scholarly journals FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA UNTUK PENERAPAN BAHAN AJAR KONTEKSTUAL MENGINTEGRASIKAN PENGETAHUAN TERKAIT DAN REALISTIK

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helma Helma ◽  
Edizon Edizon
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Teaching ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Materials ◽  
Realistic Approach ◽  
Five Factors ◽  
Motivation And Learning ◽  
Initial Research

Mathematics learning on high school should be associated with other sciences and everyday life. In this way, the mathematics learning is more realistic, interesting and meaningful. However, re-ality shows that mathematics learning materials has not been associated with other sciences and eve-ryday life. Initial research find that needs to be develop contextual mathematics material. Before the learning materials are prepared, it is important to know the characteristics of learners in following the learning of mathematics that affect the learning outcomes. There are five factors that influence the learning outcomes, namely background, interest, attitude, motivation and learning styles The purpose of research is to determine the factors that influence learning outcomes. Type of this research is de-scriptive research. The instruments are assessment sheets for learners characteristics and test. The results is factors that influence the learning outcomes of learners directly for the development needs of contextual mathematics teaching materials to integrate related knowledge and realistic approach is the learning style.

scholarly journals Differences in Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Terms of Level of Motivation and Learning Styles of Students Class XI SMK Kesehatah Imelda Ritonga

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1287-1294
Author(s):  
Dede Irawan ◽  
Amin Harahap
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Final Test ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Level Of Motivation ◽  
Motivation And Learning

This study aims to determine differences in mathematics learning outcomes of students in terms of level of motivation learning styles of students and How students ' mathematics learning Outcomes in terms of level of motivation and learning styles of students. This research experiments. The research Data consists of the initial test and final test about the material that has been delivered using the approach of learning motivation and learning styles with the dependent variable is learning outcomes. In this study, the researchers obtained data from the results of pre-test and post-test conducted in the experimental class(the class that viewed from learning motivation) and class control(class in terms of learning styles). Based on the above analysis, it has been proven that there are significant differences between the learning outcomes in terms of learning motivation and learning styles in enhancing student learning outcomes in Mathematics learning in the SMK Kesehatan Imelda Ritonga.

scholarly journals Blended Learning Strategies of Telegram-Assisted Learning Towards Student Mathematics Learning Results Reviewed from Learning Style

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Kadek Suryati ◽  
I Gede Adnyana
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Blended Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Material ◽  
Online Application

The research aims to describe the influence of telegram-assisted blended learning strategies on mathematics learning outcomes in terms of learning styles. This research is a quasi-experimental research using 2x3 factorial design. The respondents taken is the second semester students majoring in informatics engineering at the STMIK STIKOM Indonesia campus. The sampling procedure in this study was a random sampling technique that was started by carrying out the equivalency test of 4 classes taken using the one-way ANOVA test. After that randomly selected, two classes as an experimental class and two classes as a control class. To get instruments that have validity before use, questionnaires and tests are first tested and validated by experts who are experts in their fields. Normality and homogeneity tests are needed as a prerequisite before analyzing the data. The method used to analyze data is two-way ANOVA. The results showed that (1) student mathematics learning outcomes taught with telegram-assisted blended learning strategies were better than conventional mathematics learning outcomes of students taught, (2) the effect of telegraph-assisted blended learning strategies on student mathematics learning outcomes in learning styles. Based on the results of the research that has been carried out, it is recommended that further researchers or educators be able to develop a blended learning strategy as a way to convey learning material so that they can pay more attention to the learning styles of each student and can develop telegrams with more attractive features so that the telegram becomes one of online application for learning media.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Gaya Belajar dan Sikap Siswa pada Pelajaran Matematika terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leny Hartati
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Cognitive Learning ◽  
Negative Attitude ◽  
Math Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Learning Mathematics

<p>This study aims to determine the effect of learning styles and attitudes of <br />students in math on math learning outcomes. The method used is the method Expose Facto. The study sample drawn from a population with affordable proportional random technique, as many as 60 students. The instrument used in this study is a questionnaire instrument to measure learning style variables and variable attitudes of students in math, and test instruments, to measure the outcomes of learning mathematics. The research design used in this study is a 3 x 2 factorial design with three variables consisting of two independent variables, namely cognitive learning styles and attitudes of students in math, as well as the dependent variable, which is the result of learning mathematics. From the <br />data processing obtained the following results: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style, auditory and kinesthetic. It is in the show by the price of the F - count of 2,494 with a probability of 0.047 sig (sig &lt; 0.05) at significance level ? = 5 %. (2) The results of the mathematical learning of students who have a positive attitude at a higher math than students who have a negative attitude on math. It is in the show by the price of the F - count of 3,124 with a probability <br />of 0.018 sig (sig &lt; 0.05) at significance level. (3) There is no interaction between the learning styles of students in math attitudes toward math learning outcomes. It is in the show by the price of the F - calculated interaction probability value was 1.621 while sig. for interaction (learning styles * attitude of students in math) of 0.140 (sig &gt; 0.05). </p>

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneous Population ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes

scholarly journals The Differences in Influence of Approaches and Learning Styles on Learning Outcomes in the Matter Material of Class IV Students at SD IT Tadzkia, Langsa

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 1861-1872
Author(s):  
Kamal Fahlevi ◽  
KMS Amin Fauzi ◽  
Sumarno Sumarno
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Test Analysis ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Data Collection Technique

In mathematics learning, the determination of the approach greatly determines student learning outcomes, because mathematics subjects are assessed for students as quite difficult subjects, this assessment appears due to the discomfort experienced by students during the learning process in class. The method used in this research is an experimental method with two-way ANOVA test analysis. This study aims to determine differences in learning outcomes through the PMR and PMR approaches based on the Math App game in terms of student learning styles. The research was conducted at SD IT Tadzkia Langsa with a total sample of 34 students. The data collection technique uses the distribution of learning style questionnaires and by conducting tests (pre-test and post-test). This study found that there were differences in learning income between PMR and PMR based on the Math App game based on a significant value of 0.045 <0.05. Then there were also differences in learning styles based on the results of the SPSS calculation with a significant value of 0.049 <0.05. Whereas in the interaction section between the learning style approach and learning style, it was found that there was an interaction between the learning style approach and the learning style with a significant value of 0.018 <0.05.

scholarly journals ANALISIS MOTIVASI DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA DI KELAS IV SDS AMALIA MEDAN

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tri Astari
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
Motivation And Learning ◽  
Very High

Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Guru dan Sosial (JIPGUSOS) STKIP Citra Bangsa Aceh Utara Volume 1, No. 1, Maret 2018. This study aims to analyze the motivation and learning styles to the results of learning the mathematics of IV students SDS Amalia Medan. This type of research is a qualitative descriptive. The population and sample of this research are 23 students of class IV. Data analysis comes from observation, observation, and questionnaire. The result of motivation analysis obtained very high motivation percentage 13,04% (3 person), high 56,52% (13 persons), low 21,74% (5 person), and very low 8,70% (2 person). Many students completed KKM with very high motivation as much as 2 people, high as many as 13 people, and low as much as 1 person. The result of learning style analysis was 15 students (65,22%) with visual learning style, 5 students (21,74%) had an auditory learning style, and 3 students (13,04%) with kinesthetic learning style. Many students who complete the learning outcomes (beyond the limit of KKM 70) by using semester exam questions as the test is 12 visual persons (52.17%), 3 auditory (13.04%) and 1 kinesthetic (4.35%). Based on the results of data analysis, the motivation and learning style influence the learning outcomes of mathematics.

scholarly journals The Effect of Brain Based Learning Strategies and Project Based Learning on Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Students of the Kinesthetic Learning Style Group

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6S3) ◽  
pp. 373-377
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Project Based Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Brain Based Learning

Brain-based learning is a concept of strategy to create learning-oriented efforts to empower students' brain potential. Project-Based Learning is a learning strategy that utilizes projects or activities as a center of learning. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of brain-based learning and project-based learning strategies on student mathematics learning outcomes, especially kinesthetic learning style groups. The quasi-experimental research method is post-test only design, retrieval of learning outcomes data with tests and learning styles using questionnaires and data analysis using ANOVA with t-Dunnet advanced tests. This study found that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught using the Project-Based Learning strategy were higher than those taught by the Brain-Based Learning (BBL) learning strategy especially for students in kinesthetic learning styles. The suitability of investigative activities creates products in project-based learning with the characterization of students' kinesthetic learning styles which are characterized by always touching certain information objects can strengthen the memory of meaningful information and knowledge so as to improve the quality of learning outcomes.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRI DENGAN MASYARAKAT BELAJAR DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Marianto Pardosi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Communities ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika antara siswa yang diajar dengan model  pembelajaran inkuiri dan yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran masyarakat belajar, (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika  antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar auditorial, (3) interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VI Sekolah Dasar Negeri 118299 Aek Raso, Teknik penarikan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajarn inkuiri lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran masyarakat belajar, (2) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar auditorial, (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan pada hasil belajar matematika antara model pembelajaran inkuiri dan masyarakat belajar, begitu pula anatara gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar auditorial. Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran, inquiri, masyarakat belajar, gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditorial, matematika Abstract: This study aims to find out: (1) Differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students taught with inquiry learning models and those taught with learning communities learning models, (2) Differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who have visual learning styles and auditory learning styles , (3) the interaction between learning models and learning styles on learning outcomes in mathematics. The population of this research is all students of grade VI of State Elementary School 118299 Aek Raso, withdrawal technique with cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial research design. Data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significant level α = 0.05. The research findings show that: (1) the learning outcomes of students who are taught with inquiry learning models are higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with learning models of learning communities, (2) the results of learning mathematics students who have higher visual learning styles than student learning outcomes which has an auditory learning style, (3) there is an interaction between the learning model and learning style on learning outcomes in mathematics. Further test calculations with the Scheffe test show significant differences in mathematics learning outcomes between inquiry learning models and learning communities, as well as between visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. Keywords: learning model, inquiry, learning society, visual learning style, auditory learning style, mathematics

Hubungan Gaya Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik Kelas IV SD Negeri

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Atika Suri ◽  
Lilik Sabdaningtyas ◽  
Muhisom Muhisom
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Fourth Grade Students ◽  
Ex Post Facto ◽  
Mathematics Student ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
The Relationship

The problem in this research is the low mathematics learning outcomes of students. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between learning styles and mathematics student learning outcomes. This type of research is quantitative with the ex-post facto correlation research method. The data collection techniques used were questionnaires and documentation. The population in this study were 112 class IV students, with a sample of 53 students. Hypothesis testing uses the Pearson product-moment correlation test. The results of the study of the two variables X and Y show a positive relationship with a correlation of 0.42 on moderate criteria, and it can be concluded that Ha is accepted, that there is a relantionship between learning style with the mathematics learning outcomes of the fourth-grade students of SD Negeri 2 Sumberejo.

scholarly journals Penerapan pembelajaran matematika realistik pada mata kuliah matematika II ditinjau dari gaya belajar mahasiswa Teknik Sipil

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Bq. Malikah Hr ◽  
Sukandi Sukandi ◽  
Ni Putu Ety Lismaya Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Realistic Mathematics

The research aims to know the effect of realistic mathematics learning in mathematics-II courses seen from the learning styles of Civil Engineering students. This type of research uses a quasi-experimental with a 2 x 3 factorial design. The sample consists of 30 second-semester students of Civil Engineering of Mandalika university of Education. The instruments in the research were a learning style questionnaire and an essay test that contained questions for mathematics II courses. The test of data analysis using two-way analysis of variance. The results showed that the learning method and learning style had a significant effect on student learning outcomes in mathematics II courses. The influence of learning methods was 26.8% and the influence of student learning styles was 37.8%. Based on the marginal average, the average of students with realistic mathematics learning methods was 70.73 and the average of students with conventional methods was 65.93. In a class that was treated with realistic mathematics learning, the average of students with visual learning styles was 75.80, the average of students with auditory learning styles was 70.80 and the average of students with kinesthetic learning styles was 65.60. It was concluded that in mathematics II courses, the application of realistic mathematics learning was effective in improving student learning outcomes and students with visual learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles and students auditory learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with kinesthetic learning styles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document