pretest sebelum diberi perlakuan yang berbeda, yaitu skor rata-rata di kelas eksperimen  (47) dengan standar deviasi 8,50 dan skor rata-rata di kelas kontrol (44,45) dengan standar deviasi 7,75. Pada pengujian data pretest kedua kelas diperoleh bahwa data kedua kelas berdistribusi normal dan homogen yang berarti memiliki kemampuan awal yang sama. Kemudian diberi perlakuan yaitu kelas eksperimen diajarkan dengan pembelajaran menggunakan model kooperatif tipe Team Game Tournament (TGT) dan kelas kontrol diajar dengan pembelajaran menggunakan model ekspositori. Setelah pembelajaran selesai diberikan posttest, diperoleh nilai posttest dengan hasil rata-rata kelas eksperimen (88,78) dengan standar deviasi 4,06 dan kelas kontrol (81,55) dengan standar deviasi 4,17. Dari hasil pengolahan data posttest diperoleh bahwa thitung=  6,40 dan ttabel = 1,67. Sehingga thitung > ttabel.Sehingga Ha diterima yaitu Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Team Game Tournament (TGT)memberikan hasil belajar pada pelajaran dasar dan pengukuran listrik yang lebih tinggi daripada pembelajaran menggunakan model ekspositori pada siswa kelas X TITL SMK Swasta Imelda Medan.Kata Kunci: Pembelajaran Tipe Team Game Tournament, Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif AbstractEnglish translation. This type of research is quasi experimental research. The population in this study is all students of class X even semester of Imelda Medan Private Vocational School Year 2019/2020. Sampling is done by taking 2 classes, namely class X TITL 1 as an experimental class and class X TITL 2 as a control class, each of which totals 28 students. The instrument used to find out student learning outcomes is a test of learning results in the form of multiple choices with the number of questions 30 points. Pretest test results before being given different treatments, namely the average score in the experimental class (47) with a standard deviation of 8.50 and the average score in the control class (44.45) with a standard deviation of 7.75. In the pretest data test both classes it was obtained that the data of both classes are normal and homogeneous distribution which means it has the same initial capabilities. Then given the treatment that experimental classes are taught by learning using a cooperative model type Team Game Tournament (TGT) and control classes are taught by learning using an expository model. After the learning was completed, posttest scores were obtained with the average results of experimental classes (88.78) with a standard deviation of 4.06 and control classes (81.55) with a standard deviation of 4.17. From the results of posttest data processing obtained that thitung = 6.40 and ttabel = 1.67. So thitung > ttabel. So ha accepted, namely the Cooperative Learning Model Type Team Game Tournament (TGT) provides learning outcomes on basic lessons and higher electrical measurements than learning using the expository model in students of class X TITL SMK Swasta Imelda Medan.  Keywords: Team Game Tournament Type Learning, Cooperative Learning Model

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TSTS–NHT DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGANTAR BISNIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Business Students ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis.  Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.

scholarly journals PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE PAIR CHECK DENGAN TIPE THINK PAIR SQUARE DI SMA

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Nurul Huda Arianti ◽  
Syubhan Annur ◽  
Mastuang Mastuang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Achievement Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Model Pair ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Student learning outcomes is still less than optimal or unsatisfactory, it can be known through the data replication midterm class XI IPA at SMAN 9 Banjarmasin. This happens because the learning methods and models used by teachers based on observations during the learning tend to be monotonous and less engaging students, so that students are less enthusiastic and less active in the following study. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in learning outcomes of students using cooperative learning model Pair Check with the type of Think Pair Square in class XI SMA Negeri 9 Banjarmasin. This type of research used in this research is quantitative quasi-experimental research design. This study population is all students in grade XI IPA at SMAN 9 Banjarmasin. Samples were taken using cluster random sampling. Data collection techniques are techniques achievement test and documentation. The results showed that there are differences in learning outcomes of students using cooperative learning model Pair Check with the type of Think Pair Square in class XI SMA Negeri 9 Banjarmasin.

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make a Match untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elekrolit di Kelas X Madrasah Aliya DDI Lonja

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Muslimah Muslimah ◽  
Kasmudin Mustapa ◽  
Ratman Ratman
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Better Than

This research describes the differences of student’s learning with the application of cooperative learning type make a match in the electrolyte and non-electrolyte at the X grade student’s of the Madrasah Aliya DDI Lonja. This research used quasi experimental with non randomized pretest-posttest control group design. This research was conducted with two groups: XA as the experimental (n=21) XB as the control group (n=18). The data findings means score of experimental group (X1) is 70,5 with the standard deviation 9,6 and the control group (X2) is 62.0 with the standard deviation is 6. Based on the results, the researcher concludes cooperative learning type make a match has better than control class that used conventional learning model.

scholarly journals DISCOVERY AND CORE LEARNING MODEL TOWARD CREATIVE THINKING VIEWED FROM LOGICAL MATHEMATICAL INTELLIGENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 308
Author(s):  
Veronika Yusnita Andriani Prastika ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi ◽  
Siswanto Siswanto
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Control Design ◽  
Eighth Graders ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

This research aims to 1) which learning model that supports students’ creative thinking ability whether discovery, CORE, or conventional learning model, 2) which model that supports creative thinking ability the most to high, moderate, and low level students, 3) know if there is interaction between learning model and students’ logical mathematical intelligence, and creative thinking ability. This is a quasi-experimental research with the population of eighth graders of junior high schools in Madiun Regency. The research design used a group pretest-posttest control design. The sample was determined using stratified cluster random sampling. This research uses two-way unequal ANOVA. This research concluded that 1) students’ creative thinking skill is developed better using Discovery than CORE and conventional learning model, 2) students with high logical mathematical intelligence have higher creative thinking ability than those with moderate and low logical mathematical intelligence,3) there is no interaction between learning model and logical mathematical intelligence with creative thinking ability.Keywords: Creative Thinking; Learning Model; Logical Mathematical Intelligence. AbstrakTujuan dari penelitan ini untuk mengetahui 1) model pembelajaran manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih  antara model pembelajaran discovery learning, CORE atau konvensional, 2) manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih baik siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi, sedang, atau rendah, 3) apakah terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan keceredasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian adalah eksperimen semu, dengan populasi siswa kelas VIII SMP N Se-Kabupaten Madiun. Desain penelitian menggunakan group pretest-posttest control design Pemilihan sampel dengan menggunakan stratified cluster random sampling. Teknik analisis penelitian ini menggunakan anava dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Kesimpulan pada penelitian ini 1) kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang kenai model discovery learning lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran CORE dan konvensional, 2) Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis sedang dan rendah, , 3) tidak ada interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan kecerdasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif.Kata kunci: Berpikir kreatif; kecerdasan logis matematis; model pembelajaran.

scholarly journals Keefektifan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Think Pair And Share Melalui Pendekatan Inquiry Ditinjau dari Kemandiriran Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Mutia Anggraeni ◽  
Paridjo . ◽  
Eleonora Dwi W
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Inquiry Approach ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan : (1) Untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dan model pembelajaran Ekspositori.(2) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik dari pada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi.(3) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembeljaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Brebes tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Sampel yang diambil sebanyak 2 kelas eksperimen, 2 kelas kontrol, dan 1 kelas ujicoba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan menetapkan taraf signifikansi 5% adalah uji Anava dengan Rancangan Acak Kelompok, uji-t satu pihak kanan, dan uji-t satu pihak kiri, yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Ekspositori. (2) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi. (3) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik atau sama dengan yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out whether there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students taught by using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach and Expository learning models. (2) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievements of students taught by the model Think Pair and Share learning through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is not better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learning independence. The population in this study were students of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Brebes academic year 2016/2017. Sampling uses cluster random sampling technique. Samples taken were 2 experimental classes, 2 control classes, and 1 trial class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used by setting the 5% significance level is the Anova test with the Randomized Group Design, the right-hand t-test, and the left-hand t-test, which has previously been carried out prerequisite tests namely normality test and homogeneity test. From the results of the study it can be concluded that: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students who are taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach with the Expository learning model. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) Mathematics learning achievements of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach are not better or the same as those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learningindependence. Keywords: ThinkPairandShare, InquiryApproach, Learning Independence, Mathematics Learning Achievement.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Teams Games Tournament Berbasis Scramble terhadap Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA Kristen GPID Palu

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Sifra Bertin Mbosisi ◽  
Kasmudin Mustapa ◽  
Ratman Ratman
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Motivation And Learning

This study aimed to determine the effect of the cooperative learning model type teams scramble tournament games based scramble on motivation and learning outcomes students SMA Kristen GPID Palu. The population in this study were all students of class X. The research sample was students (n = 25) of class Xa as a control class and students (n= 24) of class Xb as an experiment class. The testing of student’s learning outcomes data was using the statistical analysis t-test of the two parties and the testing of student’s' motivation using the questionnaire data used a descriptive analysis. The average score of student’s learning outcomes of the experiment class (X1) was 52.83 with a standard deviation of 11.97 and the control class (X2) was 48.12 with a standard deviation of 11.37. Based on the statistical analysis of the hypothesis by t-test two parties, it was obtained that –ttable ≤ tcalculation ³ +ttable (tcalculation = 2.09 and ttable = 2.02) with a significance level a = 0.05 and degrees of freedom = 47, then H0 was rejected and Ha was accepted, therefore it can be said that there is a difference in student’s learning outcomes using cooperative learning model type teams tournament games based scramble. The results of the data analysis of student motivation indicated that the percentage value for the experimental class was 83.4% and for the control class was 81.21% and both were on the agrees attitude with the positive category, so it can be concluded that there is an influence of the cooperative learning model type teams scramble tournament games based scramble on motivation and learning outcomes of students SMA Kristen GPID Palu.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document