scholarly journals Generative Learning Model in Mathematics: A Solution to Improve Problem Solving and Creative Thinking Skill

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-261
Author(s):  
Kusairi Kusairi ◽  
Syaiful Syaiful ◽  
Haryanto Haryanto

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of Generative learning model on mathematical problem-solving and mathematical creative thinking skills. The method used in this research is Quasi-Experiment method with post-test only design. The sample in this study was 75 fifth grade students at SDIT Al-Azhar Jambi taken by random sampling technique. Data collection techniques using essay tests of mathematical problem-solving and mathematical creative thinking skills. Data analysis was done by normality test, homogeneity and hypothesis testing using one-way ANOVA by SPSS software 25.0. The results of data analysis show that there is an effect of Generative learning model on mathematical problem solving and mathematical creative thinking skills, and the application of Generative learning model with student worksheet are better than just Generative learning model or conventional learning model.

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (October) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Novi Mayasari ◽  
Anis Umi Khoirotunnisa

This study aims to find out "the effectiveness of guided discovery models by using super-task tasks on the development of students' mathematical problem solving abilities". This research is designed by using posttest only control which the research subject is first year students of 2018/2019 academic year. This research uses saturated sampling technique because all members of the population are used as samples. Data collection techniques in this study only use test instruments. Data analysis technique was done by using t-test. The results of the data analysis obtained that hypothesis testing in the experimental and control class obtained t calculation  = 3.41 with t table = 1.67. Because t calculation > t table then H0 is rejected so that it can be concluded that the guided discovery learning model by using superchemical tasks is more effective than the direct learning model on mathematical problem-solving abilities of first-level students in school mathematics II even semester at IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui “efektivitas  model penemuan terbimbing dengan menggunakan tugas superitem terhadap pengembangan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika mahasiswa”. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian dengan desain yang digunakan adalah posttest only control  dimana subyek penelitiannya adalah mahasiswa tingkat I tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik sampling jenuh karena semua anggota populasi dijadikan sebagai sampel. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini hanya menggunakan instrument tes. Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji–t. Hasil dari analisis data diperoleh uji hipotesis pada kelas eksperimen dan kontrol diperoleh thitung= 3,41 dengan ttabel = 1,67. Karena   thitung > ttabel maka H0 ditolak sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran penemuan terbimbing dengan menggunakan tugas superitem lebih efektif  dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran langsung terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika mahasiswa tingkat I pada mata kuliah matematika sekolah II semester genap di IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro.  


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-98
Author(s):  
Intan Rachmawati ◽  
Baidowi Baidowi ◽  
Nurul Hikmah ◽  
Laila Hayati

This study aims to determine the effect of Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) learning model on mathematical problem solving abilities in the form of algebra material. This type of research is a quasi experiment with the posttest only design with a nonequivalent group. The population in this study were 7th grade students of SMPN 1 Mataram in the academic year of 2019/2020. Sample determination using purposive sampling technique, where the sample of this study is students of class VII-I as an experimental class and students of class VII-H as a control class. In the experimental class applied the TAPPS learning model and control class applied the direct learning model. The instrument used in this study was a test of mathematical problem-solving abilities (posttest) on algebra form material. Quantitative data analysis was performed using t-test. The results of the data analysis showed that there are significant differences in students' mathematical problem solving abilities between the classes that get the TAPPS learning and direct learning. This suggests that learning with the Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) model affects the ability to solve mathematical problems in the form of algebra material.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-446
Author(s):  
Nur Asih ◽  
Sendi Ramdhani

AbstrakTujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui apakah peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari pada konvensional, untuk mengetahui sikap kemandirian belajar siswa terhadap pembelajaran matematika menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA), dan untuk mengetahui hambatan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Metode penelitiannya adalah eksperimen kuasi dan desain penelitiannya Nonequivalent control group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON dengan sampel sebanyak dua kelas. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Kelas XI MIPA-3 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XI MIPA-1 sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen berupa tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, angket dan wawancara. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari konvensional. Hasil angket siswa kelas XI MIPA-3 memperoleh hasil hampir seluruhnya positif respon siswa terhadap model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA).Kata Kunci: Kemandirian, MEA, Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Increased Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Student Learning Independence Using the Means-End Analysis Learning Model AbstractThe purpose of this research is to find out whether the improvement of students 'mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional learning, to determine the attitudes of students' learning independence towards mathematics learning using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model, and to find out the obstacles of students in solving problems mathematical problem solving abilities. The research method is a quasi-experiment and the research design is Nonequivalent control group design. The population in this study were all students of class XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON with a sample of two classes. The sampling technique uses a purposive sampling technique. Class XI MIPA-3 as an experimental class and class XI MIPA-1 as a control class. The instruments were in the form of tests of mathematical problem-solving abilities, questionnaires, and interviews. Based on the results of data analysis, the improvement of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional. The results of the XI MIPA-3 class questionnaire obtained almost entirely positive student responses to the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model.Keywords: Independence, MEA, Mathematical Problem Solving.


Author(s):  
Leonard Leonard ◽  
Kurnia Khaerul Nisa

Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika merupakan salah satu tujuan pendidikan nasional di Indonesia, tetapi pencapaiannya masih tergolong rendah. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian posstest-only. Pengambilan sampel pada penelitian ini menggunakan teknik purpose sampling. Sampel penelitian sebanyak 60 peserta didik yang terbagi dalam dua kelas (30 kelas eksperimen dan 30 kelas kontrol). Penelitian ini dilakukan di sekolah SMP N 10 Bekasi dan SMP N 26 Bekasi. Kelas eksperimen menggunakan model pembelajaran teamdengan strategi pembelajaran tugas dan paksa, sedangkan kelas kontrol menggunakan pembelajaran . Data yang terkumpul kemudian dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji beda rata-rata sampel bebas. Hasil analisis data menunjukan bahwa rata-rata nilai peserta didik yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran team assisted individualization dengan strategi tugas dan paksa lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan rata-rata nilai peserta didik yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran langsung. Kata kunci: Model pembelajaran team assisted individualization, Strategi pembelajaran tugas dan paksa, kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika   ABSTRACT This research was conducted to determine the effect of team assisted individualization learning models with task learning strategies and forced to the ability to solve mathematical problems. Mathematical problem solving ability is an ability that belongs to the national education goals, but its achievement is still relatively low. The method used in this study is a quasi-experimental method with a poststest-only research design. Sampling in this study uses purpose sampling technique. The study sample consisted of 60 students divided into two classes (30 experimental classes and 30 control classes). This research was conducted in the school of SMP N 10 Bekasi and SMP N 26 Bekasi. The experimental class uses team individualization learning models with task and forced learning strategies, while the control class uses direct learning. The collected data is then analyzed using independent sample t-test. The results of data analysis showed that the average value of students who learned using the team assisted individualization learning model with higher task and forced strategies compared to the average value of students who learned using direct learning models. Keywords: Team assisted individualization learning model, task and forced learning strategies, mathematical problem solving skills                


Author(s):  
Adnan S. Abed

The present study aimed at investigating the effect of the use of the Generative Learning Model on basic-stage students’ mathematical problem solving and motivation toward the learning of mathematics. Two instruments were developed and used in this study: Mathematical Problem Solving Test, which consisted of 15 items, and the Motivation toward the Learning of Mathematics scale comprising 20 items was also used. Validity and reliability of the two instruments were established. The subjects of this study were 77 eighthgrade female students, selected from a basic government school in Nablus. Subjects were divided into two groups: an experimental group 41 students, which was taught according to the generative learning model, and a control one 36 students, which was taught according to the normal way. There were statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the two groups on the mathematical problem solving and motivation toward the learning of mathematics in favor of the experimental group. A number of recommendations were made in light of the findings. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Rosita Rosita ◽  
Rika Valianti ◽  
Nurhasanah Nasution ◽  
Sri Hariani Manurung

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa yang memperoleh  pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih tinggi daripada kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran secara langsung. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu (quasi experiment). Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa MTs Negeri di kabupaten Labuhanbatu yang berakreditasi A dan B. Sampel penelitian ini adalah MTs Negeri 1 Labuhanbatu dan MTs Negeri 2 berjumlah117 siswa. Validitas instrument angket dilakukan dengan analisis butir menggunakan rumus korelasi Product Moment dan uji reliabilitas menggunakan rumus Alpha Cronbach. Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji normalitas dengan uji Chi Kuadrat dan untuk menghitung peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah  matematika setelah pembelajaran dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan pembelajaran langsung, maka digunakan uji gain ternormalisasi (g). Siswa yang mendapat model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD memperoleh rata-rata peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis sebesar 0,63 dan siswa yang mendapat model pembelajaran langsung dengan rata-rata peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis sebesar 0,36. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data penelitian diperoleh hasil bahwa ada peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran koopertiftipe STAD lebih tinggi dari pada siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran langsung.This study aims to determine the increase in the problem-solving ability of students who get cooperative learning type STAD is higher than the mathematical problem solving abilities of students who receive direct learning.This research is a quasi experiment research. The population in this study were all State MTs students in Labuhanbatu district who were accredited A andB. The sample of this research is MTs Negeri 1 Labuhanbatu and MTs Negeri 2 totaling 117 students.The validity of the questionnaire instrument was carried out by analyzing items using the Product Moment correlation formula and reliability testing using the Cronbach Alpha formula. The data analysis technique used the normality test with the Chi Squared test and to calculate the increase in mathematical problem solving skills after learning with STAD cooperative learning and direct learning, the normalized gain test (g) was used. Students who received the STAD cooperative learning model obtained an average increase in mathematical problem solving abilities of 0.63 and students who received a direct learning model with an average increase in mathematical problem solving abilities of 0.36. Based on the results of the research data analysis, it was found that there was an increase in the problem solving ability of students who took STAD type coopertive learning higher than students who took direct learning. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rani Endriani ◽  
Fibri Rakhmawati

This study aims to determine whether there are differences in the ability to solve problems and think creatively in mathematics students who are taught with the problem based learning model with the two-stay-two stray cooperative learning model in class X SMA Negeri 2 Range of TP 2018 / 2019. This research is research quantitative research with quasi-experimental type. This sampling technique uses the Cluster Random Sampling technique. The sample of this study was students of class X-1 and X-2 of SMA Negeri 2 Kisaran T.P 2018/2019, amounting to 60 students. The test instrument used to determine students' creative problem solving abilities and mathematical creative thinking is to use a test in the form of a description. Data analysis was performed by analysis of variance (ANAVA). These findings show: 1). There is a difference in the ability to solve mathematical problem of students who are taught with the Problem Based Learning model and the Two Stay-Two Stray cooperative learning model in the material of the Three Variable Linear Equation System; 2). There is no difference between students' creative thinking abilities in mathematics taught by the Problem Based Learning model and the Two Stay-Two Stray cooperative learning model in the Three Variable Linear Equation System material; 3). There is a difference in the ability of problem solving and mathematical creative thinking of students who are taught with the Problem Based Learning model and the Two Stay-Two Stray cooperative learning model in the material of the Three Variable Linear Equation System; 4). There is no significant interaction between the learning models used on the problem solving abilities and students' mathematical creative thinking in the Three Variable Linear Equation System material. The conclusions in this study explain that there are differences in students' problem solving abilities and creative mathematical thinking that are taught with the Problem Based Learning Model and the Two Stay-Two Stray Cooperative Learning Model.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-41
Author(s):  
Boni Harianda ◽  
Beni Junedi

Abstrak. Pemecahan masalah merupakan kemampuan dasar yang seharusnya dimiliki ole siswa. Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis berperan dalam menyelesaikan setiap permasalahan baik pelajaran lain maupun permasalahan dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Melalui kegiatan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa diarahkan dalam membangun pengetahuan matematika, berpikir logis, sistematis dan terukur. Faktanya kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa masih rendah. Proses pembelajaran yang menitikberatkan pada latihan yang memberikan kesempatan pada siswa dalam mengembangkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis menjadi model perbaikan dalam proses pembelajaran. Model pembelajaran missouri mathematic project merupakan model pembelajaran yang tepat memfasilitasi siswa dalam mengembangkan pemikirannya dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal pemecahan masalah matematis. Untuk itu penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa melalui penerapan model pembelajaran missouri mathematic project. Jenis penelitian merupkan penelitian tindakan kelas (PTK). Subjek penelitian siswa kelas V MIS Al Firdausy Pematang Reba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis data kuantitatif. Berdasarkan hasil tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis terjadi peningkatan pada setiap siklus dimulai dari tes awal pra tindakan, siklus I dan siklus II. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa terjadi peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa melalui penerapan model pembelajaran missouri mathematic project. Abstract. Problem solving is a basic skill that should be possessed by students. Mathematical problem solving abilities play a role in solving every problem both other subjects and problems in everyday life. Through mathematical problem solving activities students are directed to build mathematical knowledge, think logically, systematically and measurably. The fact is that students' mathematical problem solving abilities are still low. The learning process that focuses on exercises that provide opportunities for students to develop mathematical problem solving skills to become a model for improvement in the learning process. The Missouri Mathematical Project learning model is an appropriate learning model to facilitate students in developing their thinking in solving mathematical problem solving problems. For this reason, this study aims to improve students' mathematical problem solving abilities through the application of the Missouri mathematical learning model. This type of research is a classroom action research (PTK). The research subjects were grade V students of MIS Al Firdausy Pematang Reba. The data collection technique used was a mathematical problem-solving ability test. The data analysis technique used is quantitative data analysis. Based on the results of the test of mathematical problem solving abilities, there was an increase in each cycle starting from the initial pre-action test, cycle I and cycle II. It can be concluded that there is an increase in students' mathematical problem solving abilities through the application of the Missouri mathematical learning model.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-371
Author(s):  
Ahmad Kausar Raya ◽  
Sofyan M Soleh ◽  
Heny Wulandari

This study aims to determine the effect of the use of the super-scaled model of scaffolding on students' mathematical problem solving abilities. The sampling technique used was cluster random sampling with 3 classes namely experimental class 1 (the class was treated with scaffolding assisted superememe learning model), experimental class 2 (superitem learning only) and control class (the conventional treatment class). Hypothesis testing used is anava 1 cell path is not the same. The results of the study found that there were differences in students' mathematical problem solving abilities by using learning models of scaffolding assisted supermarkets. Furthermore, the mathematical problem solving ability of students with the super-intensive learning model assisted by scaffholding is the same as the mathematical problem-solving ability of students using superemit learning models. The mathematical problem solving ability of students with superficial learning models assisted by scaffholding is better than the students' mathematical problem-solving abilities using conventional learning models. Furthermore, the mathematical problem solving ability of students with superemit learning models is the same as the mathematical problem solving ability of students using conventional learning models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document